> "Miriam" == Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Miriam> * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
It is licenced under all of these licenses? Seems a very flexibly
approach... Presumably the user picks which ever one the like the
most. This removes all these potential nasty
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: construo
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : 2D construc
Your message dated Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:00:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line openoffice.org: uninstallable on powerpc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Sunday 30 January 2005 08:58, Helen Faulkner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> neither childish nor unreasonable, though it is possibly not actually
> much fun for Rusty and others.
Receiving a flame that you can display at a conference dinner is something to
be proud of!
Some people are (in)famo
On Sunday 30 January 2005 07:47, Helen Faulkner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For those of you who don't know Rusty has a fine collection of flames
> > (and other silly messages) written to some very skillful Linux
> > programmers. You can write excellent code and be nice and still get
> > flame
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:28:53AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> > "Because I don't wanna play by the rules!" is not a rationale.
>
> You are mistaken. I want to play by the rules, but the rules say
> executables should go to /usr/bin, *not* that eve
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 15:01 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Jesus,
>
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 01:49:20PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:22:13AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > an advice for "they":
> > > >
> > > > 1) make a script to mirror from http://www.d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
| Mike, I would like to make pbzip2 part of the bzip2 package. May I
| take over your ITP report?
Sure, that would be fine, take it. Since the RFP cc'd you and I didn't
hear from anyone in a couple of days, I wasn't sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
| AFAICS this feature should be added to bzip2, and not go into a
| separate binary/package.
Since it does just use libbz2 this is a possibility. I will inquire to
pbzip2 upstream if you plans to submit this feature to bzip2 upstre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Heath wrote:
| Is there a library version?
No, perhaps the short description is misleading. pbzip2 works by
splitting up a file into chunks and then encoding each chunk with a
separate thread(via libbz2), so it is perhaps more described as a
paral
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:42:36PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>Mike Furr wrote:
>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>retitle 292541 ITP: pbzip2 -- Parallel bzip2 implementation
>>thanks.
>>
>>Package name: pbzip2
>>Version: 0.9
>>Upstream Author: Jeff Gilchrist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 02:26:45PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > There is one case in which users can be bitten by this: when using apt-get
> > dist-upgrade to sarge, so when documenting the woody-sarge upgrade, it
> > should
> > be at least mentioned that the user can run into this and should
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> "Because I don't wanna play by the rules!" is not a rationale.
You are mistaken. I want to play by the rules, but the rules say
executables should go to /usr/bin, *not* that everything in /usr/bin
should be executable.
> So you have to specify a path
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Henning Glawe wrote:
>
> > I must have some supernatural powers to always attract the same bug: woodys
> > apt fed too short lists into dpkg and thus broke the configuration of
> > circular depending packages (N
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Mike Furr wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> retitle 292541 ITP: pbzip2 -- Parallel bzip2 implementation
> thanks.
>
> Package name: pbzip2
> Version: 0.9
> Upstream Author: Jeff Gilchrist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> URL: http://compression.ca/pbzip2/
> Lic
Jesus,
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 01:49:20PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:22:13AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > an advice for "they":
> > >
> > > 1) make a script to mirror from http://www.dmoz.org/Kids_and_Teens/
> > > 2) unplug "their" computer from the network
Drill a chick soon
http://camestresbeggarliness.com/sse/
0ff : camestresbeggarliness.com/xyp/
The antenna giuseppe romano brest astoria .
She household cutset pith contributor synoptic .
watkins burg cyclades ode bellini striven .
riemannian deane biconcave pentecostal .
The arc
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:40:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Jochen Voss wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > My question: does anybody have further references for the question
> > whether it is ok or maybe even preferable to install non-programs in
> > /usr/bin?
>
> You forgot to quot
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Henning Glawe wrote:
> I must have some supernatural powers to always attract the same bug: woodys
> apt fed too short lists into dpkg and thus broke the configuration of
> circular depending packages (Note: "dpkg --configure blah blubb", where blah
> depe
ЗбУбЗг ЪбнЯг жСНгЙ Зббе жИСЯЗКе жИЪП
нУС ЗПЗСЙ гдКПнЗК ИУге дК Зд КФСЭеЗ ИжМеЯ ЗбИЗУг
жЗбРн дУЪП Ие ИнддЗ жЗбРн ЗнЩЗ дСнП гд ОИСКЯг Зд
КШбЪждЗ Ъбм гЗбПЯг ждУКЭнП гдЯг жКУКЭнПжд гдЗ
жЗбЗд дЪСЦ бЯ МТ гд ИЪЦ гжЗЦнЪдЗ ЭбЗ КИОб ИТнЗСе бдЗ гд ФОХЯ ЗбЯСнг
http://www.basmh.net ЗбжЗМее ЗбСЖнУне ббгжЮЪ
Fix your anxiety or any other health concern with Medication's from the
internet this instant.
There has never been a safer, professional place.
Pay 1/2 the $ of your local store.
A prescription wont be needed.
Using Copy/Paste put the site below in your web browser.
www.shq.fastermedz.com/?wid=
Mike Furr wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> retitle 292541 ITP: pbzip2 -- Parallel bzip2 implementation
> thanks.
>
> Package name: pbzip2
> Version: 0.9
> Upstream Author: Jeff Gilchrist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> URL: http://compression.ca/pbzip2/
> License: BSD-style lice
Helen Faulkner wrote:
> Please don't CC me.
> I am on this list, and I therefore did not request to be CCd.
>
> Russell Coker wrote:
[...]
For those of you who don't know Rusty has a fine collection of flames
(and other silly messages) written to some very skillful Linux
programmers. You can wri
El Sábado 29 Enero 2005 22:47, Helen Faulkner escribió:
> Ahh, it's the "I can deal with it therefore it's OK" line. What if
> there is another solution? Are you even prepared to consider that
> possibility?
>
> What would you prefer:
> 1) - a community where people are pleasant to each other, wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
retitle 292541 ITP: pbzip2 -- Parallel bzip2 implementation
thanks.
Package name: pbzip2
Version: 0.9
Upstream Author: Jeff Gilchrist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://compression.ca/pbzip2/
License: BSD-style license, same as bzip2
Description: parallel
Please don't CC me.
I am on this list, and I therefore did not request to be CCd.
Russell Coker wrote:
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 11:26, Helen Faulkner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do not believe that being thick-skinned enough to cope with people who
are very agressive or insulting should be a r
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Jochen Voss writes:
>> Any references for this? I was a little bit disappointed that the FHS
>> was so unclear about /usr/bin and I do not know where else to look.
>
> While the FHS is not as explicit as it might be, with the application of a
> bit of co
Jochen Voss writes:
> Any references for this? I was a little bit disappointed that the FHS
> was so unclear about /usr/bin and I do not know where else to look.
While the FHS is not as explicit as it might be, with the application of a
bit of common sense it is sufficiently clear.
--
John Hasle
Hello Santiago,
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 06:06:31PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Because we already have /usr/bin for that and there is no need to
> change every script that uses gettext.
The "for that" is my question. Do you have any reference
for this usage of /usr/bin? Is this suggested to pu
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, sean finney wrote:
>
>> why not do something like this in
>> any script that uses gettext:
>>
>> #!/bin/sh
>>
>> PATH=${PATH}:/usr/share/gettext/scripts
>> . gettext.sh
>
> Because we already have /usr/bin for that and there is no
Subject: O: cacti
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I orphan the cacti package. I have no longer time maintaine this package.
Package: cacti
Description: Frontend to rrdtool for monitoring systems and services
Cacti is a complete frondend to rrdtool, it stores all of the necessary
information to c
Hello John,
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:45:00AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Jochen Voss writes:
> > until now I was under the impression that /usr/bin/ should only contain
> > programs which are expected to be directly called by users.
>
> > In bug #292759 the maintainer of gettext-base claims, th
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, sean finney wrote:
> why not do something like this in
> any script that uses gettext:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> PATH=${PATH}:/usr/share/gettext/scripts
> . gettext.sh
Because we already have /usr/bin for that and there is no need to
change every script that uses gettext.
--
To
Jochen Voss writes:
> until now I was under the impression that /usr/bin/ should only contain
> programs which are expected to be directly called by users.
> In bug #292759 the maintainer of gettext-base claims, that it is also ok
> to install shell script sniplets, which are not executable on its
hey list,
i'm looking at sponsoring a particular foo-source style kernel
module package, and haven't been able to find good documentation
on packaging tips/practices for this kind of package.
the package i'm looking at is already lintian/linda clean,
and, well, it works, but there are a few una
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Jochen Voss wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:40:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > You forgot to quote last thing I said when closing the bug.
> >
> > So I'll repeat: Please read the logs for non-bug Bug#292759, where the
> > author explains the rationale for putting gett
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:40:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> So I'll repeat: Please read the logs for non-bug Bug#292759, where the
> author explains the rationale for putting gettext.sh in /usr/bin.
you want ". gettext.sh" to work, which means you want it somewhere
in the default system path.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:40:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> You forgot to quote last thing I said when closing the bug.
>
> So I'll repeat: Please read the logs for non-bug Bug#292759, where the
> author explains the rationale for putting gettext.sh in /usr/bin.
Sorry, I did not find relevant
El Sábado 29 Enero 2005 14:59, Ron Johnson escribió:
> As I said in another post, there will come a time when they can
> do that. We'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
I don't want to feed the flame but.. I've tried dosage and it's not much
easier to use.
first you have to discover that t
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 11:31:52AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> looking at the script snippet in question, all it does is set a couple
> functions/variables, so it certainly should not be in /usr/bin. hell,
> it's not even executable.
Yes, this was my point.
All the best,
Jochen
--
http://seehuh
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Jochen Voss wrote:
> [...]
> My question: does anybody have further references for the question
> whether it is ok or maybe even preferable to install non-programs in
> /usr/bin?
You forgot to quote last thing I said when closing the bug.
So I'll repeat: Please read the logs
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 04:18:30PM +, Jochen Voss wrote:
> In bug #292759 the maintainer of gettext-base claims, that it is also
> ok to install shell script sniplets, which are not executable on
> itself into /usr/bin/
>
> This is not a bug.
>
> The file gettext.sh is meant to be sou
Hello,
until now I was under the impression that /usr/bin/ should only
contain programs which are expected to be directly called by users.
In bug #292759 the maintainer of gettext-base claims, that it is also
ok to install shell script sniplets, which are not executable on
itself into /usr/bin/
* Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050129 12:13]:
> | go to http://comas.linux-aktivaattori.org/debconf5 and register.
> On the registration page, under Accomodation in Helsinki, one of the
> options are «Lodging at HUT, with my BF/GF/wife/family». Does this
> cost anything? Should my girlfr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 292757 general
Bug#292757: openoffice.org: uninstallable on powerpc
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org' to `general'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Quoting Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> File a serious bug against package Y. initscripts have to exit with a
> successfull status if the daemon is already running.
OK. As this package Y is not (yet) part of Debian, I just changed
it: I added --oknodo to start-stop-daemon and
Hi,
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sat, Jan 29, 2005:
> What I'm saying is that -- in the same way that some people insist on
> Debian Policy to be followed blindly -- there are already some people
> insisting that this document be followed blindly. "Raising" the status
>
+++ ZD1211 Linux Driver Project + Press Report +++
+++ http://zd1211.sourceforge.net + mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+++
---
ENGLISH
The Linux driver for the ZyDAS ZD1211 chip (802.11b/g USB WLAN) is now hosted
on SourceForge (see http://zd1211.sourceforge.net).
The initial code was contributed b
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:20:25PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I haven't read the document in question in a rather long time, so
> > I can't actually object (on some sort of serious basis, I mean),
> > but I would nevertheless request that the document be handed to
> > the -english ma
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 13:49 +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:22:13AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > >
> > > an advice for "they":
> > >
> > > 1) make a script to mirror from http://www.dmoz.org/Kids_and_Teens/
> > > 2) unplug "their" computer from the network
> > > 3) stop
On 2005-01-28 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> It would also probably be a good idea to transition these packages at the
> same time:
> dovecot-common
> exim4-daemon-heavy
> libnss-mysql
> libnss-mysql-bg
> libpam-mysql
> libsasl2-modules-sql
[...]
Hello,
These four p
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:22:13AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > an advice for "they":
> >
> > 1) make a script to mirror from http://www.dmoz.org/Kids_and_Teens/
> > 2) unplug "their" computer from the network
> > 3) stop bothering the rest of open-minded people
>
> I'm saddened that a supp
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:25:47PM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote:
>
> I'm not really in favour for this proposal but would you at least read
> the rest off the thread. Splitting the packages off makes it easier for
> the person responsible for installing packages (i.e. the one with root)
> to decide wh
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, W. Borgert wrote:
> config, restarts daemon of Y, finally Y tries to start its
> daemon, but fails, as it already runs.
File a serious bug against package Y. initscripts have to exit with a
successfull status if the daemon is already running.
--
"One disk to rule them all
Hi,
for some kind of CDD I have created a package "X" that changes
another packages "Y" config file (using cfengine) and restarts
the respective daemon. That works well, if I upgrade package
X only or Y only.
Problem: If I upgrade both package X and Y at the same time
the daemon of package Y wil
Moin,
I must have some supernatural powers to always attract the same bug: woodys
apt fed too short lists into dpkg and thus broke the configuration of
circular depending packages (Note: "dpkg --configure blah blubb", where blah
depends on blubb and blubb depends on blah works; if you try to run it
* Andreas Schuldei
| go to http://comas.linux-aktivaattori.org/debconf5 and register.
On the registration page, under Accomodation in Helsinki, one of the
options are «Lodging at HUT, with my BF/GF/wife/family». Does this
cost anything? Should my girlfriend register as well? (And you
should p
57 matches
Mail list logo
