Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 04 August 2006 09:57, Wouter Verhelst took the opportunity to say:
>> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>> > In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs,
>> > as well as MTAs. An RFC s
> "Robert" == Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Are you doing conversions from SVN? Current bzr uses 20MB
Robert> of ram to do a native branch operation in similar
Robert> circumstances. (bug report gets fixed, new at 11 :)).
No, this was a conversion from baz. Mi
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After every upstream merger, I have to review every patch applied to the
> package *anyway* to make sure that it's still sane, and I find that easier
> to do by reading through the contents of debian/patches than by running
> filterdiff on diff.gz and the
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> After every upstream merger, I have to review every patch applied to
>> the package *anyway* to make sure that it's still sane, and I find that
>> easier to do by reading through the contents of debian/patche
On Aug 04, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Outside the chroot, where you probably have auto* installed the
> invocation suddenly works and you get a different generated file that
> might or might not fail.
They would immediately fail anyway on the autobuilds.
--
ciao,
Marco
s
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 12:32:59PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
> > I hope we can test the new apt version and can get this version to sid
> > and after some days to testing.
>
> Ok, I will work on a few tests for pt_BR.
>
> BTW, the translations are all in UTF-8,
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> This would be absolutely horrible. Most list subscribers use the
>> headers to put list email in separate directories, and this would make
>> some mails miss from the discussion.
> It's an end-user configu
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this is the root of the key difference between the `like patch
> systems' people and the `hate patch systems' people.
In my experience, the key difference between whether or not I want to use
a patch system like quilt is whether I have an upstream
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> This would be absolutely horrible. Most list subscribers use the headers
> to put list email in separate directories, and this would make some
> mails miss from the discussion.
It's an end-user configurable feature of mailman, so you can turn it on
On Friday 04 August 2006 09:57, Wouter Verhelst took the opportunity to say:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs,
> > as well as MTAs. An RFC straightening things out could help.
>
> ... Or we
Le vendredi 04 août 2006 à 09:45 -0400, James Vega a écrit :
> This is something that should be solved on the list manager side by not
> sending a duplicate of the email when it can see that an email was
> already sent to an address it recognizes. In fact, some of the lists
> I'm subscribed to do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/31/2006 04:53 AM, Michael Bramer wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 06:55:19PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
> wrote:
>>On 07/30/2006 03:26 AM, Michael Vogt wrote:
>>
>>>Dear Friends,
>>Hi Michael,
>
> Hi
>
>>>the current version of ap
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers
> > as "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that
> > purpose. I expect my MUA to Do The Right T
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So upgraded systems don't get the benefits of certain changes to the
> installer's
> defaults, or defaults in programs used by the installer.
>
> I first thought of this when I noticed the change in the default tuning for
> ext2 partitions created b
Hi,
Am Freitag 04 August 2006 13:39 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror
> > nor Firefox were able to handle it on my system.
>
> Really? Galeon handles it fine, as does Firefox (the latter on win32).
Really. Firefox gets very slow, ko
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:23:43AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1116 +0100]:
> > Debian's lists support List-ID, List-Post, and the other List- headers.
> > If mutt's L command doesn't use that to figure out the list reply
> > address, p
Am Freitag 04 August 2006 13:49 schrieb Ben Armstrong:
> Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > I hope that something can be done about this to make the BTS web pages
> > more usable.
>
> Are you perhaps not aware of the much smaller indices into the BTS here?
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Indeed, did
Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:37:58PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.01.1221 +0100]:
>> >> Building in chroots *hides* bugs.
>> >
>> > Uh, what
Matthew Palmer writes ("Re: Centralized darcs"):
> diff.gz archaeology should not be necessary.
I think this is the root of the key difference between the `like patch
systems' people and the `hate patch systems' people.
`Hate patch systems' people are those who can read code, and prefer
program
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: logfilter
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Jack Hughes, OPENXTRA Limited, John Brewer
* URL : http://www.logfilter.org/
* License : Apache
Description : a tool for per
Hi,
> I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror
> nor Firefox were able to handle it on my system.
Really? Galeon handles it fine, as does Firefox (the latter on win32).
> 3182462 bytes for the HTML code of a single web page is a bit much, isn't
it?
Possibly. It's also 2
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> I hope that something can be done about this to make the BTS web pages more
> usable.
>
Are you perhaps not aware of the much smaller indices into the BTS here?
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Hi,
I tried to take a look at the wnpp bug page but neither Konqueror nor Firefox
were able to handle it on my system. 3182462 bytes for the HTML code of a
single web page is a bit much, isn't it?
So I was just wondering if it is really necessary to show 3500 resolved issues
by default? They c
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060801 18:17]:
> also sprach Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.01.1701 +0100]:
> > Missing $(DESTDIR)s in Makefiles are an example. Especially when the
> > install part was DESTDIRified, but the test before if the file is
> > already there (as make
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is the naming so much of an issue? (I always confuse
>> kernel-threads and KDE applications because both start with k)
>
> Well, *d suggests it's a permanently running programme, which yours
> is not. So I'd say, yes.
You could call it "rerenice" (=
also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.04.0038 +0100]:
> To my surprise the description line of my package is quite exact:
> "renice running processes based on regular expressions"
>
> It clearly says "running" and not "new" or "spawning".
I don't think it's clear in any way.
>
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:52:50PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.03.1436 +0100]:
> > reniced does not wait for new processes to act on them. It is
> > designed to be run once a day and affect the processes running in
> > that moment.
> T
Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> A few years ago, we had only CVS, which sucked. And now, we have a
>> gazillion of different VCSes, all different.
>
> And most of them suck too, in their own ways.
Yup... and you just _know_ whichever one ends up "winning" will not be
the best by mo
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A few years ago, we had only CVS, which sucked. And now, we have a
> gazillion of different VCSes, all different.
And most of them suck too, in their own ways.
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.de
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 03:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You know, I use a mail program. Replying to people is in my fingers
> > as "hitting a button". A very specific button, especially for that
> > purpose. I expect my MUA to Do The Right T
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:21:28AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> In short, it's a mess. Lots of improvements can be made, to MUAs, MLMs, as
> well as MTAs. An RFC straightening things out could help.
... Or we could all just forget about mailinglists and start using
newsgroups instead. They don
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:41:32 +0100, Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>At 1154593998 past the epoch, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>> And you can do all that with dpatch-edit-dpatch and the
>> regular Unix commands without learning another VCS and/or
>> without needing access to it. Advantage? Yes.
>
>So
32 matches
Mail list logo
