On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 08:44:04PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't think it would hurt if maintainers whose packages are in this state
> > would email the relevant @buildd.debian.org addresses and cc:
> > debian-release on the message -- n
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 05:27:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> and if we relax this to only require "within 10 days of any source upload,
> assuming the source isn't buggy, there must be a binary upload for this
> security bug", we would be kicking out
> alpha arm mips mipsel powerpc sparc
I
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:09:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > - security response time (more builds to do)
> > Which DSAs came out later than they should have because of this
> > supposed delay? Nor could this possibly slow release.
> DSAs are occasionally delayed waiting on builds. The prive
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 08:54:36PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was quoting a post with actual download numbers that actually demonstrate
> > that the vast majority of users are on i386: see http://blog.bofh.it/id_66.
> But that doesn't
Anyone in the DC-area want to meet for keysigning March 13 - 20th?
I'll be there for work, but will have some free time.
Please cc replies or just mail directly
- bri
--
Recursivity. Call back if it happens again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
>> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
>>> be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatic
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:15:30 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 04:28:36PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Chances are that it was uploaded together with the library it depends
>> on, relying on ftpmasters doing their work, as in processing new
>> packages in reas
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:43:41PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
> be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatically
> build as many of these packages. I know where I can read about setting
> up a bu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Grzegorz Bizon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: specter
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Michal Kwiatkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://joker.linuxstuff.pl/specter/
* License : GPL
Description : packet logge
hi josh,
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:18:19PM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote:
> I seem to recall hearing that NEW processing is based solely on binary
> packages, so that the new source package would not need to go through NEW
> if it creates a binary package that is already in the archive.
>
> I coul
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 12:59:49PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > The version in experimental has -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, and it works
> > > on files larger than 2GB, but I have only tested it on the i386
> > > architecture.
> > Please use the value
El sÃb, 26-02-2005 a las 14:18 -0500, Josh Metzler escribiÃ:
> On Saturday 26 February 2005 02:45 am, sean finney wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > i'm maintaining a source package that produces two binary packages.
> > however, one of the packages is built from a seperately distributed (same
> > author, sam
On Saturday 26 February 2005 02:45 am, sean finney wrote:
> hi,
>
> i'm maintaining a source package that produces two binary packages.
> however, one of the packages is built from a seperately distributed (same
> author, same website, but different tarball and versioning scheme)
> tarball.
>
> so
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 04:28:36PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:16:57 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >That said, any package that is uninstallable in testing for such a long
> >period of time almost certainly has an RC bug that should be filed. In the
> >
|| On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:09:07 +0100
|| Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
tl> Hi Joey,
tl> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:42:49PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>> I've done this for years using the attached script (which will work with
>> both svn and cvs (less well), and can also tag release
* Daniel Burrows [Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:42:28 -0500]:
> On Saturday 26 February 2005 01:37 pm, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I remember that I once modified my dh_install to use cp -al. That will
> > make each file be a hardlink, even if you copy a dir. It's fast.
> > I wouldn't mind that dh_insta
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
>> be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatically
>> build as many of these packages. I know wh
David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Friday 25 February 2005 18:43, Frank Küster wrote:
>> in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
>> be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatically
>> build as many of these packages.
>
> Take a look
On Saturday 26 February 2005 01:37 pm, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Frank Küster [Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:34:45 +0100]:
> > I didn't look closely, but I think it might need quite some changes to
> > the code. It seems dh_install uses cp -a for directories, and you cannot
> > use hard links with directories
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My point is that half the reason why dh_install was introduced instead
> of dh_movefiles is to copy files, not move them, and it seems odd that
> now there's a thread asking how to get dh_install to move files. If you
> want to move files, don't use dh_ins
* Frank Küster [Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:34:45 +0100]:
> I didn't look closely, but I think it might need quite some changes to
> the code. It seems dh_install uses cp -a for directories, and you cannot
> use hard links with directories (at least not generally, here on my ext3
> $HOME it does not work.
Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 20:25 +0100, GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:54:27PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>>
>> > Correct. So, why not use mv?
>>
>> Add a new "--move" flag to dh_installfiles, come up with some exact
>> numbers showing th
hi!
i'v got some troubles with the via-rhine driver
resp. the via nic and hope someone can give me some hint.
the problem:i'm sending some ethernet frames
from kernel to the nic (with dev_queue_xmit). everything seems to be ok,
/proc/net/dev lists all packets sent, but the target nic did
Mrs.Lydia JOHNSON
C/o Eglise Uganda
Catholic church
Liberte Sicap,
Dakar Senegal.
Good Day,
I know this mail will come to you as a surprise, nevertheless I am Mrs. Lydia
Johnson, aged 59 years, the wife of Major Stephen Johnson, Chief Security
Officer and Aide-decamp to the president Charles
I have Trust 3011A Wireless optical deskset mouse and
keybord and use Debian sarge. I tried in XF86Config-4
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier"Configured Mouse"
Driver"mouse"
Option"CorePointer"
Option"Device""/dev/psaux"
Option"Proto
Hi,
* Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-26 16:07]:
> Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That's rather OT, but I wanted to target my question at developers, cause
> > I suppose that's the only group which would be able to help me.
> >
> > I would like to put on
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 09:56:29 +0100, David Schmitt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Saturday 26 February 2005 08:45, sean finney wrote:
>> so i'm thinking these two packages should be generated from their own
>> respective tarballs (and i'm not sure why they weren't in the first
>> place). however, o
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:16:57 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>That said, any package that is uninstallable in testing for such a long
>period of time almost certainly has an RC bug that should be filed. In the
>case of gpe-contacts, this is definitely so; the package currently in
Hi,
thanks to both Clint and you for the help.
In /etc/groff/man.local, I removed the comments in front of:
. if '\*[.T]'utf8' \
.char - \N'45'
and removed the negation ! in front of the first condition:
. if '\*[.T]'utf8' \
.tr \[oq]'
(I could have removed the condition alltogether)
You
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The version in experimental has -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, and it works
> > on files larger than 2GB, but I have only tested it on the i386
> > architecture.
>
> Please use the value of $(getconf LFS_CFLAGS) instead; it appears (based on
> past exim4 bu
BRAIN TRAUMA - FLATLINE EP! PRE-ORDER YOUR COPY NOW!!!
That is correct. You can now pre-order your copy of FLATLINE, the debut EP
from the underground phenomena, Brain Trauma. Now, "why would I preorder a
copy?" you may ask. Well, this is why... ONLY for those who pre-order there
copies, Myself an
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 04:27:48AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 10:23 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:45:47PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 00:53 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > > I have several reports saying procmail does no
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 10:23 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:45:47PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 00:53 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > I have several reports saying procmail does not support mbox folders
> > > larger than 2GB. Questions:
> >
> > OT
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:45:47PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 00:53 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > I have several reports saying procmail does not support mbox folders
> > larger than 2GB. Questions:
>
> OT here, but WTF are people smoking, to have 2GB mbox files?
Consider
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 12:12:31AM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> During upgrades the slapd package (for example) has to do some
> adjustments on config files (it asks the user for permission of course).
>
> Problem: How do I make sure the new config files have the same
> permissions!? Curren
* Eric Lavarde [Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:04:45 +0100]:
> I'm pretty sure, it's somehow due to the fact that I have set
> LANG=en_IE.UTF-8 (unicode being important of course).
> Nevertheless, I don't know if it's a problem of the manpage system or of
> the manpage writers, and how the writers could ci
> Nevertheless, I don't know if it's a problem of the manpage system or of
> the manpage writers, and how the writers could circumvent/solve the
> problem. And this information would be useful before I start filing
> bugs, or!?
This is a bug in the manpages themselves. The unformatted source s
Hi,
in some man pages (e.g. ImageMagick, dh_installmime but I've met other
ones), the dashes and single quotes are not really what they look like,
but some other unicode letter.
This has two major drawbacks:
- search for options become nearly impossible (try searching for -m,
without using -).
-
On Saturday 26 February 2005 08:45, sean finney wrote:
> so i'm thinking these two packages should be generated from their own
> respective tarballs (and i'm not sure why they weren't in the first
> place). however, one thing that's not clear to me is whether or not the
> new second source package
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 11:32 -0800, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 20:25 +0100, GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:54:27PM +0100, Frank KÃster wrote:
> >
> > > Correct. So, why not use mv?
> >
> > Add a new "--move" flag to dh_installfiles, come up with some exact
> >
40 matches
Mail list logo
