On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 02:38:18PM +0100, giskard said
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:40:01 +1100
> Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Riccardo Setti said
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > >
> > > * Package name: lopster2
> > > Versi
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 02:12:53PM +0100, giskard said
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:40:30 +1100
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Riccardo Setti wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > >
> > > * Package name: lopster2
> > >
[Ken Bloom]
> I'm confused. One making backports from sid to woody should backport
> a package in such a way that it is buildable with woody's
> build-essential.
Yes. Same will be true backporting to sarge. But if sarge
build-essential were to be updated to contain debhelper (>= 4), that
would
* Jorge Bernal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: kernel-patch-ibookg4-suspend
> Version : test6
> Upstream Author : Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://gate.crashing.org/
^^^
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:21:38 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Frank KÃster
>
> | That's correct from the point of view of a buildd, or of a developer
> | running a sid machine. But it is not correct for backporters: Imagine
> | that packages are added to build-essential, or versioned dependencie
giskard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 00:59:13 +0100
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Well, more importantly, this is archive bloat. Since apparantly the
>> lopster maintainer is not upgrading his package, you intend to just
>> add the new version to the
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Helen Faulkner wrote:
kdoomsday is a KDE panel applet that counts the time down to or up
from a specified event.
I'm the author of kdoomsday. I wrote it because I wanted to count
down to an awaited event and, to my suprise, I couldn't find anything
that would sit in my KDE
Helen Faulkner wrote:
> kdoomsday is a KDE panel applet that counts the time down to or up
> from a specified event.
>
> I'm the author of kdoomsday. I wrote it because I wanted to count
> down to an awaited event and, to my suprise, I couldn't find anything
> that would sit in my KDE panel and d
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Anthony Towns writes:
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpackage-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper.html
Having the current debhelper be build-essential would fix the ~237
bugs lintian finds for build-deps on debhelper that should be
versioned, but aren't.
Aren'
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 00:59:13 +0100
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, more importantly, this is archive bloat. Since apparantly the
> lopster maintainer is not upgrading his package, you intend to just
> add the new version to the archive, in stead of doing something about
>
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 06:40:30PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Riccardo Setti wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: lopster2
> > Version : cvs pre3.9
> > Upstream Author : Sgopsgop at users.sourcefor
David Mandelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> I think the only sensible and simple thing to do is to provide a zsync
>> file for the Contents files (zsync can 'look into' gz to rsync just
>> the changes). Then every user can use a cron job to zsync the file to
>> hi
Hi Dirk!
You wrote:
> * the gsl set:
> - gsl
> - gsl-ref-html
> - gsl-ref-psdoc
>
> The two doc packages are currently a week behind packaging the new upstream
> gsl. Well maintained upstream, maybe two releases a year. This should
> probably go to another egghead ph.d. type, pre
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Miscellaneous
> - afio (2 open bugs, active upstream, pretty straightforward)
I like afio for my compressed backups and use it very often.
I'd like to take over maintainership for it, if no otherone has already asked
for.
Kindly regards,
Erik
--
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kdoomsday
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://alioth.debian.org/projects/kdoomsday/
* License : GPL
Description : countdown timer panel applet for KDE
kdoomsday i
Ok, I'll take bc.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 07:12:05AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Could we have a package which provides /usr/share/.../Contents.gz?
> > Not sure that share/ is the right place. And as Matt said, versioning
> > is a potential problem. But lin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kernel-patch-ibookg4-suspend
Version : test6
Upstream Author : Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gate.crashing.org/
* License : GPL
Descript
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 12:40:28PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> I will take bc if no one else wants it.
You'd need to talk to Lars, he came in a few minutes earlier. I'm sure
between the two of you you can work it out.
Dirk
--
Better to have an approximate answer to the right question than a pre
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 08:32:23PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> la, 2005-01-15 kello 11:51 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel kirjoitti:
> > * bc (with binary packages bc and dc)
> >
> > Pretty stale upstream, has 5 open bugs most of which are feature requests
> > that are unlikely to ever be addres
I will take bc if no one else wants it.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:00:00 +0100, Per Olofsson wrote:
[...]
>
> It would be very nice if you could help me test it before I upload it
> to sid. Since I've done a lot of changes, I suspect that there might
> be some bugs in it. And don't forget to read NEWS.Debian and
> README.Debian.
>
Works w
la, 2005-01-15 kello 11:51 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel kirjoitti:
> * bc (with binary packages bc and dc)
>
> Pretty stale upstream, has 5 open bugs most of which are feature requests
> that are unlikely to ever be addressed. Most of these have been forwarded.
>
> Given its "Priority: stan
Given my available time and all the things competing for it (work, family,
other hacking endeavours [quantian, a few small code projects, ...],
running, ...), I have too many packages to continue to do a reasonable or
better job at keeping the packages in shape.
So from the 80+ packages I have, a
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:14:15PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > occurs when you have for example an ev56 library in lib/ev56, and a
> > ev67 CPU. Then the loader looks in lib/ev67 and then falls back to
> > lib. Since glibc is very carefully undocumented in this area [1], I
> > didn't want
Hello Simon,
Am 2005-01-15 16:29:53, schrieb Simon Richter:
> Hi,
> There is also a tool called esmtp, which seems to be able to do
> authentication, even with TLS, however it gets the authentication data
> from the sending user's home directory and is more likely to be suited
> for laptop in
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 07:38:07AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The clean target should not need to be run as root and I think that is
> a bug in sbuild and a handfull of sources.
Sbuild has nothing to do with it. It just calls dpkg-buildpackage, which
runs debian/rules clean, by using wha
> I'll dare to take the other route and ask: what is now holding back
> software such as mplayer/mencoder, transcode and mjpegtools from
> entering Debian?
Last time mplayer came up on debian-legal (the proper place for
questions like this), the problem was unclear licensing.
If the unclear lic
Simon Richter wrote:
> There is also a tool called esmtp, which seems to be able to do
> authentication, even with TLS, however it gets the authentication data
> from the sending user's home directory and is more likely to be suited
> for laptop installations only.
I don't know about older versions
Hi,
If not, please can you correct this Bug ?
As soon as someone provides a patch (a lot quicker) or I create one
myself.
Thanks and I think, this error should be solved before SARGE is released
There is also a tool called esmtp, which seems to be able to do
authentication, even with TLS, however
Hello Anibal,
Thanks for your fast answer.
Am 2005-01-15 23:53:46, schrieb Anibal Monsalve Salazar:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 12:54:27PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >Is "ssmtp" frozen ?
>
> No, it isn't.
Uff... :-)
> >If not, please can you correct this Bug ?
>
> As soon as someone prov
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I think the only sensible and simple thing to do is to provide a zsync
> file for the Contents files (zsync can 'look into' gz to rsync just
> the changes). Then every user can use a cron job to zsync the file to
> his system on a daily, weekly, monthly, whatever basis
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:40:01 +1100
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Riccardo Setti said
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: lopster2
> > Version : cvs pre3.9
> > Upstream Author : Sgopsgop at users.sou
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:40:30 +1100
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Riccardo Setti wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: lopster2
> > Version : cvs pre3.9
> > Upstream Author : Sgopsgop at u
At Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:05:43 +0100,
Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > If other libraries
> > like mesa and libssl want to use /usr/lib/ev67 and so on, we may
> > consider to add HWCAP_IMPORTANT.
>
> This should not be needed, since the library loader also looks in a directory
> corresponding to the archit
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 12:54:27PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>Hello,
>
>because there is ne reaction of the "ssmtp" Maintainer I need
>to ask here.
>
>Curently the version of "ssmtp" in SARGE is not working with
>authentication which breaks many programs (like cron) which
>can not set authent
Hello,
because there is ne reaction of the "ssmtp" Maintainer I need
to ask here.
Curently the version of "ssmtp" in SARGE is not working with
authentication which breaks many programs (like cron) which
can not set authentication manualy like
ssmtp -au -ap -t
Is "ssmtp" frozen ?
If not, pl
> I'm the maintainer, not Raphael.
Yes, I'm not ;)
> I've got xen 2.0.1(need to upgrade to .3), but can't upload, until
> kernel-source-2.4.28 enters debian. 2.6.10 already exists, so that's not
> a problem.
I'm agog...
--
Raphael Bossek
--
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More ++
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bazaar
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Bazaar Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://bazaar.canonical.com/
* License : GPL
Description : arch-based distributed revision control system
GNU Arch is a revisio
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Riccardo Setti said
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: lopster2
> Version : cvs pre3.9
> Upstream Author : Sgopsgop at users.sourceforge.net
> * URL : lopster.sf.net
> * License : GPL
> Descri
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Raphael Bossek wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> what is the status of the xen package ?
>
> Where can I help you out if you need help on Xen 2.0 (bug #280773) ?
I'm the maintainer, not Raphael.
I've got xen 2.0.1(need to upgrade to .3), but can't upload, until
kernel-source-2.4.28 en
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 08:40:56AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> Afaik neither debootstrap, cdebootstrap nor rootstrap use dpkg -i to
>> partially install packages. They explicitly use --unpack and
>> --configure and use --force-* options to e
Hi Daniel,
what is the status of the xen package ?
Where can I help you out if you need help on Xen 2.0 (bug #280773) ?
--
Raphael Bossek
pgpZaonM10HDX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 08:20:54AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > Instead of doing all this by hand I can recommend my own package
> > debarchiver. The latest versions of it do this pretty good in
> > an automatic way.
> >
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 08:40:56AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Afaik neither debootstrap, cdebootstrap nor rootstrap use dpkg -i to
> partially install packages. They explicitly use --unpack and
> --configure and use --force-* options to exactly say what they need.
rootstrap doesn't inst
Anthony Towns writes:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
>> Scott James Remnant wrote:
>>
>>> The stats:
>>> 8,920 source packages in Debian unstable main.
>>> 8,254 declare a build-dependency on debhelper
>>> = 92% of packages build-depend on debhelper.
>>> Is that sufficient to declare it build-ess
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear DDs!
>
> [Please Cc me]
>
> I am one of the contributers to the TeXlive project and we are in the
> process of packaging texlive as debian packages. Herein some questions
> have arisen, the most prominent ATM is:
> Are there any facilities to put
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 19:30 +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
>> * Scott James Remnant [Tue, Jan 11 2005, 08:19:21AM]:
>>
>> > > dpkg complains that foo-utils is not installed and aborts the
>> > > installation of foo-modules_2.0
>> > >
>> > dpkg do
48 matches
Mail list logo
