On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:17:50PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 11:16:56PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 12:03:48AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > Assume a package would recommend grub which is only available on i386.
> > > There are two cases:
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 09:39 +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 08:51:01PM +0200, Joachim Reichel said
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: core
>
> This seems a tad generic, especially since it's a library. Maybe
> libcoremath or libcore++?
Besides,
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 03:45:55PM +0200, martin f krafft said
> On #debian-devel, we tend to answer the same questions over and
> over again:
>
> - when will the freeze start? ("not today")
> - can someone help me with autoconf? ("-> #devtools")
> - i cannot get my sound working? ("-> #debi
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 09:18:29AM -0400, Brendan said
> On Monday 04 October 2004 01:26, Jules Dubois wrote:
> > I may never get totally open source, but one of the biggest reasons is
> > that some Linux (and presumably BSD) users buy their hardware anyway. The
> > attitudes of ATI and Nvidia (an
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 08:51:01PM +0200, Joachim Reichel said
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: core
This seems a tad generic, especially since it's a library. Maybe
libcoremath or libcore++?
-rob
--
Words of the day:NATO freedom supercomputer AVN diwn MD2 AMEM
This one time, at band camp, Matthew Garrett said:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We can push neither of them into Debian via security.d.o. No, sorry,
> > this is not the way stable works.
>
> /Should/ it be the way stable works? We have the ability to change that.
> Providing t
This one time, at band camp, Andreas Barth said:
> * Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041004 17:10]:
> > So, now that this thread has been going on for a little while, I wanted
> > to see what the consensus among RM's is: are we going to allow updates
> > for these programs in sarge or do we have
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:44:12PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:27:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> I don't mind what it's called as long as I can see by its name that it
> >> is useless without gnustep. In other words: T
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: susv2
Upstream Author : Copyright (c) 2001-2003 IEEE and The Open Group
* License : Installer Package: Public Domain
Description : Fetch and install SUSv2 documentation
This package was created at the request of Andrew Josey fro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: susv3
Upstream Author : Copyright (c) 2001-2003 IEEE and The Open Group
* License : Installer Package: Public Domain
Description : Fetch and install SUSv3 documentation
This package was created at the request of Andrew Josey fro
Frank Küster wrote:
> Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:27:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> >> > For example, "camera" package name was changed to "camera.app" to
> >> > prevent namespace pollution. Are you
* martin f krafft wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt:
> > http://backports.org/debian/dists/woody/spamassassin/binary-i386/Packages.gz
> > contains debconf{,-{doc,utils}} 1.2.35 as well as the SpamAssassin
> > packages. All other dependencies can (iirc) be fulfilled from
> > stock woody.
>
> That's nifty!
>
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We can push neither of them into Debian via security.d.o. No, sorry,
> this is not the way stable works.
/Should/ it be the way stable works? We have the ability to change that.
Providing that we only do it for the set of software that would
otherwise be
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:56:06AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041004 00:40]:
> > On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 02:53:57PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > We would still list everything in recommends. There were many reasons why
> > > I
> > > moved all contents of t
El lun, 04-10-2004 a las 10:03 +0200, Frank KÃster escribiÃ:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> > On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 03:55:59PM +0200,
> >> Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >> a message of 27 lines which said:
[i am sorry for the empty message; this was the content i meant to
send]
also sprach Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.04.2336 +0200]:
> Frankly speaking, the question whether to include clamav or not in
> sarge is IMHO not a question whether volatile exists or not.
> Either clamav is sta
16 matches
Mail list logo
