On Friday 16 June 2006 13:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The upgrade to the new egroupware upstream drops several applications
> [...] On the other hand, if a sarge->etch
> upgrade potentially throws away a bunch of functionality and data, users
> won't be happy.
>
> What to do?
Rename the packa
On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:06, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> Is there a way to help/join/"have news from" the apache team ?
Have you tried contacting the apache maintainers directly? (I'd cc such
mails to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, just for the record)
The changelog.Debian.gz of apache2 and apache
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
>> You may think this is a poor question to ask debian-devel, but the
>> reason I am asking is because debian BTS doesn't expand rfc822
>> inlines (so when you click on one from BTS in
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> You may think this is a poor question to ask debian-devel, but the
> reason I am asking is because debian BTS doesn't expand rfc822
> inlines (so when you click on one from BTS in debian firefox it asks
> you if you want to download an EML file),
All m
Is there any (console|gui) package in debian that can easily be used to open
a message/rfc822 attachment and "browse" it like a regular email?
You may think this is a poor question to ask debian-devel, but the reason I
am asking is because debian BTS doesn't expand rfc822 inlines (so when you
clic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Goswin von Brederlow may or may not have written...
>
>
> [snip]
>> But other sources pass a pointer as int and there you loose 32
>> valuable bits and get a segfault when the int is used as
>> pointer again. [...]
I demand that Goswin von Brederlow may or may not have written...
[snip]
> But other sources pass a pointer as int and there you loose 32 valuable
> bits and get a segfault when the int is used as pointer again. [...]
And here's me thinking that you lose them. :-)
--
| Darren Salt| linux or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:58:23AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:53:24PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
[snip]
>> So in summary, if you don't care abo
Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:58:23AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:53:24PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
>> > The others are trivially fixable; of these, the one in libavcodec is
>> > already
>> > fixed in CVS. I've committed the r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Falk Hueffner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:58:23AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:53:24PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
>>> The others are trivially fixable; of these, the one in libavcodec is already
>>> fixed in CVS. I'v
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
Hi,
the current use and definition of Build-Depends/Conflicts[-Indep] in
policy 7.6 don't match. Both use and definition also greatly reduce
the usefullness of these fields. This issue has come up again and
again over the last few years and nothing has been
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:15:32PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Henning Makholm wrote:
>
> > Another related bug type that I found lurking in my packages when I
> > investigated the warnings in this list, is trying to format a size_t
> > value with a %u or %d format string, which will break if si
On 16-Jun-06, 08:18 (CDT), Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another related bug type that I found lurking in my packages when I
> investigated the warnings in this list, is trying to format a size_t
> value with a %u or %d format string, which will break if size_t is 64
> bits (unless
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Another related bug type that I found lurking in my packages when I
> investigated the warnings in this list, is trying to format a size_t
> value with a %u or %d format string, which will break if size_t is 64
> bits (unless the actual number is small and it is the last a
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16 Jun 2006, Frank Küster told this:
>
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 Jun 2006, Steve Langasek outgrape:
>>>
Just like there's no guarantee that saying "no" to a conffile
prompt when upgrading across stable rel
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:58:23AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:53:24PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> > The others are trivially fixable; of these, the one in libavcodec is already
> > fixed in CVS. I've committed the rest (they're basically s/int/long/) and am
> > forward
On 16 Jun 2006, Frank Küster told this:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 14 Jun 2006, Steve Langasek outgrape:
>>
>>> Just like there's no guarantee that saying "no" to a conffile
>>> prompt when upgrading across stable releases will give you a
>>> usable package.
>>
>> I pref
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14 Jun 2006, Steve Langasek outgrape:
>
>> Just like there's no guarantee that saying "no" to a conffile prompt
>> when upgrading across stable releases will give you a usable
>> package.
>
> I prefer in that case not to install the new vers
Do not ignore me please,
I found your email somewhere and now daebcided to write you.
I am comibng to your place in few weeks aand thought we
cban meet each other. Let me know if you do not mind.
I am a nice pretty girl. Don't reply to this emaila.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
T
* Peter Eisentraut:
> The upgrade to the new egroupware upstream drops several applications such as
> the trouble-ticket system and the forum (because they were unmaintained or
> the functionality was picked up by something else). I'm not sure how to
> arrange an upgrade to this new version.
On 14 Jun 2006, Steve Langasek outgrape:
> Just like there's no guarantee that saying "no" to a conffile prompt
> when upgrading across stable releases will give you a usable
> package.
I prefer in that case not to install the new version of the
package; since questions can be missed in
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scripsit Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On 2006-06-07 Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> We did pick two compiler warnings and scanned the build logs of one
>>> archive rebuild on alpha (64bit), where wrong code may be generated.
>>>
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 06:18:58PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> Your workaround does, as it seems, not workaround, if the mess already
> happened:
>
[ ... ]
>
> What now?
# dpkg --configure -a
Setting up python-central (0.4.17) ...
Setting up python2.4-minimal (2.4.3-7) ...
Setting up
Because of very last minute commitments for myself, as D-I meetings
moderator, and Frans Pop, as D-I release manager, we have decided to
reschedule the Debian Installer team meeting to Saturday June 24th 16:00:
> The next Debian Installer team opened meeting is scheduled for
> Saturday June 24th
Your workaround does, as it seems, not workaround, if the mess already
happened:
I got the know error when dist-upgrading the system today:
dpkg: error processing python2.4-minimal (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent c
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qonk
Version : 0.0.2beta1
Upstream Author : Anthony Liekens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://anthony.liekens.net/index.php/Computers/Qonk
* License : GPL
Programming
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2006-06-07 Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
>> We did pick two compiler warnings and scanned the build logs of one
>> archive rebuild on alpha (64bit), where wrong code may be generated.
> [...]
>> - cast from pointer to integer of
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:39:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> [Kai Hendry]
>> > Affected packages are:
>> [...]
>> > Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >plan
>
>> How did you conclude that it depend on lesstif1? Its build
Le vendredi 16 juin 2006 à 15:27 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> If you don't have any answer and are want to prepare a NMU, I am sure
> you will some developers (including me) would be happy to sponsor it.
^ ^
find who
-
Le jeudi 15 juin 2006 à 13:31 +0300, Jari Aalto+usenet a écrit :
> PROPOSED SOLUTIONS
>
> (1) It was discussed if /etc/alternatives could be used by providing
> configuration possiblitity through
>
> update-alternatives --config
>
> Where items proposed for graphical program
Scripsit Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 2006-06-07 Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We did pick two compiler warnings and scanned the build logs of one
>> archive rebuild on alpha (64bit), where wrong code may be generated.
>> - cast from pointer to integer of different size
Le jeudi 15 juin 2006 à 16:37 +0200, Marc Chantreux a écrit :
> Olaf,
>
>
> > >I still apply my patch on every server i install, this is boring me.
> > >
> > >Is there a way to help/join/"have news from" the apache team ?
> >
> > Try irc://irc.debian.org/debian-apache
> > Unfortunately, a more i
The upgrade to the new egroupware upstream drops several applications such as
the trouble-ticket system and the forum (because they were unmaintained or
the functionality was picked up by something else). I'm not sure how to
arrange an upgrade to this new version. On the one hand, no one wants
On 2006-06-07 Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> We did pick two compiler warnings and scanned the build logs of one
> archive rebuild on alpha (64bit), where wrong code may be generated.
[...]
> - cast from pointer to integer of different size
>cast to pointer from integer of d
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:39:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Kai Hendry]
> > Affected packages are:
> [...]
> > Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >plan
> How did you conclude that it depend on lesstif1? Its build depend is
> 'lesstif2-dev | lesstif-dev', to make sur
[Kai Hendry]
> Affected packages are:
[...]
> Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>plan
How did you conclude that it depend on lesstif1? Its build depend is
'lesstif2-dev | lesstif-dev', to make sure it build with any version
of debian, but I believe it is built by lesstif2 by def
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 06:35:51PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Marc cc:ed, not sure if you're on the list.
>
> On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:06, Marc Chantreux wrote:
> > I've posted a patch to fix #350119, #342008, #350119 139 days ago and
> > have no news about it. I tried to contact the apa
le 15/06/2006,
Adrian von Bidder nous écrivait :
> There is the debian-apache mailing list. I don't ee much life there,
> though, except for bts email.
the irc chan looks like ghost city too ...
cheers
mc
--
téléphone : 03.90.24.00.19
courriel : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
38 matches
Mail list logo
