On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Vincenzo Belloli wrote:
> Package: clamav-daemon
> Version: 0.80-2
> The problem is related to clamav debian packages maintained by ... and
> hosted here:
> deb http://people.debian.org/~sgran/debian woody main
> I've 2 identical machines. These are ver
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:15:19AM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I am facing a problem with my ISP started filtering incoming mails with
> SPF. Since AOL adopted it, it seems becoming quite popular as I see it.
[...]
> SPF has known issue with e-mail forwarder such as pobox.com. I think
> debian.o
Hi,
Disclaimer: I am not asking Debian to use SPF[1] to filter incoming ML
posts.
If this has been discussed, excuse me.
I am facing a problem with my ISP started filtering incoming mails with
SPF. Since AOL adopted it, it seems becoming quite popular as I see it.
I understand my ISP's rationa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package is ready, it's name is python-nltk and can be downloaded from
www.igaelica.com/debian.
apt-get url is, deb www.igaelica.com/debian ./
Please report any bug or improvement
Best regards,
- --
Alberto Rodriguez Galdo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Tools and documentation, mostly from linuxwacom.sf.net and my own
experience getting one working on a Debian system today. Details TBA.
Ron
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: zsync
Version : 0.0.4
Upstream Author : Colin Phipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://zsync.moria.org.uk/
* License : GPLv2
Description : A client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm
This package
Scripsit Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> And if you take the combination of both: Upstream source that
> contains non-DFSG material and forbids to use the DFSG-free parts
> without explicitly referring to the removed non-DFSG-free parts,
> well, IANAL, and IANARODL[2], but I wouldn't like this.
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> If Mr Wontshare's client doesn't work without your software, this is
> what I call a derivative work. Whether it is linked to it using ELF or
> not is irrelevant.
So anything that runs on Windows is a derivative work of Windows?
This might not impact
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: apache2-redirtoservname
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.hogyros.de/misc
* License : GPL + exception to allow linking against Apache
Description : Apache m
* Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > an application needs to create more than one dot file then they should be
> > placed in a subdirectory with a name starting with a '.' character, (a "dot
> > directory"). In this case the configuration files should not start wit
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> 4. Writing to debian-legal and asking for advice.
Now that's a good idea. Why did you do that on debian-devel instead?
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- wi
Quem é vc!
_
MSN Hotmail, o maior webmail do Brasil. http://www.hotmail.com
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [1] "Debian comes in three flavors: Stale, rusting, and broken, which
> are renamed once or twice a decade. Actually, rusting is stale yet
> currently, but it can't be officially released before 2004, because
> Gnome2 and KDE3 aren't sufficiently outdated,
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Sean Perry wrote:
2) this looks like a font issue (as you mentioned) try forcing the app to
load 'fixed' as its font.
Using emacs with fixed font works and I also found the problem which is
descirbed in #279380. I think this bug is worth to be increased in
severity but strang
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:47:02PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
>> How about this rule of thumb: If you get stuff from the
>> primary NON DEBIAN distribution site, that is what you call
>> upstream. What someone unconnected to debian, not using
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To prevent this misunderstanding, perhaps change to
>
> For example, it is not sufficient reason to omit a file that it is
> used only when buidling on MS-DOS. Similarly, a Makefile provided by
> upstream should not be omitted even if the first th
Hi Bill, hi all,
I'd like to come back to one point of your mail:
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have a whole directory of binary files, you might consider
> making a new source package for them. (For example a Debian theme
> for a program).
I guess you really wanted to say
17 matches
Mail list logo
