Scripsit Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I suggest you use:
> export PAGER="sh -c \"col -b | view -c 'set ft=man nomod nolist
> titlestring=MANPAGE' -\""
>
> which explicitely calls sh -c to handle pipes and quotes in the
> expected way.
Policy does not really specify how to handle $PAG
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Still, regardless of whether the state of Utah recognizes a marriage,
>> that is surely a different question from whether the marriage has, in
>> fact, occurred.
>
> Making that distinction is, IMO, cracking open a very large barrel
> of very nasty monkey
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 21:48 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is same-sex marriage legally recognized in Utah? If not, then
> > there is only "hetero marriage". You can't discriminate against
> > what doesn't exist.
>
> To my knowledge, the court
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is same-sex marriage legally recognized in Utah? If not, then
> there is only "hetero marriage". You can't discriminate against
> what doesn't exist.
To my knowledge, the courts of Utah have never said anything about
same-sex marriages entered into in
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 21:14 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Eldon Koyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Apr 18 20:27-0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> So, if a married same-sex couple were students at BYU, that would be
> >> fine?
> >
> > BYU is a private, religious school. The chur
Eldon Koyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Apr 18 20:27-0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> So, if a married same-sex couple were students at BYU, that would be
>> fine?
>
> BYU is a private, religious school. The church which runs it will never
> acknowledge a same-sex couple as married. Als
On Apr 18 20:27-0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> So, if a married same-sex couple were students at BYU, that would be
> fine?
>
BYU is a private, religious school. The church which runs it will never
acknowledge a same-sex couple as married. Also, most states do not
recognize same-sex marria
On Apr 18 20:28-0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Eldon Koyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Actually, I think BYU takes their honor code very seriously (with the
> > exception of the football team).
>
> What does such an exception mean? That the honor code isn't really
> taken seriously?
Eldon Koyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, I think BYU takes their honor code very seriously (with the
> exception of the football team).
What does such an exception mean? That the honor code isn't really
taken seriously?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Eldon Koyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, I think BYU takes their honor code very seriously (with the
> exception of the football team). If you were to report such behavior to
> the proper person, there would likely be some disciplinary action taken
> to match the seriousness of the off
Eldon Koyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, I think BYU takes their honor code very seriously (with the
> exception of the football team). If you were to report such behavior to
> the proper person, there would likely be some disciplinary action taken
> to match the seriousness of the off
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 09:29:14 +0200, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 19:19:40 +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> it's already quite penible to use experimental (to avoid to pull
>> every single experimental package, you have to edit your
>> /etc/apt/pr
On Mar 21 8:03-0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 20 Mar 2006, Greg Conner told this:
>
> >> So we got caught trying to br BYU students. You guys win that
> >> battle.
> >
> > Interestingly enough:
> >
> > ,[ http://honorcode.
#include
* Don Armstrong [Sun, Apr 16 2006, 11:35:07PM]:
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > Much, much, much? Where? Some eye-catchers (collage, HTTP client
> > builtin) but not much for daily use for a desktop system:
> >
> > - no picture browser GUI
>
> Uh... feh -t .;
Primitive
Hi Frank,
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Cc'ing you 'cause I don't know whether you're subscribed to -devel]
I am subscribed.
> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> * Package name: xindy
>> Version : 2.2-beta2-1
>> Upstream Author : Joachim Schrod <[EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > view: -s option is only applicable to ex.
> % /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --display view | grep current
(I redirected the discussion to the bug report for the second time;
FYI, it was nview.)
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"You can gtk_mai
* Rohan Dhruva [Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:30:29 +0530]:
> view: -s option is only applicable to ex.
% /usr/sbin/update-alternatives --display view | grep current
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at
On 4/18/06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reassign 363250 man-db
> retitle 363250 please clarify in the man manpage how $PAGER is invoked
> stop
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2006, Rohan Dhruva wrote:
> > I suggest you use:
> > export PAGER="sh -c \"col -b | view -c 'se
What format should Origin and Label be set to for Release files on
people.debian.org? It seems to me there should be some best common
practice for Debian developers publishing extra-experimental packages.
I thought the two labels should be set to some selection of...
Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL
Okay maybe defining the function in the rules section does solve the
problem. However, this can have the effect of putting bug hunks of C
code in the rules section. This would seem to be bad coding style as
already suggested. It would seem that (at least one of) the uses of the
"user code" sect
Frank Kuester wrote
> Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > In order to fulfill this requirement, is there a best practice / any
> > possible way to "convert" an amd64 box which has been installed from
> > debian-amd64 to an official debian amd64 box?
>
You could always try what I
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm thinking more of extending the capabilities of apt itself for 2
>> cases:
>>
>> 1)
>> apt-get install foo (>= 1.2-3)
>> or
>> apt-get install foo>=1.2-3
>>
>> Sort the known versions of foo according
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:52:22AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> J?rg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Package name: xindy
> > Version : 2.2-beta2-1
> > Upstream Author : Joachim Schrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://xindy.sourceforge.net/
> > * License
Hi,
> > > pbuilder-satisfydepends does not understand architecture specifications
> > > like "linux-any" in build dependencies, which dpkg-dev introduced
> > > recently (e.g., "Build-Depends: libasound2-dev [linux-any]"). I am at a
> > > Linux system and see
> >
> > Which version of dpkg?
>
> I'
retitle 363250 Please clarify how $PAGER is invoked for any manpage.stopSorry for the spam, I did not know I can retitle bugs myself.-- Rohan DhruvaProud GNU/Linux user.Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming or what?"http://
Also, IMHO, topic is a bit wrong .. this "bug" applies to all man pages, not only the "man" manpage. Regards,-- Rohan DhruvaProud GNU/Linux user.Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming or what?"http://www.dhruva.be/
On 4/18/06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
reassign 363250 manretitle 363250 Please clarify how $PAGER is invoked in the man manpagestopHi,On Tue, Apr 18, 2006, Rohan Dhruva wrote:> export PAGER="col -b | view -c 'set ft=man nomod nolist titlestring=MANPAGE' -"
This $PAGER definiti
Hi,
> I didn't suggest it as a layer in the
> stable/testing/unstable/experimental spectrum. Rather, it is meant to be
> orthogonal to them, a completely new system. For example, there's no
> need to restrict uploads to DDs.
Would it be an incentive if there was extra points granted for
independe
Le Mar 18 Avril 2006 18:17, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:41:50AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Developers with amd64 machines are also now able to upload new
> > versions of their package built locally (rather than in an i386
> > chroot) -- but in order to ensure depe
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:41:50AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> Developers with amd64 machines are also now able to upload new versions
>> of their package built locally (rather than in an i386 chroot) -- but
>> in order to ensure dependencies are
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 12:17:54PM -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:41:50AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Developers with amd64 machines are also now able to upload new versions
> > of their package built locally (rather than in an i386 chroot) -- but
> > in order to
reassign 363250 man-db
retitle 363250 please clarify in the man manpage how $PAGER is invoked
stop
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006, Rohan Dhruva wrote:
> I suggest you use:
> export PAGER="sh -c \"col -b | view -c 'set ft=man nomod nolist
> titlestring=MANPAGE' -\""
> That didnt
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 12:41:50AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Developers with amd64 machines are also now able to upload new versions
> of their package built locally (rather than in an i386 chroot) -- but
> in order to ensure dependencies are calculated correctly, please make
> sure you're buil
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> I will remove my rules.old in php-json because it's a mistake and I like
> clean debian/ dirs. but please, not the bandwith argument for a file
It is also annoying to try to figure out why someone left something behind
every time you have to deal wit
Le Mar 18 Avril 2006 16:41, Anthony Towns a écrit :
> Developers with amd64 machines are also now able to upload new
> versions of their package built locally
YEEES !
I guess this is also the begining of the slow agony of i386 buildd(s)...
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thinking more of extending the capabilities of apt itself for 2
> cases:
>
> 1)
> apt-get install foo (>= 1.2-3)
> or
> apt-get install foo>=1.2-3
>
> Sort the known versions of foo according to pin and version like now
> but then, instead of p
On Die, 18 Apr 2006, Eugene Konev wrote:
> /etc/X11/fonts/X11R7/Type1/foo.scale
Thanks for clarifying this.
> NP> I would say that the former (the old location) would make more sense,
> NP> since it does not really help to have the additional X11R7 in the
> NP> /e/X/f/ hierachy.
>
> This wil
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1] It might be possible to write an apt preferences file to fix this
> problem differently, but not doing that actually has its advantages,
> in that we force maintainers to actually know what experimental
> package versions they're build-
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:05:38 +0200
Norbert Preining wrote:
NP> So I let the package depend on debhelper >= 5.0.31, but:
NP> /etc/X11/fonts/Type1/foo.scale
NP> or
NP> /etc/X11/fonts/X11R7/Type1/foo.scale
NP> ?
/etc/X11/fonts/X11R7/Type1/foo.scale
NP> I would say that the fo
On 18 April 2006 at 01:23, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 17 April 2006 at 22:42, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
| > | There are a few dozen source packages in the archive that contain a file
| > | called debian/rules.old. In many cases, this was apparently the backup
| >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: winefish
Version : 1.3.3
Upstream Author : Ky Anh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://winefish.berlios.de/
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Luebbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bitfuse
Version : 0.11
Upstream Author : Anton Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cs.umu.se/~ens05aon/
* License : GPL
Description : Abstract scrolling shoo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 363250 man
Bug#363250: general: Custom PAGER gives error on sid, but works on sarge
Warning: Unknown package 'man'
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `man'.
> retitle 363250 Please clarify how $PAGER is invoked in the man manpage
Bug#363
At 1144928811 past the epoch, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> As said, Gnome bloat. Use gqview or pornview.
The latter has been orphaned[1].
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/316934
--
Jon Dowland
http://alcopop.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
reassign 363250 man
retitle 363250 Please clarify how $PAGER is invoked in the man manpage
stop
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006, Rohan Dhruva wrote:
> export PAGER="col -b | view -c 'set ft=man nomod nolist titlestring=MANPAGE'
> -"
This $PAGER definition makes the assumption that it's passed
At 1145360089 past the epoch, Rohan Dhruva wrote:
> # Set vim as the man pager
> export PAGER="col -b | view -c 'set ft=man nomod nolist titlestring=MANPAGE'
> -"
>
> In those systems, it displays the man page properly in vim with full
> color. However, on using the same line on sid, the error giv
On 4/18/06, Rohan Dhruva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: normal
>
> I want to use vim as my man pager. On other distros, and on sarge, I use this
> line
> in my .bashrc
>
> # Set vim as the man pager
> export PAGER="col -b | view -c 'set ft=man nomod nolist titlestring=MA
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:42:42PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> There are a few dozen source packages in the archive that contain a file
> called debian/rules.old. In many cases, this was apparently the backup
> copy during a cdbs conversion or something similar that should have
> been remo
Package: general
Severity: normal
I want to use vim as my man pager. On other distros, and on sarge, I use this
line
in my .bashrc
# Set vim as the man pager
export PAGER="col -b | view -c 'set ft=man nomod nolist titlestring=MANPAGE' -"
In those systems, it displays the man page properly in v
Hi all!
Could you please explain me what is the right place where to put .scale
files?
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Eugene Konev wrote:
> This part is broken now. So I ask you please _do not_ yet upload rebuilt
> packages if you use dh_installxfonts. Or you should handle your
> maintainer scripts by hand
[Cc'ing you 'cause I don't know whether you're subscribed to -devel]
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Package name: xindy
> Version : 2.2-beta2-1
> Upstream Author : Joachim Schrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://xindy.sourceforge.net/
> * License
Le Mar 18 Avril 2006 07:23, Benjamin Seidenberg a écrit :
> Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > On 17 April 2006 at 22:42, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > | There are a few dozen source packages in the archive that contain
> > | a file called debian/rules.old. In many cases, this was
> > | apparently the bac
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 19:19:40 +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it's already quite penible to
>use experimental (to avoid to pull every single experimental package,
>you have to edit your /etc/apt/preferences,
Furthermore, /etc/apt/preferences doesn't allow wildcarded package
name
53 matches
Mail list logo
