The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 194 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 86 (new: 0)
Total number of packages requeste
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:00:54AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 08, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Indeed, the "choice of venue is a fee" argument is just that: an
> > > opinion which has at best no clear roots in the DFSG, therefore it
> > > cannot make a license non-free.
? ? ?? ??? ?? ? ?
? ?? ??
http://www.1426.ws
? ??? ?? :
??? ?? ???
? ??
? ???
???
?? ??
???
demo
? ?
demo
* ?? ?? ??? ??? ..
-
Package: cdebootstrap
Version: 0.3.4
Followup-For: Bug #254248
I was a bit surprised to see a bug like 254248 being tagged as won't
fix.
I had the very same question as the original poster of the bug and I see
that the package maintainer has taken similar actions to patches (see
bug #231711), wit
su, 2005-09-04 kello 11:32 -0400, Joey Hess kirjoitti:
> Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > That's what I wanted to say, but, alas, it doesn't work. debootstrap
> > fails to create an etch or sid chroot for me at the moment.
>
> It does if you run it with --resolve-deps.
Indeed it does. Mea culpa. I have
On Sep 09, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is nothing wrong with this, and I'm not a fan of choice of venue
> > clauses either, but they should try to modify the DFSG then.
> Could you explain why DFSG#5 couldn't be invoked in this case?
It does not work this way. If you beli
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: italc
Version : 0.9.6.2
Upstream Author : Tobias Dörffel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : italc.sf.net
* License : GPL
Description : Intelligent Teaching And Learning wi
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:58:32PM +0200, Yorick Cool wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:55:56PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
>
>The application of the
> United Nations Convention on Contracts for the In
Le vendredi 09 septembre 2005 à 00:00 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> > Yeah, but there is certainly more than a single person arguing that we
> > should
> > not distribute software with such licence.
> There is nothing wrong with this, and I'm not a fan of choice of venue
> clauses either, but th
On Sep 08, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Indeed, the "choice of venue is a fee" argument is just that: an
> > opinion which has at best no clear roots in the DFSG, therefore it
> > cannot make a license non-free.
> Yeah, but there is certainly more than a single person arguing that we
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 08:21:57PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 08, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 2) Any argument i may have are only the lame repetition of the opinion of
> > a
> > single person here on debian-legal.
> Indeed, the "choice of venue is a fee" argument is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 170477 !
Bug#170477: xmltex: can't make DVI/PS from DocBook orderedlist/itemizedlist
Changed Bug submitter from Jean-Philippe Guérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to
Jean-Philippe Guérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 53121 !
Bug#53121: There is
On Sep 08, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) Any argument i may have are only the lame repetition of the opinion of a
> single person here on debian-legal.
Indeed, the "choice of venue is a fee" argument is just that: an
opinion which has at best no clear roots in the DFSG, therefore
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 08:57:59PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> On Thursday 08 September 2005 20:24, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:53:12PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > > On Thursday 08 September 2005 16:21, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > --cut--
> > >
> > > > Yeah, well, i d
On Thursday 08 September 2005 20:24, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:53:12PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 September 2005 16:21, Sven Luther wrote:
> > --cut--
> >
> > > Yeah, well, i did an apt-get install star and looked at the copyright
> > > file, so i am n
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 06:24:34PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:53:12PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 September 2005 16:21, Sven Luther wrote:
> > --cut--
> > > Yeah, well, i did an apt-get install star and looked at the copyright
> > > file,
> > > s
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:53:12PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> On Thursday 08 September 2005 16:21, Sven Luther wrote:
> --cut--
> > Yeah, well, i did an apt-get install star and looked at the copyright file,
> > so i am not sure what facts i have to believe then.
> >
> > > http://packages.debia
Scripsit Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:58:32PM +0200, Yorick Cool wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:55:56PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
The application of the
United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale
of Goods is
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 05:04:00PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Lionel>
Lionel> >>> The application of the
Lionel> >>>United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale
Lionel> >>>of Goods is expressly excluded.
Lionel>
Lionel> Yes, but what does it *say*? What are the
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:58:32PM +0200, Yorick Cool wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:55:56PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>> The application of the
>>>United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale
>>>of Goods is expressly excluded.
>> That's my favourite bit of la
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:55:56PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Dalibor> > The application of the
Dalibor> >United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale
Dalibor> >of Goods is expressly excluded.
Dalibor>
Dalibor> [snip]
Dalibor>
Dalibor> That's my favourite bit of lawy
Scripsit Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:06:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> Do we really think it's a good idea to approve of giving copyright
>> holders extra leverage for such lawsuits in their license, and just
>> hope that none of these copyrights ever wind up
Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:55:56PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Notice that we already accepted a CDDLed program in debian, namely the star
packages which comes with this clause :
9. MISCELLANEOUS.
[snip]
The application of the
United Nations Conve
Scripsit Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I get the feeling that it is not the freeness of them which is an issue, they
> don't really make the software more or less free after all, since they enter
> in account only if the licence is broken,
There's your mistake. A choice-of-venue clause become
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:53:12PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> On Thursday 08 September 2005 16:21, Sven Luther wrote:
> --cut--
> > Yeah, well, i did an apt-get install star and looked at the copyright file,
> > so i am not sure what facts i have to believe then.
> >
> > > http://packages.debia
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:55:56PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >Notice that we already accepted a CDDLed program in debian, namely the star
> >packages which comes with this clause :
> >
> >9. MISCELLANEOUS.
>
> [snip]
>
> > The application of the
> >United Nations Conv
Sven Luther wrote:
Notice that we already accepted a CDDLed program in debian, namely the star
packages which comes with this clause :
9. MISCELLANEOUS.
[snip]
The application of the
United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale
of Goods is expressly excluded.
On Thursday 08 September 2005 16:21, Sven Luther wrote:
--cut--
> Yeah, well, i did an apt-get install star and looked at the copyright file,
> so i am not sure what facts i have to believe then.
>
> > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/star/star_1.4a17-3/star
> >.copyright
> >
> > T
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:10:56PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Sven Luther schrieb:
>
> > Notice that we already accepted a CDDLed program in debian, namely the star
> > packages which comes with this clause :
>
> Wrong.
Well, i installed the package in sid (star 1.5a60-2), and looked at
/usr/
Sven Luther schrieb:
> Notice that we already accepted a CDDLed program in debian, namely the star
> packages which comes with this clause :
Wrong.
> So, i wonder why it was accepted, if it was non-free. But maybe we just passed
> it up silently and didn't notice ? Who was the ftp-master respons
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:06:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:14:50AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:48:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:47:59PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> > > > > These two do not app
* A Mennucc [Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:45:51 +0200]:
> hi
Hi,
> I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
> debian-68k@lists.debian.org ; the error message that I got
> was strange (in particular, the two lines
> procmail: Error while writing to "DeadLog"
> procmail: Error while writing
(I am not a lawyer, but I play one on TV)
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:11:29PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Thomas Bushnell writes:
>>> Not quite correct. You are buing not just the right to read it; you are
>>> also buying the physical copy, and y
Andreas Barth wrote:
* A Mennucc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050908 13:39]:
(maybe I do not properly understand how the transition unstable -> testing
goes , but...)
my packages from source libprinterconf, see
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libprinterconf
are waiting for snmpkit
hi
I sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
debian-68k@lists.debian.org ; the error message that I got
was strange (in particular, the two lines
procmail: Error while writing to "DeadLog"
procmail: Error while writing to "/var/mail/debian"
look as if there is a misconfiguration somewh
* A Mennucc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050908 13:39]:
> (maybe I do not properly understand how the transition unstable -> testing
> goes , but...)
>
> my packages from source libprinterconf, see
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libprinterconf
> are waiting for snmpkit to go into testi
hi people
(maybe I do not properly understand how the transition unstable -> testing
goes , but...)
my packages from source libprinterconf, see
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=libprinterconf
are waiting for snmpkit to go into testing;
at the same time,
my packages from source
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:21:17PM -0400, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> > (00:58:29) *cheal:* cd contents
> > (00:58:29) *dpkg:* To find out what is on what cd, download the .jigdo
> > template, and zless fooimage.jigdo. In the [Parts] section you will see
> > the list of packages that are contained in
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:06:12AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:14:50AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:48:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:47:59PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> > > > > These two do not app
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:14:50AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:48:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:47:59PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> > > > These two do not appear to be compatible (unless you think a license
> > > > can be "free" w
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:48:15PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:47:59PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> > > These two do not appear to be compatible (unless you think a license
> > > can be "free" with a venue choice that you do not consider "sane"), so
> > > I must
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:13:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I wrote:
> >> In some jurisdictions lending is an exclusive right of the copyright
> >> owner.
> >
> > Thomas Bushnell writes:
> >> Can you be specific with references please?
> >
>
42 matches
Mail list logo
