The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 188 (new: 2)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 79 (new: 5)
Total number of packages requeste
Hello
(please Cc me)
The latest upstream version of libnet-rawip-perl won't compile with gcc-4.0
and produces lot of the below quoted errors. I produced a patch but would like
a real C programmer to verify what I tried.
I tried to understand the changelog of gcc-4.0 and think I learned that the
On 2005-09-22 Christian Hammers wrote:
> The latest upstream version of libnet-rawip-perl won't compile with gcc-4.0
> and produces lot of the below quoted errors. I produced a patch but would
> like a real C programmer to verify what I tried.
No help needed anymore :)
bye,
-christian-
--
To
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:15:32AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > -- Signed, the debian-armeb porting team.
>
> We've always had a policy of asking people to use real names on this
> list. Usually we invoke this for people using pseudonyms, but I think
> it's appropriate for role addresses,
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Before you talk about the color of the car could we maybe first say
> what kind of car we are building?
>
> What I mean is that there are several issues overlapping here and you
> are attacking the last and least urgent issue first.
Well, it is t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: slgdbm
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Paul Boekholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cheesit.com/downloads/slang/slgdbm.html
* License : GPL
Description
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> It has been discussed for a while already. While we have release
> criteria for packages, up until now we don't have any for the
> architectures. However, decisions made about an architecture affect
> both our users (and developers) and the
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:09:25AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Le vendredi 16 septembre 2005 à 00:33 +0200, Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
>> > It is maybe a crazy idea, but it is the only one that work. What you
>> > suggest simply doesn't work
Hi,
I've just set up a new site about ADSL stuff, and when I was
researching the subject, I found your site. I think your site has
got some fantastic content, and it would be a great resource for
my visitors. Would it be alright if I traded links with you?
I was so excited about the possible l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fathi Boudra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ksplash-engine-moodin
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Author : Christian Leh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://moodwrod.com/files/
* License : GPL
Description : fading spla
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: CashUtil
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/cashutil/
* License : GPL
Description : GnuCash
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 06:45:35PM +0930, Debian-armeb Porting Team wrote:
>
> We *really* need to be hooked into the buildd system to be able to
> automatically build the rest of the stable, testing and unstable
> releases. This is our top-most priority, and we hope to get help on
> this point f
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:34:22AM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote:
...
> I have investigated this by grabbing individual files with wget and I have
> discovered that the same IP address is selected each time I run wget on a
> specific computer.
...
> Any insights? Is this a bug, if so for what packa
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 06:45:35PM +0930, Debian-armeb Porting Team wrote:
> -- Signed, the debian-armeb porting team.
We've always had a policy of asking people to use real names on this
list. Usually we invoke this for people using pseudonyms, but I think
it's appropriate for role addresses, to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tom Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: binutils-msp430
Version : 2.16
Upstream Author : FSF (well, I'm fairly sure they're the main
copyright holders)
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/
* License : GPL
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:41:12PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> Debian's libc6 needs to be fixed.
There is no bug. It just enforces the EPERM message from the kernel.
Bastian
--
Intuition, however illogical, is recognized as a command prerogative.
-- Kirk, "Obsession", stardate
[Debian-armeb Porting Team]
> However, how does one get "armeb" recognised as a valid option for
> the graphs on http://popcon.debian.org? Will simply sending in
> valid survey results with armeb as the architecture cause the graphs
> on that page to list armeb separately?
Yes. The url to the po
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 01:52:06AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:52:57PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > Although it was discussed several times, I have still no idea how those
> > users should be counted?
> > Who has to show those numbers? The users? The porters?
>
Hey folks,
Has anyone gotten the setup mentioned in the subject to work as
advertised? The config I'm using is:
Options ExecCGI
SetHandler fastcgi-script
FastCGIExternalServer /fcgi-bin/php5-cgi -host 127.0.0.1:
AddType application/x-httpd-fastphp5 .php
Action appli
> The point in bug #159888 about psmerge being a horribly brittle kludge
> and ought to be superseded by a ghostscript wrapper is well made, but
> that does not mean that the same point applies to, say, psselect or
> psnup.
The psmerge from seismic unix is very useful. I don't think it was ever
pa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 329462 libgtk1.2
Bug#329462: general: standard value $LANG="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -> very tiny GTK1
font
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `libgtk1.2'.
> severity 329462 important
Bug#329462: general: standard value $LANG="[EMAIL PROTECTE
reassign 329462 libgtk1.2
severity 329462 important
thanks
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 02:57:15AM +0200, Annett Fritz wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: grave
> Tags: l10n
> Justification: renders package unusable
> The standard value $LANG="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" breaks fontsize for some gtk1
> progr
On Monday 05 September 2005 05:21, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Installation of ,,fixed packages''[2] soloved this issue. But in my
> > opinion better solution is fixing it in Debian :P.
>
> Debian will support SELinux, I do not know if GRSecurity will have a
> chance. :-|
SE
Re: Petter Reinholdtsen in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Personally, I find the list of requirements sensible, and very
> understandable after the clarifying rounds on the lists. This colors
> my view of the discussion.
AOL.
(Though I would like to see something like "at least N+1 buildd
_admins_" added
On 9/21/05, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These criteria do _not_ control addition of an architecture to unstable,
> but rather apply to architectures which the ftp-masters have accepted
> into unstable and are targetting testing and the next stable release.
> In other words, an archit
Annett Fritz schrieb am Donnerstag, den 22. September 2005:
> Package: general
> Severity: grave
> Tags: l10n
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> The standard value $LANG="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" breaks fontsize for some gtk1
> programs like gxedit or tipptrainer. With $LANG="de_DE" they sho
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:52:57PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Although it was discussed several times, I have still no idea how those
> users should be counted?
> Who has to show those numbers? The users? The porters?
"someone". That someone is probably a porter by definition, I'd say.
>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 12:00:22AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Jack has been broken for three months now.
> The problem is that the libraries libjack0.80.0-0 and libjack0.100.0-0
> declare exact version requirements against jackd: both of them
> conflict with all but one version of jackd.
Jack has been broken for three months now.
The problem is that the libraries libjack0.80.0-0 and libjack0.100.0-0
declare exact version requirements against jackd: both of them
conflict with all but one version of jackd.
If they really are proper library packages, then they shouldn't
conflict wi
29 matches
Mail list logo
