Hi,
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 08:11 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Shouldn't it be some kind of policy to mark a bug as fixed,
> only if the fix is available on the same level as the previous
> broken package?
There's a semi-policy IMHO, you can tag[1] the bugs instead of closing
them, so there's a fi
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I've got a problem with marking broken packages as fixed.
Fixed generally means that the bug has been fixed in an NMU, IE, by
someone not the maintainer; fixed-in-experimental is the tag that
usually means that the bug in question has actually been fixed
Hi folks,
I've got a problem with marking broken packages as fixed.
If there is (lets say) a grave functionality bug for package
"M" in unstable or testing, then a bugfix in experimental
doesn't help me. (I made very bad experiences with experimental,
e.g. broken version numbers, currupted apt sy
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050728 22:39]:
> on request of Ryan Murray I stopped the bugs2ldap-gateway on
> bugs.debian.org. I'll move that gateway to some other host as soon as I
> have time. At least the following services are broken by that:
> - the wnpp bug list
> - bts.turmzimmer.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Everyone,
This is to let interested people know that the Debian Science mailing list [1]
has been created. This list is aimed to encourage discussion about how best to
use Debian as an operating system for science research and how to improve Debi
Brice Goglin wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: lltag
> Version : 0.6.1-1
> Upstream Author : Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://bgoglin.free.fr/lltag/
> * License : GPL
>
Followups to #320630.
--j
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lltag
Version : 0.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://bgoglin.free.fr/lltag/
* License : GPL
Description : Massive and magic comma
David Moreno Garza wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: monouml
> Version : 0.1a
> Upstream Author : Mario Carrión <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and others.
> * URL : http://monouml.sf.net/
> * License
One more question: Was the question, should short descriptions be
capitalized? ever decided?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've started reviewing the news section, and I'm noticing that I'm
running across descriptions which are OK as-is, but could be better. So
far, Iv'e put in a comment saying how I think it could be approved, but
am clicking "OK". Is that right?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 04:08:10PM +0200, Clément Stenac wrote:
> > how will you handel changes in the description (from upstream, aka package
> > maintainer)?
>
> By comparing all descriptions when we are done. For packages which have
> a new descriptions, a manual review/merge will be needed.
N
On 29-Jul-05, 08:50 (CDT), GOMBAS Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:38:17AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> Exercise: let's say I have an application that uses GSSAPI, and has to
> be able to be built statically. Requirements:
>
> - It should build with Heimdal's libgs
The shadow package maintenance team is glad to announce the release
of version 4.0.11-1 of the shadow package, in experimental.
Shadow is the source package for passwd and login and is part of the
base system. Both packages are "Priority: required".
This package was highly desynchronized with ups
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: monouml
Version : 0.1a
Upstream Author : Mario Carrión <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and others.
* URL : http://monouml.sf.net/
* License : GPL and LGPL
Description : co
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 29, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, please note that posh is not the only shell that lacks support for
> > local. IIRC, it also breaks down under one or more of dash and busybox sh.
> dash supports local, or at least supports it in the way it's u
On Jul 29, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, please note that posh is not the only shell that lacks support for
> local. IIRC, it also breaks down under one or more of dash and busybox sh.
dash supports local, or at least supports it in the way it's used in
all the packages I main
On Jul 29, "Brian M. Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have found no less than four packages which break with /bin/posh
> as /bin/sh, including one that refuses to be removed because of its
> brokenness. I am expecting many more.
Yes, like most of my packages.
posh does not provide any bene
Hi,
I took a look at your site a couple of hours ago...
and I want to tell you that I'd really love to trade links with you. I think
your site has some really good stuff related to my site's topic of Packaging
and would be a great resource for my visitors.
In fact, I went ahead and added your sit
Hello,
> how will you handel changes in the description (from upstream, aka package
> maintainer)?
By comparing all descriptions when we are done. For packages which have
a new descriptions, a manual review/merge will be needed.
Regards,
--
Clément Stenac
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 11:32:18PM +0200, Clément Stenac wrote:
> > Someone suggested an announcement should be sent to
> > > d-d-a. What do you think ?
> >
> > Yes, go to it and find some reviewer.
>
> Will do...
>
> > Maybe you should add a 'get a random Description' link on your Page...
>
>
On 7/15/05, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, I previously had xorg from Ubuntu installed, and upgrading from
> that to Debian's xorg _didn't_ go smoothly: the file "/etc/X11/Xsession"
> was created by two packages, x11-common [debian], and xorg-common
> [ubuntu], and in upgrading tri
On 7/29/05, Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 02:31:01AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> > ..last mirror update was a week ago, what's going on???
>
> > ..and, yeah, gg:"Debian mirror update" "21-Jul-2005" etc
> > finds _lotsa_ noise.
>
> > ..whether this mirror upda
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 02:18:29PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> > FWIW, detecting a fixed libtool would be rather difficult, since it's the
> > libtool used by the depending application which does the recursion and
> > therefore needs to be fixed.
> I was thinking we'd be able to tell from the .
* Goswin von Brederlow:
> The proper use of this construct seems to be:
>
> template
> struct Foo {
> static const unsigned N = T::N;
> char bar[N];
> };
>
> struct Bla {
> static const unsigned N;
> };
>
> const unsigned Bla::N = 10;
>
> int main() {
> Foo foo;
> }
This program is ill-f
25 matches
Mail list logo
