On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:01:31PM -0500, Taral wrote:
> Looks like the python2.2 stuff migrated into testing without noticing
> that it breaks python-apt. Anyone using python-apt (e.g. aptitude users)
> are advised not to upgrade.
>
> Anyone know how exactly the testing scripts managed to miss th
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:01:31PM -0500, Taral wrote:
> Looks like the python2.2 stuff migrated into testing without noticing
> that it breaks python-apt. Anyone using python-apt (e.g. aptitude users)
> are advised not to upgrade.
Huh? What's aptitude got to do with python-apt?
Package: aptitude
On Sun, 18 May 2003, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> | On Sat, 17 May 2003, Martin Schulze wrote:
> | > should always try to stay as close to the original as you can.
> | > Changing the text layout is a NO-GO in my opinion - and in the
> | > opinion of our Apache people ap
Looks like the python2.2 stuff migrated into testing without noticing
that it breaks python-apt. Anyone using python-apt (e.g. aptitude users)
are advised not to upgrade.
Anyone know how exactly the testing scripts managed to miss this
breakage?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This message is digit
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we're doing "let's have a conf where we normally don't" how about we
> have it on the US's east coast aswell. I'd personally argue for the
> nothern Virginia are myself.
This would probably be in DC proper (specifically, at GWU) -- so a bit
further nor
> What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
If we're doing "let's have a conf where we normally don't" how about we
have it on the US's east coast aswell. I'd personally argue for the
nothern Virginia are myself.
Too many conferences are held on the US's West coast, and if con
[I've already asked a few relevant individuals about this, but am
opening it up to the list at their suggestion.]
I've recently been in touch with somebody (a lawyer and professor
concerned with government open source policy) who is interested in
sponsoring a Debian conference here in Washington,
Guy Izsolt
Systems Administrator
BEELINE Technologies
Unit 6 - 7, West End Corporate Park
305 Montague Road
West End QLD 4101
AUSTRALIA
Tel: +61-7-3004 6700
Fax: +61-7-3004 6799
Note:
This message is for the named person's use only.
It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally pri
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 05:13:54AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> Definately. This should be done if only to avoid multiple copies of a 27M
> bzip2 archive wasting everyone's disk space and network bandwidth.
>
> Also regarding the i386 arch, multiple patches would be good. Something
> in the i3
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 12:06:21PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> There is also a mechanism to order the order in which
> kernel-patches are applied -- so if, say, a m68k kernel image
> maintainer wanted to create a patch relative to the i386 patches,
> they could depend on that patch,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
> below is a list of source packages containing gettext .po files,
> for which binary packages do not ship any file under a LC_MESSAGES
> directory.
> There might be several reasons:
> a. Programs use gettext PO files to store translations bu
Tollef Fog Heen dijo [Sun, May 18, 2003 at 04:21:15PM +0200]:
> | Side question: will there be a few machines for people who can't bring a
> | laptop ?
>
> Hopefully, yes, but if you can bring a laptop: do it. :)
Tollef, I might be able to bring an extra laptop with me, as I am sure
someone will
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:33:48AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> Looking at woody in fact, it appears to only exceptions appear to be
> HPPA and IA64:
>
> kernel-source-2.2.22 - Linux kernel source for version 2.2.22
> kernel-source-2.4.10 - Linux kernel source for version 2.4.10
> kernel-source-2.4.
Hello.
On Sun, 18 May, 2003 at 23:39:09 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> There might be several reasons:
> b. PO files are not used, e.g. they are test files (po-debconf)
...
> zssh
Upstream original source contains the full lrzsz source tree.
zssh isn't gettextized, but lrzsz is (that is wh
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I also wonder if there are efforts in progress to unify the kernel
> source through more than two architectures? This would require a
> group or architecture maintainers (current kernel package mantainers)
> to work collaboratively
Hi,
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:26:38AM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Emile van Bergen wrote:
> > So what do you propose then, to drop everything just because you
> > cynically point out that a lot of rules are being violated today?
>
> What I'm saying is that (a lot of) these rules are archaic and i
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 03:28:27PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> > Right now we're getting really damn close to anarchy, when everyone and
> > their dog has the means to entirely obliterate everyone else's mailbox
> > with unwanted whatever-they-have-to-say, and sometimes even obliterate
> > their comp
Hi,
below is a list of source packages containing gettext .po files,
for which binary packages do not ship any file under a LC_MESSAGES
directory.
There might be several reasons:
a. Programs use gettext PO files to store translations but manage them
with other tools at run time (eg. abiword
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 07:26:34PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> I disagree. Once I've explained why I don't like HTML e-mail, people
> normally see 'my side' and switch.
And if they still don't see it, the following 'html' might convince
them, at least if they use outlook (be careful. It is not h
Hi,
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:39:21PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 06:55:37PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 May 2003 17:10:29 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Unfortunately, there does not seem to be a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>It's very rare for me to have a HTML email that I actually want to read, I
>probably should configure my mail server to reject them all.
I have sendmail rules to do that. I may go back to rejecting
multipart/alternative mail as well. (s
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 06:55:37PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2003 17:10:29 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Unfortunately, there does not seem to be any possibility to prevent
> >> translation work from being done on my packages.
> >
> >Unfortu
赢政天下目前收集了15000多个软件，在国内是领先的。并将软件合理分类，加入软件搜索，便于用户查询，作为软件类网站，
赢政天下在国内更新是最快的，成为新浪、网易、YESKY等许多网站的信息源。
2、用户量大定位集中
本站访问量很高，每天页访问量超过100万，而且仍在不断增长，是国内规模较大的专业软件网站。由于本站为专业软件网站，因此用户定位非常集中，都是对软硬件信息感兴趣的电脑爱好者和软硬件发烧友。因此电脑软件厂商在本站宣传会收到意想不到的效果。如果是综合网站的广告，读者兴趣各异，其中对软硬件感兴趣的可以说是少之又少。而用户上本站就是为了获取软硬件信息，因此他们对软硬件广告的兴趣很大
赢政天下目前收集了15000多个软件，在国内是领先的。并将软件合理分类，加入软件搜索，便于用户查询，作为软件类网站，
赢政天下在国内
更新是最快的，成为新浪、网易、YESKY等许多网站的信息源。
2、用户量大定位集中
本站访问量很高，每天页访问量超过100万，而且仍在不断增长，是国内规模较大的专业软件网站。由于本站为专业软件网站，因此用户定位
非常集中，都是对软硬件信息感兴趣的电脑爱好者和软硬件发烧友。因此电脑软件厂商在本站宣传会收到意想不到的效果。如果是综合网站的广
告，读者兴趣各异，其中对软硬件感兴趣的可以说是少之又少。而用户上本站就是为了获取软硬件信息，因此他们对软硬件广告的兴
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 11:39:02PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2003 01:54:34 +0200, Nicolas Boullis
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >You're probably right, those useless l10n teams are annoying.
>
> No offense intended, but actually I would prefer my packages to stay
> untranslated. I
On Mon, 19 May 2003 03:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> When I first envisaged the kernel source and kernel-patch
> system, I always figured there should be a single source package per
> version -- the one you get from kernel.org. *EVERY* arch, including
> i386, should provided a kernel-patch
赢政天下目前收集了15000多个软件，在国内是领先的。并将软件合理分类，加入软件搜索，便于用户查询，作为软件类网站，
赢政天下在国内
更新是最快的，成为新浪、网易、YESKY等许多网站的信息源。
2、用户量大定位集中
本站访问量很高，每天页访问量超过100万，而且仍在不断增长，是国内规模较大的专业软件网站。由于本站为专业软件网站，因此用户定位
非常集中，都是对软硬件信息感兴趣的电脑爱好者和软硬件发烧友。因此电脑软件厂商在本站宣传会收到意想不到的效果。如果是综合网站的广
告，读者兴趣各异，其中对软硬件感兴趣的可以说是少之又少。而用户上本站就是为了获取软硬件信息，因此他们对软硬件广告的兴
[All Cc's removed]
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 07:54:55AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
[...]
> I don't believe that there is not an estestic layout that can satisfy
> all the languages we have in Debian.
What is the rationale for having a single layout for all languages?
How do developers che
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-18
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: guidedog
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : Simon Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.simonzone.com/software/guidedog
* License : GPL
Description : NAT/mas
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 03:25:42PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Neil McGovern wrote:
> > These are all valid points, however, I still don't want to read HTML
> > e-mail in mutt.
> You are figting a losing battle.
Unfortunatly, this may be so, but the latest trend I personally have
seen is away from H
On Sun, 18 May 2003 22:54:08 +0800, Cameron Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:38:14AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> These are all valid points, however, I still don't want to read
>> HTML e-mail in mutt.
> Why not? Mutt deals perfectly well with HTML e-mail
On Sun, 18 May 2003 15:25:42 +0100, Matt Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Neil McGovern wrote:
>> These are all valid points, however, I still don't want to read
>> HTML e-mail in mutt.
> You are figting a losing battle. If the MUA that someone uses is
> set-up to send HTML (rich test, whatever)
On Sun, 18 May 2003 10:26:38 +0100, Matt Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Emile van Bergen wrote:
>> So what do you propose then, to drop everything just because you
>> cynically point out that a lot of rules are being violated today?
> What I'm saying is that (a lot of) these rules are archaic
On Sun, 18 May 2003 16:52:54 +0200, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I also wonder if there are efforts in progress to unify the kernel
> source through more than two architectures? This would require a
> group or architecture maintainers (current kernel package
> mantainers) to work c
On Sun, 18 May 2003 15:30:52 +0100, Matt Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Hello, Which does not matter at all. "This memo does not specify an
>> Internet standard of any kind." having it distributed as RFC is
>> just a convenience, because searching for "rcf1855" on goog
On Sun, 18 May 2003 17:10:29 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, there does not seem to be any possibility to prevent
>> translation work from being done on my packages.
>
>Unfortunately, there is a large population of the world that does not
>underst
>> Matt Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I'm saying is that (a lot of) these rules are archaic and
> irrelevant in today's Internet world. Firstly I doubt any of the
> people who violate the rules are even aware what an RFC is or what
> it's for - and if they did they probably wouldn't
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-18
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xsupplicant
* URL : http://www.open1x.org/
* License : GPL, BSD
Description : Implementation of the IEEE 802.1x authentication protocol.
This software allows a GNU/Linux or BSD
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 05:10:29PM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 11:39:02PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Unfortunately, there does not seem to be any possibility to prevent
> > translation work from being done on my packages.
>
> Unfortunately, there is a l
Matt Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Which does not matter at all. "This memo does not specify an Internet
>> standard of any kind." having it distributed as RFC is just a
>> convenience, because searching for "rcf1855" on google will find
>> perfect hits en ma
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
| On Sat, 17 May 2003, Martin Schulze wrote:
|
| > should always try to stay as close to the original as you can.
| > Changing the text layout is a NO-GO in my opinion - and in the
| > opinion of our Apache people apparently.
|
| Apparently. We are trying to bring t
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:54:08PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:38:14AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> | These are all valid points, however, I still don't want to read HTML
> | e-mail in mutt.
>
> Why not? Mutt deals perfectly well with HTML e-mail if you have lynx o
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 03:25:42PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Yes, but then if the majority of clients can send/recive HTML email, who has
> the compatibility problem?
It doesn't matter what the clients are able to do.
The majority of readers on this list don't want HTML-postings. Just like
they d
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-18
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kwiki
Version : 0.13
Upstream Author : Brian Ingerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/author/INGY/CGI-Kwiki/
* License : Perl/Artistic
Description
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 11:39:02PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2003 01:54:34 +0200, Nicolas Boullis
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >You're probably right, those useless l10n teams are annoying.
(..)
> Unfortunately, there does not seem to be any possibility to prevent
> translation wo
On Mon, 19 May 2003 00:25, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Neil McGovern wrote:
> > These are all valid points, however, I still don't want to read HTML
> > e-mail in mutt.
>
> You are figting a losing battle. If the MUA that someone uses is set-up to
> send HTML (rich test, whatever) email then you are highly
Only a few people will probably have noticed the mess resulting from
tons of different kernel packages in the stable (and unstable)
distribution. Not only there are several versions of kernel source in
each architecture, they are also different for most architectures.
Only mips and mipsel share th
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:38:14AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
| These are all valid points, however, I still don't want to read HTML
| e-mail in mutt.
Why not? Mutt deals perfectly well with HTML e-mail if you have lynx or
w3m installed on your system and have
auto_view text/html
in you
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello,
> Which does not matter at all. "This memo does not specify an Internet
> standard of any kind." having it distributed as RFC is just a
> convenience, because searching for "rcf1855" on google will find
> perfect hits en masse.
Hello,
Finding it is not the problem.
Neil McGovern wrote:
> These are all valid points, however, I still don't want to read HTML
> e-mail in mutt.
You are figting a losing battle. If the MUA that someone uses is set-up to
send HTML (rich test, whatever) email then you are highly unlikely to get
them to change it. Some devices (cable
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Right now we're getting really damn close to anarchy, when everyone and
> their dog has the means to entirely obliterate everyone else's mailbox
with
> unwanted whatever-they-have-to-say, and sometimes even obliterate their
> computer (with viruses).
We have the ability to ann
* Josselin Mouette
| Le jeu 15/05/2003 à 14:49, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
| > The area is covered with WLANs already, but we'll have a few switches
| > for people who don't have wireless.
|
| Side question: will there be a few machines for people who can't bring a
| laptop ?
Hopefully, yes, but
* Steve Kemp
| On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 01:39:20PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
|
| > > If a member of the sec-team says "Yes, we are actively trying to
| > > find
| > > new members, but finding competent and responsive people who have
| > > the
| > > time and will to help is very difficult", the
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 11:39:00PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2003 13:30:00 -0500, Donald J Bindner
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Maybe I should roll my sleeves up and send them some patches.
>
> apg's upstream is pretty responsive.
I checked out the source, and I don't think it
尊敬的debian-devel：
您好，您或者您的亲人、好友，有风湿病的苦恼吗？如果有，请您耐心花两分钟的时间来看此信，对于打扰之处，我们万分歉意。并祝您，生活美满，一切都好。
中国风湿病康复网--河南省新乡市协合医院是集环境、服务、医疗于一体的国内现代化大型科技医院。协合医院风湿病康复中心，人才荟萃。有门诊、病房、放射理疗、针灸、化验、
特控及制剂等科室。其化验诊断技术和特色治疗技术在国内风湿病领域居领先水平，其中高级科技医务工作人员120多名。特别在风湿病科研攻关方面，对风湿、类风湿、痛风、关节炎等
风湿性疾病的医疗科研攻关项目取得重大突破。我院专家运用
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:26:38AM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Society evolves and with it rules change, we need to accept this and see
> what evolves - if it turns out to be bad then limits will have to be
> applied, but I'm not seeing a complete state of anarchy break out yet...
Right now we're ge
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:26:38AM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Emile van Bergen wrote:
> > So what do you propose then, to drop everything just because you
> > cynically point out that a lot of rules are being violated today?
> Society evolves and with it rules change, we need
> to accept this and se
Matt Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Emile van Bergen wrote:
>> So what do you propose then, to drop everything just because you
>> cynically point out that a lot of rules are being violated today?
> What I'm saying is that (a lot of) these rules are archaic and irrelevant in
> today's Internet
Emile van Bergen wrote:
> So what do you propose then, to drop everything just because you
> cynically point out that a lot of rules are being violated today?
What I'm saying is that (a lot of) these rules are archaic and irrelevant in
today's Internet world. Firstly I doubt any of the people who
59 matches
Mail list logo
