On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Christoph Berg wrote:
If you hijack the package, please do it properly - do not let the old
maintainer rot in the Uploaders: field. Inactive maintainers as
co-maintainers are a pita for MIA tracking.
Ahh well, never thought about this - thanks for the hint. So just
keep t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libonig
Version : 4.4.4
Upstream Author : K.Kosako
* URL : http://www.geocities.jp/kosako3/oniguruma/
* License : BSD
Description : Oniguruma regular expressions li
Re: Andreas Tille 2006-09-19 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The situation you described qualifies for a group maintained upload.
> You might keep the original maintainer in the Uploaders field for the
> sake of politeness because a complete hijack is regarded rude (even
> if the facts you describe would jus
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: inotail
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://distanz.ch/inotail
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : inot
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Write the pid and host to the lock file. When you detect a lock and
>>> the lock is on the local host then check the pid is still valid. If
>>> no
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:23:35PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:04:14PM +0100, Qingning Huo wrote:
> > Because of recent changes in my Real Life, I cannot spend enough time on
> > libtorrent and rtorrent as I would like. Whoever want to adopt are
> > welcome to take ove
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:04:14PM +0100, Qingning Huo wrote:
> Because of recent changes in my Real Life, I cannot spend enough time on
> libtorrent and rtorrent as I would like. Whoever want to adopt are
> welcome to take over their maintenance. I would recommend them be
> adopted together, bec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Qingning Huo escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Because of recent changes in my Real Life, I cannot spend enough time on
> libtorrent and rtorrent as I would like. Whoever want to adopt are
> welcome to take over their maintenance. I would recommend them be
> adop
Hi,
Because of recent changes in my Real Life, I cannot spend enough time on
libtorrent and rtorrent as I would like. Whoever want to adopt are
welcome to take over their maintenance. I would recommend them be
adopted together, because they are closely related (same author), and
new upstream ver
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:12:12PM +0200, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
> > Yes, mrxvt is quite nice with its tab support, and other features. And,
> > mrxvt is being actively developed by the upstream authors.
> > Unfortunately, I have not been able to spend much time on mrxvt
> > lately (being busy wit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Piotr Ozarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-wareweb
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pythonpaste.org/wareweb/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Descri
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
>> Then I thought I might have forgotten APT::Default-Release, and with
>> APT::Default-Release set to "unstable", I could pin experimental higher
>> than 500, 700 for example, and it wouldn't upgrade the packages
>> automatically, however it
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Write the pid and host to the lock file. When you detect a lock and
>> the lock is on the local host then check the pid is still valid. If
>> not the lock is stale. If the lock is from a remote host the
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 20/09/2006 alle 10.31 +0200, Daniel Baumann ha scritto:
> > I know I could get it from gluck, but I wanted to be kind and ask before
> > I take it.
> >
> > Thanks a lot, very well done. I'll modify it so that I can track
> > differenc
Hi,
"Jan C. Nordholz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
>> > * rxvt
>> as a user of rxvt I like to see it remain in Debian. I'm not a Debian
>> developer
>
> Same for me. I'd also take rxvt and am no DD either. Michael, maybe you'd
> like to agree on some kind of team maintenance? My workload i
Hi Qingning,
> Yes, mrxvt is quite nice with its tab support, and other features. And,
> mrxvt is being actively developed by the upstream authors.
> Unfortunately, I have not been able to spend much time on mrxvt
> lately (being busy with the real life). Indeed, I would like to give
> mrxvt awa
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:49:14PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > with an ILP64 data model.
> > However, the question should rather be: *why* compilers do not define
> > int to be 64bit on a 64bit architecture? And the answer is simple:
> > Yes int should be 64bit on a 64bit architecture, since
Hi
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:07:40 +0200
"Martijn van Oosterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/20/06, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nothing says long has to be bigger that int, only thing which is
> > defined is:
> >
> > sizeof(short) <= sizeof(int) <= sizeof(long)
> >
> > so havi
On 9/20/06, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> char1 bytes
> short 2 bytes
> int 4 bytes
> long 8 bytes
Nothing says long has to be bigger that int, only thing which is
defined is:
sizeof(short) <= sizeof(int) <= sizeof(long)
so having short, int, long of same size is not
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> Fine, that's another good use case. Could you please put it somewhere
> public? We could have a common area for these "track the differences
> between distributions" tools?
Sure, I'll do some things within the next few days with it and tell you
then.
Although I'm mostl
Hi
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:52:12 +0200
"Martijn van Oosterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Odd, I always thought is was because C did not have enough int types:
>
> char1 bytes
> short 2 bytes
> int 4 bytes
> long 8 bytes
>
> If you make an int 8 bytes, you have to find some other
Il giorno mer, 20/09/2006 alle 10.31 +0200, Daniel Baumann ha scritto:
> I know I could get it from gluck, but I wanted to be kind and ask before
> I take it.
>
> Thanks a lot, very well done. I'll modify it so that I can track
> differences between backports and etch, to keep my backports easier
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> It is on gluck.debian.org, within my home directory, or here:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ubuntu-diff/bin/
I know I could get it from gluck, but I wanted to be kind and ask before
I take it.
Thanks a lot, very well done. I'll modify it so that I can track
dif
Il giorno mar, 19/09/2006 alle 20.51 +0200, Daniel Baumann ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> looks very nice.. do you mind publishing the source?
It is on gluck.debian.org, within my home directory, or here:
http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ubuntu-diff/bin/
Cheers,
--
Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED
24 matches
Mail list logo