On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 01:01:05AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> My problem with it is DFSG 8. If we accept a trademark license, we're
> attaching additional rights to the program that are Debian-specific. I
> understand that the DFSG were framed in the context of copyright
> licenses, but I thin
Special Announcement:
Good Day, I have been instructed by my head office to alert you to the fact
that your file has been reviewed and there now are a few potential options for
you to consider.
Please note that this issue is time sensitive and that your previous credit
situation is not an iss
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:38:53PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Their trademark policy is something that should not exist in a free
> > > software context. They don't care about free software. T
On 2005/06/30, at 4:11, David Moreno Garza wrote:
>> In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to
>> /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.
> Any specific idea why not use 'i486-linux-gnu'? I've seen it was already
> reported on the bug you ment
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:08:33PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> > Placing a footer in list traffic is a compromise between modifying
> > messages as little as possible and trying to help people find a way
> > to get their questions answered.
>
> A bad co
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think if DFSG 4 had intended to grant licensors broad latitude to invent
> novel ways of prevent such an inference from being drawn, it would have
> been worded differently -- or, at least, the last two sentences would have
> been.
Bear in mind that
Miles Bader dijo [Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 03:14:02PM +0900]:
> Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Whew. That was close. I thought we were gonna lose evilfinder.
>
> ... if we did, that would show that Debian really _is_ evil -- and if
> that's true, evilfinder must be capable of true proph
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:38:53PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Their trademark policy is something that should not exist in a free
> > software context. They don't care about free software. They don't care
> > about distributors/vendors.
>
> What
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 12:17:28AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 02:56:54PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:30:32PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 04:05:55PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > > Le mardi 28 juin 2005
Hi Yamada-san,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:52:32AM +0900, akira yamada wrote:
> I uploaded ruby1.8_1.8.2-9 and ruby1.9_1.9.0+20050623-2 to Debian.
> In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.
> ref:
>
* Baptiste Carvello ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> First I wanted to say again that whatever your final decision, a build
> system
> that optionally does the renaming would still be appreciated. It would be
> even
> better if the MoFo would do it themselves, of course. I'm sure some u
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 08:29 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > I've noticed that http://www.debian.org/distrib/cd/ and
> > > http://www.debian.org/CD/ are basically the same. /CD/ has more
> > > information than /distrib/cd/, so perhaps it would be best to make
> > > /distrib/cd/ redirect to /CD/
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 00:52 +0900, akira yamada wrote:
> Dear Ruby users
>
>
> I uploaded ruby1.8_1.8.2-9 and ruby1.9_1.9.0+20050623-2 to Debian.
> In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.
Any speci
Cheap Software-Upgrades-educational bargains-oem-Software Buyer's Guide.
http://lfv.c1y9xtunr4ujrvu.putrefydl.com
Very little is needed to make a happy life.
Plans are worthless, but planning is everything.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-28 13:10:04 +0200]:
> Hello Igor,
>
> * Igor Genibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-09 15:48]:
> > * Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-08 10:25:44 +0100]:
> >
> > > developer.php is currently configured not to check against any external
> > > ke
On 29-Jun-05, 07:26 (CDT), Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The BTS is public, and we encourage public discussion of bugs, so you
> should not assume that the old maintainer talked with the submitter in
> private to begin with.
The design of the BTS (mails sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
Dear Ruby users
I uploaded ruby1.8_1.8.2-9 and ruby1.9_1.9.0+20050623-2 to Debian.
In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to
/usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.
ref:
- http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00010.htm
While looking for a solution I realized that it had something to do with
the libtool that was generated in the top_builddir. If I used
/usr/bin/libtool the -rpath was correct. So with some help from `diff` I
found out what seemed to be a cause, enable-fast-install must be enabled.
I'm trying n
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:30:04AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> A UPS upgrade is being performed this week in the machine room that
> houses sphor.debian.org (aka bugs.debian.org) hosted at the Oregon
> State University's Open Source Lab. Part of this upgrade will require
> 2 complete power outages
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, James Troup wrote:
> A UPS upgrade is being performed this week in the machine room that
> houses sphor.debian.org (aka bugs.debian.org) hosted at the Oregon
> State University's Open Source Lab. Part of this upgrade will require
> 2 complete power outages for that room. Thes
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hallo Santiago,
>
> * Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-29 13:21]:
> > On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > I think you misunderstood me. Example:
> > > An adopted package xxx has a lot of old bugs which are
> > > related to very old versi
Le mardi 28 juin 2005 à 14:48 -0400, Anthony DeRobertis a écrit :
> > To make things clearer: there is no way to tell whether a program
> > actually needs librsvg2-common. Even testing it with and without
> > librsvg2-common installed wouldn't be enough, as it could e.g. make use
> > of themes that
Hallo Santiago,
* Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-29 13:21]:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Nico Golde wrote:
> > I think you misunderstood me. Example:
> > An adopted package xxx has a lot of old bugs which are
> > related to very old versions. Now the maintainer changes.
> > Now he wants to s
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Nico Golde wrote:
> I think you misunderstood me. Example:
> An adopted package xxx has a lot of old bugs which are
> related to very old versions. Now the maintainer changes.
> Now he wants to send mails to all bug openors if the bug is
> still actual and can be reproduced.
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> In my experience as a listmaster, the people who like to complain about
> the fact that we add a signature on the bottom of every email, will
> usually find a number of other things they dislike. [...]
That's funny. I don't like the high number of spam m
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 12:18 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> The 'build-essential' package itself is not build-essential, it's a
> helper package depending 'accidently' on all build-essential packages.
Does that mean that packages shouldn't be build-depending on the
build-essential package it
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 12:31:23AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> > please excuse this blatant cross-posting, i wouldn't do it if i didn't
> > think it were critical that i do so...
>
> > http://www.infodrom.org/~joey/log/?200506142140
>
> > say it isn't so!
>
> It isn't so.
Hallo Eduard,
* Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-29 12:10]:
> * Nico Golde [Tue, Jun 28 2005, 11:46:31PM]:
> > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s-pkg-tracking-system
[...]
> > Maybe I missed something?
>
> I wrote a such script a while ago,
>
Hello debians,
I am not using debian and can thus not build and maintain debian packages.
Thus I am looking for someone, who audits and maintains policyd-weight -
a policy daemon in perl for postfix.
The master site is http://robtone.mine.nu/postfix/
I am a FreeBSD contributor and maintaining t
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 12:42:45AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:34:01PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
>
> > > > If it really should not be done, maybe a check could be added to lintian
> > > > and/or linda and CDBS and the policy should be updated.
> > >
> > > There *is
* Guus Sliepen [Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:08:31AM +0200]:
> > * URL : http://www.neuroni.org/
>
> I can't find any reference to enc on that Italian website.
Try https://neuroni.org/ml/docs.php
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:23:16AM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote:
> * Guus Sliepen [Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:08:31AM +0200]:
> > > * URL : http://www.neuroni.org/
> >
> > I can't find any reference to enc on that Italian website.
>
> Try https://neuroni.org/ml/docs.php
That points me t
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:20:29PM +0200, Riccardo Setti wrote:
> * Package name: enc
That is a very generic name. Since this is a tool meant especially for
mailinglists, could it be renamed to "enclist" or "encmailing" or
something more specific?
> * URL : http://www.neuroni.org
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 09:33 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > When I installed openoffice.org2, out went OOo 1.4. (Which
> > surprised me, since I remember you writing that they are supposed
> > to be parallel installable.)
>
> Then you most probably had a thesaurus i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
A UPS upgrade is being performed this week in the machine room that
houses sphor.debian.org (aka bugs.debian.org) hosted at the Oregon
State University's Open Source Lab. Part of this upgrade will require
2 complete power outages for that room.
Hi there,
I'm finally on the "working" computer. After having tried to build the
.dev package again, here is the missing info.
The command used for compiling 'geo' (one of the binaries that must be
linked to librheolef.so (the shared library)) is the following one :
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mo
Il sistema Antivirus della posta elettronica Rai non permette la consegna del
messaggio con soggetto : Re: SMTP Server
Il messaggio inviato da : debian-devel@lists.debian.org é stato cancellato
perchè l' estensione del file allegato non é accettata.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:34:01PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> > > If it really should not be done, maybe a check could be added to lintian
> > > and/or linda and CDBS and the policy should be updated.
> >
> > There *is* a lintian check for this, and there is no need for policy to be
> > update
Hi,
Ron Johnson wrote:
> When I installed openoffice.org2, out went OOo 1.4. (Which
> surprised me, since I remember you writing that they are supposed
> to be parallel installable.)
Then you most probably had a thesaurus installed. The formats are
incompatible and so...
If you don't have a the
Body Wrap at Home to lose 6-20 inches in one hour.
With Bodywrap we guarantee:
you'll lose 6-8 Inches in one hour
100% Satisfaction or your money back
Bodywrap is soothing formula that contours,
cleanses and rejuvenates your body while
reducing inches.
http://so.incdropfat.com
* Victor Seva [Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:39:09 +0200]:
Hola Victor,
thanks for your interest in adopting a Debian package!
> I am trying to contact with you, again, in order to take over the
> linux-wlan-ng package. Enrico Tassi and I have no answer from you. We
> are interested in maintain this pac
41 matches
Mail list logo
