Quoting Brian May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> > IIRC maximum number is limited to 32 groups for a single user. Just in
> > case you are going to add more :)
>
> What happens if you exceed this limit?
We encountered this at $FIRM,
Scripsit Rick Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So, "dfsg-lint", maybe.
I think my critique against "debian-legalint" applies here too.
How about something boring and accurate, say, "apt-show-sections"?
--
Henning Makholm "Fuck Lone."
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:42:31PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 01:21:35AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> | On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:01:46PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> | > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:25:24PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> | > The firmware is needed. W
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 00:44, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> * Package name: mmsclient
> Description : mms streaming media download utility
In this case it is OK to capitalise MMS, since it is an acronym (I
assume).
A little logic behind capitalisation rules: It should always be possible
to
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 11:41, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> At 19 Nov 03 18:12:44 GMT,
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:20:21AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> I'm sorry but I missed this mail.
>
> > > I'm not sure there's any reason t
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 01:21:35AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
| On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:01:46PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
| > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:25:24PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
| > The firmware is needed. Without it, the device is completely dumb.
| > But there are some devices
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:01:46PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:25:24PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> The firmware is needed. Without it, the device is completely dumb.
> But there are some devices which can store the fw permanently. Also,
> the fw is distributed on their
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:23:21PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> It looks as if everytime we can get rid of a good reason for
> non-free (e.g. viable acroread alternatives), new reasons (firmware for
> drivers) arise. Sigh.
That's because it's a bad premise to use utility as a basis for decidi
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:49:36PM +1300, Mike Beattie wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 11:18:39PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> > A general (non-ITP-related) question: Is ENTROPY related to Freenet in
> > any way?
>
> It supports the freenet protocol, yes. But it's written in C, not Java.
Ah, that's
9 matches
Mail list logo
