Hi,
Am Montag, den 06.03.2006, 22:31 +0100 schrieb Jonas Genannt:
> * Package name: w3c-linkchecker
> Version : 4.2.1
> Upstream Author : Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~scop/
> * License : W3C Software License
>
Follow-up to myself:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 03:25:58PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm happy to report that there's been some positive progress regarding
> freetype's pending ABI transition since I last posted about it[1]. In
> response to concerns from a number of vendors about the disrupti
"Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006, Martin Schulze wrote:
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> > The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> > packages.
Mike Fogel wrote:
> hello all debian-devel,
>
> This seems like a very basic issue, but I've searched through the
> mailing lists and web and haven't found any help.
>
> I'm trying to create a basic set of custom packages which will hold some
> of our software, complied and customized as we like
hello all debian-devel,
This seems like a very basic issue, but I've searched through the
mailing lists and web and haven't found any help.
I'm trying to create a basic set of custom packages which will hold some
of our software, complied and customized as we like it for our machines.
We li
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006, Brian May wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 19:04 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> > > block 322762 with 355341
> > Bug#322762: /usr/doc still ex
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 19:04 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
> > block 322762 with 355341
> Bug#322762: /usr/doc still exists (transition tracking bug)
> Was blocked by: 1
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> donated by Schlund + Parner where it is hosted as well. It is a
> DualCore Opteron and only runs this service for Debian users and
> developers.
I think/hope it should read "runs only this service".
Hope that helps,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://pe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xsltsl
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Steve Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://xsltsl.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : XSLT Standard Library s
Hi folks,
I'm happy to report that there's been some positive progress regarding
freetype's pending ABI transition since I last posted about it[1]. In
response to concerns from a number of vendors about the disruptive effect
this transition would have on desktop distributions, freetype upstream h
Joey Hess wrote:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> > The services in the backup are:
>
> Are there any plans to add svn.debian.org / alioth to this set?
No.
Alioth will have its own backup facility.
> (/me is glad he's still backing up his svn repos on his own..)
Good.
Regards,
Joey
--
Lif
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > really cool and thanks to schlund and partner, but the links to the
> > changelogs and the copyright file at the bottom of each packages page
> > don't work. probbaly just something really minor...
>
> Didn't such things us
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Genannt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: w3c-linkchecker
Version : 4.2.1
Upstream Author : Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~scop/
* License : W3C Software License
Scripsit Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> really cool and thanks to schlund and partner, but the links to the
> changelogs and the copyright file at the bottom of each packages page
> don't work. probbaly just something really minor...
Didn't such things use to be static and cronjob-maintained
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Is this just the list from lintian.debian.org, or did you do somehting
> more fancy to find them?
Only removed packages that already had bugs filed from that.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 06:29:29PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> packages.debian.org service on a new machine. The system has been
> [...]
really cool and thanks to schlund and partner, but the links to the
changelogs and the cop
Martin Schulze wrote:
> The services in the backup are:
Are there any plans to add svn.debian.org / alioth to this set?
(/me is glad he's still backing up his svn repos on his own..)
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 03:11:30PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > It checks the User-Agent string.
>
> What are the expected results for a user accessing the following URL
> from IE running on a W2K terminal server? I didn't notice any
> restrictions.
>
> http://packages.debian.org/tuxpaint
Ma
Hi,
Am Montag, den 06.03.2006, 15:11 -0400 schrieb Ben Armstrong:
> On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:38 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > It checks the User-Agent string.
>
> What are the expected results for a user accessing the following URL
> from IE running on a W2K terminal server?
I guess the orig
Scripsit Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
>> It is a DualCore Opteron and only runs this service for Debian
>> users and developers.
> What does it mean that the machine runs this service only for Debian
> users and developers?
It proba
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:07:25PM -0600, Bob Tanner wrote:
> Works on linux or Windows (compiles as-is with g++ and MS Visual Studio)
> Object-oriented design separates the protocol into its basic parts
> Base interface class to be used for the actual user interaction
> Keeps track of buddies,
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:38 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> It checks the User-Agent string.
What are the expected results for a user accessing the following URL
from IE running on a W2K terminal server? I didn't notice any
restrictions.
http://packages.debian.org/tuxpaint
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> > > The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> > > packages.debian.org service on a new machine. The system has been
> > > donated by Schlund + Pa
Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> packages.debian.org service on a new machine. The system has been
> donated by Schlund + Parner where it is hosted as well. It is a
> DualCore Opteron and only runs this servi
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> > The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> > packages.debian.org service on a new machine. The system has been
> > donated by Schlund + Parner where it is hosted as well. It is a
> > DualCor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert J. Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libeqimbase
Version : 2004.12.15
Upstream Author : Tai Mai Shu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://teqim.sourceforge.net/?p=eqimbase
* License : GPL
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: geekast
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Frédéric Logier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gna.org/projects/geekast/
* License : GPL
Description : GNOME interface
At 1141304953, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > In any case, since the latest gnome has also disabled
> > the help system (or rather, the most up-to-date manual
> > is the accessibility guide for 2.8 and the user's guide
> > for 2.6), where has the
At 1141671548, Miles Bader wrote:
> If you attempted to view such code using an application
> which uses the standard tab size of 8 -- e.g., more or
> less in a terminal -- blocks would end up being indented
> by _16 spaces per block level_, which is (pardon my
> french) pretty fucking absurd.
Ind
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:05:34PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyway, I don't think GNOME bashing is really on-topic here.
>
> It's not gnome "bashing", it's just airing of a very common gripe with
> gnome. If there were indeed a viable fork that imp
Good Day sir. Am stanley from cameroon playing football. Sir i will like you to promote my talent in a proffessional way . Am a GOALKEEPER of age 17yrs old. I will be very happy if you make me show my talent to the world that am a real goalkeeper. Sir i want you
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 13:42 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > GNOME seems to be more and more focusing on the entry-level Linux user,
> > and less and less on advanced users. Most unfortunate, its much prettier
> > than KDE.
>
> Indeed. Wasn't there a
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Can you explain that?
Either the '{' and '}' are one indentation level down or the same indentation
level.
Hah! Not in GNU.
The GNU coding standards want you to indent '{' and '}' x/2 spaces, while
the code inside is indented x. So, the result is:
Am Montag, 6. März 2006 11:39 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
> 8bit tab width
s/8bit/8 spaces/
me is confused
HS
pgpWd6uTc4ZU0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Am Montag, 6. März 2006 10:59 schrieb Miles Bader:
> If you attempted to view such code using an application which uses the
> standard tab size of 8 -- e.g., more or less in a terminal -- blocks
> would end up being indented by _16 spaces per block level_, which is
> (pardon my french) pretty fucki
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, I don't think GNOME bashing is really on-topic here.
It's not gnome "bashing", it's just airing of a very common gripe with
gnome. If there were indeed a viable fork that improved on some bad
thing about gnome, but kept the good things, I think
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Losses: doesn't work well with many indenting styles (e.g. it would be a
>> complete lose for stuff indented in GNU style).
>
> Can you explain that?
>
> Either the '{' and '}' are one indentation level down or the same indentation
> level.
Because t
Re: Daniel Haude in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> again I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but let me ask anyway.
Please don't hijack random threads. Start a new one.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:40:22 -0500
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I plan to file normal severity bugs on the following 252 packages,
> which all still create /usr/doc symlinks and which don't yet have a
> bug filed about this. 23 such bugs already exist in the bts.
>
>
> Tim Dijkstra (tdy
On Monday 06 March 2006 10:43, Daniel Haude wrote:
> In the end I found out what was wrong: I had used an old install CD
> back from sarge==testing days. My /etc/apt/sources list therefore
> pointed at "testing" resources which, without a proper "dist-upgrade"
> (which at no point I had wanted beca
Hello Debian folks,
again I'm not sure if this is the right forum, but let me ask anyway.
Recently I installed a Debian sarge system on a brand-new system. In the
end the X server wouldn't start up because the installer couldn't identify
the video hardware.
So I did what I've done for year
Hi Joey!
> I plan to file normal severity bugs on the following 252 packages, which
> all still create /usr/doc symlinks and which don't yet have a bug filed
> about this. 23 such bugs already exist in the bts.
[snip list]
Is this just the list from lintian.debian.org, or did you do somehting
m
Hi Miles!
You wrote:
> Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > represented by tabs and alignment (like multi-line function arguments)
> > should
> > be done by spaces.
> > Gains: shows fine in _every_ editor, no need to set tab-width.
>
> Losses: doesn't work well with many indenting st
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:42:19PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > GNOME seems to be more and more focusing on the entry-level Linux user,
> > and less and less on advanced users. Most unfortunate, its much prettier
> > than KDE.
>
> Indeed. Wasn't t
Hello folks,
I hope I am in the right forum for this. This probably concerns
debian-installer.
I've been running several Debian sarge machines originating back from when
sarge was in testing stage. Recently I had occasion to install Debian on
another machine. I just popped in a netinstall
Am Montag, 6. März 2006 08:05 schrieb Miles Bader:
> Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > represented by tabs and alignment (like multi-line function arguments)
> > should be done by spaces.
> > Gains: shows fine in _every_ editor, no need to set tab-width.
>
> Losses: doesn't work well
46 matches
Mail list logo
