* Marc Haber
| On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 07:51:04 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| wrote:
| >Useful patches and comments are always welcome.
|
| The apache maintainers' "reaction" to #349716, #349709, #349708 and
| #366124 (the latter one a possible security issue), is very
| discouraging
On Friday 05 May 2006 19:37, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> As you can see in
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=362779 you need a
> patched mesa to make it works.
>
> If you want to try a working xgl (with patched mesa) you can point
> your apt to:
>
> deb http://www.prato.linux.it/~mne
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Because the Linux kernel adds an additional clause, in the form of a
>> statement of the author's interpretation of the license, saying that
>> such modules are okay.
> Are you saying that the NVIDIA driver for Li
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
>
>>> Except, they *are* loaded together.
>
>>> Making "shim" libraries does not change the licensing rules at all,
>>> which for the GPL, apply to the comp
* Jay Berkenbilt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> For the small handful of people use dxpc (differential X protocol
> compressor, a useful tool for running X over slow network connections
> even including dialup), you should be aware that I have just uploaded
> 3.9.0-1 to sid. Version 3.9.0 is not
For the small handful of people use dxpc (differential X protocol
compressor, a useful tool for running X over slow network connections
even including dialup), you should be aware that I have just uploaded
3.9.0-1 to sid. Version 3.9.0 is not runtime compatible with older
versions of because of n
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
>> Except, they *are* loaded together.
>> Making "shim" libraries does not change the licensing rules at all,
>> which for the GPL, apply to the complete program.
> So then how is it that the NVidia
Hi,
I've seen cgiirc[1] in a bad state for some time now, I tried to contact
the maintainer (Mario Holbe) more than a month ago, offering my help and
my work[2]. No answer so far.
This is a sponsored uploaded package that only had 1 upload, and had a
DSA[3] issued which is still
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 03:49:01PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:59:37PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > The fix should be somehow unclumsified, though. Currently I inject
> > some horrible runtime testing in the configure script to find out
> > whether the clib support
At http://people.debian.org/~eric/mozilla-firefox you'll find
mozilla-firefox 1.0.4-2sarge8. It contains backports of the security
fixes present in 1.5.0.4. All these fixes are the work of Alexander
Sack, who's been working tirelessly the last couple of weeks to get
things ported. It is still missi
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:15:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Since our default development suite is unstable, IMHO, does make sense
> to see bugs in previous versions that are solved in unstable.
Well, what do you propose as criteria for showing that? What do you mean by
"previous versions"
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>[Don Armstrong had a different suggestion here: Make the default view show
>anything applicable to unstable, _plus_ anything that is not marked as
>fixed in any version. I don't believe the difference is all that
>big.]
Since our
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:21:59AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> You cannot distribute GPL'd source which has been modified to link to
> a GPL-incompatible library when the only way the source would be
> useful is if it is, in fact, linked to that library.
Just for me to learn so
"Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Smith wrote:
Is this really needed? Google was very careful in making sure that the
package installs in /usr/local, and does not interfere with the
system. Normally the main reason why a debian package is bett
Dear in Christ,
The time has come for Christians to worship God in
spirit and in truth according to the book of John
chapter 4:vs23-24.``But the hour cometh and now is
when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in
spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to
worship him . God is a
I was asked to take this on -devel to facilitate easier commenting; those of
you who read Planet Debian will probably already have read most of this on my
blog, but some of it is new and some of it is condensed.
Currently we use the tag "fixed" for "bugs fixed in NMU", and
"fixed-in-experimental"
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, I agree that it's ok to trust installer source that they will not
install a backdoor into your system.
However, chances that they will write to directories that should be under
control of package manager, o
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> The fact that this is transitive linking means that it is perfectly
> >> legal to distribute gnucash *source*.
> >
> > ENOPARSE, sorry. I can't imagine how it _could_ affect the source,
> > sin
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can you provide a pointer to the discussion? I am curious to read it,
> if possible. Of course, if it's just in one of your mbox's, don't worry
> about it.
Just in mbox.
>> The fact that this is transitive linking means that it is perfectly
>> legal t
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 06:44:47PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I'm not sure what to do with bug #374367 against OpenAFS, so I'm asking
>> for advice. The short version (slightly longer version in the bug log)
>> is that the archive has switched from g
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> >> Anyhow, the point is that certain GPLd programs have special
> >> exceptions that allow them to be linked with openssl. However, note
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
>> Anyhow, the point is that certain GPLd programs have special
>> exceptions that allow them to be linked with openssl. However, note
>> that *all* the GPL'd code in the final program must have the
Hello:
we are networking items resller , we sell lots of cisco networking items,
such as GBIC,SFP, WICs, routers and switches, and so on. so if u are
interested in that , please tell us the quantity and items NO. , then we
can try to offer the price to u asap ,and if not in
On Monday 19 June 2006 01:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Howdy. Just wondering if anyone knows the whereabouts of two maintainers:
>
> Otavio Salvador (apt-proxy)
Otavio has asked me to maintain apt-proxy again and I am in the process of
preparing an upload.
> I have not noticed many updates to
Martijn van Oosterhout schrieb:
>> The /dev/random issue is one of the issues, yes. One other is that
>> GnuTLS seems to fail if used twice inside the same address space, such
>> as receiving messages via SMTP over TLS and doing lookups via ldaps if
>> both exim and libldap are linked against the s
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the webalizer-stonesteps package.
The package description is:
Stone Steps Webalizer is a command line application for web server log file
analysis based on the version 2.01-10 of the original Webalizer.
.
The Webalizer is a
On 6/19/06, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be safe to assume that a size_t can always be cast losslessly
> to an unsigned long (and then printed with %lu), or are there systems
> on which only an unsigned long long will do?
unsigned long is not sufficient.
OTOH, you could
The /dev/random issue is one of the issues, yes. One other is that
GnuTLS seems to fail if used twice inside the same address space, such
as receiving messages via SMTP over TLS and doing lookups via ldaps if
both exim and libldap are linked against the same gnutls libs.
Odd. The gnutls library
On (19/06/06 16:04), Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:43:11 +0200, "Martijn van Oosterhout"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Is this the /dev/random issue?
>
> The /dev/random issue is one of the issues, yes.
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-dev/2006-January/001046.html
and many
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:43:11 +0200, "Martijn van Oosterhout"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 6/19/06, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> otoh, noone seems to care much about GnuTLS. GnuTLS is causing much
>> grief with the exim4 packages and there is nobody who is willing to
>> help.
>
>Is thi
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:59:37PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> The fix should be somehow unclumsified, though. Currently I inject
> some horrible runtime testing in the configure script to find out
> whether the clib supports the %zu format of C99, but that breaks
> crosscompilability (which I'
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I uploaded a fixed gcalctool just after dinstall yesterday, and it
> built on 4 arches before the upload queue was processed again. When
> the *.changes uploaded by buildds were processed, my *.changes wasn't
> yet installed in the
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006, Michal Cihar wrote:
> > If we were to force all binaries to link to one and only one gnutls,
> > then we wouldn't allow two or three gnutls versions in the archive at
> > the same time.
> It's not about forcing one gnutls version for all binaries but forcing
>
Scripsit Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Scripsit Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Henning Makholm wrote:
Another related bug type that I found lurking in my packages when I
investigated the warnings in this list, is trying t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-templayer
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Ian Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://excess.org/templayer/
* License : soon to be LGPL (being relicenced soon)
Program
Hi,
I uploaded a fixed gcalctool just after dinstall yesterday, and it
built on 4 arches before the upload queue was processed again. When
the *.changes uploaded by buildds were processed, my *.changes wasn't
yet installed in the archive, and hence they were rejected.
Who should I a
Frans Pop wrote:
Hi all,
Dave Beckett is preparing a new release of libcairo2 (see [1]) after a
request from the Debian Installer team to add a udeb compiled against the
directfb backend and not against the X backend. This udeb will be used by
the d-i team for the graphical installer.
Thi
"Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ otavio CCed ]
>
> On 06/18/2006 09:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Howdy. Just wondering if anyone knows the whereabouts of two maintainers:
>>
>> Otavio Salvador (apt-proxy)
Sorry by not reply. I must had lost your mail.
Wel
Hello Fabio,
On Mon, 19.06.2006 at 11:19:22 +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Toni Mueller wrote:
> > I'd say that making a "LAMP" package that includes a lot of PHP stuff
> > and not much else is sort of hijacking a good name for a bad purpose.
> >
> > lamp-python ("b
On 6/19/06, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:27:28 +0200, "Martijn van Oosterhout"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The other alternative is to port it to another SSL library, like
>Mozilla NSS or GnuTLS. Most of the time the SSL code is not terribly
>complicated and the po
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:27:28 +0200, "Martijn van Oosterhout"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The other alternative is to port it to another SSL library, like
>Mozilla NSS or GnuTLS. Most of the time the SSL code is not terribly
>complicated and the port is fairly straight-forward.
otoh, noone seems to
Hi all,
Dave Beckett is preparing a new release of libcairo2 (see [1]) after a
request from the Debian Installer team to add a udeb compiled against the
directfb backend and not against the X backend. This udeb will be used by
the d-i team for the graphical installer.
There is one issue that D
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 07:51:04 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Useful patches and comments are always welcome.
The apache maintainers' "reaction" to #349716, #349709, #349708 and
#366124 (the latter one a possible security issue), is very
discouraging to comment and to submit patc
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> Anyhow, the point is that certain GPLd programs have special
> exceptions that allow them to be linked with openssl. However, note
> that *all* the GPL'd code in the final program must have the
> exception.
>
> For example, gwenhywfar is
Hi
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:10:15 +0200
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we were to force all binaries to link to one and only one gnutls,
> then we wouldn't allow two or three gnutls versions in the archive at
> the same time.
It's not about forcing one gnutls version for all binari
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 23:10:36 +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> Package: debian-policy
>> Severity: normal
>
>> [Side note: Buildds/dpkg-buildpackage has no robust way of telling if
>> the optional build-arch field exists and must call build. This is
>>
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > I received #370387 claiming that I should version my libgnutls-dev dep
> > because libgnutls11-dev provides libgnutls-dev and this can cause
> > multiple versions of libgnutls to be linked to a binary (e.g. the
> > version pulle
> El domingo, 18 de junio de 2006 a las 22:03:32 -0500, Ron Johnson
> escrib?a:
>
>> When I tried to install it as root (using "su -" from an xterm
>> window), it complained about not being able to find DISPLAY. Unlike
>> Sun Java & Macromedia Flash, it uses a GUI installer.
>
> I've found "s
Blars Blarson schrieb am Sonntag, 18. Juni 2006 um 14:24:35 -0700:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >there appears to currently be a sparc release of debian,
> >http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/
>
> (not currently a release candidate for etch)
>
According to http:/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fathi Boudra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name : libsynaptics
Version : 0.14.4d
Upstream Author : Stefan Kombrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://qsynaptics.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description: library to access the synaptics touch pad driv
Hi
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Adrian von Bidder skrev:
On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:06, Marc Chantreux wrote:
Is there a way to help/join/"have news from" the apache team ?
Have you tried contacting the apache maintainers directly? (I'd cc
such mails to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, just for the
51 matches
Mail list logo
