Re: timezone data packaged separately and in volatile?

On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:30:01PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: > But that doesn't mean that we can issue an update to a stable package. > > Currently they are mainly done for security purposes -- but stable updates > should not be confined to only that. They should be done to keep the > system fu

Re: timezone data packaged separately and in volatile?

On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:42:31PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Hi, > > I just realised that the timezone data in glibc is taken from an > upstream database (namely ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/). This data > sometimes changes, more rapidly than our release cycle (and than any > release cycle

Help with installing sgml/xml catalogue stuff

On Feb 6, Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi all! > > I am asking here since the debian-sgml list only contains spam in the > last few months. > > I want to install the following three files > texinfo.dtd > texinfo.xsl > texinfo.cat > in a debian conform wa

Re: Automatic testing of .deb's

On Monday 06 February 2006 19:53, Gustavo Franco wrote: > On 2/6/06, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ filing automatic package tests to the Debian bts ] > The Ubuntu maintainer should always open bugs with the test related stuff > and see if the Debian maintainer judge it's valuable or not

(no subject)

looking for a game in the leesburg eustis area thanks bob m

Re: Automatic testing of .deb's

On 2/6/06, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gustavo Franco writes ("Re: Automatic testing of .deb's"): > > On 2/2/06, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would like to have some idea what people think I should do with the > > > tests that we're hopefully going to have, eventually

Re: Automatic testing of .deb's

Gustavo Franco writes ("Re: Automatic testing of .deb's"): > On 2/2/06, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to have some idea what people think I should do with the > > tests that we're hopefully going to have, eventually for lots of > > packages. Would Debian like those tests

Re: MIT License are DFSG complicant ?

also sprach José Carlos do Nascimento Medeiros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.06.1746 +0100]: > I have a package (php-netcheckip) that was MIT licensed. > Debian suports this license ? Yes. http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .

MIT License are DFSG complicant ?

Hi,, I have a package (php-netcheckip) that was MIT licensed. Debian suports this license ? - The MIT License Copyright (c) Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the S

Bug#351656: RFH: libapache2-mod-annodex -- Provides server-side support for Annodex media

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I've created a mod_annodex package for Ubuntu, and I would love to see it in Debian. Anyone want to lend a hand? :-) deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~jdub/dapper/ ./ deb-src http://people.ubuntu.com/~jdub/dapper/ ./ Thanks, - Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [

Bug#351640: ITP: libhtml-widget-perl -- HTML Widget And Validation Framework

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libhtml-widget-perl Version : 1.03 Upstream Author : Sebastian Riedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://mirrors.kernel.org/cpan/modules/by-module/HTML/HTML-Widget

Help with installing sgml/xml catalogue stuff

Hi all! I am asking here since the debian-sgml list only contains spam in the last few months. I want to install the following three files texinfo.dtd texinfo.xsl texinfo.cat in a debian conform way. There is a bug 204117 which suggests that I install the dtd under /usr/sh