Hi there!
* Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041114 03:55]:
> If I believe I have found a security vulnerability in a package what is
> the proper course of action to follow?
Please contact the security team. Please read the Debian security FAQ
[1] especially [2] and [3] for furhter details.
If I believe I have found a security vulnerability in a package what is
the proper course of action to follow?
-Roberto Sanchez
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ce jour Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Joerg Jaspert a dit:
> Hi
>
> A while ago the old Nagios Maintainer filed an O: for nagios. A group of
> people, including myself, started an Alioth-Project for it and did some
> work with the packaging.
> Now we are at a point where we can consider an upload into the ar
Hi
A while ago the old Nagios Maintainer filed an O: for nagios. A group of
people, including myself, started an Alioth-Project for it and did some
work with the packaging.
Now we are at a point where we can consider an upload into the archive,
but I think it would be good to have some extra tests
Well, there seems to be a lot of DD asking others to test experimental
packages out there, so I just might as well do the same. I recently tried
to do some QA with some base packages that have an outstanding list of open
bugs (some of which are quite easy to fix, others which are not that easy
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: guile-simplesql
Version : 2.3.2
Upstream Author : Dave Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Stephen R. Kifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hal Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jorgen Schaefer <[EMA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This problem is caused by invalid font configuration.
Qt's QFont object are always unicode at API level. If underlying "platform"
font doesn't have all unicode glyphs, single QFont object uses several
platform fonts. Sometimes Qt can't find those se
Hi!
Marco d'Itri [2004-11-12 11:39 +0100]:
> On Nov 12, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > BTW, I suggest installing the rules files in /etc/udev/ and then
> > > creating a symlink in the rules.d/ directory.
> > Hmm, the Ubuntu hal package currently places the script directly in
> > rule
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 14:53:25 +0100, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
>> Will the start of official security support for sarge be announced widely,
>> to get as much testing as possible? (Like: general debian-announce, press
>> contacts, ...)
>
Em Qui, 2004-11-11 Ãs 13:17 -0500, Daniel Burrows escreveu:
> On Thursday 11 November 2004 10:45 am, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > It is not necessary. Look at fetchmail, for instance:
> > Replaces: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common
> > Provides: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common
> > Con
I'd like to present experimental php5 packages. I know some work has been done
(see Bug#262977) but I'd like to see the php5 packages before sarge is
released.
/etc/apt/sources.list:
# PHP5
deb http://people.debian.org/~dexter php5 sid
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~dexter php5 sid
The main
* Santiago Vila ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041113 15:25]:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 November 2004 23.44, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > N+0 days
> > > > Official security support for sarge begins
> > >
> > > Will th
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 November 2004 23.44, Colin Watson wrote:
> >
> > > N+0 days
> > > Official security support for sarge begins
> >
> > Will the start of official security support for sarge be announced w
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 November 2004 23.44, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > N+0 days
> > Official security support for sarge begins
>
> Will the start of official security support for sarge be announced widely,
> to get as much testing as possible? (Like: gener
On Nov 13, Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to commit these changes in the udev configuration without the
> user needing to reboot. Is it possible to abuse(?) udevstart for this or is
> that a bad idea.
udevstart should work. Maybe.
Another option is to synthesize the hotp
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:42:31AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 10, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was not sure whether it is valid that packages put their scripts
> > into /etc/udev/rules.d.
> It is as long as they discuss it with me. :-)
> BTW, I suggest installing the rul
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 278246 unreproducible
Bug#278246: Cyrillic letters are displayed as double-width in most places
Tags were: sarge
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
17 matches
Mail list logo
