On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 02:13:22AM +0200, Talal Al-Azem wrote:
> Hello. I have recently installed emacs-bidi on suse 9.1, kde 3.2.3.
Then you're on the wrong list. This is a list about Debian Development,
not about SuSE user support. For the latter, please go to
http://portal.suse.com/
--
The a
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:20:30PM -0700, Rob Browning wrote:
> If I compile a trivial foo.c in the unstable chroot with gcc-3.4, and
> then immediately try to run it, it segfaults.
You've hit #327780.
m68k-build: could anyone with root on crest please downgrade binutils in
all chroots to a worki
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:13:23AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I object to the notion that
> > | Testing is intended for Debian developers. If you are not a Debian
> > | developer, then install unstable as opposed to testing.
> > which rather permea
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 12:03 +0200, Vedran Furac wrote:
> > than 600 days by tonight (or if anything goes wrong -I have an exam
>
> Before you do that:
Yeah, I know there are packages that should not be closed, probably, and
they could just hide from the view and be closed. What I really trust is
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 07:50 +0200, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> Wouldn't it make more sense to close bugs that hasn't recieved more info
> in X days than bugs that had their initial post in Y days?
>
> Some packages are trickier than others to create and may therefor take
> more time. As long as peo
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I object to the notion that
>
> | Testing is intended for Debian developers. If you are not a Debian
> | developer, then install unstable as opposed to testing.
>
> which rather permeates the document.
Yeah I agree, that's pretty wacky notion. Regardl
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:34:51PM +0200, Vedran Furac wrote:
> Btw. why then mencoder, can't be packaged? Why are only ffmpeg -dev in
> debian: http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/ffmpeg.html?
Only ffmpeg-dev is in Debian as ffmpeg upstream recommends static linking
due to not having fixed the API/AB
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:04:36 +0200, Adeodato Simó uttered
> There's known trouble with this check linda producing false positives.
> Just upload if no binary of yours DT_NEEDs libstdc++5.
>
Is there really? This is the first I've heard of it, keeping in mind
I'm ignoring #179926.
Please file
Hello. I have recently installed emacs-bidi on suse 9.1, kde 3.2.3. I have
it running, but when I try to type in Arabic script in the right-to-left, it
doesnt appear correctly
i.e. dont see anything on the screen, but I see
the cursor moving.
Any ideas? Thanks, and sorry for what must be such
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:39:35PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:47:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [...really interesting and insightful explanation snipped...]
> > So: g++ is embedding an unversioned weak symbol in the library in some
> > cases, which causes the lin
If I compile a trivial foo.c in the unstable chroot with gcc-3.4, and
then immediately try to run it, it segfaults. If I then exit the
chroot and re-enter, it runs fine.
(base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mkdir test
(base)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot unstable
Executing shell in chroot: /org/chroo
Is it possible to configure a set of chroots (woody, sarge, whatever)
so that all of the chroot passwd/group DBs will stay in sync with each
other and with the host DB automaticall, so that, for example, a
useradd, usermod, or userdel, will automatically affect all of the DBs
simultaneously and sa
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> Well... this binaries *are* linked against both libstdc++5 *and*
> libstdc++6 ...
Probably something you are linking to still needs to undergo the C++
transition. Depending on what it is, just NMU its ass off...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One
Adeodato Simó wrote:
>* José Luis Tallón [Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:58:47 +0200]:
>
>Hi,
>
> (Was the direct mail necessary?)
>
>
>
>>Any advice on how to proceed with this?? I have already succesfully
>>uploaded *one* package, but Linda complained loudly on the rest...
>>some library not already tra
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:47:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> so, the problem is caused by template instantiation shoving
> this symbol into the library that uses it
> the two possible solutions are (a) stop doing that, or (b)
> version the symbol
> so that's a g++ bu
Hello *,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:58:47PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> I am rebuilding my KDE packages for upload, so as to fulfil the
> requirements of the C++ ABI transition in Sid, and i am encountering a
> serious(IMVHO) problem: binaries get linked to *both* libstdc++5 (old
> versio
* José Luis Tallón [Wed, 14 Sep 2005 20:58:47 +0200]:
Hi,
(Was the direct mail necessary?)
> Any advice on how to proceed with this?? I have already succesfully
> uploaded *one* package, but Linda complained loudly on the rest...
> some library not already transitioned???
There's known trou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I am rebuilding my KDE packages for upload, so as to fulfil the
requirements of the C++ ABI transition in Sid, and i am encountering a
serious(IMVHO) problem: binaries get linked to *both* libstdc++5 (old
version) and libstdc++6 (new version,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:43:19PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> as nm.debian.org is now using https i would like to know, where i could
> find the public part of the SSL root certificate of spi-inc.org
> online.
http://www.spi-inc.org/secretary/
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Hi,
as nm.debian.org is now using https i would like to know, where i could
find the public part of the SSL root certificate of spi-inc.org online.
Greetings
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> I'm interested in maintaining (and using) your drivers and utilities.
If you ever need a co-maintainer, just drop me a note.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alejandro,
Il giorno 14/set/05, alle ore 18:21, Alejandro Bonilla ha scritto:
Can someone help me with making a deb package for the hdaps-utils?
(hdaps.sf.net) Download section / then click on IBM HDAPS Source
Download.
We are on the process
Hi,
I "manage" the HDAPS driver for the IBM ThinkPad's with the Active
Protection system. Now that our driver is in mainline -git (Thanks to Robert
Love), we might want to consider people to start making packages for our
utils.
Basically I have seen the whole semi-god process that
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:47:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...really interesting and insightful explanation snipped...]
> So: g++ is embedding an unversioned weak symbol in the library in some
> cases, which causes the linker to resolve it to the version from the lib
> used by the app, not
Vedran Furac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Vedran Furac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Package already in Debian : gstreamer0.8-ffmpeg
>
> Ops, then it should be closed.
>
> Btw. why then mencoder, can't be packaged? Why are only ffmpeg -dev in
Normaly, encode
Christian Marillat wrote:
> Vedran Furac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>David Moreno Garza wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>>- note that there is software that probably can't be packaged:
>>
>>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Vedran Furac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Moreno Garza wrote:
>> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
[...]
> - note that there is software that probably can't be packaged:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203211
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:39:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:33:17AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:31:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Applications linked with libstdc++5 and using GTK segfault when using
> > > > SCIM[1] as
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> >Known non-free documentation licenses are:
> > - GFDL (at least up the current version 1.2)
> > - CC licenses (at least up to the current version 2.5)
> > - OPL and OpenContent License
> > - the current lice
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:36:11AM +0200,
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 168 lines which said:
>Known non-free documentation licenses are:
> - GFDL (at least up the current version 1.2)
> - CC licenses (at least up to the current version 2.5)
> - OPL an
* Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050914 10:47]:
> | Maybe, if you don't want your output to be found on the Internet, you
> | should not make it available on the Internet?
> I think there is a difference between putting it all in one place with
> a public archive and having the content availa
David Moreno Garza wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
>>>But my intention was not to read the whole list and do this by hand!
>>>This should be done by the same script which sends the sem automated
>>>mails to the BTS.
>>
>>As there is a consensus that it is a goo
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 03:01, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
--cut--
> Yes, I know there are some documents which are better than the FAQ for some
> issues (such as the Installation Manual or the Debian reference). But there
> are several reasons why I believe this document should be
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:33:17AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:12:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:31:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > >
> > > Applications linked with libstdc++5 and using GTK segfault when using
> > > SCIM[1] as input m
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:48:07AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I've fixed some of a), b) or c) with the help of Santiago Vila who is doing
> > the Spanish translation but more peer review is needed here.
>
> Note that the docum
Scripsit Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've fixed some of a), b) or c) with the help of Santiago Vila who is doing
> the Spanish translation but more peer review is needed here.
Note that the document at the official URL you quote is probably
obsolete; it identifies itself
Scripsit Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am taking the liberty to write this even though I am not a DD. Hope
> you would not mind.
Anyone who has relevant points to make are welcome on the -devel
lists. Only DDs can upload packages and vote, but that is about it.
> http://people.corn
Hi David!
You wrote:
> Talking with adn on IRC, I've decided to launch an script that will
> close every opened ITP and RFP bug on the BTS with a lifetime greater
> than 600 days by tonight (or if anything goes wrong -I have an exam
> tomorrow noon-, by tomorrow night). I'll point to documentatio
Henning Makholm wrote:
> I think this counts as abuse of the wontfix tag. Setting the tag is
> *never* a substitute for explaining (or referencing an explanation of)
> why one thinks the problem should not be solved.
I encountered this bug now, and asked myself - what should one do?
Obviously th
* Martin Schulze
| Maybe, if you don't want your output to be found on the Internet, you
| should not make it available on the Internet?
I think there is a difference between putting it all in one place with
a public archive and having the content available, but not organised
into a public archi
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 03:46:34AM +, The Fungi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:18:01PM -0400, Angelina Carlton wrote:
> [...]
> > I was told on #debian-devel that, yes it is in-precise, so I am just
> > wondering why would it *not* list all the files? What defines if a file
> > is included
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:12:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:31:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> >
> > Applications linked with libstdc++5 and using GTK segfault when using
> > SCIM[1] as input method, and neither GTK nor SCIM nor the apps seem to
> > be to blame.
>
> Just for the record: Credativ is surely a good company, but there are
> a lot more companies offering Debian support. To keep them all from
> publicly answering requests on mailing lists, thus cluttering them, it
> would be nice if we could restrict ourselves to pointers to the
> consultants page
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:19:03AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I've just tried to upgrade my testing distro, and aptitude is happy to
> remove gnome and all its dependents because the required version of
> sound-juicer has not migrated yet. Does anyone know why?
Because sound-juicer is tied up
44 matches
Mail list logo
