#include
* Roberto C. Sanchez [Wed, Jun 22 2005, 12:41:08PM]:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:32:04AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> >
> > You will also need to be careful about when you run dh_makeshlibs if you
> > manually set the version numbers.
> >
>
> In debian/rules, I have this:
>
> # shared
On 06/22/05 12:02:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:22:33 -0400 (EDT), Freddie Unpenstein <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> > - inetd begone! -> xinetd (better mechanism to control DoS,
> >> > separation, etc.)
>
> >> xinetd begone. There is no justification for us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Frost wrote:
:: Based on the requirements it seems unlikely Debian
:: would be able to afford to pay for hosting very
:: long with our current donation income amounts.
:: Gigabit network connections and associated rack space
:: is cheaper than
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Finally, it reports problems against the state of the directory
> tree at the last distribution compared with the state without
> the packages having been installed.
It would be useful if it could report the same problems in the
intermediate dis
On Thursday 23 June 2005 07:17, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes, it is, if every suggestion for "improvement" is a poor one. Lack
> > > of good ideas does not justify bad ones; not having any good ideas does
> > > not invalidate or in any way reduce the value of pointing out the
Could the Debian mail servers be reconfigured to put more information in the
Received: lines?
Below is a sample from the headers of a mail sent to me by gluck. You will
note that my server logs that the envelope recipient was [EMAIL PROTECTED]
while gluck puts no such data in the log entry.
T
ma, 2005-06-20 kello 16:47 +0100, Paul Brossier kirjoitti:
> how about an optional debian/package.piuparts file that would contain
> the syntax to make runtime tests? this would allow to check that
> executables can be run, and possibly that their result is consistent. it
> could even be used to de
la, 2005-06-18 kello 22:53 -0400, Joey Hess kirjoitti:
> I want to run a test that installs each package in woody in turn,
> upgrades them to sarge, then to sid, then purges it, then looks for
> /usr/doc and /usr/info stuff that is were produced during the package's
> install or upgrade and not rem
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 13:09 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> That would make the "you forgot this, and this or this"
> useless in my opinion.
> What do you think? I would write this patch, if you agree.
> Regards Nico
You could write the patch, file a wishlist bug against reportbug and
send it to the bu
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 17:43 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I was planning on adopting iceme and icepref. However, both are no
> longer active upstream. They are now modules of the IceWM Control Panel
> (IceWMCP). I will package IceWMCP soon. However, I would like to
> ensure that users with
I was planning on adopting iceme and icepref. However, both are no
longer active upstream. They are now modules of the IceWM Control Panel
(IceWMCP). I will package IceWMCP soon. However, I would like to
ensure that users with iceme or icepref currently installed see icewmcp
as the "next versio
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:19:44PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2005 09:21, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 05:58:11PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > Rejecting every suggestion for an improvement is not helpful.
> >
> > Yes, it is, if ever
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/22/2005, 06:47:05 PM:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:52:46 +0200
> Source: libdbd-pg-perl
> Binary: libdbd-pg-perl
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 1.42-0sarge1
> Distribution: sta
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunatly the CCCP is currently maxed out on power in its existing
> racks, so is not taking new clients, unless one moves.
Is this true for its "sister sites" too? The web page says they have
sites in Seattle, Chicago, Toronto, and Washington.
Thomas
On 6/22/05, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Olaf van der Spek]
> > I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
> > (more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
> > load on central servers?
>
> Please give some specific examples of wha
[Olaf van der Spek]
> I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
> (more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
> load on central servers?
Please give some specific examples of what you mean.
Debian services are already distributed across a wide ra
On 6/22/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If you think you could offer hosting under these conditions, please
> > send details to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I can't offer hosting, but I do have a suggestion (though perhaps it's
> already
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 11:16, Brian May wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.e
>n.html#s-mdadm
> The documentation said that there was no need for a config file, and I
> never used a 2.2 kernel, so the paragraphs starting with "If your RAID
> array was
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:22:33 -0400 (EDT), Freddie Unpenstein <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
>> > - inetd begone! -> xinetd (better mechanism to control DoS,
>> > separation, etc.)
>> xinetd begone. There is no justification for using anything
>> resembling inetd on a modern system.
> What planet
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:32:04AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
>
> You will also need to be careful about when you run dh_makeshlibs if you
> manually set the version numbers.
>
In debian/rules, I have this:
# shared library versions, option 1
version=0.2.6
major=0
Is that what I need to change?
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I can't offer hosting, but I do have a suggestion (though perhaps it's
> already been considered and rejected). We could perhaps take
> advantage of the California Community Colocation Project, which offers
> free colocation for non-profits and individuals.
Unfortunat
Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 11:14 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez a écrit :
> I am working on packaging the ROTE library so that I can depend on it
> for anyterm. I need to package version 0.2.6 + the CVS from 20050511.
> I have created a patch between the 0.2.6 release and the 20050511 CVS.
>
> Without
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>I am working on packaging the ROTE library so that I can depend on it
>for anyterm. I need to package version 0.2.6 + the CVS from 20050511.
>I have created a patch between the 0.2.6 release and the 20050511 CVS.
>
>Without the patch, the relevant contents of the .deb a
Now that sarge has released, I really want to move to the 1-0stable series
of the dovecot IMAP/POP3 server in sid. However being really busy with
various things I thought it might be prudent to get one or more
co-maintainers to help out so it can get done quickly. (Though there are
a couple o
I am working on packaging the ROTE library so that I can depend on it
for anyterm. I need to package version 0.2.6 + the CVS from 20050511.
I have created a patch between the 0.2.6 release and the 20050511 CVS.
Without the patch, the relevant contents of the .deb are:
$ dpkg -c librote0_0.2.6-1_
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 11:43:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, June 22, 2005 11:36, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > "Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
> >>> o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hostin
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:48:11AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Nico Golde]
> > what about including the possibility of an RFS in reportbug?
> > I think this would be a good idea because I often see RFS
> > requests which are totally stupid.
> Well, either way, I'd suggest a separate script.
[Jonas Meurer]
> paying for any parts of infrastructure would delete the independance
> from donations. debian was never depending on any donations, for
> good reasons. if we change this, the next step will be that some
> monstrous companies offer deals to us: "We give you money, you give
> us XY
[Nico Golde]
> what about including the possibility of an RFS in reportbug?
> I think this would be a good idea because I often see RFS
> requests which are totally stupid.
Encouraging people so inexperienced as to post stupid RFSes to upload
*more* things to Debian is not particularly productive
On 22/06/2005 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
> > o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
>
> I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
> and owns quite a lot of money - wouldn't paying for critic
> > - inetd begone! -> xinetd (better mechanism to control DoS,
> > separation, etc.)
> xinetd begone. There is no justification for using anything
> resembling inetd on a modern system.
What planet do you live on? I want MORE use of inetd, not less. I want to be
able to select a service, a
Hi,
what about including the possibility of an RFS in reportbug?
I think this would be a good idea because I often see RFS
requests which are totally stupid.
If we would include it in reportbug everybody can use a
template (for example similiar to the ITP template) and
reportbug could check if ther
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, June 22, 2005 11:36, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > I think the point is that we ask for a donation before we spend money
> > on it.
>
> Sure, but the statement quoted above rules it out entirely. "can't pay" is
> pretty definitive. I'm wonder
On Jun 22, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I am thinking too much in the future, but I would really like to
> see yaird in Debian be able to use klibc in Debian for all the user
> tools (I believe there is already an ITP for klibc).
People are working on this.
--
ciao,
Marco
signa
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:21:52PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Monday 20 June 2005 21:45, "Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyway, the major problem now are the @packages.debian.org addresses, I
> > have ~20 of them and most days they account for 1/3 to 1/2 of all the
> > spam I r
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 19:23, "Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 22, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not just block mail sent to the packages.debian.org addresses?
> > No-one sends real mail to them anyway so they are just a free pass for
> > spammers.
>
> Mainl
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 19:32, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I am ok with anti-spam measures which enable a well-behaving false
> >> positive sender to know they have run afoul, and in which the
> >> maintainers of the mechanism promise to try and adjust the system so
> >> t
On Wed, June 22, 2005 11:36, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> "Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
>>> o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
>>
>> I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary d
"Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
>> o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
>
> I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
> and owns quite a lot of money - wouldn't paying fo
> "Jonas" == Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jonas> YAIRD is a sysfs-based initrd builder. It determines
Jonas> which modules to load based on the same algorithms as
Jonas> hotplug. Unlike Debian's stock initrd-tools, the kernel
Jonas> being booted need not suppo
> "Martin" == Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> * Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-21
Martin> 14:44]:
>> Are there any kind of documents describing how to move from
>> raidtools safely to mdadm without loosing a raid?
Martin>
http://www
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 21 June 2005 01:46, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > You could help by listing the anti-spam measures that you consider to be
>> > acceptable. Rejecting every suggestion for an i
On Jun 22, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not just block mail sent to the packages.debian.org addresses? No-one
> sends real mail to them anyway so they are just a free pass for spammers.
Mainly because I do not know if I can do it without creating
backscatter, and I will not /de
On Monday 20 June 2005 21:45, "Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, the major problem now are the @packages.debian.org addresses, I
> have ~20 of them and most days they account for 1/3 to 1/2 of all the
> spam I receive (and almost all of it could be blocked with the CBL).
Why not j
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 01:46, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You could help by listing the anti-spam measures that you consider to be
> > acceptable. Rejecting every suggestion for an improvement is not
> > helpful.
>
> I am ok with
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 09:21, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 05:58:11PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Rejecting every suggestion for an improvement is not helpful.
>
> Yes, it is, if every suggestion for "improvement" is a poor one. Lack
> of good ideas does
On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
> o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
and owns quite a lot of money - wouldn't paying for critical parts of
infrastructure like ftpmaster be mo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Tsung-Hsiang Chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: openvanilla
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Lukhnos D. Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kang-ming Liu, Weizhong Yang, Tian-jian Jiang,
Meng-juei Hsieh
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you think you could offer hosting under these conditions, please
> send details to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't offer hosting, but I do have a suggestion (though perhaps it's
already been considered and rejected). We could perhaps take
advantage of the C
you can use pptpd (poptop).
But I prefer pppoe. The main thing is connectiong server to RADIUS
(freeradius) server. This RADIUS can use MYSQL. You can use web
scripts (PHP-using same MYSQL tables) to add users, set quote ... and
everything you want.
DO NOT use PAP authentication becouse passwords
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-cache-lite
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : Fabien Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/Cache_Lite/
* License : LGPL
Description : PHP PE
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-pager
Version : 2.3.2
Upstream Author : Lorenzo Alberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Richard
Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/Pager
* License
Le Mer 22 Juin 2005 02:52, Ben Burton a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Since my spare time is not what it used to be, I have put a few KDE
> apps up for adoption this morning:
>
> kdbg (#315336) -- graphical debugger interface
> kprof (#315337) -- visual tool to help analyse profiling results
> kbear
53 matches
Mail list logo
