On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 14:42 -0700, mina fahmy wrote:
> Are there any Debian developers in the Egypt, area?
Those two are returned when querying db.debian.org for people in Egypt:
* Ayman Negm ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Muhammad Hussain Yusuf ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You have to contact them directly to re
Good day to you, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you like watching cable T.V.?
PPV : Sports, Movies, Adult Channels, HBO ,Cinemax,
Starz, OnDemand, Ect. And the best part is you can
have all these channels with our product!
Our website : filtersppv.com
If you don't want this anymore, add /r to the domain
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> But however long it takes, some concerted effort should be able
> to improve things a lot. I would be interested to help with this.
Just file bugs for the above descriptions, I do that also if i find a
description to confusing. Since we have no central
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:12:41AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Especially for cases like where some research is necessary to find out
> what the package actually does. Some randomly chosen examples where
> the function of the package is not clear to me from reading the
> description:
I looked thr
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 06:31 pm, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> reopen 209891
> thanks
>
> If spam e-mail is going to start closing our Bugs in the BTS then we
> should
> start thinking about implementing authentication checks in the BTS...
> like
> for example: do not allow control mes
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocaml-ssl
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://savonet.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL + exceptions
Description : OCa
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:14:10PM -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
> Are there any Debian developers in the Portland, Oregon area?
Yep, plenty of us.
> I need to have my GPG key signed in order to become a Debian developer.
> I found one person at Intel who had his key signed by a Debian
> develop
Hello Steve,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 05:25:35PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> I think 2 min/pkg for *spotting* problems is reasonable, but not nearly
> enough for fixing them. Decent writing is non-trivial.
Especially for cases like where some research is necessary to find out
what the package
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 23:27 +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> The only *listed* offers for Oregon are:
>
> OR, Bend: Nick Rusnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> OR, Medford: Sam Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> but I'm not familiar enough with US geography to know if that's close
> enough.
Those are quite a
On 20-Jul-05, 15:18 (CDT), Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ke, 2005-07-20 kello 14:47 -0500, Steve Greenland kirjoitti:
> Given 15000 packages, and 20 volunteers, and on average two minutes per
> description (given that most descriptions probably only need little or
> no tweaking), thi
reopen 209891
thanks
If spam e-mail is going to start closing our Bugs in the BTS then we
should
start thinking about implementing authentication checks in the BTS...
like
for example: do not allow control messages or -close messages with no
attached (valid) GPG/PGP signatures (from a valid develo
Hello
> Maybe it would be worthwhile to
> have a weekend, similar to a bug squashing party, where all descriptions
> are proofread and for those that need it, a proposed new description
> filed as a wishlist bug?
>
> Given 15000 packages, and 20 volunteers, and on average two minutes per
> descri
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 11:42:40PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:28:22AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:39:23PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > > [Actually, although it's written in C++, AFAIK it only exports a C
> > > interface so the transiti
Hello: Are there any Debian developers in the Egypt, area? I need to have my GPG key signed in order to become a Debian developer.
Aslo want to complete the new maintainer process with the guide of a developer
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:14:10PM -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Are there any Debian developers in the Portland, Oregon area?
>
> I need to have my GPG key signed in order to become a Debian developer.
>
> I found one person at Intel who had his key signed by a Debian
> developer.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:15:41AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >[Actually, although it's written in C++, AFAIK it only exports a C
> >interface so the transition may not have been necessary. I only
> >realized this yesterday though and I'm not entirely sure a
> >non
Hello:
Are there any Debian developers in the Portland, Oregon area?
I need to have my GPG key signed in order to become a Debian developer.
I found one person at Intel who had his key signed by a Debian
developer. Can I have him sign it as his was already signed by a
developer, or do I have to
Since installing apt 0.6 on an otherwise up-to-date unstable (except
for anything depending on the aspell libraries...) packages on my
local archive are being overlooked even though this archive is listed
before others in my apt/sources.list. Downgrading to apt 0.5 and
things work again as expected
Am I the only one who finds it odd that holding the control key down
and rolling the mouse wheel UP results in the font size getting SMALLER?
Things work this way in Firefox, Galeon and IE, at least.
Normally, rolling the wheel UP moves the viewport UP, and down down.
Likewise I would expect that
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 the mental interface of
Marco d'Itri told:
> On Jul 20, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> i know i'm repeating myself here, but the real fix is to politely
> > solicit the upstream author to change or add a clause to their license
> > that makes such allowances.
Well, since I just whined about the poor quality of descriptions, I
guess I need to contribute. Since I'm NOT an IRC user, and since I can't
read Japanese and thus "same concept as madoka" is not useful, please
correct any technical mistakes.
On 20-Jul-05, 13:31 (CDT), Taku YASUI <[EMAIL PROTECTE
ke, 2005-07-20 kello 14:47 -0500, Steve Greenland kirjoitti:
> While mostly agreeing with the other comments ("libbar is a C library"
> is useful/appropriate; "foo is a perl program" is not.), I'd guess
> this is a symptom of a more general problem: far too many package
> descriptions are taken ver
On 20-Jul-05, 10:47 (CDT), "W. Borgert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what do you think about the usefulness of technical (and other
> strange) details in package description?
While mostly agreeing with the other comments ("libbar is a C library"
is useful/appropriate; "foo is a perl program" is
Em Sáb, 2005-07-16 às 17:22 +0200, Joerg Jaspert escreveu:
> I vote against it.
> Nice example just arrived yesterday: "Just" an soname change,
> maintainer didnt fix his scripts, no files installed in .debs. Simple,
> nice, example against automated addition of files.
This could happen to new ups
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:48:51PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > a new debian maintainer is also a ubuntu maintainer in some sense.
>
> Great news! Where's my paycheck?
>
> (both of the above "arguments" have already been raised long ago, yes.)
A
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libclass-objecttemplate-perl
Version : 0.7-2
Upstream Author : Sriram Srinivasam, Jason E. Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~jasons/Class-ObjectTemplate-
Package: wnpp
Owner: Taku YASUI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: nadoka
Version : 0.6.4
Upstream Author : SASADA Koichi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.atdot.net/nadoka/
* License : Ruby's
Description : IRC Client Server Progr
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 10:48 -0700, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
> > I'm talking about the Debian packages involved. For example, I have the
> > diff against solarwolf 1.4-1, while 1.5-1 was uploaded on 17 Feb 2004.
>
> What you have is a 3-way merge of (1.4-1)->(1.4-1 + Ubuntu changes) against
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, W. Borgert wrote:
"Foo is a Perl-based program that..."
"libBar is written in C..."
"libBang is written in only 42 lines of source code..."
"Baz has been written by me..."
Do such descriptions justify bug reports of severity=minor?
Well, I would guess wishlist is the ri
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:22:25PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 10:48 -0700, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
> > What you have is a 3-way merge of (1.4-1)->(1.4-1 + Ubuntu changes) against
> > 1.5-1.
>
> Sorry, but no.
> http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/by_maint
This discussion may be worth having, but it has nothing to do with
DebConf5, so please leave out the Cc to the debconf5-event list. Thanks.
ke, 2005-07-20 kello 20:22 +0200, Josselin Mouette kirjoitti:
> Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 10:48 -0700, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
> > > I'm talking about th
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 08:47 am, W. Borgert wrote:
> Do such descriptions justify bug reports of severity=minor?
Yes, with perhaps one exception:
"libBar is written in C..."
This is almost a sensible start to a description, since the language of
implementation actually matters for a libr
<< IMPORTANT INFORMATION! >>
This is an automated message.
The message you sent (attached below) requires confirmation
before it can be delivered. To confirm that you sent the
message below, just hit the "R"eply button and send this
message back (you don't need to edit anything). Once this is
do
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 07:29:00PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 10:21 -0700, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:57:34PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Le dimanche 17 juillet 2005 à 15:51 +0300, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
> > > > This is m
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:52:13AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, that fix is not in the stable package of aspell. In stable,
> > aspell-bin just depends on libaspell15 (>= 0.60), so a partial upgrade
> > of just libaspell15 would break a
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 10:21 -0700, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:57:34PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le dimanche 17 juillet 2005 à 15:51 +0300, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
> > > This is meant as a more convenient way for Debian maintainers to look
> > > for pos
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:57:34PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 17 juillet 2005 à 15:51 +0300, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
> > This is meant as a more convenient way for Debian maintainers to look
> > for possible useful patches from Ubuntu.
>
> This is a good idea, but it is based
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul van Tilburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libdbus-ruby
Version : 0.1.10
Upstream Author : Leon Breedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rubyforge.org/projects/dbus-ruby/
* License : GPL
Description : Ruby
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 06:13:22PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> I think one reason could be that some poeple would rather
> install a programm in a language they know and they are able
> to debug. Just a guess.
You might want to look into the "implemented-in" debtags facet instead, then;
it's probab
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 18:13 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> [...]
> I think one reason could be that some poeple would rather
> install a programm in a language they know and they are able
> to debug. Just a guess.
Debtags "facets"[0] are better for this. Descriptions are supposed to
help *ordinary*
Le dimanche 17 juillet 2005 à 15:51 +0300, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> brought to you by the Utnubu team (that is me, still waiting for more
> members, hint hint :-)), is the a newly formatted repository of Ubuntu
> patches.
>
> On http://utnubu.alioth.debian.org/scottish/by_maint/ you w
Hi,
* W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-20 18:08]:
> what do you think about the usefulness of technical (and other
> strange) details in package description? I think, those are
> annoying and should be avoided, but maybe I can learn, why they
> are useful. Examples:
>
> "Foo is a Perl-bas
Hi,
what do you think about the usefulness of technical (and other
strange) details in package description? I think, those are
annoying and should be avoided, but maybe I can learn, why they
are useful. Examples:
"Foo is a Perl-based program that..."
"libBar is written in C..."
"libBang is wr
Andreas Fester wrote:
> What about a simpler solution for the beginning? Assumed that
> annoying bugs have more replies, the bugs could be sorted by the
> number of replies to get an idea of their priority.
If this is implemented as an additional query that can be used from the
main page of the BT
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Ubuntu has transitioned it in their 'universe' to tqsllib1c2.
> However none of the exported headers contain the magic :: sign of C++,
> so I suspect it's unnecessary. (A recompile to link against
> libstdc++6 should be sufficient, without a name change).
Is a non-present
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:28:22AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> Christ, not another one. Is there any sort of automated way that we can
> check for these sorts of libraries before messing things up again?
Theoretically libraries should export only the symbols of their public
API, and such a chec
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kiax
Version : 0.8.4
Upstream Author : (c) 2004 - 2005, Emil Stoyanov and the Kiax Team
* URL : http://kiax.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : IAX client ap
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:28:22AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:39:23PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > [Actually, although it's written in C++, AFAIK it only exports a C
> > interface so the transition may not have been necessary. I only
> > realized this yesterday thou
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:39:23PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Uh... no...
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html
>
> It's a C++ library and the ABI changed due to being compiled with GCC
> 4.0.
>
> [Actually, although it's written in C++, AFAIK it only expo
Hi,
Several FTBFS are currently caused on at least sparc and alpha with the
current toolchain in packages using -Wl,--as-needed. It seems -Wl,-O1
is now used by default, so as soon as you use -Wl,--as-needed, you're
likely to hit this toolchain bug. The toolchain maintainers were
in
On Jul 20, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think that would solve the problem by muting the symptoms. what happens
> when the next free-but-not-quite-gpl-compatible licensed software is
> linked against libcurl (or something similar)?
Not relevant, gnutls is LGPL'ed.
> i know i'm repe
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow [Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:26:28 +0200]:
>
>> I would prefer a "subscribe" for bugs. If I am a user that hits the
>> same bug I want to get mails send so nnn-submitter and especialy want
>> to get a mail when the bug gets closed. I don't
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They considered the former reason much more important since it helps
> give a more positive experience for users even if the voting information
> is not otherwise used.
Like those "Press to get a signal" buttons on traffic lights that
aren't hooked up to a
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:34:23PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The 'reopen' command takes an optional submitter argument, so it was
> > difficult to get a version in here unambiguously. Instead, we've
> > introduced a new 'found' command, which says "I'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Actually, although it's written in C++, AFAIK it only exports a C
interface so the transition may not have been necessary. I only
realized this yesterday though and I'm not entirely sure a
non-transition would be safe.]
Non-transition is safe and desirable if all the
Hello,
> > To get some indication on the order the bugs should be solved in? As
> > we have limited time and people, it is smart to start with the bugs
> > affecting most people.
> >
>
> I can only see usefulness for QA team (orphaned) packages. A properly
> maintained package should have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC3jn6VZI/p353HiARApRzAJ993w2jRjwnjf9fwjMIA4V8XZEttQCbBUlw
G8Obku3P8I1PRazWOzPSGoA=
=C9+N
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 01:12:52PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> >To get some indication on the order the bugs should be solved in? As
> >we have limited time and people, it is smart to start with the bugs
> >affecting most people.
> IMHO this m
* Goswin von Brederlow [Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:26:28 +0200]:
> I would prefer a "subscribe" for bugs. If I am a user that hits the
> same bug I want to get mails send so nnn-submitter and especialy want
> to get a mail when the bug gets closed. I don't want to subscribe to
> the PTS, just the one bug
Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> With all these great news about the BTS these days, it would be nice to
> think about adding a voting feature: a way to count the number of users
> that are annoyed by each bug. It could be either a simple way to submit
> a follow-up to say 'hey,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 01:00:04PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Andreas Tille]
> > if you ask me any bug is worth fixing, also if only a single user
> > complained about the problem. So why spending effort in "rating"
> > bugs?
>
> To get some indication on the order the bugs should be so
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 12:44:14PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> if you ask me any bug is worth fixing, also if only a single user complained
> about the problem. So why spending effort in "rating" bugs?
Some of the relevant Bugzilla developers have articulated a couple of
reasons for their voti
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
To get some indication on the order the bugs should be solved in? As
we have limited time and people, it is smart to start with the bugs
affecting most people.
IMHO this might lead to the wrong assumption that bugs with only one
vote have lower p
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 01:01:09PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The next version of d-i will ask for participation during the
> installation. It was fixed just before debconf5.
Brilliant - that's the outcome I thought would be best :)
> Sad we didn't manage to do that before sarge was r
[Jon Dowland]
> I've been thinking about how popcon might be suggested by
> debian-installer. A cursory google search shows that this has been
> discussed in the past: can anyone point me at a summary?
The next version of d-i will ask for participation during the
installation. It was fixed just b
[Andreas Tille]
> if you ask me any bug is worth fixing, also if only a single user
> complained about the problem. So why spending effort in "rating"
> bugs?
To get some indication on the order the bugs should be solved in? As
we have limited time and people, it is smart to start with the bugs
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 12:44:14PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if you ask me any bug is worth fixing, also if only a single user
> complained about the problem. So why spending effort in "rating"
> bugs?
We rate bugs already, by severity, but I understand your point, and it
appears to
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:40:08PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> On 20/07/05, Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:49:37AM +0100, Stuart Yeates wrote:
> > > Maybe a good place to start would be to cross reference BTS with the
> > > popularity-contest database. This
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:44:43PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> Then why not run Debian?
That's a question for the admins. Is the server only hosting this
debian.net service and nothing else? Maybe it is primarily running
something else and offered to host this debian.net service on top. As
anoth
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 01:01:09PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> The intention, as I understand it, isn't to be a general-purpose package
> repository (at least, last time I looked at it, no pre-built binary packages
> were provided), but to be a "staging area" of sorts for packages which
> people
Hi,
* Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-20 12:28]:
> I'm not reading debian-devel for two days and now this. ;)
:)
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:21:09PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > why is mentors.debian.net powered by Ubuntu?
>
> mentors.debian.net is work in progress. As we are workin
Hi,
if you ask me any bug is worth fixing, also if only a single user complained
about the problem. So why spending effort in "rating" bugs?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 11:29:37AM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> surely installing popcon should be encouraged.
I've been thinking about how popcon might be suggested by
debian-installer. A cursory google search shows that this has been
discussed in the past: can anyone point me at a summary?
--
On 20/07/05, Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:49:37AM +0100, Stuart Yeates wrote:
> > Maybe a good place to start would be to cross reference BTS with the
> > popularity-contest database. This doesn't measure annoyance, of
> > course, but it's a a great measure
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:24:02AM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With all these great news about the BTS these days, it would be nice to
> think about adding a voting feature: a way to count the number of users
> that are annoyed by each bug. It could be either a simple way to submit
> a f
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:49:37AM +0100, Stuart Yeates wrote:
> Maybe a good place to start would be to cross reference BTS with the
> popularity-contest database. This doesn't measure annoyance, of
> course, but it's a a great measure of how many people are
> potentially effected by a bug.
surel
Hi, Nico...
I'm not reading debian-devel for two days and now this. ;)
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:21:09PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> why is mentors.debian.net powered by Ubuntu?
mentors.debian.net is work in progress. As we are working on an
improvement of the import process (that analyses the u
I like this idea too, since it would allow better prioritization
of bugs, and maybe help for a better planning of releases in
the future. Unfortunately, to really avoid abuse, this would end
in the necessity to introduce some kind of registration and login
mechanism to the BTS.
What about a simpl
Paul Brossier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With all these great news about the BTS these days, it would be nice to
> think about adding a voting feature: a way to count the number of users
> that are annoyed by each bug. It could be either a simple way to submit
> a follow-up to say 'hey, i faced this one too
Hello,
> Why not just submit a 'me too' email to the bug report?
I think it should be a command for the control bot. A simple 'me too' mail
clutters the bug report, cannot be easily counted, whereas a simple
command ("confirm #XX" for example) would allow to count such votes,
use them as sear
On 7/20/05, Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With all these great news about the BTS these days, it would be nice to
> think about adding a voting feature: a way to count the number of users
> that are annoyed by each bug. It could be either a simple way to submit
> a follow-up t
On 7/20/05, Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With all these great news about the BTS these days, it would be nice to
> think about adding a voting feature: a way to count the number of users
> that are annoyed by each bug. It could be either a simple way to submit
> a follow-up to say 'h
Hi,
With all these great news about the BTS these days, it would be nice to
think about adding a voting feature: a way to count the number of users
that are annoyed by each bug. It could be either a simple way to submit
a follow-up to say 'hey, i faced this one too', either just a button on
bugrep
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:52 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [snip]
>> So I would say just drop libaspell15c and reupload anything that was
>> already wrong
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:52 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> So I would say just drop libaspell15c and reupload anything that was
> already wrongfully uploaded again.
What does that do to people
Hi,
* Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-20 08:54]:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 12:21:09PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > why is mentors.debian.net powered by Ubuntu?
>
> Why is this question on debian-devel, instead of in the inbox of the m.d.n
> maintainers?
You are right, wrong place, sor
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:39:23PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
>>> It's a C++ library and the ABI changed due to being compiled with GCC
>>> 4.0.
>>
>>> [Actually, although it's written in C++, AFAIK it only
Le Lun 18 Juillet 2005 23:36, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:06:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > A frequently requested feature for the bug tracking system in
> > recent years has been the ability to track which bugs apply to
> > which distributions, so that, eg, maintaine
Hello.
David Nusinow:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:30:14AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
>> [The small amount of stuff that _is_ different seems to mostly be
>> high-profile end-user GUI apps that aren't going to have much
>> significance for a server anyway.]
> Then why not run Debian?
My wild gu
89 matches
Mail list logo
