On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 10:54, Miles Bader wrote:
> Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm afraid that although the character `fu' has many meanings, but
> > style or technique isn't one of them.
>
> Hmmm, you seem to be right, I was confused. :-(
>
> I don't have a chinese dictionary, but
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd think that ideally, there could be some system-wide setting that
> specified which languages to support (e.g. `english, french, korean'),
> and upon installation, i18nalised files would be filtered to strip out
> any `unsupported' languages. I suppose
Simple.
Just take the kernel-source-2.4.34.tar.bz2 tar ball out of the sid
system and recompile using make-kpkg under woody, using the apporiate
config file
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 18:41, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Where I'm working, we have Debian stable deployed on a number of boxes. For
> har
Cameron Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I seem to recall reading a number of complaints /from users/ in the BTS,
> requesting .desktop files precisely because they are i18nalised. Others
> have suggested expanding the current Debian menu definition to handle
> i18n. That, to me, sounds like
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 07:36:15PM -0700, Bruce Sass wrote:
| > Have you quantified the "bloat" you are speaking about? Can the same
| > argument not apply to any i18n effort?
|
| Yes, using KDE2.
[...]
| Yes, the same argument applies to all i18n efforts.
|
| I18n is great, until disk usage and
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm afraid that although the character `fu' has many meanings, but
> style or technique isn't one of them.
Hmmm, you seem to be right, I was confused. :-(
I don't have a chinese dictionary, but my Japanese dictionary lists a
japanese version of kung-fu `ka
Just reminding everyone of the BSP.
Remember to RSVP if your coming, thanks! If you have RSVP'ed, thanks!
And, for the record, you post your phone number online and *within days*
some friggin creditor is looking for you to pay some bill for some other
"Scott Dier". Actually, it was some guy's M
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Have you quantified the "bloat" you are speaking about? Can the same
> argument not apply to any i18n effort?
Yes, using KDE2. The script removed any lines with "[""]" in
them from KDE files (was possible at the time without incurring
breakage) and wo
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:05, Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is correct, I agree with Russell. What _I_ want to do is improve
> Debian. if for a while I have to go it alone and demonstrate mycode
> and pacakges work then so be it, but the ultimate aim is to improve
> Debian.
This
广州庆瑞电子科技有限公司
敬启者：
本电子邮件是商务宣传资料，如对您产生任何不良的影响，我表示深深的歉意，请即返回告知
并将此邮件删除，我将不再打扰。
如果您或您的朋友对驱鼠有任何需求，我们将竭诚为您服务，所列产品完全是本公司开发生产的，
具有自主知识产权。产品在广州各大供电局的电房得到广泛的使用，对电房内的电器设备起到很好
的保护作用,同时广泛用于制药，皮革和仓库等行业。
如有垂询，不胜感激。
颂致商祺！
广州庆瑞电子科技有限公司
市场部经理
俞先生
电话：020-85562199 33010208 传真：020-85560935
欢迎访问公
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:14:08PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > - how to run madison and wanna-build
>
> I thought the idea was for the unrestricted mirror to include a
> read-only copy of the database madison consults.
>
> wanna-build presumably ne
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>- how to run madison and wanna-build
>
>
> I thought the idea was for the unrestricted mirror to include a
> read-only copy of the database madison consults.
>
> wanna-build presumably needs more real-time access, though.
Ma
Peter Busser wrote:
> Fair enough. But if I were to improve Debian, I would put PaX in the default
> kernel source.
If you were to improve Debian, you'd have spent the five minutes it
takes to realize that the only two very ways of getting PaX in the
default debian kernel source is to get PaX incl
Scripsit Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Scripsit Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> > If you don't think the problem being discussed matters, why are you
> > participating in the discussion?
>
From: Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I haven't look at OPIE for ages, but when using it with ssh, doesn't
>it force you to turn privilege separation off in /etc/ssh/sshd_config?
Yes, using opie and pam and sshd all at once requires turning off
privilege separation for sshd.
Opie protects aga
As I recall you are correct on this, atleast with Stable and
testing... I have had OPIE setup for awhile on machines that only have
admin accounts and no general user accounts and I recall having to turn
off privilege separation on them to get it to work with the
challenge-response system.
#include
* Florent Rougon [Wed, Dec 10 2003, 09:48:55AM]:
> Note: this starts the root array only; the other arrays are started by a
> "mdadm -A -s" from /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid.
>
> > IIRC, There is a parameter to mdadm (--scan?) that could be used for
> > this, but when I asked the initrd
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 07:44:55PM +0100, Peter Busser wrote:
> ``We''? Who is ``we''? It is unlikely that you are one of them royal people,
> so
> I take it you meant to say:
>
> Adamantix is not what I want to do, what I want to do is to improve Debian.
That is correct, I agree with Russell
Tim Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/debian-announce-2003/msg3.html
> it says the Debian machines were compromised by password sniffing from
> other compromised machines. If you use one time passwords instead,
> then password sniffing doesn't
At
http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/debian-announce-2003/msg3.html
it says the Debian machines were compromised by password sniffing from
other compromised machines. If you use one time passwords instead,
then password sniffing doesn't yield useful information and the damage
from this
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>
> > > In which format shall application packages store
> > > their menu information.
>
> > It doesn't matter,
>
> If you don't think the problem being discus
At
http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/debian-announce-2003/msg3.html
it says the Debian machines were compromised by password sniffing from
other compromised machines. If you use one time passwords instead,
then password sniffing doesn't yield useful information.
As you probably know, t
Not sure if this is still part of the ongoing recovery or something
else, but people.d.o is producing an infinite redirect loop for any
personal page request.
$ telnet people.debian.org 80
Trying 192.25.206.10...
Connected to gluck.debian.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
GET http://people.debian.org
Subject says it all.
-Jim
--
Jam sessions community web site: http://jam.sessionsnet.org
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, the `fu' in kung-fu means something like style or technique, so
> > apt-fu sort of makes sense if you think of as a tool for doing cool
> > things using the power of apt... :-)
>
> I'm afraid that althoug
Hello!
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 04:37, Jakob Lell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > maybe Adamantix is what you are wanting to do. It is based on Debian woody
> Adamantix in now what we want to do, what we want to do is to improve Debian.
``We''? Who is ``we''? It is unlikely that you are one of them ro
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:19:57PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > What research? It certainly shows up in http://bugs.debian.org/219863 .
>
> Not when I tried it some hours ago. I can't reproduce this, sorry.
>
> Moreover I wonder why it is missing fr
"Julian Mehnle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > "Julian Mehnle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > We could use a revocation list where signatures of packages with
> > > known security holes are listed as being revoked. Of course, you'd
> > > need to be online to chec
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Julian Mehnle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We could use a revocation list where signatures of packages with
> > known security holes are listed as being revoked. Of course, you'd
> > need to be online to check it when installing/updating packages.
> > And the rev
on ... <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First i tried "fai", but while i liked the concept of
> classes it was to much of a hassle and the number of scripts and
> dependencies was to much to understand in 4 hours (after which i gave up).
Did you try the simple example DEMO in FAI? Did you read chapte
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:18:21PM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
> Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:49:54AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
> > > Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > >
> > > > It's "pass a few more text fields through to the menu methods, and
> > >
* Julian Mehnle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031210 13:40]:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > What can we do with deb signatures?
> > >
> > > For our current problem, the integrity of the debian archive being
> > > questioned, the procedure would be easy and avail
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:47:28AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:49:25PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> | Alternate approaches (that involve significantly less work)
>
> That's the bit that I (and presumably others) am not convinced about.
> You keep making this as
"Julian Mehnle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > What can we do with deb signatures?
> > >
> > > For our current problem, the integrity of the debian archive being
> > > questioned, the procedure would be easy and available to
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > What can we do with deb signatures?
> >
> > For our current problem, the integrity of the debian archive being
> > questioned, the procedure would be easy and available to every user:
> >
> > 1. get any clean Debian keyring (or
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:30:49AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> mailx -s "Merge" [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<...
> merge 219863 223355
> close 223355
> thanks
>
> and got the answer mentioned below.
It's your punishment for using the close command. DON'T!
There is no need and no excuse.
thank
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
> What research? It certainly shows up in http://bugs.debian.org/219863 .
Not when I tried it some hours ago. I can't reproduce this, sorry.
Moreover I wonder why it is missing from
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=tipptra
Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
Hi!
I haven't (seriously) used Firebird since a year and there's no chance
I'll be using anytime soon. It's low maintenance software though as
upstream is focused on firebird 1.5/2.0
Therefore I am going to orhpan:
* firebird
* php4-interbase (depending on firebird)
Dro
On Wednesday 10 December 2003 12:48, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > FWIW, the `fu' in kung-fu means something like style or technique, so
> > apt-fu sort of makes sense if you think of as a tool for doing cool
> > things using the power of apt... :-)
>
> I'm afraid t
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> FWIW, the `fu' in kung-fu means something like style or technique, so
> apt-fu sort of makes sense if you think of as a tool for doing cool
> things using the power of apt... :-)
I'm afraid that although the character `fu' has many meanings, but
style or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: xfce4-session
Version : 0.1.3+20030922-1
Upstream Author : Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Upstream: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/xfce/xfce4/xfce4-session
* License
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IIRC, There is a parameter to mdadm (--scan?) that could be used for
> this, but when I asked the initrd maintainer I was given a good reason
> why it was not used (sorry; I can't remember what this was now; it might
> simply be that the mdadm code is unrel
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:30:49AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I just sendet
> mailx -s "Merge" [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<...
> merge 219863 223355
] Debian Bug report logs - #219863
] Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
> close 223355
You also can't merge an open bug and a closed
Hi,
since the respective maintainers don't seem to have acted upon this, I
will address this here.
Policy states:
=
10.1. Binaries
--
Two different packages must not install programs with different
funct
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:22:42AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:30:49AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > I just sendet
> > >
> > > mailx -s "Merge" [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<...
> > > merge 219863 223355
> > > close 223355
>
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:30:49AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I just sendet
> >
> > mailx -s "Merge" [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<...
> > merge 219863 223355
> > close 223355
> > thanks
> >
> > and got the answer mentioned below. In fact my research
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:30:49AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I just sendet
>
> mailx -s "Merge" [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<...
> merge 219863 223355
> close 223355
> thanks
>
> and got the answer mentioned below. In fact my research showed that #219863
> does not exist in the BTS.
#219863
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the kernel raid1 autodetection only works if raid1 is compiled
> into the kernel.
That is true as explained in:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-raid&m=105232695713715&w=2
In short, to get autostart with md compiled as modules, you need to
Hi!
On 2003-12-10 9:20 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Copy /etc/modprobe.devfs to /etc/modprobe.d/1devfs and run
> update-modules. This should regenerate /lib/modules/modprobe.conf.
Err, I just see that you didn't tell whether you are using devfs or
the "old" ones. In the latter case, this soluti
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Andreas Tille wrote:
> /usr/share/doc/module-init-tools/FAQ tells something about the reason why
> in RedHat modules are not loaded automatically.
Sorry for the noise. I just had no module-init-tools installed when installing
my self-made kernel-2.6test11 package and thus "de
Hi Andreas!
On 2003-12-10 8:34 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> /usr/share/doc/module-init-tools/FAQ tells something about the reason why
> in RedHat modules are not loaded automatically. I'm missing any statement
> why this fails in Debian. I'm I missing something or is this a bug (at least
> a w
Hi,
/usr/share/doc/module-init-tools/FAQ tells something about the reason why
in RedHat modules are not loaded automatically. I'm missing any statement
why this fails in Debian. I'm I missing something or is this a bug (at least
a wishlist documentation one)?
Kind regards
Andreas.
Hi,
I just sendet
mailx -s "Merge" [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<...
merge 219863 223355
close 223355
thanks
and got the answer mentioned below. In fact my research showed that #219863
does not exist in the BTS. If this is a known issue (probably caused by the
current administration issues) forg
53 matches
Mail list logo
