Re: mozilla-firefox-locale package with all language translations

2004-11-11 Thread Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
El Jueves 11 Noviembre 2004 10:47, Jeroen van Wolffelaar escribió: > Your package is native, I suggest supporting the 'get-orig-source' > rules-target to make that one generate a .orig.tar.gz containing all > upstream languages. You mean that should I create one rule looking like the following? g

Re: Debian menu and GNOME (request for help)

2004-11-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 08:55:12PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:43:44AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 00:22 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > 1) Current gnome-panel do *not* support XDG menus (only KDE does). > > > (Debian menu has XDG menu

Re: mozilla-firefox-locale package with all language translations

2004-11-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:56:27AM +0100, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: > El Jueves 11 Noviembre 2004 07:50, Mike Hommey escribió: > > You're not lucky, with the 1.0 package that just got uploaded to > > unstable, your package is useless, 'cause support for > > /var/lib/mozilla-firefox/chrome.d h

Re: Debian menu and GNOME (request for help)

2004-11-11 Thread Graham Wilson
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:43:44AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 00:22 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > 1) Current gnome-panel do *not* support XDG menus (only KDE does). > > (Debian menu has XDG menu support through menu-xdg.) > > It's very much in the works, check out

Re: mozilla-firefox-locale package with all language translations

2004-11-11 Thread Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
El Jueves 11 Noviembre 2004 07:50, Mike Hommey escribió: > You're not lucky, with the 1.0 package that just got uploaded to > unstable, your package is useless, 'cause support for > /var/lib/mozilla-firefox/chrome.d has been dropped. Ok, no problem, I've uploaded a new package, updated for firefox

Re: Debian menu and GNOME (request for help)

2004-11-11 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 00:22 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > 1) Current gnome-panel do *not* support XDG menus (only KDE does). > (Debian menu has XDG menu support through menu-xdg.) > It's very much in the works, check out gnome-menus in CVS. It'll probably be in the next GNOME release, as I unde

Re: spamassassin3 - is memory usage ok now?

2004-11-11 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Andreas Barth | I can remember some people complained that spamassassin3 had increased | ressource usage. For the people who had problems: Are they fixed now | with the new release that appeared in unstable? It seems to work for me. (as in: it haven't eaten 500MB memory per process yet.) --

Debian menu and GNOME (request for help)

2004-11-11 Thread Bill Allombert
Hello Debian folk, As you might have discovered, the Debian menu support and in particular i18n has been greatly improved for most of the window-managers in Debian with the exception of GNOME. Here a summary of my attempts to get current GNOME and Debian menu to get along more nicely that they do

Re: How to handle libssl support?

2004-11-11 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thursday 11 November 2004 10:45 am, Mike Hommey wrote: > It is not necessary. Look at fetchmail, for instance: > Replaces: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common > Provides: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common > Conflicts: popclient, fetchmail-ssl, fetchmail-common, logcheck (<< > 1.1

Re: Which 2.6 kernel for Sarge on a Via C3?

2004-11-11 Thread Cameron Patrick
Rich Walker wrote: > The C3 reports that it is a 686 without CMOV: More recent C3s do have cmov: shameless:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : CentaurHauls cpu family : 6 model : 9 model name : VIA Nehemiah stepping: 1 cpu MHz : 1000.31

Re: spamassassin3 - is memory usage ok now?

2004-11-11 Thread simon
Ce jour Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Andreas Barth a dit: > Hi, > > I can remember some people complained that spamassassin3 had increased > ressource usage. For the people who had problems: Are they fixed now > with the new release that appeared in unstable? > > Cheers, > Andi not sure what upload you sp

Re: Which 2.6 kernel for Sarge on a Via C3?

2004-11-11 Thread Rich Walker
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 07:33:43PM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote: >> I'm wondering why I can't see many different 2.6 kernels on my Sarge >> systems any longer. I own a Via C3-based computer (an x86 for those who >> didn't know) and can find only -386 and -

Re: How to handle libssl support?

2004-11-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 10:27:08AM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Thursday 11 November 2004 04:11 am, Juergen Salk wrote: > > It seems in Sarge at least some of the crypto crippled versions > > have just vanished into thin air. > > ...which is going to silently leave users running old version

Re: How to handle libssl support?

2004-11-11 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thursday 11 November 2004 04:11 am, Juergen Salk wrote: > It seems in Sarge at least some of the crypto crippled versions > have just vanished into thin air. ...which is going to silently leave users running old versions of some software. links-ssl seems to have been replaced with a dummy u

Re: Introducing pmount in Debian / New plugdev group

2004-11-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi! Marco d'Itri [2004-11-10 14:19 +0100]: > On Nov 10, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Our /etc/udev/udev.rules has two new rules directly after the cdrom > > and floppy rules: > > > > # put removable IDE/SCSI devices into group 'plugdev' instead of 'disk' > > BUS="scsi", KERNEL="s

RE: agradou

2004-11-11 Thread genice turetta
Quem é vc? _ MSN Hotmail, o maior webmail do Brasil. http://www.hotmail.com

spamassassin3 - is memory usage ok now?

2004-11-11 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, I can remember some people complained that spamassassin3 had increased ressource usage. For the people who had problems: Are they fixed now with the new release that appeared in unstable? Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B

Re: How to handle libssl support?

2004-11-11 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 11, Juergen Salk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > what's the current policy for packaging software that can optionally > > linked with libssl support? > You just do it. If it causes no openssl+gpl-without-you-can-link-to-openssl license clash. --

Re: Transitioning to Mozilla Firefox 1.0PR

2004-11-11 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Johannes Rohr | Three of those packages can be easily brought up-to-date within five | minutes: Please download the latest langpack from ftp.mozilla.org and | rebuild your package. Here are the URLs: No, they can not. I've run into problems getting the nb_NO version to work properly. If the

Re: Use CVS/Subversion/... as a fast way to update apt lists?

2004-11-11 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 12:31:18PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > On the topic of all those talks about reducing network traffic caused by > apt-get update, without putting too high load into server (as rsync does). > > Can't CVS (or Subversion or other similar tool) solve this problem? > S

Re: mozilla-firefox-locale package with all language translations

2004-11-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:50:51PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > As for how to make the thing work with new firefox package, I'm working > on an HTML version of what I sent to extensions packages maintainers 2 > days ago about the new scheme. I'll send the URL here when it's done. And here it is: ht

Use CVS/Subversion/... as a fast way to update apt lists?

2004-11-11 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello. On the topic of all those talks about reducing network traffic caused by apt-get update, without putting too high load into server (as rsync does). Can't CVS (or Subversion or other similar tool) solve this problem? Seems that if apt-get update will turn into 'cvs update', it will save net

Re: mozilla-firefox-locale package with all language translations

2004-11-11 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 06:47:15AM +0100, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: > Hi! Sometimes a package with all the firefox translations has been proposed. > With the arrival of Firefox 1.0, localization has been normalized and now > this > package seems quite suitable. > > As a proof of concept, I

Re: How to handle libssl support?

2004-11-11 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 11, Juergen Salk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what's the current policy for packaging software that can optionally > linked with libssl support? You just do it. > Has the crypto policy changed after the Woody release? And more important: Yes. Welcome to 2002. -- ciao, | Marco | [9130 n

How to handle libssl support?

2004-11-11 Thread Juergen Salk
Hi all, what's the current policy for packaging software that can optionally linked with libssl support? For Woody it seemed to be common practice to provide two separate packages, one with ssl support enabled and another one with ssl support disabled (like fetchmail/fetchmail-ssl or lynx/lyn

Re: Introducing pmount in Debian / New plugdev group

2004-11-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi! Paul Hampson [2004-11-11 10:03 +1100]: > But don't CD-ROM and floppy devices also need the same sort of pmount > support you're proposing here? After all, you can hot-swap the media in > them, so it seems reasonable to me that they can be pmounted? What's the > rationale for _not_ including th

Re: mozilla-firefox-locale package with all language translations

2004-11-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 06:47:15AM +0100, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote: > Hi! Sometimes a package with all the firefox translations has been proposed. > With the arrival of Firefox 1.0, localization has been normalized and now > this > package seems quite suitable. > > As a proof of concept, I

Re: Debconf Templates Style Guide now part 6.5.2 of Developers Reference

2004-11-11 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 08:39:21AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Matt, I think you can now remove the direct link you put in the > developer's corner to my version of DTSG. I'll replace the file in > ~bubulle/dtsg an point readers back to the developer's reference document. Done. -- Matt