[Stephen Gran]
> While I have to agree that the presence or absence of ads in LJ may make
> or break some consumers decisions about what hardware to go with, I just
> feel I have to note that arm has been a long supported platform within
> Debian, and there are hundreds if not thousands of machine
Le Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 08:26:02AM +0200, Michael Vogt a écrit :
>
> 1. send a Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject 'GET 3 cs'
> (use cs da de eo es fi fr hu it ja nl pl pt_BR pt_PT ru sk sv_SE
> uk as langcode)
Dear Michael,
how can we get description for specific packages? Ther
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:00:21 +, "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> The packages that aren't under group maintenance and will never be,
> needs more not so strict NMU rules.
Why?
--
Hubert Chan - email & Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Adeodato Simó" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: debcache
Version : N/A
Upstream Author : Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL (bzr branch): http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/code/debian/debcache
* License : MIT
Programming L
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 07:49:30AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:29:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:50:48PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > So yes, please re-add the dependency on libxml2-dev for the time being.
> >
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:03:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:25:00AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Note it is unclear whether the makefiles could be called "scripts"
>
> Unproven assertion.
How is something proven unclear?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
This one time, at band camp, Dustin Harriman said:
> Hello Joey and all you other Debian heroes,
>
> Joey Hess wrote:
> "It's interesting to see arm increasing like this. I wonder which new arm
> systems are responsible?"
>
> It's likely that the TS-7300 is an ARM embedded computer quickly growin
This one time, at band camp, Wouter Verhelst said:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:25:00AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Again a person who tries to bend the GPL to his wishes..
>
> Gee, that sounds familiar somehow.
Haven't we reached the point where we have noticed that all posts by JS
are
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:52:50AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
>>Package: wnpp
>>Severity: wishlist
>>Owner: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>* Package name: phpunit2
>
>*cough*330301*cough*
It seems to me that the submitter
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wrote "the default python version", and I maintain that my original
> fix would work with the new upstream release.
Your "original fix" would not succesfully apply as a patch to the new
upstream version. It's also, as it happens, the *wrong* way to m
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le dim 30 juillet 2006 07:21, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
>
>> No, it requires *both* the newer Python
>
> pure speculation, upstream *AND* users on the list, claim it works
> with python2.3. so stop with that, it's tiresome.
This is incorrect.
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When this thread started, you had decided to bind the fix with the new
> upstream release and you had blocked the new upstream release with the
> switch of the default Python version. Now you're also blocking this
> new upstream release with a major n
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> > So what? If you know how to fix that issue, then why don't you upload a
>> > package based on Pierre's work with the fix? Why don't you do it RIGHT
>> > NOW and get DONE with this madness?
>> I don't kn
Hello Joey and all you other Debian heroes,Joey Hess wrote:"It's interesting to see arm increasing like this. I wonder which new arm
systems are responsible?"It's likely that the TS-7300 is an ARM embedded computer quickly growing in popularity. I suggest this because the TS-7300 (and similar, pas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2006 03:26 AM, Michael Vogt wrote:
> Dear Friends,
Hi Michael,
> the current version of apt in debian/experimental has support for
> translated package descriptions and we have a the current translations
> available for sid on the mirrors (
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> It has been a while since I reported the architecture distribution in
> Debian, as reported by popularity-contest. The raising star is 'arm',
> now used by 1.3% of the population. 'alpha' and 'sparc' continue to
> drop. Here are the numbers. You can find the details
Hi,
I have a growing suspicion that dh_python does not do the
right thing for private pure Python modules in the presence of
XS-Python-version
This is how dh_python behaves:
*** PRIVATE PURE MODULE:
If there is a .py file, and it is in a private dir. only one
version
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:39:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Do you know of a good example of a tool that has successfully shaped
> Debian development for a large number of people?
CDBS and alioth/svn.debian.org.
HTH,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 02:40:47PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: phpunit2
*cough*330301*cough*
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Dear fellow developers,
As many of you know, I am conducting research on Debian,
specifically on how Debian developers adopt or reject new methods of
package maintenance. I would like to get a broad collection of data
for the first part of my research, which is the study of tools that
have been su
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Perhaps one of these might be useful:
likevel:~> debtags grep 'game::board:chess && x11::application'
Hmmm, not really. I'm perfectly able to find all packages that
might be usefull to play chess under X. The question was how my
father will b
At Sunday 30 July 2006 17:55 wrote Andreas Tille:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, oliver wrote:
> > You are right, its definetly the stongest engine in debian now.
>
> So what we are obviousely lacking is a *nice* UI that enables
> people like my father to use this engine. Is anything out there
> that migh
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:25:00AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> >Erast Benson wrote:
> >> I do not need to make the build system
> >> available under GPL (GPL §3 requires me to make it available but does
> >> not mention a license)
>
> >GPL 3(a) requires the "comp
Do not ignore me please,
I found your email somewhere and now decided to write you.
I am coming to your place in few weeks and thbougaht we
can meet each other. Let me know if you do not mind.
I am a aniace pretty girl. Don't reply to this email.
aEmail me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 05:55:59PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> So what we are obviousely lacking is a *nice* UI that enables
> people like my father to use this engine. Is anything out there
> that might be more convinient than xboard?
Perhaps one of these might be useful:
likevel:~> debtags g
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 09:52:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> We do not vote for every decision there is --- and this does
> not boil down to the tyranny of the majority. For my packages, it
> still remains just my decision --- unless you can get three quarters
> of the membership
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, oliver wrote:
You are right, its definetly the stongest engine in debian now.
So what we are obviousely lacking is a *nice* UI that enables
people like my father to use this engine. Is anything out there
that might be more convinient than xboard?
If I missed something pl
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 05:17:22PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> On Sunday 30 July 2006 16:21, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I agree with you that there is this kind of technological competition among
> > derivatives, and so long as it is all free software, Debian and its
> > derivatives all stand to
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:02:55 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 10:51:40AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > Do you have examples of collaborative maintenance projects where
>> > the "no one is responsible" part plays a role, making people
>> > willin
On Sunday 30 July 2006 16:21, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:34:12PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:49:07AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:58:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > > When Ubuntu leads to users having ideas l
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:34:12PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:49:07AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:58:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > When Ubuntu leads to users having ideas like the one in the parent post,
> > > this is manifestly fal
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 01:01:56PM +0200, oliver wrote:
> At Saturday 29 July 2006 22:15 wrote Henning Makholm:
> > Scripsit Oliver Korff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Description : computer chess engine, calculates chess moves
> > We seem to have several such engines already. Could the descripti
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:15:34 +0100, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, I suggest this query is better for debian-user@lists.debian.org,
> since it is not related to general development issues.
Right, and I know it, sorry for that.
> Second, an I/O error trying to ls a file usually
On Sunday 30 July 2006 15:34, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:49:07AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:58:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:38:23AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > > > For one, Debian and Ubuntu aren't in compet
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:49:07AM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:58:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:38:23AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > > For one, Debian and Ubuntu aren't in competition, [...]
> > When Ubuntu leads to users having ideas li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: phpunit2
Version : 2.3.6
Upstream Author : Sebastian Bergmann
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/PHPUnit2
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: php
Description : Unit t
On Jul 30, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For some reason I thought it was considered bad to rename eth* to eth* using
> udev (race conditions and such).
This was before 0.084-4.
> # UNKNOWN device (/class/net/eth0)
Interesting, can you try to debug why this happens?
It's only cosmetic, b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: openser
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : OpenSER contributors
* URL : http://www.openser.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : very fast and config
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> (note: I am using ssh-krb5 - not that should matter - it
Brian> authenticated OK).
Brian> This is weird. Maybe I will need to experiment more.
Brian> I just tried the standard ssh in sarge, and get the same
Brian> r
Hello,
For some reason I thought it was considered bad to rename eth* to eth* using
udev (race conditions and such).
However, after upgrading my systems to etch, I notice they do just this,
by default:
--- cut ---
# This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules
# program
Hi Gustavo,
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 10:57:27 -0300
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Em Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:55:26 +0200
> Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> > If you need to apply a patch to one of my packages for a
> > non-critical bug in order to complete
[Török Edvin]
> Afaik popularity-contest uses access-time to report statistics.
That is not entirely true. The installation count is collected using
dpkg -l. The votes on the other hand are collected using atime, and
that is less accurate and should be taken with a grain of salt.
Because of thi
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 10:51:40AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Do you have examples of collaborative maintenance projects where the
> > "no one is responsible" part plays a role, making people willing to
> > go back to non-collaborative maintenance?
> Yes, there was a mention of it j
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 10:17:10 +0100
Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 12:02:37PM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> > * Package name: pdfcrack
> >
> [snip]
> > This software uses xpdf/poppler stuff (categorized as free).
> >
>
> Hi there,
>
> Does thi
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>Erast Benson wrote:
>>
>> I do not need to make the build system
>> available under GPL (GPL §3 requires me to make it available but does
>> not mention a license)
>GPL 3(a) requires the "complete corresponding source code [be]
>distributed under the terms of Section
On 7/30/06, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you want to help the Debian project to get a more accurate view on
the architectures used, make sure your machines have the
popularity-contest package installed and enabled. The reported data
is also used to decide which packages go
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> (note: I am using ssh-krb5 - not that should matter - it
Brian> authenticated OK).
Brian> This is weird. Maybe I will need to experiment more.
I just tried the standard ssh in sarge, and get the same results.
--
Brian May
Le dim 30 juillet 2006 07:21, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> No, it requires *both* the newer Python
pure speculation, upstream *AND* users on the list, claim it works
with python2.3. so stop with that, it's tiresome.
> *and* the newer Guile.
In another mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you said
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 12:02:37PM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> * Package name: pdfcrack
>
[snip]
> This software uses xpdf/poppler stuff (categorized as free).
>
Hi there,
Does this use xpdf or poppler? :)
poppler is a fork of xpdf which allows dynamic linking, so is much
preferr
It has been a while since I reported the architecture distribution in
Debian, as reported by popularity-contest. The raising star is 'arm',
now used by 1.3% of the population. 'alpha' and 'sparc' continue to
drop. Here are the numbers. You can find the details on
http://popcon.debian.org/>.
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > So what? If you know how to fix that issue, then why don't you upload a
> > package based on Pierre's work with the fix? Why don't you do it RIGHT
> > NOW and get DONE with this madness?
> I don't know a fix for that issue except to use Guile 1.8
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Actually, I didn't make those "packaging mistakes"; the previous
> maintainer did.
« "The previous maintainer did the mistakes" is the refrain of people
who don't want to fix their packages. » :-P
> You seem to think this is a battle, in whic
At Saturday 29 July 2006 22:15 wrote Henning Makholm:
> Scripsit Oliver Korff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Description : computer chess engine, calculates chess moves
>
> We seem to have several such engines already. Could the description
> please say something that distinguishes this from the o
> "Osamu" == Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Osamu> Hi, Are you sure it is Debian gluck issue?
It was working fine all the time up and until the compromise of
gluck.debian.org.
I haven't made any changes to the software on this computer, except to
install the odd security fix.
(I
54 matches
Mail list logo
