Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Anthony Towns
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:55:31PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote: > Perhaps we can look at this a different way. I haven't read anyone > voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out > loud) is a 'good fellow'. Probably because it's completely off topic for this mailing list. Take

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Marc Singer
(Unintentionally, I first sent the reply to you directly.) On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 02:09:24PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > Incidentally "North America" != "USA". And your point is, what? > A Canadian conference would be in North America and satisfy the > objections of people who don't like th

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Marc Singer
Perhaps we can look at this a different way. I haven't read anyone voicing the opinion that GWB (can't say the name of the beast out loud) is a 'good fellow'. I'm supposing that all of us agree that he's a snake-oil salesmen of the odious kind, interested most in lining his pockets and the pocket

Re: voting system overview

2003-05-22 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:00:58AM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote: > Hello, This is off-topic for debian-devel -- we have a -vote list for discussion of votes, please use it. Followups to -vote. In, > http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/comp/vote.html you claim: ] Generalised Strategy

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Adam Heath
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 09:51:33PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > Admin installs from cd. Admin runs programs. Admin finds something he > > thinks > > is a bug. Admin reads changelog to see if the bug existed previously. > > hmm.. why would he do tha

Bug#194377: ITP: socketapi -- Socket API library for sctplib

2003-05-22 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-23 Severity: wishlist * Package name: socketapi Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Thomas Dreibholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://tdrwww.exp-math.uni-essen.de/dreibholz/rserpool/ * License : LGPL Descrip

Bug#194378: ITP: rsplib -- Prototype implementation of the IETF RSerPool architecture

2003-05-22 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-23 Severity: wishlist * Package name: rsplib Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Thomas Dreibholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://tdrwww.exp-math.uni-essen.de/dreibholz/rserpool/ * License : LGPL Descriptio

Bug#194379: ITP: sctplib -- Userland implementation of the SCTP protocol (RFC 2960)

2003-05-22 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-23 Severity: wishlist * Package name: sctplib Version : 1.0.0-pre19-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Dreibholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://tdrwww.exp-math.uni-essen.de/dreibholz/rserpool/ * License : LGPL D

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 09:51:33PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > Admin installs from cd. Admin runs programs. Admin finds something he thinks > is a bug. Admin reads changelog to see if the bug existed previously. hmm.. why would he do that? Greetings Bernd -- (OO) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 23 May 2003 03:20, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > You are taking personal actions inimical to the standard of > living of me and my loved ones in retaliation for actions by my > government (which I have little control over), and you expect me to > roll over and congratulate you all on

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Adam Heath
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:11:23PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > Consider the admin, who discovers some bug. They look at the changelogs for > > the problem package, seeing if it had a similiar bug. Also, consider that > > this system is not online, a

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Miles Bader
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And I know of approixmatly zero Americans who have reason to boycott > Canada. Er, well. I doubt there's a government in existance that hasn't done something objectionable enough to piss off a foreigner somewhere (e.g., recent european attempts to export t

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Glenn McGrath
On Thu, 22 May 2003 12:20:39 -0500 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let me clue all of you in: anyone who takes a stand and tries > to hurt the US economy, I see as a taking action inimical to me, and > my loved ones, and I do *NOT* see that as friendly action. What you say

Re: Orphaning my packages

2003-05-22 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Morgon Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > None taken. And no, I am not. [a DD] OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:11:23PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > Consider the admin, who discovers some bug. They look at the changelogs for > the problem package, seeing if it had a similiar bug. Also, consider that > this system is not online, and the admin has no network connection. Well, an adm

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Adam Heath
On Thu, 22 May 2003, Brian Nelson wrote: > If you don't do this, the original bug submitters will see a bug has > been fixed, but probably not remember what the bug was, especially if he > or she filed multiple bugs for the package. Furthermore, it's a real > pain to have to look at the BTS, and

Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying

2003-05-22 Thread Raul Miller
> On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 04:57:18PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > "Hard to understand"? We'd require a certain level of voter approval > > before we'll consider an option -- options which don't achieve that > > can't win. How is this "hard to understand"? On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 12:50:02AM +020

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Brian Nelson
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:10:28PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: >> * Francesco Paolo Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030522 21:35]: >> > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. >> > Do it using BTS directly. >> >> The developers r

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Thu, 22 May 2003 01:26:27 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:55:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > It's much more helpful to write this as: > > yes of course, but the question is where the line between helpfulness and > usefulness is :) > > At l

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:33:05PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > Shall I go on? No. Michael -- -!- bunny is now known as trinityBunny >=) * trinityBunny doubles flips in the room, slow motion rotates around jbailey waves h at him in fast motion and stands still.

voting system overview

2003-05-22 Thread Jochen Voss
Hello, For those of you, who want to make a well-informed decision in the upcoming general resolution about our voting system, the following web page should be interesting. http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/comp/vote.html There I put together pointers to all relevant information

Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying

2003-05-22 Thread Jochen Voss
Hello Raul, On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 04:57:18PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > "Hard to understand"? We'd require a certain level of voter approval > before we'll consider an option -- options which don't achieve that > can't win. How is this "hard to understand"? The thing which is hard to understa

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Morgon Kanter
This one time, at band camp, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No, it does not _recommend_ that, don't misrepresent it! > > > > [...] > > "It is an old tradition to acknowledge bugs fixed in non-maintainer uploads > > in the first changelog entry of the proper maintainer upload, for in

Re: lintian: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath, --disable-rpath doesn't help

2003-05-22 Thread Sylvain LE GALL
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:58:35PM +0200, Sebastian Muszynski wrote: > Hello all! > > I am getting a lintian error, binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath although i run > configure with --disable-rpath option. It is no automake problem... i've > remake all automake stuff to check this. > > ./configure --

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Brian Nelson
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:55:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >> It's much more helpful to write this as: > > yes of course, but the question is where the line between helpfulness and > usefulness is :) > > At least I think it is not a good idea to tal

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Brian Nelson
Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: >> > directory-administrator (1.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=low >> > . >> >* New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276) >> >> Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if a

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 05:27:40PM -0400, Morgon Kanter wrote: > > > > > >* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) > > > > > > > > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. > > > > Do it using BTS directly. > > > > > > Debian Developers' Reference

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:10:28PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Francesco Paolo Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030522 21:35]: > > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. > > Do it using BTS directly. > > The developers references tells that both methods are allowed in

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Morgon Kanter
This one time, at band camp, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) > > > > > > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. > > > Do it using BTS directly. > > > > Debian Developers' Reference actual

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:33:29PM -0400, Morgon Kanter wrote: > > > >* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) > > > > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. > > Do it using BTS directly. > > Debian Developers' Reference actually recommends doi

Re: Orphaning my packages

2003-05-22 Thread Morgon Kanter
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron M. Ucko) wrote: > > > fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit. > > > > I'd be interested in taking these over if no one else wants to, because > > one if my ITPs (Quat) depends on these. > > No offense, but are

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:49:52PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > > >* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) > > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. > Do it usin

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Andreas Barth
* Francesco Paolo Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030522 21:35]: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > > >* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. > Do it using BTS directly.

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
El día 22 may 2003, Francesco Paolo Lovergine escribía: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > > >* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) > > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. > Do it using BTS directly.

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Stephen Frost
* Francesco Paolo Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > > >* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) > > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. > Do it using BTS directly. He'

Re: Orphaning my packages

2003-05-22 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Morgon Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This one time, at band camp, Stefan Schwandter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit. > > I'd be interested in taking these over if no one else wants to, because > one if my ITPs (Quat) d

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:49:52PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > > >* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) > > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. > Do it usin

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Morgon Kanter
This one time, at band camp, Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > > >* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) > > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. > Do

Re: Accepted ptkei 1.18.0-4 (all source)

2003-05-22 Thread Brian Nelson
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 21 May 2003 12:24:42 -0700, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> reopen 192068 thanks > >> John O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:40:18 +0100 Source: ptkei >>> Binary: ptkei Architecture:

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Jarno Elonen
> As other people have said: I'm not going, but I don't object to a > conference in the US per se. Same here. Even if I had the money to attend, I wouldn't like to travel to the US because of the new copyright and anti-terrorist laws. Still, I think it's a good idea to arrange a conference for t

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: > > >* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616) Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. Do it using BTS directly. -- Francesco P. Lovergine

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Stephen Frost
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > It's really not any more expensive to travel to Toronto or Vancouver > than it is to travel a similar distance inside the US[1]. Once you get > there you'll find that the conference is cheaper since the Canadian > dollar is (still) weaker than the US dollar.

Re: Accepted ptkei 1.18.0-4 (all source)

2003-05-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Wed, 21 May 2003 12:24:42 -0700, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > reopen 192068 thanks > John O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:40:18 +0100 Source: ptkei >> Binary: ptkei Architecture: source all Version: 1.18.0-4 >> Distribution: unstable

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Miles Bader dijo [Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:06:17PM +0900]: > Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Please don't hold the conference in the U.S. I am a Canadian > > who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared > > it was at war. > > You mean the iraq war? What's

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 05:06:24PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: > Emile van Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > > On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:39:02PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote: > > > > You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoid

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Joey Hess
Stephen Frost wrote: > I don't see any problem with having conferences in the USA, or other > places for that matter, provided there are enough people who will go to > warrent it and there is someone willing to sponsor it. Lots of people > might not be willing to go to the USA for political reason

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 12:17:32PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > As one of the 200+ developers in the USA I don't feel it should be > avoided and I feel quite out in the cold most of the time when these > conferences come around because I don't have the funds to go elsewhere. > I don't see any prob

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Thu, 22 May 2003 22:39:02 +1000, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote: >> You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the >> U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel >> about the U.S. governments acts or

Re: Orphaning my packages

2003-05-22 Thread Morgon Kanter
This one time, at band camp, Stefan Schwandter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit. I'd be interested in taking these over if no one else wants to, because one if my ITPs (Quat) depends on these. Morgon -- You said homosexuals form

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 23 May 2003 01:06, Mathieu Roy wrote: > > > If the US economy stays down long enough then the current government > > > won't last. Rhetoric about imaginary enemies in Iraq doesn't satisfy > > > people who lose their jobs because of the economy sucking. > > > > Hm, as could be seen in Iraq,

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Stephen Frost
* Mathieu Roy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Both points of view make sense. > > Fact is selecting a location for an event which is outside USA seems a > good compromise for everybody. > People that do not want to go to USA are not forced to, others that do > not think USA should be avoided would s

Re: Orphaning my packages

2003-05-22 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Stefan Schwandter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd be glad if someone could orphan the packages that nobody wants to > take right now, because I don't have access to a debian system to do > it myself. I'd be willing to adopt fltk1.1, and will also upload a new build of spiralsynthmodular shortly

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Mathieu Roy
Emile van Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > Hi, > > On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:39:02PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote: > > > You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the > > > U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how s

Re: HylaFax

2003-05-22 Thread Diego Brouard
> I have heard that Hylafax has a Windows client available. (I am not sure > if this just gives the ability to send faxes or if it also lets you view > received faxes though). Yes, there's "WHFC" ( http://www.uli-eckhardt.de/whfc/download.shtml ) a client program for windows to send faxes throug

Orphaning my packages

2003-05-22 Thread Stefan Schwandter
Hello! [Please CC me!] I have some packages left I'd like to orphan: fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit. spiralsynthmodular (http://www.pawfal.org/Software/SSM/) : a modular software synth. Needs fltk. aseqview: displays ALSA synthesizer events. I'd be glad i

Re: ITP: codestriker -- A web based collaborative code review tool

2003-05-22 Thread Nicolas THOMAS
I know have a working package (lintian clean). Can be found here : deb http://nthomas.free.fr/debian sid main deb-src http://nthomas.free.fr/debian sid main Hope this helps, Nicolas ps: still looking for a sponsor..

Re: Error in upgrading libgd-perl?

2003-05-22 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
This is a consequence of its broken build-depends (Bug #193602). -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.

lintian: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath, --disable-rpath doesn't help

2003-05-22 Thread Sebastian Muszynski
Hello all! I am getting a lintian error, binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath although i run configure with --disable-rpath option. It is no automake problem... i've remake all automake stuff to check this. ./configure --disable-rpath works in so far that it sets or unsets $KDE_RPATH but -rpath appears

Re: Firebird 0.6

2003-05-22 Thread Andreas Happe
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric Dorland wrote: > Could you be more specific? If there's a permission problem I'd like > to fix it :) I've used the root account to install some mozilla - modules into /usr/lib/mozilla-firebird/chrome. After i changed into my normal user account I couldn't start

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:39:02PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote: > > You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the > > U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about > > the U.S. governments acts or positio

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Stephen Frost
* Simon Law ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Please don't hold the conference in the U.S. I am a Canadian > who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared > it was at war. If we have a sponsor and there are enough interested parties to warrent it I think we should do i

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Russell Coker
On Thu, 22 May 2003 17:06, Miles Bader wrote: > You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the > U.S. going to help anything, regardless of how strongly you feel about > the U.S. governments acts or positions? When tourism goes down the hotel, entertainment, and airline industries

tagcolledit: first infancy of a GUI editor for package tags

2003-05-22 Thread Enrico Zini
Hello. I've started working at a GUI editor for package tags. It's called tagcolledit and you can find it in my apt repository: deb http://people.debian.org/~enrico/ unstable/$(ARCH)/ deb http://people.debian.org/~enrico/ unstable/all/ deb-src http://people.debian.org/~en

Error in upgrading libgd-perl?

2003-05-22 Thread Neil McGovern
Hi all, While trying to upgrade libgd-perl I get the following error: vivacia:/home/maulkin# apt-get install libgd-perl Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are

Bug#194286: ITP: labrea -- a "sticky" honeypot and IDS

2003-05-22 Thread Samuele Giovanni Tonon
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-22 Severity: wishlist * Package name: labrea Version : 2.5.beta1 Upstream Author : Tom Liston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://labrea.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : a "sticky" honeypot

Bug#194280: ITP: dcraw -- This is a small utility which converts proprietary image formats used in various digital cameras into ppm

2003-05-22 Thread Steve King
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-22 Severity: wishlist * Package name: dcraw Version : 1.110 Upstream Author : Dave Coffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.shore.net/~dcoffin/powershot * License : Unknown free (see below) Description : Th

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Miles Bader
Hi Greg, Now that you've got this release out, have you given any thought to the message I sent earlier about merging gdb server versions? Here it is again in case you've forgotten: Hi, The current version of gdbserver in uClinux-dist only works on the m68k. In my v850-specific version of uCli

Re: [OT] Storms (Re: Do not touch l10n files (was Re: DDTP issue))

2003-05-22 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Wed, 14 May 2003 09:28:53 +0200 Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 09:02:20 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña > wrote: > > > "Tormenta en un vaso de agua" in Spanish. So it seems that french > > and spanish drink more water than tea. > > "Sturm im Wassergl

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 04:06:17PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Please don't hold the conference in the U.S. I am a Canadian > > who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared > > it was at war. > > You mean the iraq war? Wha

Re>$B9f30(B! $B?M5$(B200 $B!s(BUP$BCf!*!*(B

2003-05-22 Thread drcxezeexwtc2fdq7u5v
$BF|K\0l$N=P2q$$7O%5%$%H$KL\;X$9!*(B $B$?$@:#2q0wEPO?$O(B20$B?M0J>e!"F|(B5000$B?MA}0wCf(B $B%a%k%H%b!*%d%j%H%b!*(B $BI,$:=P2q$($k(B $BKM$i$N;dC#$N!*"v#L#O#V#E"v(B $B"-"-(BAINO.COM $B"-"-(B (Bhttp://divide.jp/ai/ $B7HBS$+$i%"%/%;%9$b$G$-$^$9$h!*(B (B $B

Re: Maintaining kernel source in sarge

2003-05-22 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dim 18/05/2003 à 16:52, Martin Schulze a écrit : > I also wonder if there are efforts in progress to unify the kernel > source through more than two architectures? This would require a > group or architecture maintainers (current kernel package mantainers) > to work collaboratively towards this

second for John's amendment

2003-05-22 Thread Jochen Voss
Hello, I think that John's modification is a good thing. Hereby I second the amendment quoted below. Jochen On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 12:19:33PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > --- proposal-srivasta Fri May 16 09:42:59 2003 > +++ proposal-jaqque Mon May 19 11:43:13 2003 > @@ -1,139 +1,139 @

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Miles Bader
Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please don't hold the conference in the U.S. I am a Canadian > who has not stepped foot on American soil since your government declared > it was at war. You mean the iraq war? What's the point? How is avoiding the U.S. going to help anything, regard

Re: Firebird 0.6

2003-05-22 Thread Miles Bader
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So unless you have a better reason > then PCness, I'll use either as the mood strikes me :) To be accurate, I don't think this is an example of PCness, but rather of PR-speak, the same sort of thing that goes into press releases (though I mean `public rel

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-22 Thread Colin Walters
On Sun, 2003-05-18 at 22:07, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > [I've already asked a few relevant individuals about this, but am > opening it up to the list at their suggestion.] > > I've recently been in touch with somebody (a lawyer and professor > concerned with government open source policy) who is inter

Re: ITO packages: ntop, apt-show-source

2003-05-22 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 05:03:47PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 01:42:32PM +0200, Dennis Schoen wrote: > > > Package: ntop > > > Description: display network usage in top-like format > > > ntop is