Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +1. We've been using bsdiff (http://www.daemonology.net/bsdiff/) at
> work for some internal stuff and it's great.
Oh, and one more thing:
| bsdiff is quite memory-hungry. It requires max(17*n,9*n+m)+O(1)
| bytes of memory, where n is the size
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:45:24PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> What would you suggest instead?
> > Stop signing keys for Debian developers, since purchased ID's
> > are acceptable in this community? ;) At this point, I am not sure
Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://www.daemonology.net/bsdiff/
How does that compare with rsync batch files?
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 26 May 2006 18:34, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at
> >> least two photo ID's issued by the government).
> >
> > WTF? In Ore
On Friday 26 May 2006 13:40, Joe Smith wrote:
> Apparently the US makes it very clear that US Citizens are not to be
> pestered at customs
> "OR ELSE".
If only that were true. The Americans give me hell. Canada practically waves
me through. Last time I drove back to Oregon, US customs decide
On Friday 26 May 2006 10:33, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Some countries that have shaky relations with others usually agree to
> stamp you an extra sheet, so that your passport does not show the fact
> you were to that country. I have seen this both in Cuba and in
> Israel.
About the only way for an Ame
Paul Johnson dijo [Fri, May 26, 2006 at 08:06:40AM -0700]:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at least
> > two photo ID's issued by the government).
>
> WTF? In Oregon, if you have a driver's license, yo
Heya,
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 11:20:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 16:01 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit :
> > Thanks for all replies.
>
> In a private email you sent me, you said you were going to stop posting
> on Debian mailing lists. This was just another lie.
>
On Friday 26 May 2006 15:27, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at
> >> least two photo ID's issued by the government).
> >
> > WTF? In Oregon, if you have a dri
> I. the reason why i suggest a patch-oriented download process
+1. We've been using bsdiff (http://www.daemonology.net/bsdiff/) at
work for some internal stuff and it's great. Furthermore, since unstable has
gone to using diffs for the Packages files, my dselect updates have been
*way* fa
On Friday 26 May 2006 15:20, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:45:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> On Thursday 25 May 2006 15:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > [0] As long as he doesn't go and vote too, since the people in the voting
On Friday 26 May 2006 00:50, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 25 mai 2006 à 02:36 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> > It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
> > unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
> > signing party recently.
>
> FWIW, I'm p
On Friday 26 May 2006 00:29, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Manoj Srivastava:
> > I will not be signing his keys, ever, based on this action of
> > what I consider to be bad faith. Based on discussion with other
> > people who seem to find this action amusing, but not unacceptable, I
> > fin
> MS == Manoj Srivastava [2006-5-26]
MS> These are not poor keysigning techniques, unless you accept all ID
MS> document verification techniques rely on a gentleman's agreement
MS> about not presenting purchased ID's.
I think gentlemen don't need ID's, since of course they do not lie when
th
> Stop signing keys for Debian developers, since purchased ID's are
acceptable in this community? ;)
There's a difference between 'purchase' and 'pay for' in this context. I
have always had to pay for any kind of ID card, be it passport,
citizen's ID or student ID. You make it sound like he bo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On May 26, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> No, Im asking to have _one_ delay at a defined point instead of X
>> packages having a delay because they might have to run depmod manualy.
> This is not a choice, every package which install
Please use reply-to-list instead of reply-to-all, I do read debian-devel.
On Friday 26 May 2006 14:01, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I requir
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 15:45 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think the core issue here is if we deem presenting purchased
> > identification at an event designed to extend the web of trust
> > acceptable behaviour.
>
> I don't thin
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the core issue here is if we deem presenting purchased
> identification at an event designed to extend the web of trust
> acceptable behaviour.
I don't think anyone has said that it's satisfactory.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at least
>> two photo ID's issued by the government).
>
> WTF? In Oregon, if you have a driver's licen
Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:07 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> > * Package name: mod-bt
>
> I suggest to name your package (you can name just binary package, but it
> since you are building just one binary package, it's easier to rename
> source package as
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:07 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> * Package name: mod-bt
I suggest to name your package (you can name just binary package, but it
since you are building just one binary package, it's easier to rename
source package as well) as libapache-mod-bt to follow common practic
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 19:57 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > But that is not relevant to the problem. Experience shows that keys do
> > get compromised and need changing. So rotation or no rotation the key
> > change has to be handled anyway. Rotation just adds it at specific
> > intervals on top o
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Not always.
>
> In Mexico, upon reentry, my passport is sometimes stamped, but usually
> not.
You _usually_ don't get your passport stamped? Really? In recent flights?
I have never entered Mexico back without the Immigration seal.
> Within the Schengen area (European Union
I demand that Goswin von Brederlow may or may not have written...
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Actually, passports are not really an answer (I have no idea what the
>> passport of cameroon looke like, for example). Given time, one can pay
>> more attention to each document (I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:06:40 -0700
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require
> > at least two photo ID's issued by the govern
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I disagree with this; Debian has no need to know my birthdate or -place
> and I don't see a reason to stuff that kind of information into a database.
I agree with this. Although checking for date of birth while checking
your GPG key is a very nice thing I learned from som
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at least
> > two photo ID's issued by the government).
>
> WTF? In Oregon, if you have a driver's license, you cannot get an ID
Penny Leach wrote:
>Penny is clearly short for Penelope.
No, it is not _clear_. I don't have to know what are the short names
for almost any name around. I'm also confused with names in German
(correct me if wrong, please) containing, for example 'ö' and being
displayed as 'oe', or some of the
Your message dated Sat, 08 Apr 2006 06:32:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted tcm 2.20+TSQD-3 (source i386 all)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 07:15:53AM +1200, Penny Leach wrote:
> On 5/26/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While you're obviously free to set your own standards as to whose keys
> >you sign and not, I have come to the conclusion that the "exact same
> >spelling" requirement doesn't ma
"David Moreno Garza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luca Capello wrote:
As a side note, while my passport was valid (re-newed the day before
leaving for Mexico because I forgot it was expired after 5 years and
not 10), I didn't get any Mexican seal when I arrived a
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at
>> least two photo ID's issued by the government).
> WTF? In Oregon, if you have a driver's license, you cannot get an ID
> c
Your message dated Sun, 14 May 2006 19:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Accepted openbabel 2.0.1-1 (source i386)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On 5/27/06, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Only if you are reasonably well acquinted with the English language andusual english names and nicknames.This is true. One of the people at Debconf 5 I was thinking of, whose name I absolutely have no idea of anymore, was either a n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo [Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:34:50AM -0500]:
> > know who Martin Krafft is; I've seen him at a number of FOSDEM
> > instances, and I've seen him last year in Helsinki, where I called
> > him by his name (to which he reacted), and where literally hundreds
> > of others did the sam
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Penny Leach wrote:
> struck me as a little bit silly. Penny is clearly short for Penelope.
Only if you are reasonably well acquinted with the English language and
usual english names and nicknames.
> Perhaps this was my bad when I made the key & displayed a lack of foresight.
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:47:15PM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> That's illegal actually. It is quite often to get your passport sealed
> while leaving your country but it is supposed to be mandatory to get the
> seal in the country you are arriving, otherwise you could be thought
> you are an
David Moreno Garza dijo [Fri, May 26, 2006 at 01:47:15PM -0500]:
> > As a side note, while my passport was valid (re-newed the day before
> > leaving for Mexico because I forgot it was expired after 5 years and
> > not 10), I didn't get any Mexican seal when I arrived at Mexico City
> > airport. A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 25 May 2006 16:21:35 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Kevin B. McCarty writes ("Re: sending debian-private postings to
> > gmail"):
> >> Ian Jackson wrot
Luca Capello wrote:
> As a side note, while my passport was valid (re-newed the day before
> leaving for Mexico because I forgot it was expired after 5 years and
> not 10), I didn't get any Mexican seal when I arrived at Mexico City
> airport. As 2 others DDs with me (Aurelien Jarno and Matthias K
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
> On Tue, 23 May 2006, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I suppose it would be preferable to fix the "stop" target of the init
>
> There is nothing preferable about it. Stop targets *are* to exit with
> status 0 if the service is already stopped.
Makes sense. In this case,
On 26 May 2006, Matt Zagrabelny spake thusly:
> On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:16 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Cracking is not a scientific study.
>
> cracking may not be, but determining the average number of people
> who spot an unofficial id could be construed to be.
I can honestly stat
Dear Debian-Developers All Over The World!
may i introduce my,
proposal for a more efficient download process
I. the reason why i suggest a patch-oriented download process
II. a brief description
II.A. on the users
On Friday 26 May 2006 07:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell told this:
> > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Based on this, I strongly suggest that mere signatures on a new
> >> maintainers key from a DD be also not enough, since people have now
> >> effec
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:07:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Only the "dpkg:arch" is required and that can be done with "Provides:
>> dpkg-arch" again.
>
> Right. I wonder if even this should strictly be necessary, though, or if
> dpkg shou
Hello Sir/Madam
Having recieved your email address iam happy to infrom
you that we are one of the embroiders,supplier and exporters of all kinds of
badges for that last 20 years.we have skilled pattern masters ,designers and
very skilled workers.you plz visit www.style-view
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 25 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow uttered the following:
>
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I would say, off hand, that section 8.2 is for people who want
>>> to provide a shared library for other packages, with a stable ABI,
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What would you suggest instead?
>
> Stop signing keys for Debian developers, since purchased ID's
> are acceptable in this community? ;) At this point, I am not sure what
> my stance is going to be.
What do you think we get by having the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:45:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On Thursday 25 May 2006 15:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
[snip]
> [0] As long as he doesn't go and vote too, since the people in the voting
> table
> wou
On Fri, 26 May 2006, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> That's illegal actually. It is quite often to get your passport sealed
I have no idea about illegal (it might well be against some international
treaty, however), but it is very dangerous for you not to have your passport
stamped. There are very fe
On 26 May 2006, Thiemo Seufer outgrape:
> Keysigning isn't for judging behaviour but for confirming identity.
> * Michael Meskes:
>
>> This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state
>> that I certify this key really belongs to the person it seems to
>> belong to?
>
> Exactly. It
On May 26, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, since one cannot run depmod properly without the respective
> kernel being installed, removing the depmod call will caus harm.
Are you sure that this is still true? I believe that this has been fixed
a long time ago.
> It should be p
On May 26, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What about using depmod -a instead, how much would it cost? AFAICS it
> > We already do.
> Eh, typo, should have been "depmod -A". I think this is a sufficiently
> time-optimized version of "depmod -a".
Yes, this is what the script uses.
--
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Goirand said:
> Hello!
>
> Is there somebody in Shanghai from Debian able to check my ID and sign
> my key? If there is none, is there somebody in Singapore, where I might
> be able to go? I wouldn't be able to go in Hongkong (because of visa
> problems) where I
On 26 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst told this:
> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:57:09AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
>> This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state
>> that I certify this key really belongs to the person it seems to
>> belong to?
>
> That aside, personally, I don't kno
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mod-bt
Version : 0.0.16
Upstream Author : Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.crackerjack.net/mod_bt/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: C, la
* Michael Meskes:
> This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state that I
> certify this key really belongs to the person it seems to belong to?
Exactly. It does not tell us anything about your views regarding that
person or the purpose of the key itself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at least
> two photo ID's issued by the government).
WTF? In Oregon, if you have a driver's license, you cannot get an ID card.
If you have an ID card, you have to surren
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:57:09AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:30:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On 25 May 2006, Andreas Tille spake thusly:
> > > Is there any reason to revoke my signature I have put on
> > > Martin's key after he showed me his passport?
> >
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> >and not showing any passports or showing passports:
>
> [...]
>
> >- which did not had the *same* spelling as the name in the key (letter by
> > letter)
> >
> >will not get a signature
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:45:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 15:26, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > I'm pretty sure we can find official IDs that look so lame that you'd think
> > it's a fake (the old french ones could be good example, and i know people
> > who still use that
Hi,
I think the core issue here is if we deem presenting purchased
identification at an event designed to extend the web of trust
acceptable behaviour.
I check photographs, name, age, and expiry dates on ID
presented. I did not include document verification in that checklist,
Martin Schulze wrote:
> However, since one cannot run depmod properly without the respective
> kernel being installed, removing the depmod call will caus harm.
Kernels already run depmod when installed, and module packages would
just need to be changed to call depmod with the right parameters to m
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 11:20:26PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 24 mai 2006 à 16:01 -0700, Erast Benson a écrit :
> > Thanks for all replies.
>
> In a private email you sent me, you said you were going to stop posting
> on Debian mailing lists. This was just another lie.
Hmm, Debi
On 25 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell told this:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an unofficial,
>> and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key signing party
>> recently. This was apparently to belabour the obvious point th
On 25 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow uttered the following:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I would say, off hand, that section 8.2 is for people who want
>> to provide a shared library for other packages, with a stable ABI,
>> and a development package to facilitate linking
On 26 May 2006, Florian Weimer outgrape:
> * Manoj Srivastava:
>
>> I will not be signing his keys, ever, based on this action of what
>> I consider to be bad faith. Based on discussion with other people
>> who seem to find this action amusing, but not unacceptable, I find
>> that my decision to
On 5/26/06, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While you're obviously free to set your own standards as to whose keysyou sign and not, I have come to the conclusion that the "exact samespelling" requirement doesn't make that much sense. As an example, take
Bdale whose real name isn't Bdale
* Goswin von Brederlow:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> * Goswin von Brederlow:
>>
>>> Doesn't work if the key is ever compromised and a new one has to be
>>> created out of schedule. Or when you spend your x-mas holidays away
>>> from your system and couldn't upgrade before new
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:49:20AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > The maintainer, at some point during a private conversation, even
> > discouraged me to upload to *experimental* a new version of sysklogd
> > fixing the issues I have prepared. That's why they ended up in my
> > p.d.o page (they
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 08:00:23PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> FWIW, I noted down those keys I would *not* sign and didn't tell the people
> at the KSP that I would not sign them. I guess his experiment "only one in
> ten said that they would *not* sign it" is moot unless he back
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:06:31AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 26 May 2006, Thiemo Seufer outgrape:
>
> > Keysigning isn't for judging behaviour but for confirming identity.
> > * Michael Meskes:
> >
> >> This may be a silly question but doesn't my signature only state
> >> that I certify
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:10:09AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> At Debconf Joey Hess and I have integrated support for the graphical
> installer into the main build system for d-i. For now the support is for
> i386 only, but amd64 [1] and powerpc will follow very soon.
I've integrated the existing
On May 26, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, Im asking to have _one_ delay at a defined point instead of X
> packages having a delay because they might have to run depmod manualy.
This is not a choice, every package which installs modules must run
depmod or they will not be ava
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5/25/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 20:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
>> >> So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools in
Travis Crump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Who actually has two forms of government issued picture ID[not counting
> a passport which I never take anywhere unless I really need to since it
> is really bad to lose it and doesn't fit in a wallet, not to mention my
> passport photo isn't a very good
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Franz Pletz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pympd
Version : 0.06.1
Upstream Author : pympd Dev Team
* URL : http://http://pympd.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Frontend f
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:16 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost spake thusly:
>
> > * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost spake thusly:
> >>> I wasn't making any claim as to the general validity of IDs which
> >>> are purchased
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 10:11:55PM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
> Who actually has two forms of government issued picture ID[not counting
> a passport which I never take anywhere unless I really need to since it
> is really bad to lose it and doesn't fit in a wallet, not to mention my
> passport phot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
Is there somebody in Shanghai from Debian able to check my ID and sign
my key? If there is none, is there somebody in Singapore, where I might
be able to go? I wouldn't be able to go in Hongkong (because of visa
problems) where I could see ther
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Andreas Tille spake thusly:
>
> > On Thu, 25 May 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >
> >> It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
> >> unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
> >
> > Is there any reason to revoke my si
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:30:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Andreas Tille spake thusly:
> > Is there any reason to revoke my signature I have put on
> > Martin's key after he showed me his passport?
>
> In my opinion, yes, if you consider subverting the KSP like
>
Le Thu, May 25, 2006 at 07:29:43PM -0400, Charles Fry a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: libjung-java
> Version : 1.7.4
> Upstream Author : Joshua O'Madadhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http:
#include
* Marco d'Itri [Thu, May 25 2006, 09:36:11AM]:
> On May 24, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What about using depmod -a instead, how much would it cost? AFAICS it
> We already do.
Eh, typo, should have been "depmod -A". I think this is a sufficiently
time-optimized version
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost verbalised:
>
>> * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> Explanation? What we have here is an act of bad faith, in the guise
>>> of demonstrating a weakness. In my experience, one act of bad faith
>>> often leads
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
and not showing any passports or showing passports:
[...]
- which did not had the *same* spelling as the name in the key (letter by
letter)
will not get a signature from me.
While you're obviously free to set your own standards as to whose keys
yo
On May 25, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about having module-init-tools run depmod when needed and have all
> other packages rely on that? That way it would run at most once.
And how would module-init-tools be supposd to know when it would be
needed to run depmod?
--
ciao
* Manoj Srivastava:
> I will not be signing his keys, ever, based on this action of
> what I consider to be bad faith. Based on discussion with other
> people who seem to find this action amusing, but not unacceptable, I
> find that my decision to vaive my personal requirements of two
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Maybe we should just drop holding KSPs, and fall back to the
> traditional method of "Hey, nice dinner we had yesterday. Say, now
> that you know me, my family and my history, would you like to sign my
> key as well?" - Signing for people you actually know, not just linking
> f
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
> script?
I guess it would be a time-saver to remove the depmod call.
However, since one cannot run depmod properly without the respective
kernel being installed, removing the depmod call will caus harm
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 285 (new: 3)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 77 (new: 0)
Total number of packages requeste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:42:07AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
[snip]
> People write books in the name of someone else fairly often, actually.
>
> No, I'm not only thinking about the Bible :)
>
> There's professional book writers w
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, passports are not really an answer (I have no idea
> what the passport of cameroon looke like, for example). Given time,
> one can pay more attention to each document (I require at least two
> photo ID's issued by the government)
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would say, off hand, that section 8.2 is for people who want
> to provide a shared library for other packages, with a stable ABI,
> and a development package to facilitate linking to their
> library. There are certain hoops we must jump i
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:07:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Say you have a binary package (Multi-Arch: no) firfox and a
> > library/plugin package firefox-mplayer-plugin.
> > This could be handled by firefox having a "Provides:
> >
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 25 May 2006, Stephen Frost verbalised:
>
> > * Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> Explanation? What we have here is an act of bad faith, in the guise
> >> of demonstrating a weakness. In my experience, one act of bad faith
> >> often leads to others.
> >
On 5/25/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le mardi 23 mai 2006 à 20:52 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
>> So, does anybody mind if I remove depmod from the module-init-tools init
>> script?
>
> Please go ahead. Anything relying on it
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
> unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity device at a large key
> signing party recently. This was apparently to belabour the obvious
> point that large KSP's are events where it is hard to reas
James Troup wrote:
> My key was part of the DC4 KSP materials, but I didn't manage to
> attend in the end. A couple of people signed my key despite my lack
> of attendance and one of them an NM applicant, IIRC. Again from
> memory, Martin talked to the NM in question who was very apologetic,
> cl
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
