On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:14:26PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Matthew Grant wrote:
> > 2) Their stable release uses a kernel that is not patched for security
> > holes.
> It is, the status of the currently prepared sarge2 update
He was referring to the stable release of *Xen*, which is ba
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Also, as a part of recent maintenance update, the current "Debian New
> Maintainers' Guide" has following pointer at the start of "Chapter 3 -
> Modifying the source":
>
> Please make sure to read /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
> before pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/24/2006 10:03 AM, Cord Beermann wrote:
[...]
> [1] Bounce as in mutt b. I don't know if and how this can be done in
> thunderbird, or M$ LookOut. If it possible someone may explain
> it in a follow up. Forwarding is NOT ok at this tim
Hi
as recently mentioned on planet and some debconf lists I made sites for
past DebConf events available again. They are now all organized on the
debconf.org main server, so its easy to find them.
Use debconfX.debconf.org to access them, starting with zero and at the
time of this writing going up
Hi,
I took a look at your site yesterday...I do not know if you got my
original e-mail as my modem went down.
and I want to tell you that I'd really love to trade links with you. I think
your site has some really good stuff related to my site and would be a great
resource for my visitors.
In fa
Le jeudi 23 février 2006 à 19:56 -0500, Michael Gilbert a écrit :
> One final open-ended question is: which consumes more resources?
> Duplicate packaging or backporting?
No, the question is how is the Ubuntu project willing to spend its
resources.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 18:08 +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> One thing I desperately wish for is for a big flip switch to turn it
> off, even if I have KDE or GNOME installed, both on a packaging system
> level (for example, by having a package "disable-zeroconf" that helps me
> avoid installation)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Mike O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libswixml-java
Version : 1.4.4
Upstream Author : Wolf Paulus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : custom, see below
Description : a smal
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 11:30:16AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> A grave bug has been file against a package I maintain pointing out
> that the package does not work on AMD64 and in fact never has, even
> though it builds on AMD64. Since it turns out this package has never
> worked on AMD64, this b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philippe COVAL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fatresize
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Anton D. Kachalov
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/fatresize/
* License : GPL
Description : Command line tool f
Matthew Grant wrote:
> 2) Their stable release uses a kernel that is not patched for security
> holes.
It is, the status of the currently prepared sarge2 update can be found at
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelSargeUpdateStatus
> Fortunately, individual security fixes are almost all only small
"Shaun Jackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A grave bug has been file against a package I maintain pointing out
> that the package does not work on AMD64 and in fact never has, even
> though it builds on AMD64. Since it turns out this package has never
> worked on AMD64, this bug is not a regres
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I intend to package gnonlin.
* Package name: gnonlin
Version : 0.10.0.5
Upstream Author : Wim Taymans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 07:56:42PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> The solution would be to convince Ubuntu to branch from stable instead
> of sid. The problem is that this creates a lot of work for Ubuntu
> because they have to backport all of the desired bleeding-edge stuff.
> However, Debian d
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:01:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354417: general: "You have new mail" but how to read?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
15 matches
Mail list logo
