You need Codeine. You get it here. No need to wait any longer!
It is your unique chance to save on the medications up to 70%.
http://yougurtsful.com/33/5/index.php?ai=7333
-
hotel checklist topologize deliverance
_
OxUxT
www.yougurtsful.com/unsub/
%RND_TEXT
%RND_TE
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: fl-cow
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Davide Libenzi
* URL : http://xmailserver.org/flcow.html
* License : GPL
Description : copy-on-write utility
Fl-cow allows you to utilise hard links to save disk space
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> I've just started http://wiki.debian.net/SoftwarePackaging, intended to
> collect thoughts of packagers how upstream developers can make the life of
> a packager easier.
>
> I'm sure all packagers have
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:07:49PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not the
> -dev).
>
> Mass bugfiling with allowed? Which severity?
I guess the mass bug filing is ok, but you could have waited longer than
four hours for consen
El Jueves 11 Noviembre 2004 07:50, Mike Hommey escribió:
> Anyways, I'd suggest to make a multi-binary package so that it produces
> several mozilla-firefox-locale-* packages.
> Mike
I've just uploaded a new version (1.0-3) that generates separate binary
packages for each language.
The remaining
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:29:38PM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> When running apt-get dist-upgrade I'd like to be able to set a list of
> packages whose confiles shall be replaced by the newer versions
> supplied by the package (if any) , while other packages' confiles
> should be keep
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: q-tools
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/q-tools
License : GPL
Description : collection of ia64 performance analysis tools
> "Matthew" == Matthew Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not just any person should take this package on, as it is highly
> technical. I am looking for someone with a background in IPSEC and in
> network programming. I am also looking to help out from time to time and
> add new functionalit
Ron Johnson a Ãcrit :
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:12 +0100, sferriol wrote:
hello
i have a problem using apt under small disk, on a PC under debian and
another during debian installation (pre-rc2).
On the first PC, i do a 'apt-get upgrade' but there is no place to
download packages and after configu
Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 16:16 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
> On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not
> > the -dev).
>
> Did you actually check whether any of these *had* -dev packages?! A lot
> of
Hello,
from time to time (about 1-2 time in three month) debmirror fails with
the following error:
---
$ /usr/bin/debmirror -v /tmp/debian --arch=i386 --host=debian.tu-bs.de
--nosource --getcontents --dist=testing
Mirroring to /home1/ftp/pub/debian/debian from
ftp://anonymous:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:07:49PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not the
> -dev).
Yep... I wrote about it few days ago.
> Mass bugfiling with allowed? Which severity?
>
> A quick apt-file search on sarge/i386 shows:
[...]
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not the
> -dev).
>
> Mass bugfiling with allowed? Which severity?
>
> A quick apt-file search on sarge/i386 shows:
>
> $ apt-file search \.pc | grep pc$ | grep pkgconfig | grep -v de
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:12 +0100, sferriol wrote:
> hello
> i have a problem using apt under small disk, on a PC under debian and
> another during debian installation (pre-rc2).
> On the first PC, i do a 'apt-get upgrade' but there is no place to
> download packages and after configure them. i f
* Duncan Findlay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041116 16:50]:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:01:03PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I agree with you that fixing is only required if this might be a problem
> > for upgrades from woody. As this bug report is quite young, I think the
> > best thing really is to
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:01:03PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > IMHO it only *has* to be fixed in sarge if it affects upgrades from
> > 2.20, which is in stable. Otherwise, documentation on NEWS.Debian should be
> > enough.
It doesn't affect upgrades from 2.20 which have no Bayes at all. The
o
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not the
> -dev).
>
Did you actually check whether any of these *had* -dev packages?! A lot
of them would be bogus bugs.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
hello
i have a problem using apt under small disk, on a PC under debian and
another during debian installation (pre-rc2).
On the first PC, i do a 'apt-get upgrade' but there is no place to
download packages and after configure them. i finally succeed by
selecting package one by one 'apt-get inst
Hi,
Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not the
-dev).
Mass bugfiling with allowed? Which severity?
A quick apt-file search on sarge/i386 shows:
$ apt-file search \.pc | grep pc$ | grep pkgconfig | grep -v dev
beast: usr/lib/pkgconfig/bse.pc
beast: usr/lib/pkg
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041116 14:55]:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Steinar H. Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041116 12:30]:
> > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:54:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > Given that SA3 is a major change, and we had mass
Hi,
When running apt-get dist-upgrade I'd like to be able to set a list of
packages whose confiles shall be replaced by the newer versions
supplied by the package (if any) , while other packages' confiles
should be keep the locally modified version.
Is this possible?
Cheers,
Free
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Steinar H. Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041116 12:30]:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:54:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Given that SA3 is a major change, and we had massive memory issues with
> > > the previous upload, the transfer to sarge is
* Steinar H. Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041116 12:30]:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:54:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Given that SA3 is a major change, and we had massive memory issues with
> > the previous upload, the transfer to sarge is a bit delayed. I expect
> > that SA3 will go in o
Eliminate pain with C0D3INE. Try it at only $2.49/p1LL
http://yougurtsful.com/33/5/index.php?ai=7333
-
lowry tumult ku amphibian
_
OxUxT
www.yougurtsful.com/unsub/
%RND_TEXT
%RND_TEXT
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:54:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Given that SA3 is a major change, and we had massive memory issues with
> the previous upload, the transfer to sarge is a bit delayed. I expect
> that SA3 will go in one of these days, and it is _definitly_ on my
> direct watch list.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 12:07:24PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> i dont use this shell. i read an article which said that on old systems
> this command in the csh freezes the whole system. i tried it an noticed
> that it isnt clean yet.
This has nothing to do with the shell. Its a fork-bomb, and you
Hello Andrew,
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-16 12:05]:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 05:26:19PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> > hi,
> > is the maintainer of the bash currently the same as the maintainer of
> > the csh?
>
> Don't think so:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep-available -s Packa
Hi,
* Ramunas Vabolis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041116 09:15]:
> I was wondering too, why there is no SA3 in sarge yet. A friend of mine
> asked to write a couple words about this new version from a system
> administrator view.
Given that SA3 is a major change, and we had massive memory issues with
Hello there,
I was wondering too, why there is no SA3 in sarge yet. A friend of mine
asked to write a couple words about this new version from a system
administrator view.
When I was using 2.6x series, the main tool to mark spam was bayes
database, and some others tests would help to identify s
29 matches
Mail list logo
