* James Westby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On (29/06/06 19:37), Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >
> > > > Scott James Remnant dropped me an email recently, interested in
> > > > improving the
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:37 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > * Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >
> > > > Scott James Remnant dropped me an email recently, interested
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:42:12PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> It is also used to compile contrib modules that are included in the
> distribution. If you started using pkg-config you'd have introduced a
> build dependancy on a GPL'd program in a BSD licenced package, not
> exactly a goo
Hi,
> > Your bug is meant to be already fixed (#355252), but I see there are
> > some deviations between Debian and Ubuntu (which you seem to
> > maintain), I'm suspecting there might be problems with Debian code
> > which is only updated about 3 months ago.
>
> Ok, that's a possibility - there w
This one time, at band camp, Andreas Metzler said:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> [making foo-config a wrapper around pkg-config]
>
> > If you started using pkg-config you'd have introduced a
> > build dependancy on a GPL'd program in a BSD licenced package, not
> > exactly a good idea.
> [...]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: octave2.9-forge
Version : 2006.03.17
Upstream Author : Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://octave.sourceforge.net/
* License : Various (GPL, Public Domain)
Pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: octave2.1-forge
Version : 2006.03.17
Upstream Author : Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://octave.sourceforge.net/
* License : Various (GPL, Public Domain)
Pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ryan Finnie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: isomd5sum
Version : 11.1.0.50
Upstream Author : Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/anaconda-installer/
* License : GPL
Programming L
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:42:12PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> It is also used to compile contrib modules that are included in the
> distribution. If you started using pkg-config you'd have introduced a
> build dependancy on a GPL'd program in a BSD licenced package, not
> exactly a goo
On (29/06/06 19:37), Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> >
> > > Scott James Remnant dropped me an email recently, interested in
> > > improving the automake situation in Ubuntu and Debian[0].
> > >
>
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
[making foo-config a wrapper around pkg-config]
> If you started using pkg-config you'd have introduced a
> build dependancy on a GPL'd program in a BSD licenced package, not
> exactly a good idea.
[...]
That is something I hadn't thought about, gnutls is LGPL. Thank
* Mike Hommey:
>> The fix is to combine the diffs before applying them, so that you only
>> need one process the large Packages file once. I happen to have ML
>> code which does this (including the conversion to a patch
>> representation which is more amenable to this kind of optimization)
>> and
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:25:39 -0300
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
> > > "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROT
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:41:05 +0300 (EEST)
"Ozgur Karatas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> i want to help as much as i can. i dont know very much but i want to
> help debian evolve and improve myself at the same time. i am coding
> small applications for this purpose. they could help some.
Y
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 06:29:40PM +0200, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Marc Haber:
>
> > The machine in Question is a P3 with 1200 MHz. What's making the
> > process slow is the turnaround time for the http requests, as observed
> > multiple times in this thread alone.
>
> Then
* Marc Haber:
> The machine in Question is a P3 with 1200 MHz. What's making the
> process slow is the turnaround time for the http requests, as observed
> multiple times in this thread alone.
Then your setup is very broken. APT performs HTTP pipelining.
On my machines, I see the behavior Miles
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:25:39PM -0300, Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
> >> "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PR
On 6/30/06, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
> "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Software
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
> "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Software suspend which exists in kernel for several years?
>
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:15:03PM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > CastPodder is a fork and enhancement of the popular iPodder
> > podcast receiver.
>
> I already packaged and uploaded castpodder. However, it was rejected
> because copyright statement
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 12:12:10PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Oh, so you mean checking the _free_ RAM instead of the _physical_ RAM?
> This would be reasonable -- I didn't use this in the debian/rules
> snippet I proposed as the physical memory is a trivially discernable
> number while free RAM
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:55:58PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> You know that you can easily turn off this feature by adjusting apt.conf:
Sure, and I've done so for several of my machines now. Actually, for many
enough machines that it's becoming bothersome...
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http:/
On (30/06/06 10:51), Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Following up to myself with a proper subject line.
>
> In bug #376146, Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> > In an effort to clean up the SSL certificate mess on Ubuntu servers, we
> > recently converted all our supported Server packages to make use of
> > the ssl
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:35:41PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Not really. pdiff's mainly reduce download size for low bandwidth
> > connections. file:// is pretty high bandwidth, you won't notice the
> > difference.
>
> I usually notice the difference -- the ot
Following up to myself with a proper subject line.
In bug #376146, Martin Pitt wrote:
In an effort to clean up the SSL certificate mess on Ubuntu servers, we
recently converted all our supported Server packages to make use of
the ssl-cert package instead of creating a package-specific
self-
In bug #376146, Martin Pitt wrote:
In an effort to clean up the SSL certificate mess on Ubuntu servers, we
recently converted all our supported Server packages to make use of
the ssl-cert package instead of creating a package-specific
self-signed SSL certificate. This allows admins to easily rep
Hi all,
are there any activities on that project? There is no mailinglist
active at https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-cdrtools/ and the
latest cvs-entry is about 3 months ago or so. Meanwhile we have
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/cdrtools-2.01.01a10.tar.gz
# apt-cache policy cdrec
Or uptime(1)CesareOn 6/30/06, Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load> and usage.As far as I can see it, you're reading the exact same information as top(1)...
On 6/29/06, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:25:17 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le mer 28 juin 2006 23:20, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>> So you don't have any excuse to not update your packages any more.
>> About 60% of the Python modules have already been updated,
* Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 10:58]:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 08:44:30 +0200, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >Your guess is correct, see #372504. "This is currently a UI problem.
> >It displays the line three times, but it only downloads it in the
> >first. The other two
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ozgur Karatas wrote:
> Re,
> ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load
> and usage.
> regards.
But top(1) also does that, no?
Or is the difference that it is a "running total", like ping?
Still, this app is so small t
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:18:58PM +0300, Ozgur Karatas wrote:
> ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load
> and usage.
top reports these. For example:
| Tasks: 112 total, 2 running, 109 sleeping, 1 stopped, 0 zombie
| Cpu(s): 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni,
On 6/30/06, Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Software suspend which exists in kernel for several years?
> >
> >
> > And works properly in Debian
> ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load
> and usage.
As far as I can see it, you're reading the exact same information as top(1)...
--
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl
GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC
http://tokkee.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 6/30/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| 4. Custom config tools can often provide more info than available in
| pkg-config (plugin or config directories).
Like:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ > pkg-config --variable=system_bus_default_address dbus-1
unix:path=/var/run/dbus/system_bus_soc
Hello,
i want to help as much as i can. i dont know very much but i want to help
debian evolve and improve myself at the same time. i am coding small
applications for this purpose. they could help some.
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:18:58 +0300 (EEST)
> "Ozgur Karatas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> R
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:10:37 +0200, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>* Marc Haber [Fri, Jun 30 2006, 08:00:57AM]:
>> file:// URLs are not the only issue here - aptitude update is also
>> much slower than before on a hosted box which has 100 Mbit/s
>> connectivity and could load the Packages
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:18:58 +0300 (EEST)
"Ozgur Karatas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re,
> ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's
> load and usage.
huh?
My top shows (admittedly not on my desktop machine;) shows:
15:31:22 up 50 days, 2:41, 2 users, load ave
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CastPodder is a fork and enhancement of the popular iPodder
> podcast receiver.
I already packaged and uploaded castpodder. However, it was rejected
because copyright statement and licenses to files in the contrib/
directory were missing.
If you manag
Re,
ps and top command gives the ram state. i am doing this to see cpu's load
and usage.
regards.
> top(1) gives the exact same information. What's the advantage of your
> program?
>
> Cheers,
> Sebastian
>
> --
> Sebastian "tokkee" Harl
> GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC
> http://tokkee.org/
,''`. Ozgur
> This code is written to
> take CPU loading statistics. cpustat; shows the usage load statistic of
> your CPU.
top(1) gives the exact same information. What's the advantage of your program?
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl
GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC
http://tokkee.org/
signature.asc
De
Hello,
I have written a program which gives CPU statistics, then what should i do
for putting this program in to the debian? This code is written to
take CPU loading statistics. cpustat; shows the usage load statistic of
your CPU. I Code tested for Intel Processors. After then code will be
ported f
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:37 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> >
> > > Scott James Remnant dropped me an email recently, interested in
> > > improving the automake situation in Ubuntu and Debia
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your bug is meant to be already fixed (#355252), but I see there are
> some deviations between Debian and Ubuntu (which you seem to
> maintain), I'm suspecting there might be problems with Debian code
> which is only updated about 3 months ago.
Ok, that
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:36:20AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 07:02:15AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Debian still has to provide an upgrade path for users upgrading from
> > > Sarge.
> > > We cannot blindly break users scripts.
> >
> > Here, the only way seem
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 08:41:33AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:22:48AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > The same can't be said for upstream makefiles though. Many sources
> > don't build with -j option.
Right, that's just what I said :p It's the upstream and
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:26:15AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Still, the buildd admin has no way to estimate how much a sub-process
> > of a package is going to use, the maintainer has at least a rough
> > idea. Since the maintainer's action
* "Martijn van Oosterhout"
| On 6/30/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Is there a reason why gnutls-config and xml2-config aren't just tiny
| > wrappers around pkg-config for backwards compatibility? IMO, it's
| > kinda silly to have each package provide its own -config script w
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Software suspend which exists in kernel for several years?
> >
> >
> > And works properly in Debian since what? Weeks? Months?:-)
>
> It doesn't really w
#include
* Marc Haber [Fri, Jun 30 2006, 08:00:57AM]:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:43:45 -0700, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I usually notice the difference -- the other way. "aptitude update" on a
> >> machine that hasn't been up
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 08:44:30 +0200, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Your guess is correct, see #372504. "This is currently a UI problem.
>It displays the line three times, but it only downloads it in the
>first. The other two lines are unpack and rred (patch)."
So the "rred" is not a
On 6/30/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a reason why gnutls-config and xml2-config aren't just tiny
wrappers around pkg-config for backwards compatibility? IMO, it's
kinda silly to have each package provide its own -config script with
its own set of bugs, rather than havi
* Mike Hommey
| On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 07:38:56PM +0200, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > Hello,
| > currently "libgnutls-config --libs"' output looks like this,
| > -L/usr/lib -lgnutls -L/usr/lib -ltasn1 -lgcrypt -lgpg-error
| > listing both direct (-lgnutls) and indirect depende
Hello,
On Wed, 28.06.2006 at 23:20:46 +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please look for your name (or your team) in the list below and start
> updating those as well!
I'm expecting to update roundup this or the next weekend at the latest
to fix all currently outstanding bugs, i
54 matches
Mail list logo
