Package: libxml-atom-perl
Version: 0.09-1
Severity: wishlist
The package has gotten out of date again. Can you package the latest version,
0.16? Or if you are busy, let me know and I can do an NMU.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-xenU-p4
* Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-31 19:09]:
> Ok, after a quick look through the existing NEWS.Debian files on my box,
> I concede that this is the way most developers use the file. I still
> maintain that the information provided was useful, but it could probably
> go in some othe
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:34:39AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Ok, after a quick look through the existing NEWS.Debian files on my box,
> > I concede that this is the way most developers use the file.
>
> It's not a question of "the way mos
Scripsit Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ok, after a quick look through the existing NEWS.Debian files on my box,
> I concede that this is the way most developers use the file.
It's not a question of "the way most developers use the file". It's a
question of what the file is _for_. NEWS.D
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:15:00AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 06:03:06PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 07:36:37PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > Please remove the entry from NEWS.Debian and do not do this again.
> > > Users should not care
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to hijack 'equivs', as its maintainer (Fabio Rafael da Rosa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) is believed MIA.
I will wait a week or so to see he shows up.
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #349419
Owner: "Sébastien ESTIENNE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The debianization has been sent upstream
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers dapper-updates
APT policy: (500, 'dapper-updates'), (500, 'dapper-security'), (500, 'dapper')
Ar
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 06:03:06PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 07:36:37PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Please remove the entry from NEWS.Debian and do not do this again.
> > Users should not care about who maintains the package.
>
> Why not?
IMHO, NEWS.Debian sho
Il giorno mar, 31/01/2006 alle 18.03 -0600, Kenneth Pronovici ha
scritto:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 07:36:37PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Please remove the entry from NEWS.Debian and do not do this again.
> > Users should not care about who maintains the package.
>
> Why not?
Because NEWS.D
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 07:36:37PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Please remove the entry from NEWS.Debian and do not do this again.
> Users should not care about who maintains the package.
Why not?
(Besides, I listed in the previous news item that the package was up for
adoption, so it only seem
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Baishampayan Ghose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: latex2man
Version : 1.19
Upstream Author : Dr. Jürgen Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.informatik-vollmer.de/software/latex2man.php
* License : LaTeX Pr
reopen 190560 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 188439 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Hi,
the package is there in agnula, will be uploading soon.
kernel-patch-bootsplash (2.6.15-0) unstable; urgency=low
* Add patch for 2.6.15
-- Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:51:48 +0100
ker
also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.01.31.1936 +0100]:
> Please remove the entry from NEWS.Debian and do not do this again.
> Users should not care about who maintains the package.
Why send this to debian-devel? I suggest talking to Chris directly
first.
--
Please do not send copi
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:50:44PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Lionel Elie Mamane]
>> The remaining question is the equivs package, which is NMU-maintained
>> these days. I suppose that the qa group should take it after a week
>> or two?
> If you think it should be orphaned / hijacked, I'm w
[Lionel Elie Mamane]
> The remaining question is the equivs package, which is NMU-maintained
> these days. I suppose that the qa group should take it after a week
> or two?
If you think it should be orphaned / hijacked, I'm willing to adopt it.
I use it.
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The remaining question is the equivs package, which is NMU-maintained
> these days. I suppose that the qa group should take it after a week or
> two?
Hijack it?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
---
Please remove the entry from NEWS.Debian and do not do this again.
Users should not care about who maintains the package.
> xmltv (0.5.42-2) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * After talking with Kenneth J. Pronovici, I have now taken over
> maintainence of this package. I use XMLTV on a regular ba
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:23:28PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Otavio, you seem to have been his sponsor, do you have any news
>> from him in the last 6 months (or since January, 1st 2005, for that
>> matter)? Anybody else?
> I didn't have any
Dear Mr(s),
I sent you a link exchange request a few days ago, and just wanted to
make sure you got it.
For any case please find my previews mail below:
=
My previews mail:
Dear Mr(s),
I visited your site (debian.org) today, and I really like it.
19 matches
Mail list logo
