Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
>
>
>The Azureus Java client does this, so yes, it is possible. How bad this
>interacts with the scatter-gatter logic of BT, I don't know. But the
>.torrent files would be huge, and they would need to be upd
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:42:32PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> > However, I do feel that having a p2p backend to apt is a very
> > interesting and feasible distribution method. There is a lot of
> > structure in the way Debian lays out its archive,
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:42:32PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> However, I do feel that having a p2p backend to apt is a very
> interesting and feasible distribution method. There is a lot of
> structure in the way Debian lays out its archive, from the Package files
> to the .deb's themselves, which
[Jesus Climent]
> The problem being that X using Debconf to store information, Y
> modifying the info and then X getting an upgrade, the info stored by
> X using Debconf might be used again to set the values in the data
> file, which will break the initial purpose of Y.
Well, the solution to this
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 02:33:16PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> This do not scale well, and make it harder to share knowledge across
> several custom debian distros.
>
> > If x and y have configuration utilities xcfg and ycfg then z should
> > insofar as possible use xcfg and ycfg to mak
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 03:37:57PM +0100, paddy wrote:
> >
> > What happens with a package orphaned from stable?
>
> As I understand it, the stable qa team manage it.
Same should be with packages in v.d.o, since is part of the infrastructure of
Debian (read WILL be, if agreed upon).
> I hadn't
i be very happy to help Van Johnson 2233 hy9 east dillon s.c.29536
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 06:48:00PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Sven Mueller writes:
> > Say a new open source network security scanner enters the world, and it
> > works well when compiled against Debian stable, we might want to add it
> > to v.d.o even though it wasn't available when the last stab
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Pablo Sau wrote:
* Package name: dcmtk
Version : 3.5.3
Upstream Author : Marco Eichelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dicom.offis.de/
* License : BSD like
Description : OFFIS DICOM ToolKit
Freely available DICOM ToolKit (DCMTK) from
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:14:08AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
Come on! The FHS regulates what normal software can/should do,
partially so that package managers can work reliably. dpkg is the
package manager, thus it is exempt from the FHS.
In fact, I should have been even cl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arnaud Kyheng wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I love the Debian project, and I have worked on a new development for
| it: Apt-Torrent :)
Thank you for your contribution. However, I looked at doing something
similar to this a little while ago and found that bittorr
Scripsit "Millis Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The upstream has since released a newer version under the GPL and has
> indicated to me a willingness to have the package called eMail.
> My question is if this change of capitalization acceptable to Debian, or
> would it still insist on a differen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: socket++
Version : 1.12.12
Upstream Author : Gnanasekaran(Sekar) Swaminathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Herbert Straub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.li
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 04:53:29PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > * bash reads and writes a number of files in ~/ (.bash_profile,
> > .bashrc, .bash_history)
> > * there are several directories related to GNOME (at least ~/.gnome2
> > and ~/.gnome2_private)
> > * vim h
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 01:41:23PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Why not simply make it search for ~/GNUstep, and when that isn't
> found, ~/.GNUstep or something like that - would retain full
> compatibility.
With Debian, yes. With the rest of the world, no. You have to take
into accou
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:00:16PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> [...]
>> > If we can get individually-signed .debs, you won't even need to worry so
>> > much about getting the torrent files off a t
also sprach Anthony Towns [2004.10.30.0713 +0200]:
> Having apt-spy dpkg-divert the file in /usr on install, and
> replace it with a symlink to a file in /var/lib, and then update
> the file in /var/lib when invoked seems the obviously correct way
> to deal with this, no?
Why dpkg-divert? Why hav
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:14:08AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > Come on! The FHS regulates what normal software can/should do,
> > > partially so that package managers can work reliably. dpkg is the
> > > package manager, thus it is exempt from the FHS.
> In fact, I should have been even cle
I wrote (on debian-devel):
> While we wait for the official list, can we at least assume that
> "test" will be grandfathered, and consequently that "-a" and "-o"
> should be avoided?
Oops -- I meant to send this to debian-policy.
The broader context of my question was bug #267142 "debian-policy:
Manoj suggested this language for 10.1:
> --
> 10.1
>
> Except for the following shell builtins, additional commands provided
> by a Debian shell installed in /bin/sh shall be considered to have the
> same status as executa
Frank KÃster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * Window Maker stores its configuration across several files and
>> directories under ~/GNUstep (configurable) (and no, I won't change
>> the default because it's configurable via an environment variable)
>
> I was always annoyed by this,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dcmtk
Version : 3.5.3
Upstream Author : Marco Eichelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dicom.offis.de/
* License : BSD like
Description : OFFIS DICOM ToolKit
Freely available DICOM ToolKit (DCMTK) fro
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:00:16PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> > If we can get individually-signed .debs, you won't even need to worry so
> > much about getting the torrent files off a trusted mirror...
>
> dpkg-sig exists. Use it :)
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> If we can get individually-signed .debs, you won't even need to worry so
> much about getting the torrent files off a trusted mirror...
dpkg-sig exists. Use it :)
Marc
--
$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 10:35:53AM +0200, Arnaud Kyheng wrote:
> I love the Debian project, and I have worked on a new development for
> it: Apt-Torrent :)
>
> Apt-Torrent is an apt proxy to the Bittorrent network. For security, the
> package listing, and the .torrent files are downloaded from a
Hello,
I love the Debian project, and I have worked on a new development for
it: Apt-Torrent :)
Apt-Torrent is an apt proxy to the Bittorrent network. For security, the
package listing, and the .torrent files are downloaded from a regular
http server, as usual for a package, but then the whole
26 matches
Mail list logo
