Quoting John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Gustavo Franco writes:
> > I think that popcon is a bit underrated in the project.
>
> Does the installer mention popcon?
It installs it..:-)
(unfortunately, for various design issues, the sarge installer stopped
installing it during its development pr
I recently generated a new gpg key. I was planning on revoking my old
key, however all of my packages were uploaded with signatures from my
old key. Do I need to prepare new uploads with the new key? Since I am
not too far into the NM process so far, my key is not in the Debian
keyring yet, so I
Scribit sean finney dies 16/10/2005 hora 11:00:
> also, i think extreme care should be take wrt these ssl certificates.
> i don't think they should be blindly purged at package removal (or
> probably even package purge) time, without getting permission from the
> local admin.
I think that this SSL
Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:27:14PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> On 10/17/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> >> That is why I ask that before an NMU, someone should show me the
Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/17/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > That is why I ask that before an NMU, someone should show me the patch,
>> > and if I reply "I don't have time right now, okay to NMU tha
Gustavo Franco writes:
> I think that popcon is a bit underrated in the project.
Does the installer mention popcon?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Gustavo Franco]
> Have you a TODO list to share with us and are you thinking in ways
> to expand the popcon visibility in the short term ?
We are two persons maintaining the package (it is on alioth,
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/popcon/>), and you should
probably use our mailing list to dis
On 10/17/05, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm pleased to observe that the non-x86 architectures reporting to
> debian popularity-contest have seen a steep increase the last few
> days. The steepest climber is armeb, followed by alpha and hppa. It
> is great to see that the t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: transcend
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Jason Rohrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://transcend.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : retro-style, abstrac
Epitomics
Rabbit
Monoclonal Newsletter - Oct 17th
NEW 2005-06
Epitomics Catalog !
Premier EditionOver 200 pages of
Rabbit Monoclonals Featuring :-Apoptotsis-Cancer-Cell Cycle
-Cytoskeletal-GPCR's-Kinases-Phospho Specific &
MoreRequest your copy today - Click
Hereor visit www.epit
On October 17, 2005 13:03, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > The problem seems to be that udev runs lmctl before the usbfs entry
> > corresponding to your mouse has been created under /proc/bus/usb. The
>
> By design. The correct rule would be:
>
> BUS=="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}=="046d", SYSFS{idProduct}=="c025
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:27:14PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 10/17/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> That is why I ask that before an NMU, someone should show me the patch,
> >> and if I reply "I don't have time right no
On 10/17/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > That is why I ask that before an NMU, someone should show me the patch,
> > and if I reply "I don't have time right now, okay to NMU that if you
> > like" then it's fine (and in fact it is
On Oct 17, Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BUS="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}="046d", SYSFS{idProduct}="c025",
> > PROGRAM="/usr/bin/lmctl -8 --sms"
> The problem seems to be that udev runs lmctl before the usbfs entry
> corresponding to your mouse has been created under /proc/bus/usb.
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That is why I ask that before an NMU, someone should show me the patch,
> and if I reply "I don't have time right now, okay to NMU that if you
> like" then it's fine (and in fact it is going to be the answer you will
> hear most from me ATM).
What if
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:35:40 +0200, Peter Palfrader
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think better than yet another complex system to handle reference
>counts and stuff all packages should by default just be configured to
>use /the/ host certificate.
>
>That is, have all packages that need ssl certs de
Op ma, 17-10-2005 te 16:17 +0200, schreef Frank Küster:
> Hi Wouter,
>
> thanks for your answer - did you reply to me instead to the list on
> purpose?
Uh, no -- sorry.
> If you want, you can cite me on the list.
Here goes :)
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> The big problem
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also how would a package inset such a Post-Invoke line into the
> conffig? Modifying the conffile would be a policy violation.
The package that provides the hook to run provides the config entry; the
packages that need to run the hook touch a file
Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:33:50AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>> also sprach Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.10.16.2047 +0200]:
>> > Extra ITP information:
>> > I am packaging this for unstable so that more people can use this,
>> >
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Frank Küster wrote:
>>>
In the particular case, the reason is something else: If the recommended
package B (tetex-bin) is there, it makes
On October 16, 2005 18:12, Frank Hart wrote:
> I use the following udev rule to let the Logitech applet change the dpi
> from 400 to 800:
>
> BUS="usb", SYSFS{idVendor}="046d", SYSFS{idProduct}="c025",
> PROGRAM="/usr/bin/lmctl -8 --sms"
>
> This worked with udev 0.068. After I installed 0.070 I ha
Scripsit Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I received some feedback from the IPR WG, resulting in this wording:
> The Contributor grants third parties the right to
> copy and distribute the Contribution, with or without
> modification, in any medium, without royalty. The
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:33:50AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.10.16.2047 +0200]:
> > Extra ITP information:
> > I am packaging this for unstable so that more people can use this,
> > but do not think it is ready for release until i
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Frank Küster wrote:
>>
>>> In the particular case, the reason is something else: If the recommended
>>> package B (tetex-bin) is there, it makes sense to run one of its
>>> executables (mktexlsr,
Simon Josefsson writes:
> Is that license acceptable to the Debian community?
Looks fine to me. Is it going to be retroactive?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> In the particular case, the reason is something else: If the recommended
>> package B (tetex-bin) is there, it makes sense to run one of its
>> executables (mktexlsr, updmap) to register the files of package A (any TeX
>> f
* Simon Josefsson:
> I received some feedback from the IPR WG, resulting in this wording:
>
> The Contributor grants third parties the right to
> copy and distribute the Contribution, with or without
> modification, in any medium, without royalty. The IETF
> requests tha
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Peter Samuelson:
>
>>> * Simon Josefsson:
>>> > The Contributor grants third parties the right to
>>> > copy and distribute the Contribution, with or without
>>> > modification, in any medium, without royalty. If the
>>> > Contribution
I'm pleased to observe that the non-x86 architectures reporting to
debian popularity-contest have seen a steep increase the last few
days. The steepest climber is armeb, followed by alpha and hppa. It
is great to see that the total count of submitters are up to 7850.
Visit http://popcon.debian.o
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.10.16.2047 +0200]:
>> Extra ITP information:
>> I am packaging this for unstable so that more people can use this,
>> but do not think it is ready for release until it is more closely
>>
also sprach Brian Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.10.16.2047 +0200]:
> Extra ITP information:
> I am packaging this for unstable so that more people can use this,
> but do not think it is ready for release until it is more closely
> integrated with the SchoolTool packages. A seriou
Hi,
Steve Langasek wrote:
It's easy to understand why people are opposed to too-frequent NMUs. They
don't want to be seen as bad maintainers for having too many NMUs on their
packages; they worry about new bugs being introduced in the process; they
worry about sloppy fixes hiding bugs and prev
On 10/16/05, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 03:59:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Such a tool would be very nice, and not just because of the cruft they
> > leave behind -- many packages currently support SSL connections; some
> > automatically generate a se
On 10/17/05, Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:01:52AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > No its not my BIOS time. It appears to be a timezone 4 timezones east
> > of New Zealand, GMT+16, i.e., out of this world. How about on your
> > machine?
>
> I don't have a /var/l
34 matches
Mail list logo
