also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.17.2210
-0500]:
> mdadm is a *critical* part of a system that uses linux software
> raid. Anything that helps users understand all the important
> changes an update will imply is always uselful.
Of course, but if there weren't
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.17.1029 -0500]:
>> I know this isn't the sort of feedback you want but these aren't
>> all "please ship the new version of mdadm" bugs and whilst they
>> might well be fixed by this version I though
Here I was, as a user, happy to read the announcement that the real thing was
going into non-free. Then this. Brilliant. This is a stuff-up of Kovco[1]
proportions. How can Sun consider a license with those sort of provisions
fair? How can the JDK get into the archive before anyone picking up on
Executive Summary: There are serious issues with clause 2a, 2b, 2c,
2f, and 4; and lesser issues with other bits of this license. As much
as some of our users would like to see us distributing this JDK in
non-free, I'm really not sure that it can be distributed while
complying with the license or w
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:37:56PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> Then when are we removing the debian-policy package from the archive?
> But seriously, if violating Debian Policy has no consequences, then it
> probably won't be followed. As it stands now, Policy is useless because
> the worst t
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:44:54PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:20:14AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > During the past weeks there has been close collaboration between Sun
> > engineers and Debian and Ubuntu developers. The quick turnaround for
> > creating tho
* Bill Allombert:
> I don't think it is appropriate to use debian-devel-announce to
> advertise non-free softwares epecially when we are striving to provide
> a free alternative.
I tend to agree.
> Any pointer to that discussion ? I could not find any on debian-legal.
> From reading the licens
* Emmanuel le Chevoir:
> Florian Weimer a écrit :
>> * Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
>>
>>> Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
>>> section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun releasing[11 Java under a new
>>> license: the Operating System Distributor License for Java (DLJ)[2
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> delivered internaly or not at all for my chroots but I still want to
>> be able to report bugs with the right dependency informations. If you
>> force the use of an MTA then I would have t
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:55:54PM -0500, martin f krafft wrote:
> I just don't think there's a big point in duplicating information in
> the Debian changelog.
I see debian work as tailoring upstream one so that it best fits our
users. Selecting the appropriate information from the upstream change
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> What about modifying it to work through something like an http POST?
>
> > I'm personally not too terribly interested in implementing an HTTP
> > access method for the BTS, because it makes it more easy f
On Wed, 17 May 2006, martin f krafft wrote:
> Mh. I don't want to (re)start a flamewar, but my take is that
> changelog.Debian documents changes I've made, and the upstream
> changelog documents the changes they've made. I acknowledge these
> changes by closing the bugs, and if you care how it got
What I am trying to point out is that the DEBs *would* be a good idea
it would clog up APT and dpkg (emphasis on dpkg) because on my system
I have over 25 files from packages installed and as a result it
takes at *least* 30 seconds to read the database from /var/lib/dpkg.
Adding these pixmaps
Le mercredi 17 mai 2006 à 06:31 +0100, Indraveni a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> we are working for a distro which is using debian pacakges. By
> default the gnome panel is having no colour. I want to change the look
> and feel of the panel, Applications menu backgroud color, Window title
> background color
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:16:35PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Ignorance, fear of becoming an open relay and years of learning
> will have to be overcome before Most Users will config Debian to
> use a relayhost.
It's not very difficult to have exim, the default MTA, simply not launch
an smtp lis
also sprach Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.17.1029 -0500]:
> I know this isn't the sort of feedback you want but these aren't
> all "please ship the new version of mdadm" bugs and whilst they
> might well be fixed by this version I thought consensus was to try
> to describe what it was
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
> It blocks *incoming* port 25 traffic for well understood reasons.
Yes, purely commercial reasons.
> I never knew, though that it also blocks all *outgoing* smtp
> traffic except to it's own servers. Maybe to Winbots from emailing
> files back "home"?
Ye
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> You mean connection from random user ports to destination port 25?
Yes.
> If you are at a place where that is the case then you should have an
> IT team or admin that will tell you what smtp host to use or even
> install your system.
We do. So
Juha Jäykkä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was digging around a problem with a user not being able to access his
> cdrom even though the user belongs to group cdrom (as reported by
> "groups user") and the cdrom device is mode rw- group cdrom. It was
> immediately clear this is a libnss-ldap issu
"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In case anyone is interested in filing mass bug reports (I am not
> sufficiently interested, sorry), here are the -dev packages in
> unexpected sections, obtained as follows:
>
> grep-aptavail -r -P '.*-dev$' -s Section,Package | paste -sd ' \n' |
Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I demand that Gabor Gombas may or may not have written...
>
> [snip]
>> How do you want to handle one-arch-only binNMUs? binNMUs change
>> changelog.Debian.gz, so
>> - you can't upgrade just the architecture that was binNMUed without
>> changelog.Debian.
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>> And how would that be any simpler than setting an smtp server for
>> reportbug? Setting up a fully usable MTA is more difficult than having
>> reportbug connect directly to bugs.d.o.
>>
>
> I'm sorry, but that i
Check this out!
I've found this great site! The girls are hot and the pics are even hotter!
And man can they talk the talk. Great Buzz! A definite must see.
www.seemetextme.com/girls
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
Check this out!
I've found this great site! The girls are hot and the pics are even hotter!
And man can they talk the talk. Great Buzz! A definite must see.
www.seemetextme.com/girls
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 23:28 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:35:44 +0200, Adam Borowski
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Why this tool is written in python, an interpreted language with a run
> time system the size of Buckingham Palace, The White House and the
> Kreml combi
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 22:47 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 10:44:19 -0500
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Interesting. b.d.o doesn't seem to be answering on port 25 though.
>
> Doesn't your provider block port 25?
>
> $ telnet bugs.debian.org 25
> Trying 140.211
On Wed, 17 May 2006 22:56:06 +0100 Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:02:34 + Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> >
> > > [For -legal people, the license is attached.]
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > [...]
> > > Also, section 4 poses a major issue. If, for any reason, th
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:50:51AM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> > If Sun becomes aware of a compatibility problem with the JDK
> > software on your OS distribution and notifies you about it, then you
> > must fix the problem and offer a patch or new version to your
> > downstream users
In case anyone is interested in filing mass bug reports (I am not
sufficiently interested, sorry), here are the -dev packages in
unexpected sections, obtained as follows:
grep-aptavail -r -P '.*-dev$' -s Section,Package | paste -sd ' \n' | \
egrep -v '^Section: (|contrib/|non-free/)(doc|python|
Hi!
I was digging around a problem with a user not being able to access his
cdrom even though the user belongs to group cdrom (as reported by "groups
user") and the cdrom device is mode rw- group cdrom. It was immediately
clear this is a libnss-ldap issue, since the problem disappears if I add
the
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> And how would that be any simpler than setting an smtp server for
> reportbug? Setting up a fully usable MTA is more difficult than having
> reportbug connect directly to bugs.d.o.
>
I'm sorry, but that is just plain wrong.
aptitude install postfix
"What type of
Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:02:34 + Brian M. Carlson wrote:
>
> > [For -legal people, the license is attached.]
>
> Thanks.
>
> [...]
> > Also, section 4 poses a major issue. If, for any reason, the Linux
> > kernel doesn't do something that Java requires, then we are obl
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> The d-i people, or the m-t-a people? That's where you define what
> kind of service you want.
>
> You'd not just have to bluntly ask, but firmly recommend that they
> install the m-t-a as a relay host. (Once a desktop user like me
> figures out what a relayhost is, and th
Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ever thought development packages classified by $NAME-dev belong to the
> Section devel or libdevel, but
>
> I am really suprised. Which packages belong to devel/libdevel?
>
I found this more instructive:
$ apt-cache search -n .\*-dev\$ | sed 's/ -.*//' | xarg
Carlos Correia wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Florian Weimer escreveu:
> | * Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> |
> |
> |>Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
> |>section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun releasing[11 Java under a new
> |>license: t
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 10:34 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 00:01 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >> "Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On 5/15/0
On 15 May 2006, at 1:13 pm, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
More generally, Perl modules to send mail rather than using
/usr/sbin/sendmail are often useful with web applications (or other
applications that need security isolation) that are running in a
chroo
On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:35:44 +0200, Adam Borowski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Except, this is _doubling_ a question that was already asked somewhere else,
>ie, a bug. The UNIX way of configuring the mail is setting up a binary that
>knows how to deliver it as "/usr/sbin/sendmail"; it doesn't matte
On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:33:21 +0200, "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>=> /etc/.d directory might not be perfect, but it's good sight
> better then monolitic configuration files
Agreement on that.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy co
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:44:21AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Which is still stupid not to have in the kernel API as feedback from
> the event manager and have insmod optionaly block.
For that to work you should make device discovery synchronous everywhere
in the kernel. That would be a
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:42:42AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
>
>>An open outgoing port 25 is commonly blocked by default anywhere you
>>have non-incompetent network management, unless you are on the
>>business of selling full internet uplinks for serv
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> which results in "smtphost bugs.debian.org" in the conffile. Maybe the
>> default to the MTA question could be "N" instead.
>
> An open outgoing port 25 is commonly blocked by default anyw
On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:02:34 + Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> [For -legal people, the license is attached.]
Thanks.
[...]
> Also, section 4 poses a major issue. If, for any reason, the Linux
> kernel doesn't do something that Java requires, then we are obligated
> to either fix it or inform ever
On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:01:26 +0200 Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:20:14AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
> > section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun releasing[11 Java under a
> > new license: the Opera
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 09:42 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[snip]
> What exactly is the problem with making a local MTA absolutely mandatory,
> (as in anything that sends email either recommends or depends on
> mail-transport-agent)?
>
On Wed, 17 May 2006 10:44:19 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting. b.d.o doesn't seem to be answering on port 25 though.
Doesn't your provider block port 25?
$ telnet bugs.debian.org 25
Trying 140.211.166.43...
Connected to bugs.debian.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 sp
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:20:14AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
> section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun releasing[11 Java under a new
> license: the Operating System Distributor License for Java (DLJ)[2][3].
> This licen
I demand that Gabor Gombas may or may not have written...
[snip]
> How do you want to handle one-arch-only binNMUs? binNMUs change
> changelog.Debian.gz, so
> - you can't upgrade just the architecture that was binNMUed without
> changelog.Debian.gz becoming invalid for the other arches
[snip]
I
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:44:21AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> Which is still stupid not to have in the kernel API as feedback from
>> the event manager and have insmod optionaly block.
>
> For that to work you should make device discovery syn
Hi,
I ever thought development packages classified by $NAME-dev belong to the
Section devel or libdevel, but
% apt-cache search -n .\*-dev\$ | sed 's/ -.*//' | \
xargs apt-cache show | grep \^Section: | sort -u
Section: admin
Section: comm
Section: contrib/libdevel
Section: devel
Section: doc
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:14:24AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Multiarch (so far) does not allow the same path/file in 2 packages
>> (with the exception of /usr/share/doc/ files)
>
> Hmm. How do you want to handle one-arch-only binNMUs? binNMUs
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:01:08AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> "Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Why do you think there's no compatible solution?
>>
>> Because basicaly all sources assume binaries go to /bin. You
>> want t
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:42:42AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> > An open outgoing port 25 is commonly blocked by default anywhere you
> > have non-incompetent network management, unless you are on the
> > business of selling full i
Scripsit Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> What about modifying it to work through something like an http POST?
> I'm personally not too terribly interested in implementing an HTTP
> access method for the BTS, because it makes it more easy for bug
> submissions to be sent from people who can n
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:42:42AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> An open outgoing port 25 is commonly blocked by default anywhere you
> have non-incompetent network management, unless you are on the
> business of selling full internet uplinks for server hosting, or you
> do business
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Weimer escreveu:
| * Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
|
|
|>Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
|>section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun releasing[11 Java under a new
|>license: the Operating System Distributor License f
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 10:34 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 00:01 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> "Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > On 5/15/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 12:12 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
>
> and then apt doesn't run, and instead prints:
>
> E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes
pbuilder login --save-after-login
[...]
# apt-get install gnupg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Weimer a écrit :
> * Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
>
>> Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
>> section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun releasing[11 Java under a new
>> license: the Operating System Distributor License
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 10:41 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 00:24 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 08:44 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >> >> On
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:35 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:58:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 19:21 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
[snip]
> Except, this is _doubling_ a question that was already asked somewhere else,
> ie, a bug. The UNIX way o
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:11:43AM -0500, martin f krafft wrote:
> Here's the changelog:
> mdadm (2.4.1-1) experimental; urgency=low
>* The "I'll kill that maintainer... uh, wait, it's me" release. Sorry for
> the delay, here's the long awaited new upstream release,
> which closes:
The rest of the Linux distribution world is using udev with the current
semantics and has not crumbled. If you don't like the current semantics, I
understand, but that shouldn't stand in the way of its adoption.
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gavl
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Burkhard Plaum
* URL : http://gmerlin.sf.net
* License : GPL
Description : Gmerlin Audio Video Library
Gavl is short for Gm
Hi Jeroen,
Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Users requiring the complete functionality of Sun Java will find
> that the Java 5 JRE and JDK can be installed by adding the non-free
> component to their APT configuration. For now, this applies only to
> users of unstable/sid, but will the packages are
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:14:24AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Wait a second. How do you create the dir when the file already exists?
There was quite some talk on linux-kernel about
'every-file-is-a-directory' approaches when Reiserfs 4 was released.
Some said they'd like to see this fea
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 06:02:58PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Few things that I see:
> -- FUSE goes throught userland <-> kernel <-> Userland so it:
> ** May be an overhead for all /usr/bin calls.
Sure. Every feature has a price. In reality I expect the dentry cache
and the page cache takes c
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:13:31PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Did you read the accompanying FAQ? Question 12 addresses your concern.
> http://download.java.net/dlj/DLJ-FAQ-v1.1.txt
I did, but I wasn't sure if that FAQ has any legal meaning. I have
problems seeing that the FAQ answer fits with
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> which results in "smtphost bugs.debian.org" in the conffile. Maybe the
> default to the MTA question could be "N" instead.
An open outgoing port 25 is commonly blocked by default anywhere you have
non-incompetent network management, unless you are
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 09:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:59 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:53:39AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> >> ti, 2006-05-16 kello 09:53 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw kirjoitti:
> [...]
> >>> AFAIK, vi
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:01 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Could someone please explain to me why paragraph 2(f) does not pose a
> problem? I couldn't find ANY discussion about the license on Debian legal
> which surprises me a little bit, but then maybe I just missed the
> relevant parts of the li
[For -legal people, the license is attached.]
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:01 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:20:14AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
> > section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun releas
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
> section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun releasing[11 Java under a new
> license: the Operating System Distributor License for Java (DLJ)[2][3].
This license requires that we remove all other Java impl
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 08:33, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:09:37 +0200, "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >How so? As an admin you can always comment out any conf.d file
> > completely if you don't want what is in there. After which dpkg will
> > come wit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: thunar-archive-plugin
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://foo-projects.org/~benny/projects/thunar-archive-plugin/
* Lic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: thunar-media-tags-plugin
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Jannis Pohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://thunar.xfce.org/pwiki/projects/thunar-media-tags-plugin
*
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 02:44 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Indraveni wrote:
[snip]
> I notice that you have asked lots of questions on the debian-user and
> debian-devel lists. Not that there is anything wrong with that, but you
> may wany to consider hiring a Debian consultant [0] to help the
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:58:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 19:21 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > >> The point is that they could if the wanted to. And if they did, it
> > >> would work for _all_ programs, not just particular perl scripts that
> > >> happen to use som
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:20:17AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Hi. I'm just a lowly user with a bandwidth problem.
> Certainly was a shock to get back from town to find the documentation
> gone from the debs I brought back.
> However, I am to make one last trip to town so it's my one shot chance
>
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:20:14AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Official packages of Sun Java are now available from the non-free
> section of Debian unstable, thanks to Sun releasing[11 Java under a new
> license: the Operating System Distributor License for Java (DLJ)[2][3].
> This licen
Op wo, 17-05-2006 te 06:31 +0100, schreef Indraveni:
> Hi,
>
> we are working for a distro which is using debian pacakges. By
> default the gnome panel is having no colour. I want to change the look
> and feel of the panel, Applications menu backgroud color, Window title
> background color..,etc
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:09:37 +0200, "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>How so? As an admin you can always comment out any conf.d file completely
>>if you don't want what is in there. After which dpkg will come with the
>>usual prom
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:19:35AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > You don't need to wait for a particular event to be finished processing;
>> > instead you should wait for the resource you actua
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 00:24 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 08:44 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 16 May 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> >> > On the "home desktop" reportbug
* Marco d'Itri:
> On May 16, "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Except that many ISPs now block outbound port 25 (at least on
>> consumer-level service), except for what is relayed through their mail
>> servers.
> Agreed. It's not reasonable to expect that port 25 connections fr
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:01:08AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Why do you think there's no compatible solution?
>
> Because basicaly all sources assume binaries go to /bin. You
> want to break that. Also a lot of scripts expect binaries
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 00:01 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> "Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On 5/15/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Sun, Ma
On Wednesday, May 17, 2006 7:59 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:53:39AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> ti, 2006-05-16 kello 09:53 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw kirjoitti:
[...]
>>> AFAIK, vilolating policy always waarent a serious bug:
[...]
>> This is not wha
Dear Debian users and workers,
The EDOS project (http://www.edos-project.org/) is a research project funded by
the European Union and focusing on fundamental aspects of free software
processes such as distribution, quality assurance and dependency management.
As the WP2 (Dependencies Management)
On May 17, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It may be possible to check that all pending udev events have completed.
It is possible to check the status of individual events by looking at the
queue, but it's not obvious why people would want to do this instead of
using RUN rules.
--
ci
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:12:30PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > /usr/sbin/pbuilder update --override-config --configfile /etc/pbuilderrc.sid
>
> Ok, this gets me a good sid chroot. But I can't build with it. When
> I try to build, using, say
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:53:39AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ti, 2006-05-16 kello 09:53 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw kirjoitti:
>> Lars wrote:
The usage is mendantory (aka a must clause) but the bugs are not
RC? This does not fit.
>>> It violates policy, but not in a way enumerated on
>>>
Indraveni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are working for a distro which is using debian pacakges. By default
> the gnome panel is having no colour. I want to change the look and feel
> of the panel, Applications menu backgroud color, Window title background
> color..,etc. Just to make it look diferent with
On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:09:37 +0200, "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How so? As an admin you can always comment out any conf.d file completely
>if you don't want what is in there. After which dpkg will come with the
>usual prompt at package upgrade about the conf-file being
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:19:35AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You don't need to wait for a particular event to be finished processing;
> > instead you should wait for the resource you actually need to become
> > available, e.g. a device no
95 matches
Mail list logo
