Keysigning in Nagoya, JP

2003-10-20 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi Debian Developpers, I'll be in Nagoya on November 1, 2 or 3 (for now, I couldn't say on which day(s) I'll be there, that will partly depend on the answers I'll get to this email ;) ). If there are any people interested in keysigning during that week-end, drop me a message. By the way, if the

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Paul Hampson
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:07:33PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I think a third (or, after reading some replies to this same mail, > fourth, fifth or nth) way could be used: Binary packages enter Sid as > usual. Now, after the 10-day period, when they are ready to enter > Testing, they are autobuilt

Bug#53121: Dont settle for cyber duds, our members are real awgqs

2003-10-20 Thread Judith Gostanian
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content preview: Jump start your love life. With millions of members, there's somebody f

Bug#53121: 43297 get ur refills ogkfkuayp gca s

2003-10-20 Thread Bonnie Dobson
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content preview: DISCREET OVERNIGHT PHARMACY Our Doctors will write your Prescription Yo

Re: faster boot

2003-10-20 Thread Thomas Hood
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 05:12, Russell Coker wrote: > Hmm, maybe we could make it the rule that anything with number 99 can return > before it's finished initialising? If the point here is to "speed up boot" then I think it would suffice to move the rc symlinks for those "leaf" services to somethin

Bug#53121: 50906 u need some of this medications! n zx qgs j

2003-10-20 Thread Hank Haines
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content preview: DISCREET OVERNIGHT PHARMACY Our Doctors will write your Prescription Yo

Re: Package which uses jam (instead make)

2003-10-20 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:55:00 -0500, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 04:39:54PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> > The "must" in the new meaning is an accidental byproduct of >> > conversion to the new language. >> >> Accidental or not, it has been an established

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Neil Roeth
On Oct 21, Andrew Pollock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 06:08:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Sure, sure. > > > > Just give me one real world reason why it is not good to build in an > > artificial environment like you call it (either pbuilder or an > > autobuilder)

Re: faster boot

2003-10-20 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:08, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 02:44, Russell Coker wrote: > > Surely if a daemon takes a long time before it detaches from it's > > terminal and "goes daemon", then you can have a parent process put it in > > the background and direct it's output to some conv

Re: faster boot

2003-10-20 Thread Thomas Hood
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 02:44, Russell Coker wrote: > Surely if a daemon takes a long time before it detaches from it's terminal > and > "goes daemon", then you can have a parent process put it in the background > and direct it's output to some convenient log file. System V initscripts must not r

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread John Hasler
Matt Zimmerman writes: > This premise assumes that only developers use unstable, and in my > experience this is very far from the truth. It is true that some packages go into testing without having been tested on all platforms. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elm

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:07:33PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I think a third (or, after reading some replies to this same mail, > fourth, fifth or nth) way could be used: Binary packages enter Sid as > usual. Now, after the 10-day period, when they are ready to enter > Testing, they are autobuilt

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 09:52:14AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:17:40PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > If a broken package is not noticed in unstable, the package must not be > > particularly important to anyone. > > I disagree. > > 1. A package may not be important to

Re: faster boot

2003-10-20 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 04:13, Mark Ferlatte wrote: > I suspect that the improvement would be _very_ system dependent, though. > For example, netatalk takes a _long_ time to start, and parallelizing would > be a benefit. sendmail can take a while too, especially if you have DNS > issues at boot time.

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Brian May
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:17:40PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > c) The package is uploaded from the real-world environment where it works, > > built on the architecture 99% of the users have. The breakage in the > > other architectures' autobuilt packages is not noticed until after Sarge, > > a

Bug#53121: Fwd: The 24th of this month

2003-10-20 Thread Marshall Arias
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content preview: Buy Xanax® (alprazolam) Online! Buying it online is easy and legal Xana

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 06:08:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Sure, sure. > > Just give me one real world reason why it is not good to build in an > artificial environment like you call it (either pbuilder or an > autobuilder) and i will go away, as you say. Yes, please do. I've been following t

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Gunnar Wolf
John Hasler dijo [Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:25:45PM -0500]: > Gunnar Wolf writes: > > I think a third (or, after reading some replies to this same mail, > > fourth, fifth or nth) way could be used: Binary packages enter Sid as > > usual. Now, after the 10-day period, when they are ready to enter > >

Re: Debconf in Brazil?

2003-10-20 Thread Jesus Climent
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:14:59PM -0200, Leonardo Dias wrote: > That would be nice. And it would be incredibly nice if it were in Sao > Paulo, near the Paulista Avenue. I thought the idea was porto alegre... j -- Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org Unix SysAd

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:03:03AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > A Malicious maintainer has installed a version of libc or whatever on > his system that opens the way to a security hole. Because, of course, a malicious buildd admin or member of the Debian Security Team is a flat impossibility, as is

Re: ttf Depends ??

2003-10-20 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:06:14PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 20-Oct-03, 13:22 (CDT), Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What font does the program use by default? I would Depend on that one. > > If it's an X program, then it shouldn't Depend on any font, as they may > be on

Bug#216776: ITP: smilutils -- DV command line utilities

2003-10-20 Thread Jens Gecius
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: smilutils Version : 0.3.0 Upstream Author : Charles Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://kino.schirmacher.de/ * License : GPL Description : DV command line utilities Collection of various DV command lin

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread John Hasler
Gunnar Wolf writes: > I think a third (or, after reading some replies to this same mail, > fourth, fifth or nth) way could be used: Binary packages enter Sid as > usual. Now, after the 10-day period, when they are ready to enter > Testing, they are autobuilt. Only the autobuilt version hits Testing

Re: ttf Depends ??

2003-10-20 Thread Steve Greenland
On 20-Oct-03, 13:22 (CDT), Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 07:15:47PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > > > what Depends are best to guarantee that after package installation at > > least one True Type font package is installed?? > > Should I add a best guess font

canned peach Unsubscription

2003-10-20 Thread canned peach
Unsubscription from list: canned peach is successful. If you would like to subscribe to canned peach in the future, just click this link: http://www.bairestrade.com/mojo/mojo.cgi?f=n&l=cannedpeach&e=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&p=9388 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread John Hasler
I wrote: > Or hold them back until at least one autobuild succeeds. Wouter Verhelst writes: > You're going to have to explain this one to me. You want to hold them > back (not try to build them) until one build succeeds? Hold back the maintainer's binary upload until at least one autobuild succee

Re: ttf Depends ??

2003-10-20 Thread Alexander Sack
Hi, Thx, this is what I just received by mail: Le lun 20/10/2003 à 19:15, Alexander Sack a écrit : what Depends are best to guarantee that after package installation at least one True Type font package is installed?? Should I add a best guess font package or is there a kind of meta package availabl

Bug#216772: ITP: fisg -- Fast IRC Statistics Generator

2003-10-20 Thread Alexander Wirt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: fisg Version : 0.3.8 Upstream Author : Matti Hamalainen (ccr) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.tnsp.org/fisg.php * License : (GPL) Description : Fast IRC Statistics Generator Generates a webpage with

Re: Driver Support for Intel Motherboard

2003-10-20 Thread Mathieu Roy
"Srikanta Prasanna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Dear Sir, > I am Srikanta Prasanna from Bangalore > (India) doing my final year Degree. I recently installed Debian > (Knoppix 3.2) on my system (P4, 2Ghz, 845 GLAD Intel motherboard). I > am not able to

Welcome to canned peach

2003-10-20 Thread canned peach
Hello! Thanks for subscribing. Here's information about canned peach that was given by the list owner: canned peach syrup buyers Private Policy: You might want to save this email for future reference. You can unsubscribe anytime from canned peach by following this link: http://www.baires

Unscribe

2003-10-20 Thread sacomanr
I am unscribeing please take the necessary action to remove my name from your list of scribers.   Thank you.

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Andrew Suffield dijo [Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 07:57:20AM +0100]: > So, we have two scenarios. Let the package be broken in such a way > that it builds differently on different platforms. > > a) All packages uploaded to the archive are built in an artifical > environment. All packages in the archive f

Bug#78782: psodle altiteter

2003-10-20 Thread Manuela Rich
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content preview: Vicodin ES 90 Tab Special. -Free Doctors consultation -No Rx Required -

canned peach Unsubscription

2003-10-20 Thread canned peach
Unsubscription from list: canned peach is successful. If you would like to subscribe to canned peach in the future, just click this link: http://www.bairestrade.com/mojo/mojo.cgi?f=n&l=cannedpeach&e=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&p=9388 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#53121: trakway dekthward

2003-10-20 Thread Judson Hutton
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Content preview: Need Vicodin? We're Fast. Low Price Prescription Pain MedsNo Rx Req

Driver Support for Intel Motherboard

2003-10-20 Thread Srikanta Prasanna
Dear Sir, I am Srikanta Prasanna from Bangalore (India) doing my final year Degree. I recently installed Debian (Knoppix 3.2) on my system (P4, 2Ghz, 845 GLAD Intel motherboard). I am not able to find a driver for my motherboard (the audio is not dete

Re: ttf Depends ??

2003-10-20 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 07:15:47PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > what Depends are best to guarantee that after package installation at > least one True Type font package is installed?? > Should I add a best guess font package or is there a kind of meta > package available for ttf packages? What

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:51:20AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > c) The package is uploaded from the real-world environment where it works, > built on the architecture 99% of the users have. The breakage in the > other architectures' autobuilt packages is not noticed until after Sarge, > and/or

Re: udev 0.3 package

2003-10-20 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:40:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 19, Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/ > >Any plans for an upload to unstable? > I'd like to know first if it works or not and how much useful it is in > its current form, as

Re: faster boot

2003-10-20 Thread Mark Ferlatte
Robert Giardalas said on Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:55:52PM -0400: > I had some preliminary modifications of the parallel loading system > proposed by James Hunt from IBM working for Debian, but it looked like > it would speed things up less than 10%, which wasn't enough to lure me > away from SysV

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:13:22PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > b) The package is uploaded from real-world environments. Sometimes it > > > breaks; when this happens the bug is noticed and corrected, so that > > > the package always builds

Re: udev 0.3 package

2003-10-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Oct 19, Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/ > >Any plans for an upload to unstable? > I'd like to know first if it works or not and how much useful it is in > its current form, as I currently do not ow

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 08:01:08AM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Goswin writes: > > So far the best suggestion for this problem I have heart was to allow > > (require) binary uploads but to hold them back and autobuild everything > > for all archs. > > Or hold them back until at least one autobuild

Re: Package which uses jam (instead make)

2003-10-20 Thread John Goerzen
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 04:39:54PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > The "must" in the new meaning is an accidental byproduct of > > conversion to the new language. > > Accidental or not, it has been an established part of the > infrastructure for the whole life of ./debian/rules conventio

Re: Debconf in Brazil?

2003-10-20 Thread Joerg Wendland
Steve McIntyre, on 2003-10-20, 15:42, you wrote: > Ah, OK. For some reason I was expecting it to be in July. Having my > 30th birthday in Brazil sounds like a cool idea... So you'll be inviting us to your birthday party in Brazil? When you charter that plane you'll even get a birthday present fro

ttf Depends ??

2003-10-20 Thread Alexander Sack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, what Depends are best to guarantee that after package installation at least one True Type font package is installed?? Should I add a best guess font package or is there a kind of meta package available for ttf packages? Thx - -- ~ PGP messages prefe

Re: Bug#214036: im: imput doesn't work with Perl 5.8.1

2003-10-20 Thread Steve Kemp
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:13:49AM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > With the perl 5.8.1 package, the line input operator (<>) causes > "Bad file descriptor". This problem is reproducible by the > following sample code. > > > #!/usr/bin/perl > $file = "/etc/debian_version"; > open(FH, $fil

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am So, den 19.10.2003 schrieb Andrew Suffield um 21:08: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 05:57:55PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > The proposal was "All packages should be built in an artificial > environment of this form". I have pointed out that this is a > braindamaged idea. Well, any maintainer tha

canned peach in syrup x 850 grs.

2003-10-20 Thread canned peach
We offer canned peach in syrup x 850 grs. box x 24 Cans u$s 15 FOB Buenos Aires. Bairestrade Brokers Viamonte 1546 7o 703 www.bairestrade.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bajo decreto S1618 titulo 3ro. aprobado por el 105 Congreso de Estandarización de Normativas Bajo el Decreto S.1618 TITULO III aprobad

Re: Bug#214036: im: imput doesn't work with Perl 5.8.1

2003-10-20 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
Could anyone help me to fix Bug#214036 in the im package (mail/news handling utility written in Perl)? On October 4, 2003 at 2:06PM +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On October 4, 2003 at 12:59PM +0900, > Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I found `imput' didn't wor

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:24:54PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:55:40AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Seriously, i perfectly understood what you are proposing, and i think > > you don't realize the things involved for making such a proposal. Think > > about it seriousl

Re: search-citeseer_0.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2003-10-20 Thread Agustin Martin Domingo
Henning Makholm wrote: Scripsit Agustin Martin Domingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Last time I read about that, if is byte compiled it should depend on virtual package 'emacsen' (provided by all emacs flavours), since otherwise emacs-package-install failed if no emacsen was installed. If that is true, s

Re: Debconf in Brazil?

2003-10-20 Thread Leonardo Dias
That would be nice. And it would be incredibly nice if it were in Sao Paulo, near the Paulista Avenue. A real-time pic of it can be seen here: http://www2.climatempo.com.br/ali/av_paulista_bcoreal_pamplona.jpg There's transportation for everyone and the place is full of Debian users. :) - ld

Re: Debconf in Brazil?

2003-10-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:42:03PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:25:02AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > >* Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-20 14:50]: > >> There's not been much discussion of this since the initial > >> proposal. Are we planning on doing it

Re: udev 0.3 package

2003-10-20 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:31:10 +, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Oct 19, Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/ > >Any plans for an upload to unstable? > I'd like to know first if it works or not and how much useful it is in > its current form, as I curr

Re: Debconf in Brazil?

2003-10-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:25:02AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >* Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-20 14:50]: >> There's not been much discussion of this since the initial >> proposal. Are we planning on doing it or not? > >Yes, Brazil is still the plan. There's also a mailing list a

Re: Bug#216492: FTBFS (unstable/all) missing build-dep

2003-10-20 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:24:19AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:15:17AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > Other people have cov

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:55:40AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Seriously, i perfectly understood what you are proposing, and i think > you don't realize the things involved for making such a proposal. Think > about it seriously, and you will see why your proposal is not a good > idea. FUD. Go away

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:13:22PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > b) The package is uploaded from real-world environments. Sometimes it > > breaks; when this happens the bug is noticed and corrected, so that > > the package always builds the same way. > > Why would it ever be noticed? That

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Andrew Suffield
I disagree with the parent mail in every respect. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:51:20AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > a) All packages uploaded to the archive are built in an artifical > > environment. All packages in the archive function as expected. > > > > b) The package is uploaded from real-world environments

Unidentified subject!

2003-10-20 Thread <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ([63.172.68.222]) HELO=hmiv by avsia.com (Wildcat! SMTP v5.6.450.8) with SMTP id 289115000; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:04:45 -0500

Re: Debconf in Brazil?

2003-10-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-20 14:50]: > There's not been much discussion of this since the initial > proposal. Are we planning on doing it or not? Yes, Brazil is still the plan. There's also a mailing list at http://listas.cipsga.org.br/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debconf4 The cu

Debconf in Brazil?

2003-10-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
There's not been much discussion of this since the initial proposal. Are we planning on doing it or not? I remember that one of the big sticking points for people was the cost of flights. I'm investigating now roughly how much it would cost to charter a plane from Europe for the trip, to see if th

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread John Hasler
Goswin writes: > So far the best suggestion for this problem I have heart was to allow > (require) binary uploads but to hold them back and autobuild everything > for all archs. Or hold them back until at least one autobuild succeeds. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse H

Re: Bug#88029: Package which uses jam (instead make)

2003-10-20 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:28:31PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > We might be more successful in resolving the issue if some people stopped > thinking of it as an ad hominem flamewar. :p Especially since Wichert don't bother playing :( > > > The interface to the rules file is defined well enough, >

Re: Bug#88029: Package which uses jam (instead make)

2003-10-20 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:06:30AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Summary of the auction so far: > > Steve bet on Manoj and Josip on Wichert. > > Deuce. We might be more successful in resolving the issue if some people stopped thinking of it as an ad hominem flamewar. :p > > The interface to th

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, what if we stick to our principle "the maintainer knows best" and provide the infrastructure for source only uploads, but leave it to the maintainer whether he wants to do so. Some here think buildd'ed packages are better, some think their building the packages themselves is better. So just th

Re: how to ask for packages rebuilding

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:57:06AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:52:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Op ma 20-10-2003, om 12:11 schreef Sven Luther: > > > Yes, i will add it to the policy and document it. It will not help for > > > the current setup, unless we throw

Re: udev 0.3 package

2003-10-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 19, Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/ >Any plans for an upload to unstable? I'd like to know first if it works or not and how much useful it is in its current form, as I currently do not own any hot-pluggable device and cannot test it. -- ci

Re: how to ask for packages rebuilding

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:52:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Op ma 20-10-2003, om 12:11 schreef Sven Luther: > > Yes, i will add it to the policy and document it. It will not help for > > the current setup, unless we throw out the current mini-freeze, and > > restart everything. > > As said,

Re: how to ask for packages rebuilding

2003-10-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:52:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Op ma 20-10-2003, om 12:11 schreef Sven Luther: > > Yes, i will add it to the policy and document it. It will not help for > > the current setup, unless we throw out the current mini-freeze, and > > restart everything. > > As said,

《软件测试工程师》今年最后一期报名

2003-10-20 Thread 软件测评中心
中国软件评测中心 关于举办23期"软件测试工程师(STE)"上海培训班的通知(今年最后一次) 报名咨询 网址:http://www.52peixun.com 中国软件测评中心网站:http://www.cstc.org.cn 各有关单位: 中国软件评测中心将与上海市软件评测中心联合举办上海"软件测试工程师(STE)"培训班, 将有中国软件评测中心质量总监-何伟起教授、上海市计算机软件评测重点实验室主任-杨根兴 博士等国内软件评测界权威授课。 参加培训班的学员,在考试合格后,将获得由中国软件评测中心颁发 的"软件测试工程师(STE)"认证证书。 特别提示:优秀学员提供

Re: how to ask for packages rebuilding

2003-10-20 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op ma 20-10-2003, om 12:11 schreef Sven Luther: > Yes, i will add it to the policy and document it. It will not help for > the current setup, unless we throw out the current mini-freeze, and > restart everything. As said, I'll monitor the ocaml packages so that your current mini-freeze will work.

Re: how to ask for packages rebuilding

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:18:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:13:06PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > These all boil down to the same problem: ocaml was upgraded to > > > ocaml-3.07, while the packages that were

Re: how to ask for packages rebuilding

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:26:26AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Yes. Adding explicit (>> version) build dependency to the libraries will > > help there. I will add this to the debian/ocaml policy. > > If you'll do that, there will not be need for m68k maintainers to be > notified about this..

Re: how to ask for packages rebuilding

2003-10-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:13:06PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > These all boil down to the same problem: ocaml was upgraded to > > ocaml-3.07, while the packages that were available at the time depended > > on ocaml-3.06-1. Since that doesn't exist an

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:39:54AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > So, we have two scenarios. Let the package be broken in such a way > that it builds differently on different platforms. > > a) All packages uploaded to the archive are built in an artifical

Re: how to ask for packages rebuilding

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:57:04AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Ideally, it could be automated, by delaying the build > > of these packages by one day, and it would be fine. > > That's an option, although imperfect since it assumes that all > architectures will always build all packages withi

Re: how to ask for packages rebuilding

2003-10-20 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op ma 20-10-2003, om 11:13 schreef Sven Luther: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:57:04AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > Ideally, it could be automated, by delaying the build > > > of these packages by one day, and it would be fine. > > > > That's an option, although imperfect since it assumes tha

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 07:57:20AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:39:54AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:08:11PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > > And you also volunteer to replace the autobuilders and build _every_ > > > > package out there b

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:08:11PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 05:57:55PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 09:39:05PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 03:32:41PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > > Its good for the a

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Andrew Suffield wrote: > a) All packages uploaded to the archive are built in an artifical > environment. All packages in the archive function as expected. > > b) The package is uploaded from real-world environments. Sometimes it > breaks; when this happens the bug is noticed and corrected, s

Re: how to ask for packages rebuilding

2003-10-20 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op ma 20-10-2003, om 09:07 schreef Sven Luther: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:13:06PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > These all boil down to the same problem: ocaml was upgraded to > > ocaml-3.07, while the packages that were available at the time depended > > on ocaml-3.06-1. Since that doesn't e

Re: Bug#216492: FTBFS (unstable/all) missing build-dep

2003-10-20 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:15:17AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > Other people have covered why this breaks. Here's the solution I use: > > > > Make your buil

Re: how to ask for packages rebuilding

2003-10-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:13:06PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Op zo 19-10-2003, om 20:04 schreef Sven Luther: > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:15:40PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > Op zo 19-10-2003, om 10:44 schreef Stefano Zacchiroli: > > > > I've never understood which is the right/polit

Re: Source only uploads?

2003-10-20 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:39:54AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:08:11PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > And you also volunteer to replace the autobuilders and build _every_ > > > package out there by hand on _every_ architecture ? > > > > > > Have you seriously thought

Re: Bug#216492: FTBFS (unstable/all) missing build-dep

2003-10-20 Thread Chris Waters
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:15:17AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > What needs to happen to get this into policy? The usual - see /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy-process.html (or .txt.gz or .sgml.gz) for details. -- Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra-osis is too long [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Where are we now? (Was: Bits from the RM)

2003-10-20 Thread Chris Cheney
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:13:23AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > I still need to get KDE 3.1.4 into sid and stablized. I hope for it to > be ready to migrate into sarge by Oct 20 (including the 10 day wait > time). From what Colin Watson mentioned to me earlier today there are > some other packages

Re: Bug#216492: FTBFS (unstable/all) missing build-dep

2003-10-20 Thread Chris Cheney
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:15:43PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:20:39PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 09:51, Adam Conrad wrote: > > > > > Package: libtool > > > Version: 1.5-3 > > > Severity: serious > > > > > > libtool fails to build fr