Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Ron Johnson may or may not have written...
>
> [snip]
> > But really, does the kernel use MMX?
>
> Here, at least: linux/arch/i386/lib/memcpy.c
Which will only be used for CyrixIII and K7, and boils down to:
config MCYRIXIII
bool "CyrixIII/VIA-C3"
Since my computer died in an HDD crash, I cannot help with
package versions etc. All I can say is that the packages
were of late October and the system was heavily upgraded
(a February snapshot with tons of upgrades) but it didn't
have any broken packages.
Now I have to live with an extremely out
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: gpib
Version : 3.2.01
Upstream Author : Frank Mori Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> et al.
URL : http://linux-gpib.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Description : kernel modules, libraries and language bindings for
I demand that Ron Johnson may or may not have written...
[snip]
> But really, does the kernel use MMX?
Here, at least: linux/arch/i386/lib/memcpy.c
--
| Darren Salt | linux (or ds) at | nr. Ashington,
| woody, sarge, | youmustbejoking | Northumberland
| RISC OS | demon co uk | Too
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:52:26 +0100, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, I can remember some people complained that spamassassin3 had
> increased ressource usage. For the people who had problems: Are they
> fixed now with the new release that appeared in unstable?
Well, it hadn'
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcgi-wiki-plugin-locator-uk-perl
Version : 0.09
Upstream Author : Kate Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Wiki-Plugin-Locator-UK/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : A
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcgi-wiki-plugin-categoriser-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Kate Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Wiki-Plugin-Categoriser/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcgi-wiki-formatter-usemod-perl
Version : 0.16
Upstream Author : Kate Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Wiki-Formatter-UseMod/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : Use
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcgi-wiki-plugin-diff-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Ivor Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Wiki-Plugin-Diff/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : format di
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcgi-wiki-plugin-rss-modwiki-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Earle Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Wiki-Plugin-RSS-Reader/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcgi-wiki-plugin-rss-reader-perl
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Earle Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Wiki-Plugin-RSS-Reader/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description :
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:52:35AM +0100, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:50:51PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > > Anyways, I'd suggest to make a multi-binary package so that it produces
> > > several mozilla-firefox-locale-*
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:52:35AM +0100, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:50:51PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > Anyways, I'd suggest to make a multi-binary package so that it produces
> > several mozilla-firefox-locale-* packages.
>
> A stupid question from my side: do
On Friday 12 November 2004 09:03, Robert Parker wrote:
> the MPAA / RIAA don't want you to do. Mandrake being more or less the most
> "Windows" like distro stomps on any attempts to configure it the way you
I am confused. How does it stomp on these attempts?
On the desktops at my school, we have a
What is the proper forum for posting about a Linux/Open Source Training
Facility I have opened in the Boston/Somerville Massachusetts area?
I only ask this because I am curious about giving discounts to open-source
developers, so that I can pay back (in a small way) how open-source software
has
On Friday 12 November 2004 16.16, Christoph Berg wrote:
> That leaves us with "text editor" ;-)
Debian, the distribution of a hundred window managers and a thousand text
editors...
-- vbi
--
Oops
pgptm6UpoamMe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|| On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:55:40 +0100
|| Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
re> I don't think so. Your package doesn't need pkg-config. It can be used
without
re> it. If you use pkg-config in the app using the lib you can build-depend on
it
re> extra at that package...
>> Should I fil
Re: Lior Kaplan in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Description : a powerful text editor for GNU/Linux and *BSD
I always have the impression that those packages having "powerful" in
the description are the least deserving it... Besides that, "for
GNU/Linux" in a Debian GNU/Linux package description is
* Jonathan McDowell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041112 15:10]:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 10:34:04PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > * Package name: l2tpns
> > Version : 2.0.5
> > Upstream Author : David Parrish and others <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://l2tpns.sf.net
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:07:36PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> Please stop following up to this ITP and telling me you don't understand
> the description unless you have prior experience of L2TP in an ISP
> environment. If you don't know what L2TP is or how an LNS fits into the
> picture, th
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 10:34:04PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> * Package name: l2tpns
> Version : 2.0.5
> Upstream Author : David Parrish and others <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://l2tpns.sf.net/
> * License : GPL
> Description : L2TP LNS which d
Hi,
Am Freitag, 12. November 2004 14:47 schrieb Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo:
> I've just started packaging some library which provides .pc file for
> pkg-config. So I was wonder where to put this file and if my -dev package
> should depend on pkg-config.
IMHO not. Because you don't need pkg-config.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tea
Version : 5.1
Upstream Author : Peter Semiletov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://tea.linux.kiev.ua/
* License : GPL
Description : a powerful text editor for GNU/Linux and *BSD
TEA is the powerful tex
Hello.
I've just started packaging some library which provides .pc file for
pkg-config. So I was wonder where to put this file and if my -dev package
should depend on pkg-config.
As usual I started looking how it is done in other libraries and
unfortunatelly this didn't lead me to clear answer.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:12:48AM +0100, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> El Jueves 11 Noviembre 2004 10:47, Jeroen van Wolffelaar escribió:
> > Your package is native, I suggest supporting the 'get-orig-source'
> > rules-target to make that one generate a .orig.tar.gz containing all
> > upstream
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I can remember some people complained that spamassassin3 had increased
> ressource usage. For the people who had problems: Are they fixed now
> with the new release that appeared in unstable?
>
I recently decided to try SA3, even though its alleg
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041112 12:20]:
> I would like to know if the Debian community is really going to release
> Sarge with G++ 3.3.x as the default C++ compiler.
>
> My question stems from the fact that Sarge will probably be the only
> stable release in the next year or two, t
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:43:44AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 00:22 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > 1) Current gnome-panel do *not* support XDG menus (only KDE does).
> > (Debian menu has XDG menu support through menu-xdg.)
> >
> It's very much in the works, chec
Hi all.
I would like to know if the Debian community is really going to release
Sarge with G++ 3.3.x as the default C++ compiler.
My question stems from the fact that Sarge will probably be the only
stable release in the next year or two, that Sarge's packages C++ code
is compiled against libstd
On Nov 12, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, I suggest installing the rules files in /etc/udev/ and then
> > creating a symlink in the rules.d/ directory.
> Hmm, the Ubuntu hal package currently places the script directly in
> rules.d/ (as with any other *.d file) since I did not wan
Hi Marco!
Marco d'Itri [2004-11-12 10:42 +0100]:
> On Nov 10, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I was not sure whether it is valid that packages put their scripts
> > into /etc/udev/rules.d.
> It is as long as they discuss it with me. :-)
> BTW, I suggest installing the rules files in
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:50:51PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Anyways, I'd suggest to make a multi-binary package so that it produces
> several mozilla-firefox-locale-* packages.
A stupid question from my side: do we have any code in the mozilla-*
wrappers to automatically select the right langu
On Nov 10, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was not sure whether it is valid that packages put their scripts
> into /etc/udev/rules.d.
It is as long as they discuss it with me. :-)
BTW, I suggest installing the rules files in /etc/udev/ and then
creating a symlink in the rules.d/ directo
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 06:47:15AM +0100, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
>
> The "rules" file includes an "wget" rule that can download the available XPI
> files with the translations.
> After download new XPI files, if you regenerate the package then you get all
> the required files for t
Hi,
at http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi the hosts raptor and trex are listed
as s390 developer machines. I wanted to build the package phylip which has
to be builded manually because it is in non-free.
$ ssh -i ~/.ssh/my_key [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by rem
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:07:12AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Paul Hampson [2004-11-11 10:03 +1100]:
> > But don't CD-ROM and floppy devices also need the same sort of pmount
> > support you're proposing here? After all, you can hot-swap the media in
> > them, so it seems reasonable to me
36 matches
Mail list logo
