Gentlemen, the Info dir on my system is not in tip top shape, and may
not be also on yours. Try this simple test for duplicate entries:
$ sort /usr/share/info/dir|uniq -d|fgrep \*
* patch: (diff)Invoking patch. Apply a patch to a file.
* sdiff: (diff)Invoking sdiff.
hay u suck u faget u lick dick suck yr mu
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:26:57PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 06:40:46PM -0400, W3C List Manager wrote:
> > This is a response to a message apparently sent from your address to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > Subject: Re: Thank you!
> > From:
> > Date:Sa
Guido Guenther wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > if [ -n "$var" ]; then
I always prefer this myself too. It is portable.
> Just of out curiosity, is this in any way different from the shorter:
> if [ "$var" ]; then
For Debian, no. But for those of us trying to program portably across
syste
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-09-07
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: nrpe
Version : 1.9
Upstream Author : Ethan Galstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.nagios.org/
* License : (GPL)
Descriptio
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 07:24:42 +0200, Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 15:32:58 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> case "$1" in configure)
>> # Configure this package. If the package must prompt the user for
>> # information, do it here. There are three sub-cases:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:40:01PM +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> To conclude, our collaboration (Karl and myself) on
> NUT bug squashing was really productive! I think he
> also should be listed as NUT Co Maintainer to
> officialise it, as Karl is also one of the most active
> people in the NUT Com
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:23:15AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Where did you come by this, and if it's something we should worry about,
> why isn't it documented in Policy?
It is, but you shouldn't worry about it anyhow because nobody's crazy enough
to try doing anything with a dpkg that old
Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> Dear ruby package maintainers!
I'm probably the only "ruby package maintainer" who doesn't speak ruby.. :-)
Luckily I have eager ruby minions to take care of that part of mooix.
However, we were a bit suprised to have to make the configure script
check for libruby.so.$VERS
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 10:23:15 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 03:32:58PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> case "$1" in configure)
>> # Configure this package. If the package must prompt the user for
>> # information, do it here. There are three sub-cas
Dear ruby package maintainers!
As Marcelo pointed out on Bug#209052, ruby-dev has been obsoleted, so
packages that build-depend on ruby-dev can't be built now.
We have ruby1.6-dev (for ruby1.6) and ruby1.8-dev (for ruby1.8), so
please rebuild your packages to use ruby1.6-dev and/or ruby1.8-dev.
On 06-Sep-03, 12:28 (CDT), George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not think the variable is the real issue here. If we grab a snippet of
> the MPlayer's debian/rules:
> ./configure --prefix=/usr --confdir=/etc/mplayer $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)
That's a bug, as Matt noted.
> --prefix and --
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:58:03AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 06:08:06PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 17:23, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Man, that's ugly. I use:
> > >
> > > if [ -n "$var" ]; then
> > > fi
>
> > I have been using
> >
> >
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:23:15AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> if [ -n "$var" ]; then
> fi
Just of out curiosity, is this in any way different from the shorter:
if [ "$var" ]; then
fi
-- Guido
pgpeYjAwFH0tB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 11:58:03 -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 06:08:06PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
[...]
> > I have been using
> >
> > if [ "$var" ]; then
> > fi
>
> > I hope that's kosher too; otherwise I have a few scripts to fix.
>
> In general, no. If the conte
Harald,
> I am not talking about runtime, but installation time. AFAIR the
> interface to use is called debconf. Obviously some packages want
> to be very sure that I get some important messages, and try to
> send me an EMail instead (or in addition).
Ah, I see the problem now. Well, it could be
Hallo,
* Matthias Fechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-09-03 19:05]:
> i have tried now a lot of different thinks, to get apt-get or dpkg
> running, but i get always an errormessage(unstable error since about 4
> september)
I have found now my problem, the file avaiable was defect and so dpkg
has fail
* Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the moment:
>
> * Perl is lost (that threaded thing)
As one of the new Co-Maintainers, I'm going to upload the package from
http://p.d.o/~nobse/vim/ to experimental this evening.
The perl issue is fixed in this package.
> * Can't ac
#include
* Manoj Srivastava [Mon, Aug 25 2003, 03:50:33PM]:
Okay, I think I have found a solution for the people with different
points of view. First, let's summarize some.
> >> > This is my view: the kernel headers and the configuration used
> >> > when compiling a stock kernel are to be viewed
Hi,
i have tried now a lot of different thinks, to get apt-get or dpkg
running, but i get always an errormessage(unstable error since about 4
september)
apt-get -f install
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg exited une
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 06:08:06PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 17:23, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Man, that's ugly. I use:
> >
> > if [ -n "$var" ]; then
> > fi
> I have been using
>
> if [ "$var" ]; then
> fi
> I hope that's kosher too; otherwise I have a few scr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Bsfilter is a bayesian spam filter.
- English and Japanese are supported.
- It works with IMAP. (but the feature is beta)
- It is written in Ruby.
Homepage: http://nabeken.com/bsfilter/> (Japanese)
Download: http://www.h2.dion.ne.jp/~nabeken/bsfilter/bsfilt
Hi, ruby package maintainers!
I've upload new ruby-defaults that make ruby 1.8.0 the debault version of ruby.
I contains some new binary package so it takes time to get into unstable.
You can get the new ruby-defaults from
deb http://pkg-ruby.alioth.debian.org/deb/ ./
deb-src http://pkg-ruby.al
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 17:23, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Man, that's ugly. I use:
>
> if [ -n "$var" ]; then
> fi
I have been using
if [ "$var" ]; then
fi
I hope that's kosher too; otherwise I have a few scripts to fix.
> for this sort of thing. However, that does depend on a certain o
Hi all,
I'm looking for someone who might be interested in co-maintaining or
perhaps adopting vegastrike. I haven't played the game in many months
and thus have been very sluggish in packaging the most recent
version(which is about to be superseded). Upstream is very active,
responsive and frien
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[postinst configure]
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 03:32:58PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
[...]
>> elif test -z "$2" -o "$2" = ""; then
> file:///usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/ch-maintainerscripts.html
> is my Bible when I'm writing/editing
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 03:32:58PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> case "$1" in
> configure)
> # Configure this package. If the package must prompt the user for
> # information, do it here.
> # There are three sub-cases:
> if test "${2+set}" != set; then
Man, that's ugly. I us
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-07
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnome-blog
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Seth Nickell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-blog/0.5
* License : GPL
Description
Hi Luca,
sorry about the Cc, but eye-balling -devel didn't reveal much activity
from you, so I'm not sure if you track the list. M-F-T is set to d-d.
> I propose to restructure the vim package so that it builds fewer vim
> variants.
>
> I propose to have only the following:
> vim (aka
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 10:25:39PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > AJ's requirement is fractionally stricter than policy's, but packages on
> > which other packages pre-depend should be playing it safe anyway. I
> > think that very much the same kind of care is needed to satisfy AJ's
> > requirement
Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ we were discussing request for packaging for alsa-tools ]
>> I think the programs are ok, but my experience is not really up to the
>> task. But I'm slowly moving...
>
> Allright. Well, filing a request for package does not hurt, the
> packager has to eva
Hi Robert!
Am 2003-09-06 16:29 +0200 schrieb Robert Epprecht:
> OK, I'll probably do that, but will enquire first a bit more, and do
> some more RTFM ;-)
Oh, I will help you if you are unfamiliar with it, but we should do
that by private mail.
> > Small compiling issues might be sorted out when
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 08:22:33AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Obviously this option leads into a conflict with some subsequent
> packages relying upon a working EMail configuration within the
> same installation session.
> My suggestion would be to use debconf only.
The packages are using deb
I did not intend to send an Email that could not be replied to.
However, I will send this post to let you know I do have Email --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Simon,
Simon Richter wrote:
Harald,
Would it be possible to get rid of the need to install EMail (e.g.
exim or sendmail) by default?
A lot of packages need at least the /usr/sbin/sendmail program, to be
able to send email to the admin, for example cron or at, which send the
Sure.
I am not talk
36 matches
Mail list logo
