On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 03:05:21PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 06:27:05PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > After the 486, Intel always provided a method to determine the CPU type and
> > features available. As far as I can tell, there's no easy programmatic wa
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 06:59:37PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> That is not parseable to me.. Can anyone give me a clue about why
> openoffice.org isn't in testing yet?
16383 katie 18 0 223M 223M 892 R99.9 29.7 72:31 python
'cause it's not finished running.
(It didn't go in yeste
On Wed, 14 May 2003 01:54:34 +0200, Nicolas Boullis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You're probably right, those useless l10n teams are annoying.
No offense intended, but actually I would prefer my packages to stay
untranslated. I am not an English native speaker, and by no way fluent
in English, but
On Mon, 12 May 2003 13:30:00 -0500, Donald J Bindner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Maybe I should roll my sleeves up and send them some patches.
apg's upstream is pretty responsive.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 11:41:02AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Not only you, Jerome and me were suggesting it in the past. However I am
> afraid that the whole package movement machinery would have to be
> rewritten to allow independent handling of the version in different
> "testing" threes, plus
Some common sense rules, perhaps.
1. No one person can produce a solution to fit everyone.
2. The translation teams / translators should try as far as
possible to maintain the meaning of the original. Sentence
structure / paragraphing / layout / punctuation will vary
from language to language.
I'm working in Calgary, Alberta for the next three months. If
anyone's interested in a key-signing, drop me a line.
Cheers,
Shaun
Hi,
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 05:57:31PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> [He who should not be named wrote]
> > That .sig is problematic beyond just its content; it is 12 lines long and
> > adds almost 1kb to each of your messages (probably longer than the
> contents
> > of many messages). Refer to RFC
On 11-May-03, 20:41 (CDT), Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anacron recommends cron and having a system without cron is really rather
> silly. I do not see anything wrong with depending on cron only.
Well, that's a valid solution, and since I won't be maintaining
checksecurity a
On 16-May-03, 18:25 (CDT), Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do not enter a number smaller than 1 or larger than 5.
> You may skip numbers. You may rank options equally (as long as all
> choices X you make fall in the range 1<= X <= 5).
But then:
> [ ] Choice 1: Ultra Violet
> [
Denis Barbier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is currently no consensus whether translated man pages should
> be shipped along with original man pages or within manpages-xx packages.
The general rule is that manpages-$lang contains translated manual
pages from the manpages (upstream name: man-pages) packa
Hi,
first, thanks to aj -- he ovverrode openoffice.org to go into testing regardless
of the 1 RC bugs (flex) [1]
Anyhow, I just looked:
$ madison --regex ^openoffice.org
openoffice.org |1.0.3-2 | unstable | source, all
openoffice.org-bin |1.0.3-2 | unstable | i386, powerpc, s39
[He who should not be named wrote]
> That .sig is problematic beyond just its content; it is 12 lines long and
> adds almost 1kb to each of your messages (probably longer than the
contents
> of many messages). Refer to RFC 1855 or any other netiquette document for
> further information.
With stat
On Sat, 17 May 2003, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> Recently the Ogg bitstream format (the container format employed for the
> well-known Ogg Vorbis audio code) has been designated an official MIME type:
> "application/ogg"; for details see http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3534.txt .
>
[SNIP]
> apache:
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 05:57:54PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> apache: mime.types needs updating.
On my system at least, /etc/apache/mime.types is a symlink to
/etc/mime.types.
--
- mdz
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 02:08:28AM +1200, Nick Phillips wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 01:27:12PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:03:32AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > > Figuring that a security upload would be preferable, I approached the
> > > security team
Em Sat, 17 May 2003 07:54:55 +0200 (CEST), Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > Then you ask people to submit bugs to change the original description.
>
> Yes because if they believe that a better layout should be in place i
> don't see anything wrong in filing a wishlist bug.
On Sat, 17 May 2003, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Please keep in mind that a translation is a translation and not a
> redesign or reformat. When translating documents and strings, you
True. But the Debian translators are trying to l10n Debian, not to translate
it. And l10n *includes* redesign, reform
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 09:24:51PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> already fixed there. They should go into a security update repository, just
> as is done for stable, but not on security.debian.org.
Why not? It's already there.
#Security
deb http://security.debian.
Denis Barbier wrote:
> > | Description: Versatile, high-performance HTTP server
> > | The most popular server in the world, Apache features a modular
> > | design and supports dynamic selection of extension modules at runtime.
> > | Some of its strong points are its range of possible customizati
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 01:27:12PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:03:32AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > Figuring that a security upload would be preferable, I approached the
> > security team and offered to prepare an upload. I was effectively told
> > that this is
unsubscribe
>--[Andreas Metzler]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > glyphs iconv returns? My locale is C. What locale are you using?
> [...]
> de_AT (uses ISO-8859-1 as charset).
> LANG=de_AT, everything else is unset:
> *promp
#include
* Björn Stenberg [Thu, May 15 2003, 01:18:57AM]:
> Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > So let me make the following modest strawman proposal. Let us posit
> > the existence of a new distribution, which for now I'll name
> > "testing-x86".
>
> I suggested the same thing a few weeks ago, with little
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 06:25:28PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to test the new voting scripts, complete with
> signed acks. I'll be running this vote over on my home machine,
> pending the resolution of the fact that devotee does not run on
> potato (vote.d
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 10:51:18PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > I must be totally missing something. Is one getting the s3kr1t
> > > "create-a-repository-key" when you are becoming a DD? Where would these
> > > repositories be located? Nobody told me so!
> > >
> > To create a respository you
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 04:09:28PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Michael Banck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I wouldn't feel like setting up a repository for testing that only
> > clueless people-who-put-every-apt-line-they-see-in-their-sources-list[0]
> > would use.
>
> Others would see what y
On Sat, 17 May 2003, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Fri, 16 May 2003 06:55:04 +0200 (CEST), Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> > > Why do you bother with the layout of the translation? The translators are
> > > the authorities when it comes to their languages. I think we
Em Fri, 16 May 2003 06:55:04 +0200 (CEST), Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > Why do you bother with the layout of the translation? The translators are
> > the authorities when it comes to their languages. I think we should not
> > be put in a jail and be unable to decide how
29 matches
Mail list logo
