On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:58:27PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> Herbert, would it be possible to get the ACL kernel patch included in the
> Debian kernel source?
I'm afraid that you've missed boat for 2.4.23. I'll consider it for
2.4.24. Please file a bug report against kernel about it.
> Muc
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> doesn't seem to be available in a documented way to people who have
> their own $HOME/.fvwm2rc)
FTR, you can do something like this:
Read /etc/X11/fvwm/menudefs.hook
AddToMenu Applications "Applications" Title
+ "&Deb
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 12:57:53PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > Some or all of: twm, pdmenu, blackbox, afterstep, fluxbox, gtk-menu,
> > wmaker, fvwm2, enlightenment, etc, consult /etc/menu-methods for more.
> > There are dozens of programs that use the debian menus that would have
> > no reason t
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> For various reasons [1], I am interested in building Debian from source
> -- and continuing to do so for upgrades and newly-installed packages.
>
> What I'm after is basically something where I can say:
>
> apt-foo install kde
>
> The sys
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 04:54, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> > > The only one which comes to mind is a rogue Debian developer that
> > > you do not wish to trust, even though the project trusts him.
> >
> > Not quite. The signed deb is non-repudia
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 19:06, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > > Actually, I think the biggest benefit of md5sums is that while
> > > attackers certainly could modify them, often they don't. While passing
> > > debsums certainly can't prove the int
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031205 16:11]:
> > With replaced files being kept you can recalculate correct md5sum
> > lists for A and B at any time in any combination of installed
> > packages. But even if it fails due to some bug you
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 12:53:21PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> I tried that twice and it just ate the commands file without
> doing anything in return.
It worked for me.
> In fact, none of my uploads have gone anywhere near the archive.
>
> The kernel packages for 2.4.23 disappeared without a tra
Seems that gcc 3.3 and kernel 2.4.18 (with grsec patch) dont like
eachother.
I got alot of complains about 2 files in the asm-i386/ and some other,
when compiling..
the problem was that it seems as if gcc 3.3 needs to have assembler
lines(inline) ending with a ";\n" where as one seemed to been ab
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Upload a .commands file.
>
> See the README in pub/UploadQueue..
I tried that twice and it just ate the commands file without
doing anything in return.
In fact, none of my uploads have gone anywhere near the archive.
The kernel packages for 2.4.23
Em Sex, 2003-12-05 Ãs 11:32, Felipe Almeida Lessa escreveu:
> Now I'm using GNOME, but some time ago I have used XFce, Window Maker and
> others. IMHO, we could have a script that converted new .desktop to old-style
> Debian Menu while the WM don't understand .desktop. Or even better, we could
> ma
Em Qua, 2003-12-03 Ãs 18:31, Zenaan Harkness escreveu:
> > If the Debian menu system can't represent what you want, then we should
> > either extend it so that it does, or get rid of it. It makes no sense
> > to support two sets of menu entries throughout the distribution.
>
> I agree. I would li
Em Sex, 2003-12-05 Ãs 19:48, Joey Hess escreveu:
> > I see only one -- duplicate work, which has been beaten to death already.
> > But since you insist on my opinion ...
>
> Nowhere in Herbert's response to bug #219304 does he talk about
> "duplicate work". He's quite clearly talking about duplica
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 17:13, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:23:52AM -0600, cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2003-12-05 11:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > >Debian-Edu *is* a CDD because
> > > it is completely inside Debian and
> >
> > h
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For various reasons [1], I am interested in building Debian from source
> -- and continuing to do so for upgrades and newly-installed packages.
>
> What I'm after is basically something where I can say:
>
> apt-foo install kde
Close enough
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 16:48, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> > hm, as far as I know Debian-edu is nothing more then a couple of
> > task-packages at this point (and some education packages that got added
> > to the archive)
>
> I do
Hi,
Brian May wrote:
> My first attempt to upload dar here failed, due to timeout error.
>
> Now I can't upload at all, because the incomplete file still
> exists and I don't have permission to delete or replace it.
>
> ncftp /pub/UploadQueue > del libdar1_2.0.1-1_i386.deb
> delete libdar1_2.0.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 16:43, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> > More importantly, Skolelinux has done more than almost any CDD in
> > terms of contributing back to Debian in both code and in
> > methodology. Their method of s
My first attempt to upload dar here failed, due to timeout error.
Now I can't upload at all, because the incomplete file still
exists and I don't have permission to delete or replace it.
ncftp /pub/UploadQueue > del libdar1_2.0.1-1_i386.deb
delete libdar1_2.0.1-1_i386.deb: server said: Permission
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Yes, so people got wiser along the way. Isn't that supposed to be what
> happens in these discussions?
I'm still seeing the same old same old in eg, Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > If you think that it's so obvious, why don't you start by addressing my
> > objections in the quoted bug report?
> >
> I see only one -- duplicate work, which has been beaten to death already.
> But since you insist on my opinion ...
Nowhere in
Perhaps some folks would be interested in talking about Debian at
USELINUX in Boston next year? If someone in the Boston area would be
willing to help organize a Debian BOF and other activities, that would
be great.
I'm going to be fairly busy during the Usenix/USELINUX myself, between
being a
Scripsit Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 08:05:34PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Step 2: Packagers can now chose to supply .desktop files instead of
> > the Debian format, with a versioned dependency on menu.
> I can see no reason to proceed any further t
Scripsit Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm wrote:
> > The proposal is to enhance update-menus such that it knows how to
> > parse .desktop files and feed the information from them
> > transparently to menu methods that expect the Debian native
> > format.
> The head of this thread i
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:08:53PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I presume I can lower the dependencies on things like modutils and whatnot
> > down to the versions that are in stable with no ill-effects?
>
> It only depends on coreutils|fileutils, so there's no problems in that regard.
What a
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 08:05:34PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > You speak of a transition, but I see no transition plan here.
>
> What do you expect from a "transition plan" then?
>
> Step 1a: Update menu infrastructure such that packages can transparently
> supply either .desktop fil
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Evidently, so that's not what is proposed. The proposal is to enhance
> update-menus such that it knows how to parse .desktop files and feed
> the information from them transparently to menu methods that expect
> the Debian native format. Then debian-native menu systems wou
Hi, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Are they strong divergences on the goal to reach and the method to
> follow between Debian and freedesktop.org?
There don't seem to be.
But, assuming that we assume that .desktop files are The Future (they
have technical advantages over our menu files, and Debian is abou
Hi, Herbert Xu wrote:
> If you think that it's so obvious, why don't you start by addressing my
> objections in the quoted bug report?
>
I see only one -- duplicate work, which has been beaten to death already.
But since you insist on my opinion ...
The fact is that it isn't. At time X, which is
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 03:02:29PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:53:11PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > The nearest I have seen is fink, but I know little about it.
> >
> > Am I missing something?
>
> apt-src, apparently.
Well, not really. apt-src doesn't integrat
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:13:57AM -0800, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> FAI is good, but it doesn't handle updating the systems once you have them
> installed.
with a few modifications you can do this...
i did a fork of FAI 2.3, which is used in my department for
installations and updates. much of my work
Scripsit Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mathieu Roy wrote:
> > It doesn't need to be done in two days, does it? If new packages start
> > directly with .desktop and others packages move to .desktop in the
> > next year, it does not seems to be an awful load of extra work.
> If that happened then
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 12:24:07AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Release signing protects against a hostile or compromised mirror,
> > > network, DNS server, proxy server, and a host of o
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:53:11PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> The nearest I have seen is fink, but I know little about it.
>
> Am I missing something?
apt-src, apparently.
--
- mdz
: : Hi,
: : I am studying food
engineering at Gaziantep university in Turkey. .I will graduate next year and I
am interested in continuing my education(master)in Germany.Please send me the
required information for doing master there and fees of that and all information
regarding applicatio
Hello,
For various reasons [1], I am interested in building Debian from source
-- and continuing to do so for upgrades and newly-installed packages.
What I'm after is basically something where I can say:
apt-foo install kde
The system will then:
1. Look at kde and build/install any of its b
Mathieu Roy wrote:
> If it is just a matter of time, the transition can be done step by
> step: the first step is just to say that this transition should be
> done.
>
> It doesn't need to be done in two days, does it? If new packages start
> directly with .desktop and others packages move to .desk
Mathieu Roy wrote:
> >> So far there has been a lot of support for the .desktop standard
> >> effort. Which systems do you refer to that are not supporting,
> >> adopting, or intending to adopt the .desktop standard?
> >
> > Some or all of: twm, pdmenu, blackbox, afterstep, fluxbox, gtk-menu,
>
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 11:11, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> That is but one optimization: we already are suffering from
> archive bloat, what about the disk and bandwidth cost of carrying
> around the sigs? And since one rarely needs the md5sums anyway, what
> is so wrong with checking agains
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 20:46, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Because without preventing tampering (even accidental) of the md5sums
> file its quite useless.
I want to check if anything on my system was corrupted after a recent
bout of fun with fsck. The md5sums are quite useful for that.
signatur
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 19:06, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Actually, I think the biggest benefit of md5sums is that while
> > attackers certainly could modify them, often they don't. While passing
> > debsums certainly can't prove the integrity of a system, debsums
> > failing can certainly prov
Maybe remove the pid file before killing, not after? If it resists
our best attempts at killing. including -9, that would be a different
bug, and leaving a pid file would be useless anyway? Just a guess.
Following the suggestion in the recent message to
debian-devel-announce, I tried using dupload to upload to the
anonymous queue. Soon I got back this message:
--
Subject: Processing of autoconf_2.58-9_i386.changes
PGP/GnuPG sign
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 04:54, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > The only one which comes to mind is a rogue Debian developer that
> > you do not wish to trust, even though the project trusts him.
>
> Not quite. The signed deb is non-repudiable authorship -- nice
> to know whence the software come
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 06:37:47PM +0100, Jakob Lell wrote:
> maybe Adamantix is what you are wanting to do. It is based on Debian woody
> and
> uses kernel and gcc patches to improve security. At the moment you need to
> install a normal Debian woody and then upgrade. However, you might create
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:44:40PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Le vendredi 05 décembre 2003 à 12:38:10, Amaya a écrit:
> > I was out to the movies with him yesterday, he is not MIA or anything.
> > We even talked about plucker's state. He is in the proccess of fixing
> > the bugs.
>
> [...]
>
Hello,
maybe Adamantix is what you are wanting to do. It is based on Debian woody and
uses kernel and gcc patches to improve security. At the moment you need to
install a normal Debian woody and then upgrade. However, you might create
installation CDs yourselve. For more information about Adaman
Chad Walstrom said on Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 10:05:15AM -0600:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:13:57AM -0800, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> > FAI is good, but it doesn't handle updating the systems once you have
> > them installed.
>
> You're absolutely right. The cfengine scripts are also slightly
> difficu
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 04:08:41AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > ... It only stands to reason that if both the KDE and Gnome desktop
> > camps wish to formalize on the format that we should adopt it as
> > well, if only as an extension of our menu system. We would
> > have to generate .deskto
* Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031205 16:11]:
> With replaced files being kept you can recalculate correct md5sum
> lists for A and B at any time in any combination of installed
> packages. But even if it fails due to some bug you will only get a
> false negative. Then you download the
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 19:24:28 +0100, Marc Haber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:43:39 +1000, Anthony Towns
> wrote:
>>Maybe an easy way of answering that is to instead answer this: why can't
>>you just make the -config package a bunch of files and a script that
>>doesn't get execut
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:43:39 +1000, Anthony Towns
wrote:
>The one that gets installed later, Pre-Deps the one that gets installed
>earlier. exim4-daemon Pre-Depends: exim4-config; exim4-config Depends:
>exim4-base, probably.
Unfortunately, that doesn't work. apt immediately bombs out with "E:
Inte
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:23:52AM -0600, cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2003-12-05 11:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Well, at least for my understanding SkoleLinux is not a "Custom Debian
> > Distribution" exactly because they have packages which are not integrated
> > in Debian. This is no
这些天你跑去哪里了，很久没找你一起玩了，真的很想念。
我这几天也没干什么，老是窝在家里上网，最近发现了一个很有意思的网站，叫什么"精品世
界（http://www.52jp.com）";
他上面的东西很好玩，比如说，有装在相机上能拍透视效果的红外透视镜头，有很好玩的微型无线摄像机，
有能观测十几公里的望远镜，有能防偷拍、防窃听的探测狗，还有打电话时能变声音的电话变声器，更有……嘿嘿……
能让女孩子欲乱情迷的催情药哦。
我自己也买了一个针孔摄像机玩，还拍了一些很有意思的"电影"哦，下周六我来找你玩，把片子带来也分享
给你看看，这可是我的秘密宝贝哦，要不是咱俩关系好，我才不拿出来呢：）
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:13:57AM -0800, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> FAI is good, but it doesn't handle updating the systems once you have
> them installed.
You're absolutely right. The cfengine scripts are also slightly
difficult to re-use after the initial installation. A good cfengine
setup is ha
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> I was intrigued by Progeny's autoinstall Python script, but never had a
> chance to look into it further.
Progeny no longer maintains autoinstall, but I have picked it up and
continue to use, maintain, and enhance it. If you haven't looked at it in
a
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 10:20:19AM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> > I believe that our GCC packages already have propolice patched in but not
> > enabled. Therefore it should be a much easier change to make for it to be
> > included.
>
> This is true, debian/patches has a line
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 12:24:07AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Release signing protects against a hostile or compromised mirror,
> > network, DNS server, proxy server, and a host of other, similar attacks,
> > and also prevents most forms
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:36:20AM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Then that discussion needs to be resolved so that a solution can be made
> that is in Debian main.
It's useful to try to clarify the terms so people can speak the same
language, but as soon as you categorize anything somebody's go
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 03:20:45AM -0600, cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> _ideally_ there are no changes. In practice there will be.
Why?
> For instance:
> In skolelinux there's currently a package called locale-config-skolelinux
> which sets up de default locale for all users. This package i
(no need to CC: me as I'm subscribe)
> > Why do we have to make each of our users find a solution to generate this
> > from a _local_ mirror (or the system's .deb archive which shoulnd't be
> > trusted in the event of an intrusion) when we could do this ourselves and
> > provide the results?
>
>
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> hm, as far as I know Debian-edu is nothing more then a couple of
> task-packages at this point (and some education packages that got added to
> the archive)
I do not compare the quality of Debian-Edu or SkoleLinux - I just want to
use the right term. Yes, Skole
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> I will personally move forward with this as soon as I get access to
> CVS.
Thanks. This would be much appreciated.
> Andreas, perhaps you missed this message:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200309/msg00
尊敬的先生:
最低价格限量出售项目中标方案、软件源代码、技术教学,企业管理培训、个人能力训
练、商业计划书等精华资料光盘.
--
资料齐全、内容丰富。现全套一口价318元。如不放心者也可货到付款、绝对安全保证。
联系人: 张小姐 手机: 13066910205 电话 : 0755-26461572
QQ : 228725366 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
网址：http://zeh
On 05-Dec-03, 05:54 (CST), Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > As for me, I'm happy to provide either my current menu files, which are
> > supported by all of the DE/WM systems in Debian, *or* .desktop files,
> > *when* they are supported by al
Em Fri, 5 Dec 2003 21:55:21 +0800, Cameron Patrick escreveu:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:17:08PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> | Thing is, none of this matters. If upstream support .desktop files,
> | then we just run them through the script that converts them to Debian
> | menu entries whil
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:03:39AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Signed debs establish a trust chain from the buildd to the user and
> > from the buildd-admin/maintainer to the user as well as copy the
> > existing trust chain from ftp-maste
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:07:53AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > I wrote a little script that checks what apt things its installing
> > against what the control files of the debs say. I will test it with
> > some more fakes and then file it
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 04 Dec 2003 02:44:31 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> * Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031203 20:12]:
> >> > Before we make such a push, we should at least ens
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031204 18:00]:
> > >> The md5sum file should be generated at build time, signed and only
> > >> the signature kept. The signature is small enough not to cause
> > >> bloat, it can be included in the Package fi
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031204 15:05]:
> > > I also think it is hardly possible to regenerate the .md5sums file
> > > in a way the signature will be kept. It would need to never change
> > > which files are included and how they
Javier =?iso-8859-15?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Manoj, I'm going to concentrate on this example, it's probably a corner
> case and I'm probably digressing here ... oh well]
>
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:17:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Finally,
Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wasn't going to post this, but it might be relevent to the
> ongoing custom distribution stuff that's happening.
>
> I've been experimenting with producing a hardened Debian derivitive
> as a small piece of paid work. This mostly means compiling
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Dec 3, 2003, at 21:07, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >
> > You can just as well just check all the debs. gunzip doesn't take
> > longer, the slowest thing usually is the cdrom.
>
> True, so I should probably just put the md5sums files on my CD,
Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 12:10:44PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:39, Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ? I've been experimenting with producing a hardened Debian derivitive
> > > ?as a small piece of paid work. ?This mostly
Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:59:40PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:41, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So, I was wondering how to go about taking the source package for
> > > 2.4.23-686 (and the SMP version) and bac
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:58:27PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> Much of this patch is scheduled to be included in 2.4.24, so the work
> required
Who claims that?
#include
* Andrew Pollock [Fri, Dec 05 2003, 03:41:14PM]:
> Is it as simple as taking the source package and building it in a stable
> pbuilder chroot, or is there more black magic involved with kernel packages?
AFAIK you need at least updated modutils and procps. And you should use
the default
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:16:56AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Please see my previous mail and try to accept that while absolutely
> incomplete the common entry point for CDDs is:
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/
>
> under the topic "Projects".
Right, this page is (1) out of date and (
Hi,
I have a local package pool which contains backports to woody. To be
able to do package pinning, I have Release files containing the
following:
Archive: woody
Component: main|contrib|non-free
Architectures: i386
Origin: mysite
Label: mysite/woody
Description: foobar
my sources.list lines are
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:17:08PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
| Thing is, none of this matters. If upstream support .desktop files,
| then we just run them through the script that converts them to Debian
| menu entries while installing. dh_installmenu would be a good place to
| do this.
|
| Th
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 03:02:42PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> | Yeah, inverted the sense, you get the idea. We need both tools, at
> | which point there's no longer a reason not to just continue using the
> | existing Debian menu system.
>
> Except that AFAIK .desktops are still semantically
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 04:08:41 -0600, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:18:46 -0600, Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 04:49:45PM -0200, Felipe Almeida Lessa
> > wrote:
> >> I think only one thing is blocking the whole idea o
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 23:32, "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, last week I compiled a 2.4.23 kernel on my "unstable" desktop,
> created a kernel-image package with make-kpgp, and it didn't
> install on a plain woody machine. The "depmod" part failed.
>
> On the 'stable' machin
Ludovic Rousseau dijo:
> Why not. It may be a good solution.
IMHO, Co-m rules :-)
> I will upload my NMU to correct the two RC bugs in DELAYED/7-day as
> explained in [1]. So he has enough/some time to fix the bugs himself
> and upload a new version.
I will make sure he does ;-)
--
.''`.A
Le vendredi 05 décembre 2003 à 12:38:10, Amaya a écrit:
> I was out to the movies with him yesterday, he is not MIA or anything.
> We even talked about plucker's state. He is in the proccess of fixing
> the bugs.
Good news.
> Comanteinance may be an option?
Why not. It may be a good solution.
I
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:30, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:59:40PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
>> > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:41, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > So, I was
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 21:16, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [BTW, declaring that SkoleLinux as "no CDD" ... is one of the most
> impressive derivatives of Debian, but it just does not (yet) fall under our
> definition.]
So we have:
Debian, parent project & parent GNU/Linux Distribution
|
+-
James Troup wrote:
> As part of the recovery process, db.debian.org has migrated, both to a
> new host (because the old box was on it's last legs and HP kindly
> donated a shiny new one to replace it), and to a newer version of LDAP
> (because it was still using potato's OpenLDAP).
Which exact ver
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:30, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:59:40PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:41, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So, I was wondering how to go about taking the source package for
> > > 2.4.23-686 (and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-05 11:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> > > There are no changes to Debian, because CDDs reside completely in
> > > main / testing /unstable as any other package.
> >
> > _ideally_ there are no changes. In practi
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, cobaco wrote:
> On 2003-12-05 11:16, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > their fine work. I really love what they do and SkoleLinux is one of the
> > most impressive derivatives of Debian, but it just does not (yet) fall
> > under our definition.]
>
> huh ?! How do you figure that?
Pleas
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Joerg Wendland wrote:
> Sure, but configuration of the samba package should be the
> responsibility of this package. What the Debian Enterprise project
> should do is to work with the samba maintainer to achieve this and
> maybe provide some sort of special configuration packa
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Billy Biggs wrote:
>> So far there has been a lot of support for the .desktop standard
>> effort. Which systems do you refer to that are not supporting,
>> adopting, or intending to adopt the .desktop standard?
>
> Some or all of: twm, pdmenu, blackbox, aft
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> As for me, I'm happy to provide either my current menu files, which are
> supported by all of the DE/WM systems in Debian, *or* .desktop files,
> *when* they are supported by all (or at least most) the DE/WM systems in
> Debian.
If everybody waits the .
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:42:28PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> That's what the debian-cd package is for.
Thanks, that was exactly what I was looking for :)
Steve
--
Will code for food.
Fabian Fagerholm, on 2003-12-04, 20:47, you wrote:
> The way Debian Enterprise has been described, it would provide you with
> this option. But you may also want to move "apt-get install samba" and
> the related session of tweaking samba's options to suit your network, to
> the install phase. Imagi
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
>>
>> I don't think that this is the case. As I understand it, .desktop files
>> have the advantage that they are already shipped by a number of upstream
>> packages, support i18n better than Debian menus, are supported natively
>> by KDE and Gno
Hi,
The package plucker has 2 RC bugs. The lastest upload is dated 1 Dec
2002 (one year ago!). The package was orphaned (#160472, 11 Sep 2002)
and adopted by Pablo S. Torralba.
Pablo S. Torralba was/is not yet a DD and the last upload was sponsored
by Amaya Rodrigo Sastre.
The two RC bugs are ve
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 05:49, Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote:
>> > On Thursday 04 December 2003 13:19, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> > The other question is "how hard could it be to adapt menu to desktop files
>> > ?".
>> I think only one thing is blocking the w
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
