On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:27:12PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Just a reminder that these maintainers still have packages that depend
> on debconf by itself without an alternate dependency on | debconf-2.0.
> As I mentioned in my original post, I plan to file bugs on all of these
> soon, which, omit
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:18:01PM -0400, Angelina Carlton wrote:
[...]
> I was told on #debian-devel that, yes it is in-precise, so I am just
> wondering why would it *not* list all the files? What defines if a file
> is included or excluded from this list.
[...]
A quick look through the dpkg sou
I am not sure if this is a bug, and oversight or by design but dpkg -L
or dpk-query -L do not always list every single file
the package installs.
I was told on #debian-devel that, yes it is in-precise, so I am just
wondering why would it *not* list all the files? What defines if a file
is incl
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>>I have also noticed tickets submitted to the bug facility that are
>>>spam. Can that facility be configured so that if the format (packa
On Sep 05, Joerg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Drop not, but reject. It would be the best, if you can reject spam in
> the SMTP dialog.
Actually it's the only possible solution, a 100K msg/day backscatter
source would be quickly widely blacklisted.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Descriptio
Hello Blars,
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>I have also noticed tickets submitted to the bug facility that are
>>spam. Can that facility be configured so that if the format (package
>>name, version, etc) is not followed; the b
Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> I wonder if it would be possible to appeal to google to have them
> manually edit that search so that l.d.o doesn't appear. (Same for
> [replaced with "string instrument" to avoid another google hit]'s)
What I think I would rather see is targeted moderation of anything
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: doom-data
Version : 1
Upstream Author : Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://jon.dowland.name/code/doom/doom-data/
* License : GPL
Description : Installer for
On Monday 05 September 2005 22:36, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> I gave this a quick go, after finding the real location of the tarball.
> The result is at wiki.wolffelaar.nl, and the simple formatting works
> reasonable.
[...]
> Any help is appreciated -- improve formatting conversion, and findin
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-05 22:36:26]:
> Any help is appreciated -- improve formatting conversion, and finding bugs.
> For bugreports and patches, please mail me privately or address me on IRC
> (jvw). Once I'm reasonably content with the conversion, I'll prepare a tarba
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-05 21:14:20]:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:59:10PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > I just chatted with Sun's FOSS embassador Simon Phillips and i
> > asked if Sun would switch to a LGPL compatible license even for
> > openSolaris in the course of the r
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 02:10:57PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> But anyway, what's needed is someone who uses some perl (or whatever) magic
> on that tarball, to get moin-compatible data/pages files that can be
> unpacked in the wiki.debian.org installation by a DSA member. I wonder
> whet
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pentagram
Version : CVS snapshots
Upstream Author : W. J. Palenstein, P. Burke, M. Horn, R. Nunn, D. Reichardt,
M. Jimenez
* URL : http://pentagram.sourcef
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, any idea of when this will be fixed, and if it takes long, maybe we
> should inform our users about it. This affects all sarge installs, or only
> powerpc and some other minority arches ?
FWIW, it's also blocking work on #325421, which affects mo
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:59:10PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> I just chatted with Sun's FOSS embassador Simon Phillips and i
> asked if Sun would switch to a LGPL compatible license even for
> openSolaris in the course of the recent announcement.
>
> However he said it would stay with the CD
> I'd like to have a debian-planet list that would receive blog
> postings from planet.debian.org.
>
> The main reason is that after postings expire on the planet website,
> it's very hard to find old postings if you cannot remember who wrote
> it. Think of "there was some nice sh script snippet"
Hi, Wouter:
El Lunes, 05 Septiembre 2005 19:52, Wouter Verhelst escribió:
[...]
>
> "spam", as in, unsolicited bulk email, was named after a particular
> brand of corned beef. See http://www.spam.com/
Not exactly. Spam, as unsolicited bulk email, was named after a particular
Monty Python's Fly
I just chatted with Sun's FOSS embassador Simon Phillips and i
asked if Sun would switch to a LGPL compatible license even for
openSolaris in the course of the recent announcement.
However he said it would stay with the CDDL and was not aware how
that would hinder a debian port of openSolaris. Cou
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:35:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Sven Luther [Mon, 05 Sep 2005 20:02:12 +0200]:
>
> > This is another instance of the braindead single desktop task and KDE
> > breaking
> > the install. KDE packager should all die :)
>
> Watch your typos.
Indeed, it should ha
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Sven Luther [Mon, 05 Sep 2005 20:02:12 +0200]:
>
>> This is another instance of the braindead single desktop task and KDE
>> breaking
>> the install. KDE packager should all die :)
>
> Watch your typos.
Yes, it should be "packagers". :)
::duck::
* Sven Luther [Mon, 05 Sep 2005 20:02:12 +0200]:
> This is another instance of the braindead single desktop task and KDE breaking
> the install. KDE packager should all die :)
Watch your typos.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Mecano - Dalai La
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 05:59:47PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Brian May [Sun, 04 Sep 2005 20:32:05 +1000]:
>
> > Is this a known problem?
>
> Yes, and the Security Team is aware of it (#325254).
It would be great if we would get an official errata or otherwise a
recomendation on how to fi
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 07:42:47PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> Am 2005-09-05 15:54:47, schrieb Matthew Garrett:
> > Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > If the SPAM-Filter of Debian fails, you will shot yourself...
> > > I think, the filter trash around 99% of the
David Pashley writes:
> No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on Google.
If these people read the messages they find with their searches they
wouldn't post here. They don't. They just grab the address and spam us.
And helping people get off C4LL W4VE is not our job.
> I b
Hi Matt,
Am 2005-09-05 15:54:47, schrieb Matthew Garrett:
> Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If the SPAM-Filter of Debian fails, you will shot yourself...
> > I think, the filter trash around 99% of the SPAM.
>
> That should be "spam" - "SPAM" is a trademark of Hormel Foods
> Co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Proulx wrote:
> David Pashley wrote:
>
>>> Don't follow up. Reply to them privately.
>>
>> No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on
>> Google.
>
>
> That is exactly the point. We DO NOT WANT people to find the
> Debian mailin
On Sep 05, 2005 at 18:14, Bob Proulx praised the llamas by saying:
> David Pashley wrote:
> > > Don't follow up. Reply to them privately.
> >
> > No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on Google.
>
> That is exactly the point. We DO NOT WANT people to find the Debian
> mail
David Pashley wrote:
> > Don't follow up. Reply to them privately.
>
> No, because that doesn't help the next person that searches on Google.
That is exactly the point. We DO NOT WANT people to find the Debian
mailing lists in any relation to that search. Every time someone
references it in a
On Sep 05, 2005 at 17:13, John Hasler praised the llamas by saying:
> David Pashley writes:
> > I believe it is far more useful to follow up to these emails providing
> > useful information how to remove themselves and in particular link to the
> > rather informative email from Josh Metzler[0] so t
Matthew Garrett writes:
> No, Hormel only claim the capitalised form. In capitalised form it's a
> clear reference to the food product, and as such is potentially
> infringing under various circumstances.
I'm quite certain that if you brought out a brand of canned pork under the
label "spam" that
David Pashley writes:
> I believe it is far more useful to follow up to these emails providing
> useful information how to remove themselves and in particular link to the
> rather informative email from Josh Metzler[0] so that they might find out
> how to do it themselves rather than emailing the l
On Sep 05, 2005 at 16:31, John Hasler praised the llamas by saying:
> Please do not follow up to these messages. These idiots apparently Google
> the phrase and then spam all the addresses they find. Posting about the
> subject here just creates more hits.
I believe it is far more useful to foll
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthew Garrett writes:
>> That should be "spam" - "SPAM" is a trademark of Hormel Foods
>> Corporation.
>
> Only when used to sell food (in which case "spam" would also infringe the
> mark).
No, Hormel only claim the capitalised form. In capitalised form
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libscriptalicious-perl
Version : 1.10
* License : Perl (GPL/Artistic)
Description : Make scripts more delicious to SysAdmins
This module helps you write scripts that conform to
Please do not follow up to these messages. These idiots apparently Google
the phrase and then spam all the addresses they find. Posting about the
subject here just creates more hits.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Matthew Garrett writes:
> That should be "spam" - "SPAM" is a trademark of Hormel Foods
> Corporation.
Only when used to sell food (in which case "spam" would also infringe the
mark).
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[Michelle Konzack]
> Are you happy ?
Sure, I am happy. :)
> If the SPAM-Filter of Debian fails, you will shot yourself... I
> think, the filter trash around 99% of the SPAM.
I will? I do not know if gmane uses the debian spamfilters, but it
seem to do quite a good job filtering out spam. :)
I
On Sep 05, 2005 at 15:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] praised the llamas by saying:
>I notified you, electronically a month or more ago to cancel my
>subscription to CALL WAVE.
>This billing has continued on my VISA bill for two or more months.
>
>Will you acknowledge receipt of this current
On Monday 05 September 2005 16:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I notified you, electronically a month or more ago to cancel my
> subscription to CALL WAVE.
> This billing has continued on my VISA bill for two or more months.
>
> Will you acknowledge receipt of this current message? I would like a
>
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the SPAM-Filter of Debian fails, you will shot yourself...
> I think, the filter trash around 99% of the SPAM.
That should be "spam" - "SPAM" is a trademark of Hormel Foods
Corporation.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
I notified you, electronically a month or more ago to cancel my subscription to CALL WAVE.
This billing has continued on my VISA bill for two or more months.
Will you acknowledge receipt of this current message? I would like a credit memo for the last month or two, but I know this action will
* Hamish Moffatt ::
> I just packaged podracer last week, which is a derivative of
> bashpodder.
> Is there any benefit to having both?
>
> The podracer license is MIT/BSD-style, so if the bashpodder license is
> GPL, something's not quite right!
Does a 14-line bash script (*) contains enough c
Am 2005-09-01 20:20:39, schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> [Allyn, MarkX A]
> > I have been noticing (and a bit irritated) at the spam I am seeing
> > on this and some other email lists. The latest was a bit offensive
> > for me in my work environment.
>
> The debian lists are not doing a great job in
* Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-05 10:04:54]:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
> > compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
> > from the old .net wiki to the new .org one
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:34:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Francesco P. Lovergine:
>
> >> I intended to write the opposite: file locks are a per-process
> >> resource in NPTL, so NPTL probably has the problems, and LinuxThreads
> >> doesn't.
> >
> > A question: why using file locking inst
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:42:54PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:34:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Francesco P. Lovergine:
> >
> > >> I intended to write the opposite: file locks are a per-process
> > >> resource in NPTL, so NPTL probably has the proble
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:34:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Francesco P. Lovergine:
>
> >> I intended to write the opposite: file locks are a per-process
> >> resource in NPTL, so NPTL probably has the problems, and LinuxThreads
> >> doesn't.
> >
> > A question: why using file locking inst
* Francesco P. Lovergine:
>> I intended to write the opposite: file locks are a per-process
>> resource in NPTL, so NPTL probably has the problems, and LinuxThreads
>> doesn't.
>
> A question: why using file locking instead of thread mutexes (which
> is the proper answer to syncronization issues i
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Blars Blarson wrote:
>> I've been working on the spam filtering for the BTS. We are getting
>> over 100,000 spams/day and about 50/day get through the filters.
>
>are these numbers available somewhere? (the spam/day ratio for example)
>it w
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 10:07:56PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Florian Weimer:
>
> > * Adeodato Simó:
> >
> >> Also, I have no idea what's the case for Debian: "On some versions of
> >> Linux, a thread is not able to override locks created by a different
> >> thread in the same process.
Blars Blarson wrote:
[snip]
>
> I've been working on the spam filtering for the BTS. We are getting
> over 100,000 spams/day and about 50/day get through the filters.
are these numbers available somewhere? (the spam/day ratio for example)
it would be interesting to graph the data.
filippo
--
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:41:40AM +0200, Andreas Fester wrote:
> I thought that the wiki was to be moved to mediawiki?
>
> http://wiki.debian.net/?HelpMoveDebianWikiToMediaWiki
>
> Will w.d.org be a replacement for w.d.net? With the latter
> leading to the same page once the migration is done?
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
> compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
> from the old .net wiki to the new .org one.
This is the first I've heard of plans for a wiki under the offi
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:32:05PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Hello,
>
> According to http://packages.debian.org/stable/libs/libkscan1>,
> this package requires "kdelibs4 (>= 4:3.3.2-6.2)" on the powerpc,
> however the latest version in stable appears to be 4:3.3.2-6.1.
>
> Many other KDE applicat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Michal Čihař" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-gammu
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cihar.com/gammu/python
* License : GPL
Description : Python module
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Michal Čihař" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: wammu
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cihar.com/gammu/wammu
* License : GPL
Description : Mobile Phone Manager
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:47:21PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> spamscan is single-threaded, and the latency of DNSBL lookups is the
> main delay. We have less than 1 second to process each message on
> average. Any good recomendations for a perl inter-process
> communications library? Once it b
57 matches
Mail list logo
