Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any anti-spam measure that gets any large portion of the spam will have some
> false positives.
What is this, "you go to war with the army you have, not the army you
want"?
Thomas
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The parsimonious explanation is that the issue wasn't thought about in
> that much detail when the social contract was written. The archives tend
> to support this. The obvious thing to do here is not to attempt to find
> a way that we can interpret th
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 01:27:21AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Some Alpha systems (I forgot which) came with only the inferior
> AlphaBIOS installed in flash. Later, an SRM version for this system
> was released, and installing this is generally considered a good
> thing. These firmwares r
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 05:07:42PM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> I'm trying to trim my system a little bit. I wanted to purge Evolution
> from my system since I use Mutt for email. But doing that wants to
> remove Gnome.
So it wants to remove the Gnome meta-package. So what?
--
Marc Wils
Kernel module source packages generated Debian packages which may not be
installable. For instance, alsa-source does not depend on alsa-base,
but the generated alsa-modules does. ndiswrapper-source does the same
with ndiswrapper-utils.
Is there a flag to dpkg to refuse to install unless depen
Re: Carl B. Constantine in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm trying to trim my system a little bit. I wanted to purge Evolution
> from my system since I use Mutt for email. But doing that wants to
> remove Gnome.
apt-cache is your friend:
[0] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $apt-cache show gnome
Package: gnome
[...]
I'm trying to trim my system a little bit. I wanted to purge Evolution
from my system since I use Mutt for email. But doing that wants to
remove Gnome.
Also, I wanted to update console-data to the recent version but it wants
to remove Base-Config and Console-tools (I just upgraded base-config).
Fi
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scripsit Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 11:33:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
>>> Please suggest any case which you don't think this criteria adequately
>>> covers.
>
>> The bios.
>> Unless, we decide that the bios we put
Hi,
I just accepted whois 4.6.24+volatile3 into woody-volatile. This version
reflects the changed address of the .org whois registrary and is adapted
to the new query format of the .de whois registrary; besides of this,
some IP address mappings were updated. Please see the package changelog
for a
Scripsit Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 11:33:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> Please suggest any case which you don't think this criteria adequately
>> covers.
> The bios.
> Unless, we decide that the bios we put in non-free isn't the bios we
> need to boot the mach
Am Freitag, den 31.12.2004, 13:24 -0600 schrieb Steve Greenland:
> On 29-Dec-04, 09:30 (CST), Hendrik Frenzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * License : MPL 1.1
> > Description : VHCS is a webhosting management system.
> > VHCS delivers a complete hosting automation appliance by offering
> > si
* Luca Capello
| on 05/03/2004 01:01 AM, Ramón Rey Vicente wrote:
| > * Package name: gaim-guifications
| > Version : 1.7
| > Upstream Author : Gary Kramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > * URL : http://guifications.sourceforge.net/
| > * License : GPL
| > Descript
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 07:46:48PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 01, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I wouldn't mess with the real /usr/bin/* binaries/symlinks, and would
> > do something similar to what ccache does. have a look at /usr/lib/ccache.
> > (so, apt-build wou
Hi,
is it OK to have a package install an alternative in /etc, like this:
update-alternatives --install \
/etc/emacs/site-start.d/51caml-mode.el \
caml-mode-startup.el \
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/tuareg-mode/tuareg-startup.el \
30
The question is whether update-a
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 11:33:21AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Please suggest any case which you don't think this criteria adequately
> covers.
The bios.
Unless, we decide that the bios we put in non-free isn't the bios we
need to boot the machine.
--
Raul
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> The social contract says "...but we will never make the system depend on
> an item of non-free software." not "but we will never make the system
> depend on an item of non-free software /which we must distribute/."
>
> In order to allow the vast majority of hardware whi
On Jan 01, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wouldn't mess with the real /usr/bin/* binaries/symlinks, and would
> do something similar to what ccache does. have a look at /usr/lib/ccache.
> (so, apt-build would prepend /usr/lib/apt-build or similar to the PATH.)
Agreed. This is w
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 23:50 +0100, Jean-Luc Picard wrote:
> yes, debian is still 2 years late to any other distro.
WTF do you get by trolling?
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
If you fall and break your leg, don't come running to me!
* Julien Danjou [Sat, 01 Jan 2005 15:22:16 +0100]:
> Do you have any idea about how to divert everything correctly ?
> I think I could provide a gcc-apt-build package which would do the job
> by replacing the gcc one and diverting some files, but I am bot happy
> with this solution.
> So, I am wa
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 23:50:52 +0100, Jean-Luc Picard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes, debian is still 2 years late to any other distro.
If you're sleeping since Woody release, we're! Good morning Jean-Luc,
for your information:
- There' s a new Debian installer[0] that will be used in the upcomin
Hallo Brian,
* Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-27 00:56]:
> > "Nico" == Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Nico> this bug:
> Nico> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=286257
>
> I am not sure what the problem is here, according to the bug report,
> the sol
Hello,
I plan to orphan some of my packages. At the moment I have not enough
time for those packages.
cacti - Frontend to rrdtool for monitoring systems and services
There is a new upstream version available, which fix a lot of
outstanding bugs. Please let me known, if you are interested on
Hello,
I am the current maintainer of apt-build.
I am looking for the best way to wrap all calls to gcc/g++. For now,
apt-build makes a diversion like this in /usr/bin:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Dec 31 14:27 gcc -> gcc-3.3
becomes:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Nov 15 21:17 gcc.rea
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 03:09:52PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> The blobs for the in-kernel drivers are not to be executed by the host
> CPU itself, neither is the non-free ICQ, MSN or Yahoo servers
> (although Gaim can be seen useful by itself as it works with IRC and
> Jabber... Well, brain, pleas
Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>That would, however, cover firmware and wind up sending X to
>>>contrib. So maybe: ... iff it is stored on the local machine's file
>>>system.
>> That would be my *intuit
El dv 31 de 12 del 2004 a les 23:50 +0100, en/na Jean-Luc Picard va
escriure:
> yes, debian is still 2 years late to any other distro.
Are you sure? I win a lot of time using debian because all I can find is
packaged and works directly, the quality and dependence system is
enought hard to assure I
Quoting Jean-Luc Picard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> yes, debian is still 2 years late to any other distro.
Flame answer sent in private mail, in French, which makes me easier to
share my feelings about the consideration the above mail shows towards
a volunteer work.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 03:09:52PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt dijo [Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 04:26:26PM +1100]:
> > Yet the ICQ client is not useful without a component which is not in
> > Debian and in fact is not freely available.
> >
> > If the emulators were extended to be able to
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Scripsit Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>>That would, however, cover firmware and wind up sending X to
>>>contrib. So maybe: ... iff it is stored on the local machine's file
>>>system.
>> That would be my *intui
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 05:02:15PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> The social contract says "...but we will never make the system depend on
> an item of non-free software." not "but we will never make the system
> depend on an item of non-free software /which we must distribute/."
We don't ma
30 matches
Mail list logo
