[redirecting this to -devel; discussions of ftp team NEW queue policies are
off-topic for -release.]
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:13:47PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > And thats what I asked for, yes. Drop the version from -dev|-dbg|-doc,
> > use the shlib system for the rest (which makes pac
Scribit Josselin Mouette dies 12/11/2005 hora 18:37:
> It was already suggested to accept only source+binary uploads, but to
> rebuild the binaries on the upload's architecture anyway.
Has there been a consensus on rejecting that solution?
Curiously,
Nowhere man
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9
Scribit Manoj Srivastava dies 11/11/2005 hora 22:35:
> You gotta start trusting somewhere. Our web of trust starts with the
> Developers in the keyring, we trust these people not to muck with the
> binaries.
You trust them, but not any user of Debian will want to trust them so
much. Some will want
Shaun Jackman wrote:
> In the following email Chris suggests that I add support for bit
> torrent magnet:// URLs under Gnome2 in the Azureus package by setting
> the gconftool-2 parameter /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/magnet/command
> to call Azureus. This seems like a pretty reasonable thing to do,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:38:10PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 11:17:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 04:56:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > It resembles describing charity as "investment with no return".
> > Perhaps; though there are diff
In the following email Chris suggests that I add support for bit
torrent magnet:// URLs under Gnome2 in the Azureus package by setting
the gconftool-2 parameter /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/magnet/command
to call Azureus. This seems like a pretty reasonable thing to do, but
it must be done for each
Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> * Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-14 18:46:50]:
Hold on - does this mean I will or won't be able to do
apt-get install debconf6-doc
>>
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:17:06 +1000 Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Well, it's not an inaccurate description (I think), but you would
> > use such a definition only if you think that charity is a stupid
> > thing to do...
>
> So, if I'm parsing you right, you're saying that a person (such as
> myself) wo
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> * Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-14 18:46:50]:
>>> Hold on - does this mean I will or won't be able to do
>>> apt-get install debconf6-doc
>>
>> you will, and most likely it will be 100% com
Loudly promoting my own software here...
la, 2005-11-12 kello 10:39 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh kirjoitti:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Besides, depends/pre-depends and conflicts should be more than enough if
> > > done right.
> >
> > Yes, this is what is meant by sup
Dear Webmaster I handle online
marketing for my clients As an ogoing process to increase the link
popularity of my client site, i am looking for some good quality sites to
exchange links..I would request you to kindly consider my client site and add
this to your link page with the followin
Dear Webmaster I handle online
marketing for my clients As an ogoing process to increase the link
popularity of my client site, i am looking for some good quality sites to
exchange links..I would request you to kindly consider my client site and add
this to your link page with the followin
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-14 18:46:50]:
>> Hold on - does this mean I will or won't be able to do
>> apt-get install debconf6-doc
>
> you will, and most likely it will be 100% complete. if someone
> packages it.
Uhhh, why would
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 08:40:04AM +0100, Brian May wrote:
> Is a back port available for sarge? If not, how feasible would it be
> to create on? Does it depend on anything not in sarge?
Approx needs the current version of libocamlnet-ocaml-dev,
but otherwise should compile and work OK in sarge.
* Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-14 18:46:50]:
> Hold on - does this mean I will or won't be able to do
> apt-get install debconf6-doc
you will, and most likely it will be 100% complete. if someone
packages it.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The same benefit that accrue from freedom of software still
> remain if that software bits represent a presentation; the
> software/presentation can be modified to suit a particular need, and
> redistributed, excepts can be used in other
Matthias Klose a écrit :
* Once dependencies are fulfilled for all architectures, request
binNMU's for all other packages depending on a library package with
a changed package name.
If a source upload is necessary for other fixes, wait as well until
dependencies are fulfilled for all
On 12:14 Mon 14 Nov 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [Sent to d-d-a as well, didn't arrive there yet]
Did you actually sign the mail to d-d-a?
Quoting http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/:
Only messages signed by a Debian developer will be accepted by this
list.
Cheers,
-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kitty
Version : 0.9.2
Upstream Author : KesieV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.kesiev.com/kittyguide/home/
* License : GPL
Description : a Qt/KDE based RSS podca
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 11:17:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 04:56:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > It resembles describing charity as "investment with no return".
>
> Perhaps; though there are differences. Charity does have returns: both
> emotionally/psychologica
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:04:51 +0100, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Scripsit David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> From reading the responses from Andreas, rather than people trying
>> poorly to interpret him, it's pretty apparent that they'll be
>> giving freely licensed talks a great
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:21:38 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 06:59:41AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
>> > On Nov 13, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I think the best reason to ask or require contributors
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: barnyard
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Andrew R. Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Roesch <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/barnyard/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sancp
Version : 1.6.1
Upstream Author : John Curry [ john dot curry at metre dot net ]
* URL : http://www.metre.net/sancp.html
* License : QPL
Description : network s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Bahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sguil
Version : 0.5.3
Upstream Author : Bamm Visscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.sguil.org/
* License : QPL
Description : Realtime network security monitor
On 11/14/05, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I case you hadn't noticed, there was a major _difference_ in opionons
> about how "software" was to be interpreted. The editorial
> clarification in 2004-003 removed the confusion by avoiding the
> ambiguous word "software"
Unfortunately n
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> If your old prerm fails, the new prerm should be called with
>>> "failed-upgrade" as its first argument (see Policy 6.4 and 6.5),
>>> so you can do any necessary workarounds there. Errors in postrm
>>> are handled similarly.
>>
>> But what would be th
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 03:04:51PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > From reading the responses from Andreas, rather than people trying poorly
> > to interpret him, it's pretty apparent that they'll be giving freely
> > licensed talks a greater weight
Scripsit Anthony Towns
> In case you hadn't noticed, for the Debian project's purposes software
> is a synonym for computer programs; if it weren't the reversion of the
> social contract would have had no effect on the "non-free documentation
> in main" question.
I case you hadn't noticed, there
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Oh, and here's something else to ponder: Maybe, just maybe, James has
> more time to go to Ubuntu below zero than he has to handle keyring
> updates because he prioritizes by what gets the bills paid. As most of
> us do, I suppose.
Maybe, just maybe, someone else should be
Scripsit David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From reading the responses from Andreas, rather than people trying poorly
> to interpret him, it's pretty apparent that they'll be giving freely
> licensed talks a greater weight than non-free ones. They're also going to
> make it easy to choose a free
Hi all,
it seems that just reading the policy again sometimes solves a problem...
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:25:01PM +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> was heard to say:
>>> we just received a bug r
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 06:59:41AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> > On Nov 13, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I think the best reason to ask or require contributors to licenses
> >> their papers in a DFSG form is so that Debian ca
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 04:56:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:28:41 +1000 Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:26:55PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > I disagree with your calling "licensing in a DFSG-free manner" as
> > > "giving up rights": this seems
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cvsconnect
Version : 0.1
* URL : http://cvs.m17n.org/~akr/cvssuck/
* License : BSD
Description : CVS connection minimizer
CVSconnect enables you to do multiple CVS
Quoting "Ivan S. Dubrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The problem is I can't find thorough documentation or some kind of "How To"
> there I can find how to write these extensions. Although they just simply
> pieces of make-files, I find it difficult to start understanding them. For
> example, the diffire
[Sent to d-d-a as well, didn't arrive there yet]
Another round of package renamings of some libraries written in C++ is
needed. Background:
libstdc++6 is currently configured to use the mt allocator based on
discussions in April 2004 with upstream libstdc++ developers. This
configuration turned o
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:25:01PM +0100, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
>> we just received a bug report that is caused by a buggy prerm script
>> in the package in sarge (it fails because it doesn't handle read-only
>> /usr/local
Could anybody point me to some documentation or example of writing custom
rules/classes for CDBS?
BTW, is there other build systems like CDBS?
WBR,
Ivan Dubrov
The best I could find is
https://perso.duckcorp.org/duck/cdbs-doc/cdbs-doc.xhtml
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
#include
* Eric Cooper [Mon, Nov 07 2005, 09:18:15AM]:
> > Is there a good alternative?
>
> I wrote approx for exactly this purpose. It's now in testing.
Update your package description please. Current apt-cacher does not
require Apache.
Eduard.
--
Elric: We are dreamers, shapers, singers, an
40 matches
Mail list logo
