Re: libcrypto++

* Nathanael Nerode: > I'd be interested in working on tracking down the linking problems, but I > don't want to duplicate your work. Are your patches-so-far available > somewhere? I think I've found the linking bug. Details later. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Re: doomsday not DFSG

On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 18:31 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > > Doomsday (or Deng as upstream and I refer to it) is the cleanest > > implementation in regards separation of the different game logic and > > features. The plugins are basically .so files, so if you want to play > > doom, you load the jdo

Re: libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am fighting with libcrypto++ but so far I am loosing. This is an exceedingly nasty library. There is way too much templatization in this library, and GCC spews warnings like there's no tomorrow. I'd be interested in working on tracking down the linking problems, but

Re: (no subject)

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:16:08 -0700, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Friday 22 July 2005 10:00 pm, Ryan Schultz wrote: >> For -devel... does anyone know why this list receives so many >> questions about [REDACTED]? >> >> [long list of links into -devel archives] > Because you jus

Please participate in popularity-contest

Please help the install team and others get a better view on the use of packages in Debian. To do this, install the popularity-contest package and say yes to participate. The results are updated daily on http://popcon.debian.org/>, and the information is used to make the Debian CDs, to give deve

Re: Keyboard lockup after X startup; possible cause

On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:50:10AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: I had the same bug. It used to happen when you changed inittab to use more than 6 VCs, I had no idea it could race even on lower VCs. > I don't know which is the correct way to fix it. > Possible ways: > > *) ensure that X i

Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions

Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:11:14PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote: >> >> It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in >> the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply send an email to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED], where >>

ITP: pycocuma -- Pythonic Contact and Customer Management

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: pycocuma Version : 0.4.5-5 Upstream Author : Henning Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.srcco.de/pycocuma/index.html * License : GPL v2 or later Description : Pythonic Contact and Customer Managem

Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions

On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:11:14PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote: > > It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in > the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply send an email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED], where > nnn is the bug number you wish to {,un}subscribe

Re: (no subject)

On Saturday 23 July 2005 02:16 pm, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Friday 22 July 2005 10:00 pm, Ryan Schultz wrote: > > For -devel... does anyone know why this list receives so many questions > > about [REDACTED]? > > > > [long list of links into -devel archives] > > Because you just told Google that

Re: (no subject)

On Friday 22 July 2005 10:00 pm, Ryan Schultz wrote: > For -devel... does anyone know why this list receives so many questions > about [REDACTED]? > > [long list of links into -devel archives] Because you just told Google that we're a good source for information about you-know-what :P. Danie

Re: doomsday not DFSG (was Re: ITP: doomsday - greatly improved engine to play doom, doom2, heretic and hexen)

I've added the original ITPer to the CC list, as he hasn't contributed to this thread (and so I don't know if he reads -devel). Alexander, your ITP has generated a bit of discussion: see . On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 03:08:06PM +1000, Ja

Re: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3

Dan From <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hey there. > > I want to install libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 but it says that it is virtual > file. > I want to install it because i want to install apt-move, so i can > install dfsbuild, so i can make a live cd, just for my needs. > But i cant find it any wher

libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3

Hey there. I want to install libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 but it says that it is virtual file. I want to install it because i want to install apt-move, so i can install dfsbuild, so i can make a live cd, just for my needs. But i cant find it any where, and i saw (see, im dainish :) ) that i should wri

Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?

On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:30:24AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:33:32 -0300, Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >>> 2. Programs written in obscure languages may prove unmaintainable >>> if the original developer disappears. Besides threatening >>> obsoles

Re: congratulations to the X team!!

On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 02:53:42PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, David Nusinow wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:41:18PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Sean Perry wrote: > > > > I just updated to X.org. With apt. Automatically. Woohoo!! I mean full >

Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 10:58:34 -0300, Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 01:21 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> Because that information is not presented to me in aptitude, one of >> the preferred front ends to package management. Once the deb tags >> system gets inte

Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?

On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 01:21 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Because that information is not presented to me in aptitude, > one of the preferred front ends to package management. Once the deb > tags system gets integrated into the front ends, the long description > can stop shouldering

Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions

Hello Don, Am 2005-07-22 15:30:35, schrieb Don Armstrong: > What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing > submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header > is added to prevent that. [It's possible that this subscription would > happen without even needing t

Re: congratulations to the X team!!

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, David Nusinow wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:41:18PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Sean Perry wrote: > > > I just updated to X.org. With apt. Automatically. Woohoo!! I mean full > > > on xserver-xorg too. I did not touch ANYTHING. > > > > My only g

Re: Keyboard lockup after X startup; possible cause

Hello, > Several people probably faced the problem that after initial system bootup, > and startup of *dm, keyboard does not work. > Suggested workaround was to add implicit 'vtX' parameter to X server > command line in Xservers file. I don't use a diplay manager, but I face the same problem wh

Re: ITP: darkplaces - greatly improved engine for original quake1

On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 12:20:33PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 12:14:53PM +0200, Alexander Fieroch wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > > > URL: http://icculus.org/twilight/darkplaces/index.html > > License: GPL > > > > Description: > > > > darkplaces is

Re: LinuxWorld in San Francisco

On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 03:37:07PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > No, it merely means that everyone was too lazy to respond. > > The booth exists,[1] is being organized,[2] and there will actually be > people there.[3] Great. Looking forward to meet you guys. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Mic

Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions

[Don Armstrong] > What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing > submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header > is added to prevent that. Sounds good. But since this information was already tracked, I figured there must have been a (good?) reason this ha

Re: ITP: darkplaces - greatly improved engine for original quake1

On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 12:14:53PM +0200, Alexander Fieroch wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > URL: http://icculus.org/twilight/darkplaces/index.html > License: GPL > > Description: > > darkplaces is a greatly improved engine for quake1 with new advanced > graphic effects. > > T

Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions

Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Jochen Voss: > >> Hi Goswin, >> >> On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:55:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >>> subscribing [the initial submitter] is already the current way. > >> Really? Since when is this the case? > > Just to stress Jochen's point:

Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions

* Petter Reinholdtsen: > [Florian Weimer] >> Developers must be careful to Cc: the submitters, otherwise they >> probably never receive the message. > > What about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address? It's an alias for the email address of the submitter. AFAICS, messages to this address do not end up

ITP: darkplaces - greatly improved engine for original quake1

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist URL: http://icculus.org/twilight/darkplaces/index.html License: GPL Description: darkplaces is a greatly improved engine for quake1 with new advanced graphic effects. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Re: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Sa den 23. Jul 2005 um 10:32 schrieb Steve Langasek: > It receives questions about callwave because it has received questions about > callwave. Stupidity on the Internet is remarkably self-perpetuating. If the users are too silly to read and to th

Re: libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading)

On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:33:28AM +0200, Jens Peter Secher wrote: > GCC4 does definitely not like a mix of templates and anonymous enums > [1,2] but there are easy fixes for this. [1] clearly stats this as illegal according to the C++ standard. > What is worse, it seems that GCC4 silently refuse

Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions

On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:55:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Not subscribing the initial submitter would be insane and subscribing > him is already the current way. Not in the sense that's being discussed here, it isn't. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [

Re: (no subject)

On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:00:03AM -0400, Ryan Schultz wrote: > On Saturday 23 July 2005 12:07 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > can u please remove the call waves from my computer please Thnk you very > > much > Hello Shorty550, > This is debian-devel, a mailing list for developers of the Debian G

Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions

[Florian Weimer] > Developers must be careful to Cc: the submitters, otherwise they > probably never receive the message. What about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address? I thought it send a message both to BTS and to the submitter? I use it all the time when I want the submitter to get the message. I

Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions

* Don Armstrong: > No, it wouldn't. The messages are only sent to people after they have > made it through the spam filters, and for sumitter, it's even more > difficult, because the message must be formatted properly to actually > generate a new bug instead of an error. > > The idea was for the s

Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions

* Jochen Voss: > Hi Goswin, > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:55:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> subscribing [the initial submitter] is already the current way. > Really? Since when is this the case? Just to stress Jochen's point: only closing a bug report automatically triggers mail to

Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?

On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:32:50 +0200 (CEST), Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >>> A 'normal' user doesn't know what C, C++ and Perl are. >> >> The "user" I am creating packages for does. I am not really that >> interested in working for user