On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:40:32PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> William Ballard wrote:
> >All the required .so files are in /x/b/moz/cur.
> Why no set LD_LIBRARY_PATH for programs that you want to let
> find the libraries?
Yeah, I figured that out. I suppose that's enough -- it just loads the
* William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:55:42PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > And what would the advantage be over using mozilla? The gecko engine
> > is the same, in fact mozilla tends to have a newer gecko engine than
> > firefox. I mean this could be done, but
Hi,
I'm packaging the Printer Configuration Tool (default printer config
tool on RedHat/Fedora systems) for Debian. This aplication allows users
to configure printers without needing to know if they're running CUPS,
LPRng or whatever. To do that, the RedHat/Fedora team is using the
alternatives sys
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:55:42PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> And what would the advantage be over using mozilla? The gecko engine
> is the same, in fact mozilla tends to have a newer gecko engine than
> firefox. I mean this could be done, but if it doesn't actually confer
> any advantages why bo
* William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> gtkmozembed.h is packaged in mozilla-dev
> mozilla-dev depends on mozilla-browser
>
> Apparently it is possible to use FireFox instead and RPM for
> "firefox-gtkmozembed" exit:
> http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2004-October/011326
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: liblingua-stem-perl
Version : 0.81
Upstream Author : Benjamin Franz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lingua-Stem/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : Stemming of words
This r
Dear Software in,
I'm the webmaster of a sales lead resource website at
http://www.quality-sales-leads.com.
We've collected quality links to other sales leads resources on the
Internet on ourlinks page.
We came across your site and feel that it'd make a perfect fit in our
collection of
qua
On 02-Jan-05, 15:54 (CST), Stephan Niemz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, is there a guide somewhere telling how to switch an
> "unstable" system from 2.4 to 2.6?
apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.
Seriously, that Worked For Me. It wasn't a big deal.
However, as usual, "It depends": If
William Ballard wrote:
I build Firefox from source and just `cp -rL dist/bin` to some
directory, and just run 'firefox' from there. I like having the rest
of the system unware of Firefox's existence unless I explicitly wire it
up.
But now I want to mess around with GtkMozEmbed, so I have to regist
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libclass-virtual-perl
Version : 0.05
Upstream Author : Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Virtual/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : Base class for virt
I build Firefox from source and just `cp -rL dist/bin` to some
directory, and just run 'firefox' from there. I like having the rest
of the system unware of Firefox's existence unless I explicitly wire it
up.
But now I want to mess around with GtkMozEmbed, so I have to register
some of the shar
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:01:03AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 02 janvier 2005 à 12:49 -0600, Steve Greenland a écrit :
> > On 01-Jan-05, 21:14 (CST), Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 05:07:42PM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> > > > I'm tryi
gtkmozembed.h is packaged in mozilla-dev
mozilla-dev depends on mozilla-browser
Apparently it is possible to use FireFox instead and RPM for
"firefox-gtkmozembed" exit:
http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2004-October/011326.html
Will Debian package such?
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Why in the world would you then want to install a metapackage if its
> selection doesn't suit you?
Most users do not understand meta-packages. They decide to "run Gnome"
rather than "run KDE" and so they install Gnome.
--
John Hasler
Le dimanche 02 janvier 2005 à 12:49 -0600, Steve Greenland a écrit :
> On 01-Jan-05, 21:14 (CST), Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 05:07:42PM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> > > I'm trying to trim my system a little bit. I wanted to purge Evolution
> > > from
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was just following your line of reasoning:
>
> "You cannot justify the bad things that happen as a result of your
> actions by saying that your goals cannot be reached without such bad
> things happening", where:
>
> action = greylisting
> bad things
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > For example, implementing greylisting in master would be bad for you,
> > because you demand that mail is transmitted without any delay at all.
>
> When have I ever made such a demand?
I was just fo
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:17:43AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Monday 03 January 2005 07:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > This is true whether the bad things are false positives in email or
> > the deaths of hundreds of people. Certainly deaths are worse, but I
> > wa
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:17:43AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Monday 03 January 2005 07:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > This is true whether the bad things are false positives in email or
> > the deaths of hundreds of people. Certainly deaths are worse, but I
> > wa
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 03 January 2005 07:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > This is true whether the bad things are false positives in email or
> > the deaths of hundreds of people. Certainly deaths are worse, but I
> > wasn't comparing false
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For example, implementing greylisting in master would be bad for you,
> because you demand that mail is transmitted without any delay at all.
When have I ever made such a demand?
Thomas
On Monday 03 January 2005 07:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is true whether the bad things are false positives in email or
> the deaths of hundreds of people. Certainly deaths are worse, but I
> wasn't comparing false positives to deaths.
>
> I was explaining why your st
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 20:16:19 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Any reason you're not using 2.6 kernels?
Yes. I'd like to switch to 2.6, but I suspect it would break
certain things. There are too many changes and I don't have the time to
go through this at the moment. Still I'd like to h
On 2 Jan 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> My point was that you cannot justify the bad things that happen as a
> result of your actions by saying that your goals cannot be reached
> without such bad things happening.
However, the same could be said about the result of our *inactions*.
When bad
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's not the point. The point was that you are comparing the actions of a
> scumbag (I am being nice) who deliberately caused the needless deaths of
> hundreds of people from his own country with typical actions of a Unix
> administrator (which do
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:16:44PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
> 2.6 is still too new as far as most ISVs are concerned, and so Debian
> shouldn't lower the priority of work on 2.4 kernels too much just yet,
> in my opinion.
Debian isn't lowering priority on Linux 2.4 work but individual people
are.
On 2 Jan 2005, at 7:16 pm, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 07:37:59PM +0100, Stephan Niemz wrote:
The kernel version 2.4.28 is out for almost seven weeks now.
Does anybody know about the status of the corresponding Debian
packages? And is there an estimation for when the kerne
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 07:37:59PM +0100, Stephan Niemz wrote:
> The kernel version 2.4.28 is out for almost seven weeks now.
> Does anybody know about the status of the corresponding Debian
> packages? And is there an estimation for when the kernel-patch-*
> packages will support the new kern
On 01-Jan-05, 21:14 (CST), Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 05:07:42PM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> > I'm trying to trim my system a little bit. I wanted to purge Evolution
> > from my system since I use Mutt for email. But doing that wants to
> > remove Gnom
On 27-Dec-04, 12:24 (CST), sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 03:54:08PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > [delete obsolete configuration files?]
>
> i'd say if they don't get in the way, leave them there, but make a note
> of the fact that they're obsoleted via a
The kernel version 2.4.28 is out for almost seven weeks now.
Does anybody know about the status of the corresponding Debian
packages? And is there an estimation for when the kernel-patch-*
packages will support the new kernel version?
Thanks,
- Stephan.
signature.asc
Description: Digit
On Sunday 02 January 2005 20:19, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:03:48PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > That's not the point. The point was that you are comparing the actions
> > of a scumbag (I am being nice) who deliberately caused the needless
> > deaths
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:03:48PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> That's not the point. The point was that you are comparing the actions of a
> scumbag (I am being nice) who deliberately caused the needless deaths of
> hundreds of people from his own country with typical actions of a Unix
> admi
On Sunday 02 January 2005 18:21, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sunday 02 January 2005 16:34, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Any anti-spam measure that gets an
[Way OT, but what the heck. If you must, flame me privately:]
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sunday 02 January 2005 16:34, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > What is this, "you go to war with the army you have, not the army
> > you want"?
>
> Coker's law: As a
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 02 January 2005 16:34, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Any anti-spam measure that gets any large portion of the spam will have
> > > some false positives.
> >
> > What is thi
On Sunday 02 January 2005 16:34, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Any anti-spam measure that gets any large portion of the spam will have
> > some false positives.
>
> What is this, "you go to war with the army you have, not the army you
37 matches
Mail list logo
