Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The proposal by upstream is to configure libstdc++ to use the new
> allocator again (the default one).
I've noticed that with recent updates, I'm suddenly getting tons of
undefined function errors resulting from STL-related template
instantiation. [I'v
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ> You're correct, although it's very close. It will be
> Russ> possible with the 1.4.1 release (and is almost possible
> Russ> right now but openafs-krb5 is too old; I'm waiting for t
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russ> You're correct, although it's very close. It will be
Russ> possible with the 1.4.1 release (and is almost possible
Russ> right now but openafs-krb5 is too old; I'm waiting for the
Russ> 1.4.1 release to retire the open
Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> while preparing an upload of gcc-2.95 which fixes its worst problems
> I wondered how many users of it are actually left. 9 packages in
> unstable still declare a build dependency on gcc-2.95 or g++-2.95,
> this makes it IMHO a plausible release goal to
On November 11, 2005 19:53, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I prepared a new package of grub for upload in next days. It still
> needs some work but looks like a good improvement.
>
> Would be good if you could do a brief test of it and provide feedback
> directly to me. If it solve any previous bug that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Haas wrote:
> Hi, Arnaud...
Hi Christoph,
> Andreas Barth wrote recently:
>
>>It is now on bts2ldap.debian.net (but this host name has the advantage
>>that it can stay, even if the ldap-server moves once again :), port is
>>10101.
>
> A q
Dear Webmaster I handle online
marketing for my client http://www.timetin.com/
To increase the link popularity of my client's site , we are now
looking for traingular Link swapping with some good quality sites. You are
already aware that Triangular Link swapping is much more popular and b
Dear Webmaster I handle online
marketing for my client http://www.timetin.com/
To increase the link popularity of my client's site , we are now
looking for traingular Link swapping with some good quality sites. You are
already aware that Triangular Link swapping is much more popular and b
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 21:07 +0100, Miros/law Baran wrote:
> 16.11.2005 pisze Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Debian is staffed by volunteers who do this because they want to.
> > I, for one, appreciate very, very much what they do for me.
>
>
> Writing/maintaining software is providing a
Hi, Arnaud...
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 16:58, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> I'd like to query the bts automatically to write an application where I
> could summarize bug counts and release bloquers for the java team.
>
> Is there a way to query the bts and receive the response in a way it's
> easil
Anyone knows why I'm getting all these errors?
Sid
I know I need some PGP settings but there are a lot of errors now with apt-get
update and apt-get upgrade... basically most of times it will say that it was
unable to fetch a file and then keep downloading at a high speed. Plus it also
mentions th
16.11.2005 pisze Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Debian is staffed by volunteers who do this because they want to.
> I, for one, appreciate very, very much what they do for me.
Writing/maintaining software is providing a service (even when
it's free). You need to listen to your customers if y
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 07:33 -0800, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 04:12:45PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> > > The situation is: gcc-2.95 is no longer needed to compile debian packages,
> > > but it is still needed for other tasks, by many people.
> >
> > By whom, and for what?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 02:17:08PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
> I wouldn't call it a "mirror" though; how does it manage to fetch the
> complete repository including history? It doesn't do something evil
> like fetch the cvs log, and then fetch every single revision for
> every file, does it?
Looki
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: feynmf
Version : 1.08
Upstream Author : Thorsten Ohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/feynmf/
* License : GPL
Descripti
> Debian is not rushing to drop gcc 2.95, but in the long run, it's
> inevitable. Or, to put it in your words, there is a business case for
> dropping gcc 2.95 support in etch.
If current debian maintainer(s) don't want to maintain gcc-2.95 any longer,
they should probably orphan it, just like any
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:02:40AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>gramps
Fixed in gramps 2.0.8-5.
--
James Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Carrigan writes:
> I am quite sure that there are Debian *users* out there that have legacy
> code that only builds under gcc 2.95 (or more likely g++ 2.95) and they
> haven't ported it to a newer C compiler because there is no business
> case for it.
>
> Removing a package simply because th
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 12:05, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Device driver development for embedded systems? There are embedded
> > systems, including x86-based, that run kernels which fail to compile with
> > gcc >= 3.x.
>
> In that case you likely need as well an older binutils version, which
>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> Replacement (2.6 Kernel) in the works, should be removed once 2.6 is
> stable enough:
>
>Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> kernel-image-2.4.27-m68kBuild-Depends: gcc-2.95
> kernel-patch-2.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 04:01:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> If a domain was set up to be treated this way for an unrelated reasons
> without an announcement anywhere, surely that is even worse !
Well, it's no longer "DSA is making misleading statements about the nature
of the problem"; the fact
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 23:03 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 05:15:28PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 23:59 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > > I understand that, and the whole proposal. And it will break a lot of
> > > > things for many of my u
* Dave Carrigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005:11:16 07:33 -0800]:
> I am quite sure that there are Debian *users* out there that have legacy
> code that only builds under gcc 2.95 (or more likely g++ 2.95) and they
> haven't ported it to a newer C compiler because there is no business
> case for it.
Dave Carrigan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 04:12:45PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>>>The situation is: gcc-2.95 is no longer needed to compile debian packages,
>>>but it is still needed for other tasks, by many people.
>>By whom, and for what? So far I haven't heard a specific project's
>>name
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'd like to query the bts automatically to write an application where I
could summarize bug counts and release bloquers for the java team.
Is there a way to query the bts and receive the response in a way it's
easily parsable?
I heard about bts+
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 02:51:10PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
> On 15 Nov 2005, at 2:34 pm, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > No: there is nothing "proper" about rejecting mail from a host
> > that you have configured to forward mail for you.
>
> I can see where you're coming from, but it's unavoidable, isn'
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 04:12:45PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > The situation is: gcc-2.95 is no longer needed to compile debian packages,
> > but it is still needed for other tasks, by many people.
>
> By whom, and for what? So far I haven't heard a specific project's
> name.
Debian does not
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> >> > The need for gcc-2.95 usually means the source code is broken (in C99
> >> > terms) and should be fixed. Do you have an example of an use case where
> >> > this is unfeasible, and which is important enough to justify continued
> >> > maintenance of gcc 2.95?
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15 Nov 2005, at 2:34 pm, Steve Langasek wrote:
* The mail backlog that `will never be able to be delivered' was
(as far as I can tell) all spam that chiark has been properly
rejecting.
No: there is nothing "proper" about rejecting mail
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 11:02:40AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Thanks to the introduction of dh_gconf, the list of packages shipping
> their GConf schemas in /etc has dramatically reduced. I think it's time
> to file bugs against the remaining packages. These packages should use
> dh_gconf, b
>> > The need for gcc-2.95 usually means the source code is broken (in C99
>> > terms) and should be fixed. Do you have an example of an use case where
>> > this is unfeasible, and which is important enough to justify continued
>> > maintenance of gcc 2.95?
>>
>> Device driver development for embe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: glpk-shlib
Version : 4.8
Upstream Author : Andrew Makhorin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/glpk/glpk.html
* License : GPL
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libhttp-request-ascgi-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Christian Hansen, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~mramberg/HTTP-Request-AsCGI-0.2/
*
On 11 Nov 2005, at 2:32 pm, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
CVSsuck is a mirroring tool for CVS repositories. Unlike other
tools such as CVSup or rsync, it uses cvs command to access the
repository. So, it works well with remote repositories without
a special server or shell account. However it is
Hi,
Aaron Isotton wrote:
As far as I can see at least for the packages using autotools this
should not be too difficult; it should be enough to adapt debian/control
to generate the mingw32 packages and debian/rules to pass an appropriate
'--host' parameter to configure.
If the package is suff
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 01:46:04AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Steve Langasek]
> > python-dev provides an interface that packages can build-depend on
> > which gives them both /usr/bin/python, and a set of development tools
> > from the corresponding version of python. This is not analogous
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> These packages should use
> dh_gconf, build-depend on debhelper >= 4.2.13 and depend on
> ${misc:Depends}. Packages using cdbs just have to use the gnome.mk
> template to benefit of it.
Thanks Joss, I hij
Hi,
I want to use Debian to develop some cross-platform (Linux and Windows)
programs. Compiling programs which don't use any libraries works fine
using mingw32, but obviously I cannot use the same libraries for both.
To avoid cluttering the build tree with libraries needed for Windows
only, I'd l
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
> >> The need for gcc-2.95 usually means the source code is broken (in C99
> >> terms) and should be fixed. Do you have an example of an use case where
> >> this is unfeasible, and which is important enough to justify continued
> >> main
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
[snip]
> > Also, people have some code (old completed internal projects, etc), which
> > probably would never be ported to newer C++ standards (it's plainly too big
> > job), but which are still useful to keep working - e.g. for
> > demonstration/
Enrico Zini([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-11-15 17:55:
> I implemented a new kind of package search, here:
>
> http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/search.cgi
Nice.
Could this be tied in with the results of the popularity contest to
give a ranking of results?
Often several packages provide the
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
>
>
> > Dave Carrigan wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> >>
> >> > this makes it IMHO a plausible release goal to get rid of 2.95
> >> > maintenance for etch.
> >>
> >> No it is not. Just because debian packages don't use 2.
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:30:00PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> > The need for gcc-2.95 usually means the source code is broken (in C99
> > terms) and should be fixed. Do you have an example of an use case where
> > this is unfeasible, and which is important enough to justif
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
>> The need for gcc-2.95 usually means the source code is broken (in C99
>> terms) and should be fixed. Do you have an example of an use case where
>> this is unfeasible, and which is important enough to justify continued
>> maintenance of gcc 2.95?
[..]
> Also,
> Dave Carrigan wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>>
>> > this makes it IMHO a plausible release goal to get rid of 2.95
>> > maintenance for etch.
>>
>> No it is not. Just because debian packages don't use 2.95 doesn't mean
>> that end users have the same
Hi,
Thanks to the introduction of dh_gconf, the list of packages shipping
their GConf schemas in /etc has dramatically reduced. I think it's time
to file bugs against the remaining packages. These packages should use
dh_gconf, build-depend on debhelper >= 4.2.13 and depend on
${misc:Depends}. Pack
47 matches
Mail list logo
