Well, I understand that systrace is a little more lightweight, and
easier to configure.
So I (and others I think) would still be interested in having systrace
included in debian.
But I cannot tell how much effort that is, which was also part of my question.
Stephan
On 10/21/05, Gustavo Franco <[
* David Moreno Garza [Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:59:48 -0500]:
Hola David,
> There is no need at all, to have more useless duplicated bug reports,
> specially on wnpp. Only those duplicated bug reports with useful
> information in it should remain open.
I disagree with this: bugs should always be mer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sam Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pwsafe
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Nicolas S. Dade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://nsd.dyndns.org/pwsafe/
* License : GPL
Description : command line encrypted
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 09:41:15AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian> What is the preferred way of closing bugs that are not bugs
> Brian> (e.g. mistake by the submitter)? -- Brian May
> Brian> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Has the "reas
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> What is the preferred way of closing bugs that are not bugs
Brian> (e.g. mistake by the submitter)? -- Brian May
Brian> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Has the "reassign" command changed? What versions apply if you
reassign a bug to a
To: debian-devel, bug#315059 and submitter
CC: krb4 maintainer and openafs maintainers
Hello,
There have been increasing calls for me to drop krb4 support in
Heimdal (first in bug #315059 and now by upstream in bug #334632 - it
would also solve #236851). It would also eliminate confusion such as
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 03:32:57PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Saturday 22 October 2005 12:08, Rudolf Weeber wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Rudolf Weeber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: dspam
> > Version : x.y.z
> > Upstream Author : Dee
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dnspython
Version : 1.3.4
Upstream Author : Bob Halley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dnspython.org
* License :
Description : DNS toolkit for Python
dnspytho
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 10:23:24AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Steve Langasek]
> > This seems like an opportune time for someone to write a config
> > interface for /etc/pam.d/common-*, so that we have a generally
> > useful means of enabling other PAM modules as well.
>
> Good idea. We
Package: wnppSeverity: wishlist
* Package name : jahshaka
Version : 2.0RC1
Upstream Author : Jah Shaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*
URL
: http://www.jahshaka.org
* License : GPL
Description : Realtime editing and effects system
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Also, RFCs with the new license doesn't include the license template
>> itself, it just reference BCP 78. So if BCP 78 is updated, perhaps it
>> automatically apply to RFCs that simply reference BC
unmerge 335173
close 335173
thanks dudes
There is no need at all, to have more useless duplicated bug reports,
specially on wnpp. Only those duplicated bug reports with useful
information in it should remain open.
A patch for reportbug (checking the package names intended to be
reported against w
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, RFCs with the new license doesn't include the license template
> itself, it just reference BCP 78. So if BCP 78 is updated, perhaps it
> automatically apply to RFCs that simply reference BCP 78. I doubt the
> legality of that too.
Is that comp
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 04:28:37PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sat, October 22, 2005 10:04, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > I maintain one such list on alioth, and I have not been able to find a
> > way to let bug reports and other debian-related messages get into the lists
> > unmoderated wi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brett Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-django
Version : 1.0.0 (when it's released)
* URL : http://www.djangoproject.com/
* License : BSD
Description : A high-level Python Web framework
Django is a h
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson writes:
>> Is that license acceptable to the Debian community?
>
> Looks fine to me. Is it going to be retroactive?
It is a good question. The RFC Editor has claimed that the RFC 2026
license apply to older RFCs too, in particular RFC 15
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kbfx
Version : 4.7.3
Upstream Author : Siraj Razick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linuxlots.com/~siraj/kde/plugin/home/
* License : GPL2
Description : K
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-pyxmpp
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Jacek Konieczny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pyxmpp.jabberstudio.org/
* License : GPL
Description : XMPP and Jab
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:16:35PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> > You know, here SPF could help us. There is no reason at all for people to
> > complain that they cannot send email from bugs.debian.org, db.debian.org and
> > some other spec
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:16:35PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> You know, here SPF could help us. There is no reason at all for people to
> complain that they cannot send email from bugs.debian.org, db.debian.org and
> some other special *subdomains* of debian.org. This does not im
Hi Noah,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:22:39PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> It depends on what you mean by "up to date". If we're only including
> glibc headers, then we can only use functionality that glibc supports.
> If we bypass glibc and directly use kernel functionality, then we get
> all th
Hi,
Noah Meyerhans schrieb:
> Hypothetical networking features that may be added to Linux in the
> future. As I've said, I do not believe any existing features will need
> to be removed in order to remove the linux specific bits of this
> package.
Well, I think it would be acceptable to stop bu
On Saturday 22 October 2005 17:29, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:59:41PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > > It depends on what you mean by "up to date". If we're only including
> > > glibc headers, then we can only use functionality that glibc supports.
> > > If we bypass g
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:59:41PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > It depends on what you mean by "up to date". If we're only including
> > glibc headers, then we can only use functionality that glibc supports.
> > If we bypass glibc and directly use kernel functionality, then we get
> > all t
On Sat, October 22, 2005 10:04, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I maintain one such list on alioth, and I have not been able to find a
> way to let bug reports and other debian-related messages get into the lists
> unmoderated without also accepting a lot of spam. If you or anyone else
> can give me
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I maintain one such list on alioth, and I have not been able to find a
> way to let bug reports and other debian-related messages get into the
> lists unmoderated without also accepting a lot of spam. If you or
> anyone else can give me a recipe on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philippe COVAL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: newmat
Version : 1.10.0b (upstream version 10b)
Upstream Author : Robert Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.robertnz.net
* License : Custom license (looks like
On Saturday 22 October 2005 12:08, Rudolf Weeber wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Rudolf Weeber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: dspam
> Version : x.y.z
> Upstream Author : Deep Logic Inc.
> * URL : www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam
> * Li
Hi,
I took a look at your site a couple of hours ago...
and I want to tell you that I'd really love to trade links with you. I think
your site has some really good stuff related to my site and would be a great
resource for my visitors.
In fact, I went ahead and added your site to my Resource Dir
merge 335173 195948
thanks
On Saturday 22 October 2005 12.08, Rudolf Weeber wrote:
> * Package name: dspam
> I am packaging this program, because we are using it the students'
> representation at university, and having a standardized, easy to install
> package would be very handy.
Have you
On Friday 21 October 2005 22.22, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> It depends on what you mean by "up to date". If we're only including
> glibc headers, then we can only use functionality that glibc supports.
> If we bypass glibc and directly use kernel functionality, then we get
> all the latest and great
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rudolf Weeber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dspam
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Deep Logic Inc.
* URL : www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam
* License : gpl
Description : Highly accurate and fast statisti
[Alejandro Bonilla]
> Will OpenOffice2 hit Sid anytime soon? Is there anything to do to
> help to get it in?
It is waiting in NEW at the moment, so as soon as the ftpmasters had a
look at it, I expect it to go into sid.
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html>.
I'm sure the OOo-maintainers want mor
[Steve Langasek]
> This seems like an opportune time for someone to write a config
> interface for /etc/pam.d/common-*, so that we have a generally
> useful means of enabling other PAM modules as well.
Good idea. We need a better way to enable LDAP and NIS authentication
then to tell every admin
[Sean Finney]
> that's a good idea, and i'm imagining that it's probably quite
> a feasible one too. i wonder if anyone who knows more about
> mailman could chime in?
I maintain one such list on alioth, and I have not been able to find a
way to let bug reports and other debian-related messages g
35 matches
Mail list logo
