On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:40:06PM -0800, D. Starner wrote:
> > I just installed the textedit.app package; it pulled in a few GNUstep
> > libraries, but not a complete desktop environment.
>
> Do the GNUstep libs still start a demon at startup? Last time I
> checked, they did, instead of starting
> I just installed the textedit.app package; it pulled in a few GNUstep
> libraries, but not a complete desktop environment.
Do the GNUstep libs still start a demon at startup? Last time I
checked, they did, instead of starting them only if you were running
a GNUstep program, like KDE and GNOME d
Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For me, I don't want GNUstep in the names of my programs because I am not
> connected to GNUstep and don't want to be. It is just a couple of libraries
> that I use to write my apps -- you wouldn't put "GTK+" in the name of your
> apps, would you?
Most
Frank Küster wrote:
> Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Frank Küster wrote:
> >
> >> If I'm wrong, I apologize and will not object against cddb.bundle (at
> >> least not because of this. Still the ".bundle" part is meaningless to
> >> me, but that might be due to my bad english). If
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 04:05:50PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Hamish Moffatt]
> > Why is it useful to fetch this documentation and install it through a
> > Debian package, rather than say with your favourite web browser?
>
> Offline reading?
wget?
Why is this document useful for offlin
Marc Dequènes (Duck) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, if i'm not dead for GNOME 2.10, custom Debian menu is gonna die, as
> it is a bunch of unbrowseable nightmare stuff.
That seems a tad overwrought.
I usually prefer the debian menu because it's much more complete than
the gnome menu, and ofte
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> * SAVERIO FERRARO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041005 18:49]:
>> I HAVE SOME PROBLEMS WITH THE CONFIGURATION OF THIS PRINT.
>> HOW HAVE I TO DO?
>
> Tell us your problem, and we might be able to help.
>
> Oh, and in case you didn't noticed: Your caps-lock key seems to be
> bro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: 6wall
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Eric de Thouars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://leaf-project.org/doc/howto/6wall.html
* License : GPL
Description : IPv6 Firewall, based on Shoreline Firewall (Shor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gaim-encryption
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : encryption plugin for gaim
Gaim-Encryption
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:08:42PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am under the impression that 'normal procedures' does not involve
> > updating the application to catch new threats. If I'm wrong, then there
> > is no need for this entire thread.
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am under the impression that 'normal procedures' does not involve
> updating the application to catch new threats. If I'm wrong, then there
> is no need for this entire thread.
Talk to the security team. Talk to the security team. Talk to the
securi
Hi,
>>If the names above are still too generic, I think I will use libcore++ as
>>prefix. Or has anyone else another suggestion?
>
> Why not libexact?
Maybe, but I'd prefer if "core" is part of the package name, because is is
known under this name in the scientific community.
>>I'm a bit uncertai
On Tuesday 05 October 2004 18:49, SAVERIO FERRARO wrote:
> I HAVE SOME PROBLEMS WITH THE CONFIGURATION OF THIS PRINT.
> HOW HAVE I TO DO?
> THANKS
You should really start out by reading
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html (especially
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.h
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: hsql
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Krasimir Angelov
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=65248
* License : BSD
Description : Multi-Database Interface System for Haskell
HSQL provi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: hunit
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Dean Herington
* URL : http://hunit.sf.net/
* License : BSD
Description : Haskell Unit Testing Framework
HUnit is a unit testing framework for Haskell, inspired by the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: missingh
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : gopher://quux.org/devel/missingh
(not yet active)
* License : GPL
Description : Library of utility func
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: haskell-cabal
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Isaac Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.haskell.org/cabal
* License : BSD
Description : Haskell Common Architecture for Building Applications and
Lib
Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, Brendan wrote:
>
>> Open Source is awesome, but most hardware companies are
>> never, ever going to open their hardware.
>
> There's a rather large difference between telling people how to talk to
> the hardware they buy (some interpretations of G
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 06:58:07PM +0200, Joachim Reichel wrote:
>
> If the names above are still too generic, I think I will use libcore++ as
> prefix. Or has anyone else another suggestion?
>
Why not libexact?
> I'm a bit uncertain about potential consequences if the Debian package name
> d
* SAVERIO FERRARO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041005 18:49]:
> I HAVE SOME PROBLEMS WITH THE CONFIGURATION OF THIS PRINT.
> HOW HAVE I TO DO?
Tell us your problem, and we might be able to help.
Oh, and in case you didn't noticed: Your caps-lock key seems to be
broken.
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
si
Hi,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: core
This seems a tad generic, especially since it's a library. Maybe
libcoremath or libcore++?
Hmm, you're right. Does your comment only apply to the source package name
or also to the binary package names? I intend to make the following p
I HAVE SOME PROBLEMS WITH THE CONFIGURATION OF THIS PRINT.
HOW HAVE I TO DO?
THANKS
_
Personalizza MSN Messenger con sfondi e fotografie!
http://www.ilovemessenger.msn.it/
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is exactly the problem. I don't think that most people actually
> > think it would be better to release either no AV/spam/whatever software
> > or useless software. I am getting the impre
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is exactly the problem. I don't think that most people actually
> think it would be better to release either no AV/spam/whatever software
> or useless software. I am getting the impression that people don't want
> to disrupt the stability of the re
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:04:05PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> if 'boot-loader' was not a real package (not sure if it requires a new
> catagory or if it fits under meta or virtual) and then when you did:
> apt-get install boot-loader
> it (dpkg or apt -- not sure) checked your ARCH and
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 11:00:56AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When I said "without GNOME installed," I meant without the entire GNOME
> > desktop environment installed: nautilus, gnome-session, metacity, etc.
>
> No Gnome application I'm aware of r
* ROBERTOJIMENOCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041005 16:00]:
> So I download the source package (dsc, diff.gz & tar.gz), dpkg-source
> it, apply my patches, dpkg-buildpackage
> -rfakeroot, install it and mark it for hold so when upgrading a newer
> version isn't installed.
I didn't tried it myself, but
Re: ROBERTOJIMENOCA in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So I have, in a folder, something like:
> glibc_2.3.2.ds1-16.diff.gz
> glibc_2.3.2.ds1-16.dsc
> glibc_2.3.2.ds1.orig.tar.gz
>
> and just running a command have that files upgraded to the latest
> version.
cd src && rm -rf glibc_* glibc-* && apt-get so
I have to compile many packages from source because some of my patches
are not applied upstream. So I download the source package (dsc, diff.gz
& tar.gz), dpkg-source it, apply my patches, dpkg-buildpackage
-rfakeroot, install it and mark it for hold so when upgrading a newer
version isn't installe
Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - Getting the packages into testing, which was previously apparently
> > impossible.
> > - Avoiding the common problem with task packages that if you remove
> > one package in the task, you have to remove the task package as
> > well, since its dependecies
[Hamish Moffatt]
> Why is it useful to fetch this documentation and install it through a
> Debian package, rather than say with your favourite web browser?
Offline reading?
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:11:43PM -0400, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: susv3
> Upstream Author : Copyright (c) 2001-2003 IEEE and The Open Group
> * License : Installer Package: Public Domain
> Description : Fetch and install SUSv3
* Thiemo Seufer:
> How could clamav possibly have a stable engine and suddenly start to
> need libfoo?
Most antivirus software today is a framework for mobile code
distribution. Too often, you have to replace MIME decoders, HTTP
decoders, and the like.
I find it rather strange that new dependen
I am looking for sponsors to close the following ITPs:
#268613 ttf-summersby
http://www.linuks.mine.nu/i_debian/ttf-summersby/
#268722 ttf-f500
http://www.linuks.mine.nu/i_debian/ttf-f500/
Thanks,
Gürkan Sengün
Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I said "without GNOME installed," I meant without the entire GNOME
> desktop environment installed: nautilus, gnome-session, metacity, etc.
No Gnome application I'm aware of requires metacity. I don't believe
that gnome-session will be pulled in exc
Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> If I'm wrong, I apologize and will not object against cddb.bundle (at
>> least not because of this. Still the ".bundle" part is meaningless to
>> me, but that might be due to my bad english). If I am not wrong, and
>> GNUstep app
Closing this RFP, and ITP already exists:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=247337
Cheers,
Free
|--==> Free Ekanayaka writes:
FE> Package: wnpp
FE> Severity: wishlist
FE> * Package name: lives
FE> Version : 0.9.1-pre6
FE> Upstream Author : G. Finch <[
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: lives
Version : 0.9.1-pre6
Upstream Author : G. Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://www.xs4all.nl/~salsaman/lives/
* License : GPL
Description : Linux video editing system
LiVESis designed to be simple
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:54:51AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.05.0015 +0200]:
> > > We can push neither of them into Debian via security.d.o. No,
> > > sorry, this is not the way stable works.
> >
> > /Should/ it be the way stable works
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:46:29PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Francesco Paolo Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041004 19:40]:
> > What we probably need is the infrastructure to support the volatile
> > archive (buildd support and pools) and a general policy for those kind
> > of updates. Progra
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Unfortunately, I'm currently unable to get news from Istvan Verok, our
> usual and very efficiant Hungarian translator.
[snip]
> Hungarian has always been complete in past D-I releases and most often
> quickly, so I suspect an unscheduled event for
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:28:21AM +0100, John Lines wrote:
>
> > >
> > > clamav can be as stable as a rock but be completely useless... when
> > > two months after Sarge's release, a new virus hits hard, and in
> > > order to detect it, clamav needs libfoo, which is not in Debian.
> > > What then
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 01:22:13AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> in organizing the tags that compose debtags, it would be nice to reuse
> existing ontologies for our facets (groups of tags from specific points
> of view), so that we could have some facets that could be linking points
> for other exis
also sprach John Lines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.05.0828 +0200]:
> You could take the rather horrible step of building a static copy
> of libfoo into clamav. This would be rather messy, but would allow
> a single binary to be updated.
The problem is not so much that a new dependency would be ne
Hi, Brendan wrote:
> Open Source is awesome, but most hardware companies are
> never, ever going to open their hardware.
There's a rather large difference between telling people how to talk to
the hardware they buy (some interpretations of German law suggest that one
*has* to do that; for instanc
> >
> > clamav can be as stable as a rock but be completely useless... when
> > two months after Sarge's release, a new virus hits hard, and in
> > order to detect it, clamav needs libfoo, which is not in Debian.
> > What then? *Maybe* we could push a new clamav via security.d.o, but
> > what abou
also sprach Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.05.0018 +0200]:
> Some quick & dirty perl and shell scripts. I plan to completely
> rewrite these scripts in python soon.
Superb. It would rock if you could make this available as a package
(which I am sure you will). I think many of use
also sprach Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.05.0015 +0200]:
> > We can push neither of them into Debian via security.d.o. No,
> > sorry, this is not the way stable works.
>
> /Should/ it be the way stable works? We have the ability to change
> that.
No. It's "stable". It's one of the
This is a quite unusual call, but a quite urgent one.
Debian installer is currently in its final stages of development and
currently in what we call a "string freeze". This means that no change
to translatable parts happen, allowing translator to finish their
work.
The string freeze lasts until O
* Rob Weir [Tue, 05 Oct 2004 09:45:38 +1000]:
> Is this any more useful than a wiki FAQ?
From: madduck
To: gort
Subject: ~tell Rob I asked for private answers
From: gort
To: Rob
Subject: Rob, madduck asked for private answers
scnr,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es
50 matches
Mail list logo
