Bug#345403: ITP: libhtml-tagcloud-perl -- HTML::TagCloud - Generate An HTML Tag Cloud

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libhtml-tagcloud-perl Version : 0.32 Upstream Author : Leon Brocard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~lbrocard/HTML-TagCloud/ * License : dual GPL/Artist

Bug#345399: ITP: maypole-authentication-usersessioncookie -- Maypole::Authentication::UserSessionCookie - Track sessions and, optionally, users

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: maypole-authentication-usersessioncookie Version : 1.4 Upstream Author : Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~simon/Maypole-Authentication-UserSession

Bug#345398: ITP: maypole-plugin-upload -- Maypole::Plugin::Upload - Handle file uploads in Maypole

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: maypole-plugin-upload Version : 0.02 Upstream Author : Marcus Ramberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~mramberg/Maypole-Plugin-Upload/ * License : dual

Bug#345397: ITP: libtest-mockmodule-perl -- Test::MockModule - Override subroutines in a module for unit testing

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libtest-mockmodule-perl Version : 0.05 Upstream Author : Simon Flack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~simonflk/Test-MockModule/ * License : dual GPL/Art

Re: poppler maintenance

On Wed, Dec 28, 2005, Frank Küster wrote: > Now I've learned that poppler has just been orphaned > (http://bugs.debian.org/344738) and that the sources are already in the > pkg-gnome svn repository. Will you maintain the package as a team? (It seems this question is now answered by the adoption

Re: debian "experimental"

2005-12-30 21:03 +0100, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Le Ven 30 Décembre 2005 17:06, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:48:06PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib > > > non-free deb-src http://

Re: debian "experimental"

Le Ven 30 Décembre 2005 17:06, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:48:06PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib > > non-free deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main > > contrib non-free > > So why

Re: pthread development problem

    NOTE AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY This and any attachments contain information from  Vladimir Goldstern, which is confidential and/or privileged.  The information is intended for the use of the above addresse only.  If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, d

Re: stable aliases for CD drives

I demand that Adrian von Bidder may or may not have written... [snip] > stable Ethernet interface names suddenly becoming unstable in out of the > box upgrades is not funny either. Yes, there are solutions, but at least > one of these needs to be installed in a default installation of Debian. >

Re: stable aliases for CD drives

I demand that Marco d'Itri may or may not have written... > On Dec 29, Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I remember [%e etc.] being reliable. Sacrificing their reliability at the >> altar of boot speed (AIUI) wasn't really a good idea... > No reliability will be sacrified, [...] That'd b

Re: stable aliases for CD drives

On Dec 29, Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I remember them being reliable. Sacrificing their reliability at the altar of > boot speed (AIUI) wasn't really a good idea... No reliability will be sacrified, but some things will have to be implemented differently. -- ciao, Marco signature

Bug#345353: O: mantis

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I originally adopted the Mantis package because I hoped that a previous employer would start using the .deb instead of local installations. This didn't happen, so I have never really been a user of the package maintained by me. What's worse: Support from upstream in

Bug#345313: general: after upgrade in testing many gtk grograms do not run

reassign 345313 libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2 retitle 345313 libgtk2.0-0: after upgrade in testing many gtk grograms do not run thank you Hi Marcin, please as first thing to do is to go read: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting After you read and understood what did you do wrong when you filled 'general

Re: Bug#345160: ITP: libgpod -- a library to read and write songs and artwork to an iPod

Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 10:54:25AM +0100, Christian Marillat <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >> No issues for this package. I simply did these packages because this is >> more fast to me, instead of waiting for an official package. Nice to play >> wi

Re: net-tools maintenance status

On 12/22/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/16/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/16/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 08:03:47PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > > > Bernd? > > > > > > I dont like the prpos

Re: Bug#345160: ITP: libgpod -- a library to read and write songs and artwork to an iPod

On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 10:54:25AM +0100, Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There is already a libgpod0 package on Christian Marillat's archive, so I > > guess there must be an issue regarding this package's relation with debian. >

Re: Archive architecture qualification

* John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-30 10:25]: > > Anyway, that's the general idea; hopefully it'll become clearer > > later. Given release architectures have de-facto requalified, candidates > > for archive (re)qualification are ttbomk: ... > Does this mean that archs not listed (such as a

Re: debian "experimental"

On 30/12/05, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So why do you use ftp.debian.org and not ftp.pl.debian.org for > experimental? Now I use ftp.pl.debian.org. > > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz: > > 404 Not Found > > So ftp.debian.org seems to be b

Re: Archive architecture qualification

On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 03:32:43AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Anyway, that's the general idea; hopefully it'll become clearer > later. Given release architectures have de-facto requalified, candidates > for archive (re)qualification are ttbomk: > > * arm, m68k, s390, sparc > * am

Re: debian "experimental"

On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:48:06PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free > deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ experimental main contrib non-free So why do you use ftp.debian.org and not ftp.pl.debian.org for experimental?

Re: debian "experimental"

Hi, On 30/12/05, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:12:23PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have noticed that directory > > debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-i386 is empty. > > Where is new "experimental" repository? > > -rw-r--r-- 1 mirror m

Re: stable aliases for CD drives

On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 11:48:56AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > "Network interfaces may be renamed after sarge to etch upgrades" is > acceptable. "Network interfaces may completely lose any stable naming and > may be randomly named after every reboot after sarge to etch upgrades > unless y

Re: debian "experimental"

On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:12:23PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > I have noticed that directory > debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-i386 is empty. > Where is new "experimental" repository? Unless there is a problem with the mirror you are using that directory should contain a Release and P

Re: debian "experimental"

On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:12:23PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > I have noticed that directory > debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-i386 is empty. > Where is new "experimental" repository? -rw-r--r-- 1 mirror mirror 1288427 2005-12-29 21:14 Packages drwxr-sr-x 2 mirror mirror

debian "experimental"

Hi, I have noticed that directory debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-i386 is empty. Where is new "experimental" repository? Regards, Michal Piotrowski

Sascha Einloft ist nicht im Büro.

Ich werde ab 24.12.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 02.01.2006. Bitte wenden Sie sich während meiner Abwesenheit an meine Kollegen von der IT-Abteilung unter der Telefonnummer: +49 (8272) 86-555. Ihr Mail wird nicht automatisch weitergeleitet! Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Sascha Einlo

Re: ITK: debmake

Ok, to make things gradual, this is what I plan to do: * Announce this in -devel-announce to celebrate the new year. * Wait a few weeks. * Submit wishlist bugs against all packages affected (which I hope they will not be as much as 78 by then). * After the release of etch, debmake will be remov

Re: dependencies on makedev

pe, 2005-12-30 kello 09:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst kirjoitti: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 05:31:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 12:40:37AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > > > > Indeed. Editing plain text configuration files has never been the Unix > > > > way, and vi certainly

Re: stable aliases for CD drives

On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 12:02:44AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Finn-Arne Johansen wrote: > > Would it not be enough for apt if d-i created an fstab that linked > > /dev/hdX -> /media/cdrom ? > > Hmm, that's what it does, so maybe things will be ok. I don't know > really what else might depend on th

Bug#345313: general: after upgrade in testing many gtk grograms do not run

Package: general Severity: important Hi, The upgrade log: === [UAKTUALNIONY] alsa-base 1.0.10-1 -> 1.0.10-3 [UAKTUALNIONY] console-data 2002.12.04dbs-50 -> 2002.12.04dbs-52 [UAKTUALNIONY] dash 0.5.2-8 -> 0.5.3-1

Re: dependencies on makedev

Adam Heath writes: > What ever happened to standard unix tools? chmod/mkdir/chown/mv? > > You're suggesting doing things like some other OS(like Windows, were you have > to edit a registry). I agree with you, but OTOH, if I change something in /usr, I have to fuck around with dpkg-statoverride

Re: poppler (was: Work-needing packages report for Dec 30, 2005)

Frank Küster wrote: >>poppler (#344738), orphaned 4 days ago >> Reverse Depends: libpoppler-glib-dev libpoppler-dev abiword-plugins >>libpoppler-qt-dev libkpathsea4 evince libpoppler0c2-qt tetex-bin >>libpoppler0c2-glib > > ... and hopefully some more in the future. There

Re: ITK: debmake

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > On Friday 30 December 2005 03.18, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Santiago: > > > As a realistic goal, I estimate that etch will be the last release > > > containing debmake, but of course, I would be deligthed to see it > > > happen sooner. > > > > It woul

Re: Bug#341894: ITP: pessulus -- lockdown editor for GNOME

> Any news on this? You didn't answer, and Pessulus is not yet in Sid, nor > in experimental. > Please take also into account Thomas Viehmann's comment on adding the > term "kiosk" to the description. Since I have some free time today, I took pessulus from pkg-gnome svn, updated it to 0.3 and did

Package dependencies due to documentation relationships?

In #303948 it is requested that coreutils Suggest: glibc-doc on the grounds that documentation in the former links to documentation in the latter. I have seen other requests of this kind and I have never been sure how these situations are supposed to be handled. Are there policies or recommendatio

Re: ITK: debmake

On Friday 30 December 2005 03.18, Anthony Towns wrote: > Santiago: > > As a realistic goal, I estimate that etch will be the last release > > containing debmake, but of course, I would be deligthed to see it > > happen sooner. > > It would be pretty lame if we couldn't do this in less than a year..

Re: ITK: debmake

Santiago Vila wrote: > Therefore, I hereby announce my Intention To Kill debmake. Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >emacspeak I think this has been orphaned, and is waiting for adoption. Cc'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Frank -- Frank Kü

Re: stable aliases for CD drives

On Friday 30 December 2005 01.19, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 05:55:03PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > > On Thursday 29 December 2005 14.45, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote: > > > Would it not be enough for apt if d-i created an fstab that linked > > > /dev/hdX -> /media/cdrom ?

Re: Bug#341894: ITP: pessulus -- lockdown editor for GNOME

Le dimanche 04 décembre 2005 à 11:25 +0100, Jérôme Warnier a écrit : > Le samedi 03 décembre 2005 à 21:23 -0200, Guilherme de S. Pastore a > écrit : > > Em Sáb, 2005-12-03 às 22:54 +0100, Jerome Warnier escreveu: > > > Package: wnpp > > > Severity: wishlist > > > Owner: Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: dependencies on makedev

On Dec 30, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, I have a package that depends on makedev (pbbuttonsd) and I was > wondering why it doesn't show up in your list? Maybe because it > is powerpc only? Yes, I did build the list on my x86 box. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description:

Re: dependencies on makedev

On Dec 30, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bug filed.) Next, it looks like you edit 020_permissions.rules (or > rather the file it is symlinked to). Maybe you change this line: > > ENV{ID_CDROM}=="?*",GROUP="cdrom" > > to > > ENV{ID_CDROM}=="?*", KERN

Re: dependencies on makedev

On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:39:01PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > To prepare for the eventual removal of makedev, I propose that packages > currently depending on it will add an alternative dependency to udev. > Also, policy should be amended accordingly. > > The affected packages are: [...] Hmm, I

Re: Bug#345160: ITP: libgpod -- a library to read and write songs and artwork to an iPod

Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There is already a libgpod0 package on Christian Marillat's archive, so I > guess there must be an issue regarding this package's relation with debian. No issues for this package. I simply did these packages because this is more fast to me, instead of

Re: Bug#345160: ITP: libgpod -- a library to read and write songs and artwork to an iPod

Hello, Am Freitag, den 30.12.2005, 08:35 +0100 schrieb Frank Lichtenheld: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 11:55:17PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > There is already a libgpod0 package on Christian Marillat's archive, so I > > guess there must be an issue regarding this package's relation with debian.

Re: poppler (was: Work-needing packages report for Dec 30, 2005)

On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 09:33 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested > > through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the > > last week. > > > > Total number of orphaned packages: 172

Re: dependencies on makedev

On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 05:31:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 12:40:37AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > > > Indeed. Editing plain text configuration files has never been the Unix > > > way, and vi certainly isn't a standard unix tool. > > No, I'm saying why are people attempt

poppler (was: Work-needing packages report for Dec 30, 2005)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested > through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the > last week. > > Total number of orphaned packages: 172 (new: 3) > Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 96 (new: