This one time, at band camp, Thomas Hood wrote:
>On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 18:56, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> The FHS is about more than just providing a system that technically
>> allows you to mount different filesystems as needed. There are also
>> aesthetic concerns in the heirarchy (in the broad sen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: bioperl-run
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Various <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.bioperl.org/
License : Perl (Artistic/GPL)
Description : Perl wrappers for applications used by bioperl
Bioperl-run p
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 08:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> do u know how to send them?
I think you use the command "deltree C:\", it may ask you some questions, but
say yes to them all if you really want to send that virus out!
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux pac
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 04:44:58AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 08:59:42PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> > Repetitive, largely useless to the user messages like those should
> > be removed and put in a file like SPONSORS or whatever. I would
> > NOT use any program that is
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 04:44:58AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > Repetitive, largely useless to the user messages like those should
> > be removed and put in a file like SPONSORS or whatever. I would
> > NOT use any program that is going to spew out poinless stuff
> > when I do not want to se
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:46:03PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:16:34PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Wrong. It was Red Hat who *instigated* the change in library names
> > upstream to allow the devel packages to be installed simultaneously,
> > because they have no i
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:16:34PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Wrong. It was Red Hat who *instigated* the change in library names
> upstream to allow the devel packages to be installed simultaneously,
> because they have no intention of trying to recompile GNOME 1 against a
> different libpng.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 08:59:42PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> Repetitive, largely useless to the user messages like those should
> be removed and put in a file like SPONSORS or whatever. I would
> NOT use any program that is going to spew out poinless stuff
> when I do not want to see it.
one co
Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having a one or two liner message
> during startup of a command line utility is fine by me. Having
> 5 pages of stuff is not fair to the user. Period.
>
> The job of a maintaier is to make the software as usable to a u
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:03:53PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:02:22AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Q: Why don't we just say goodbye to binary-compatibility with other
> > distros on those few corner cases ?
> > A: I'm not against that, but some people in the proje
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 09:58:08AM -0600, Ed Boraas wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> Ideally, I think, including the verbatim message in a separate file
> ("SPONSORS"?) and including a reference to that file in mkreiserfs'
> output should serve as an acceptable balance. I'm willing to reconsider
> that
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:02:22AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Q: Why don't we just say goodbye to binary-compatibility with other
> distros on those few corner cases ?
> A: I'm not against that, but some people in the project seem to be.
> Anyway, this is certainly not a move we can make with
* Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030424 19:26]:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 06:27:34PM -0400, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> > A bug on the lack of a debian-x86-64 mailing list has been opened (162668).
> >
> > All that can be done has been done -- it's out of our hands now :)
> >
> > The pressure
As some people were asking for it, and the situation is pretty unclear,
I think it is time for a few answers to the questions that can be asked
about libpng. This mail is targetted to maintainers of packages using
libpng.
Q: Why are there 4 versions of libpng on my system ?
A: In fact, there are o
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 11:02:02PM +0200, Andrea Capriotti wrote:
> "A big part of your job as Debian maintainer will be to stay in contact
> with the upstream developers..."
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-developer-duties.en.html#s-upstream-coordination
I thought
On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 00:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> do u know how to send them?
please add this guy to spamassassin's black lists.
cheers
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:07:10 +0100
> Source: xt
> Binary: xt
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 0.9.1-1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTE
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: freedroidrpg
Version : 0.94
Upstream Authors: Johannes Prix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reinhard Prix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://freedroid.sourceforge.net/
* L
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:30:39 +
> Source: cyphesis-cpp
> Binary: cyphesis-cpp-mason cyphesis-cpp cyphesis-cpp-clients
> Architecture: source i386 all
> Version: 0.2.0+0.2.1rc1-4
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Mic
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 06:27:34PM -0400, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> A bug on the lack of a debian-x86-64 mailing list has been opened (162668).
> All that can be done has been done -- it's out of our hands now :)
>
> The pressure, as you put it, could be increased by modifying the bug's
> severi
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030424 17:18]:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
>
> > I meant "in the meantime". I think that the list in lists.d.o must be
> > created, but as this will take some time and seems that there are some
> > people interested in this, I th
I'm trying to implement ucf in a perl postinst script, but I'm running
into problems due to debconf's fuckage with the file descriptors, I
think.
I call stop() as soon as I'm done interfacing with debconf, but that
doesn't seem to be good enough when I get to ucf. First, I tried
system("/usr/b
* Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030424 16:36]:
> ...But IA64 is the name for the platform, as opposed to a specific
> implementation. We also refer to the Pentiums, Athlons and their smaller
> cousins as x86 or i386 chips[1]. The right naming should follow the
> architecture's name, not a specif
do u know how to send them?
Hi!
I'm hit by a strange bug, and I really don't know to wich package
report, nor how to further debug it.
Mi personal machine runs sid and I have an i386 Debian mirror,
updated dayly with debmirror in a cron job. At 2003/04/21 debmirror
stopped working, with the logs showing nothing. This machi
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 09:36:10PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 06:28:06PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > How about ensuring that all addresses on the Debian keyring are
> > > whitelisted by default?
> > As well as all gpg signed mail?
> Spammers are starting to u
Le jeu 24/04/2003 à 22:57, Jérôme Marant a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> It seems that libpng12-0-dev has been silently replaced
> by libpng12-dev, and packages depending on it are broken
> now.
>
> Shouldn't a libpng12-0-dev depending on libpng12-dev have
> been kept, for transitional purpose?
As libpng12-
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 10:00:49PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> When I read http://www.debian.org/legal/cryptoinmain correct, all
> Software that contains cryptographic functionality must be registered
> before it can legally be distributed. So the ftp-master must check if
> a new package cont
Il gio, 2003-04-24 alle 21:07, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> A Debian maintainer should not be a stranger to the upstream maintainer.
> Your (active) upstreams should _already_ know who you are and that you are
> responsible for the Debian packaging of their software. The one thing that
> they need to k
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 10:00:49PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:30:50PM -0400, christophe barbe wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:30:35PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > > Yes, it is normal. The reason is crypto-in-main: they have to be
> > > checked by ftp
Hi,
It seems that libpng12-0-dev has been silently replaced
by libpng12-dev, and packages depending on it are broken
now.
Shouldn't a libpng12-0-dev depending on libpng12-dev have
been kept, for transitional purpose?
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> I meant "in the meantime". I think that the list in lists.d.o must be
> created, but as this will take some time and seems that there are some
> people interested in this, I think that it's better this way.
I perfectly understand your int
* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> When I read http://www.debian.org/legal/cryptoinmain correct, all
> Software that contains cryptographic functionality must be registered
> before it can legally be distributed. So the ftp-master must check if
> a new package contains cryptographic f
On Wednesday 23 April 2003 06:17 pm, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mer 23/04/2003 à 22:23, Josh Metzler a écrit :
> > Shuttle:/home/josh# apt-get -s install libpng3
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > The following extra packages will be installed:
> > libpng
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 24 April 2003 20:00, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> Good point... it is probably best to follow the decisions made at the
> kernel/gcc layer. And since both of these call the platform x86-64,
> that is what will stick.
No, they don't both use
How can I create a base.tgz which will be useable for pbuilder with
sid?
1.
pbuilder update --distribution sid --logfile
/var/cache/pbuilder/sid/log/update --override-config --basetgz
/var/cache/pbuilder/sid/base.tgz
where /var/cache/pbuilder/sid/base.tgz is the one I use for sarge gi
> > I think they're right this time. Most of the press releases that have gone
> > out mention AMD64 instead of x86-64, and the marketing info at amd.com all
> > mentions AMD64 as well.
>
> Most of the press releases I've read also mention 'Itanium' and not
> 'ia64'.
...But IA64 is the name for
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:30:50PM -0400, christophe barbe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:30:35PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > Yes, it is normal. The reason is crypto-in-main: they have to be
> > checked by ftp-masters first.
>
> I don't see why they should not be readable by everyone befo
christophe barbe wrote:
> I don't see why they should not be readable by everyone before being
> checked by ftp-master. I don't said I disapprove that (for what it would
> worth) but I don't understand the logic. Can someone explain?
There is no logic involved. Just US law. Cryptographic softwar
* christophe barbe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:30:35PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > Yes, it is normal. The reason is crypto-in-main: they have to be
> > checked by ftp-masters first.
>
> I don't see why they should not be readable by everyone before being
> checked b
* Joey Hess
| Hmm, you might have to do something mildly tricky with the limits stuff;
| if the user did not turn it on you would have to manage
| commenting/uncommenting the lines in the config file. Still seems quite
| doable.
db_get mailman/gate_news || true
if [ "$RET" = "no" ]; then
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:30:50PM -0400, christophe barbe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:30:35PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > Yes, it is normal. The reason is crypto-in-main: they have to be
> > checked by ftp-masters first.
>
> I don't see why they should not be readable by everyone befo
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 08:01:52PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
>
> > I thought this was a good idea. And since there was no such list yet I
> > requested the creation of 'debian-x86-64'. It will take 72 hours to
> > setup, I will reply to this thread
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:46:56PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> BTW, I just thought about it again and the screensaver code is here
> already ;) There is screensaver that displays random fortunes (executes
> fortune(6)). Create fortune's database consisting of credits information
> and you are don
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 11:17:16AM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> Imagine you are the developer of some random piece of free software. You
> don't necessarily use Debian; you certainly don't understand all its
> systems and protocols.
> The conventional way to get in touch with the developers of a
On 21-Apr-03, 21:16 (CDT), John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
> > I (apparently incorrectly) presumed that debconf was also intended to
> > allow for the eventual automation of replicated Debian installations.
>
> I distinctly remember reading exactly that.
I remember
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030424 14:17]:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
>
> > I thought this was a good idea. And since there was no such list yet I
> > requested the creation of 'debian-x86-64'. It will take 72 hours to
> > setup, I will reply to this thread when it's
* LapTop006
| I use both Mutt and OE to read my E-mail (mostly mutt). The one feature
| OE has (on both mac and windows) that NO other client I've seen matches
| (Mozilla 1.0 came close, haven't tried since then) is its support for
| offline IMAP.
use isync or something similar? Or try gnus (wh
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:30:35PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> Yes, it is normal. The reason is crypto-in-main: they have to be
> checked by ftp-masters first.
I don't see why they should not be readable by everyone before being
checked by ftp-master. I don't said I disapprove that (for what it
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 01:43:54PM -0400, Rich Payne wrote:
> > The Inquirer is not always right, so I am not sure if I should take that
> > as truth or just rumors.
>
> I think they're right this time. Most of the press releases that have gone
> out mention AMD64 instead of x86-64, and the market
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030424 13:55]:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
>
> > * Rich Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030424 13:43]:
> > > > On a side note, it would seem that the 'x86-64' branding may be dropped
> > > > in favor of 'AMD64'.
> > > >
> > > > http://
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> * Rich Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030424 13:43]:
> > > On a side note, it would seem that the 'x86-64' branding may be dropped
> > > in favor of 'AMD64'.
> > >
> > > http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9133
> > > (7th paragraph)
> > >
> > > The In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 24 April 2003 19:05, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> On a side note, it would seem that the 'x86-64' branding may be dropped
> in favor of 'AMD64'.
True, at least SuSE and MicroSoft are only talking about AMD64 on their
product pages. OTOH, the
Oleg Drokin wrote:
Hello!
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 12:25:11PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
If someone wants to create a boot program and/or screensaver that picks
a random OS component to describe the authors of at boot time, that
would be nicest of all.
BTW, I just thought about it again and
* Rich Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030424 13:43]:
> > On a side note, it would seem that the 'x86-64' branding may be dropped
> > in favor of 'AMD64'.
> >
> > http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9133
> > (7th paragraph)
> >
> > The Inquirer is not always right, so I am not sure if I should t
Hello!
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 12:25:11PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> If someone wants to create a boot program and/or screensaver that picks
> a random OS component to describe the authors of at boot time, that
> would be nicest of all.
BTW, I just thought about it again and the screensaver c
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> I thought this was a good idea. And since there was no such list yet I
> requested the creation of 'debian-x86-64'. It will take 72 hours to
> setup, I will reply to this thread when it's ready.
While it is good that your problem of creating a list i
I demand that Nathan Paul Simons may or may not have also sent directly to me
despite my not having requested this...
> On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 08:28, Darren Salt wrote:
>> Hmm. They're conffiles (not sure why, given that they're all binaries);
>> have you tried 2.4 with the 2.3 drums files?
> I be
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> * Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030424 03:56]:
> > Though I think that a debian-x86-64 list is worth you can open a
> > project in alioth in the interim. You could use it also to have a CVS
> > repo for patches or packages you need t
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Joel Baker wrote:
> That's more or less what I was hoping - however, checking
> /usr/share/doc/fortune-mod doesn't show any references to 'language', or
> any obvious references to i18n or l10n, at least on stable (my chroots are
> currently down due to one machine having some
* Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030424 03:56]:
> Though I think that a debian-x86-64 list is worth you can open a
> project in alioth in the interim. You could use it also to have a CVS
> repo for patches or packages you need to build.
I thought this was a good idea. And since th
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:35:41AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Joel Baker wrote:
>
> > larger sense, is whether there is a way to have the translations available
> > in some easily selectable format.
> I think the i18ned fortune makes this simple.
That's more or less what I
Hi,
Björn Stenberg wrote:
> 1) Debcheck often reports "Package declares a build time dependency on [pkg]
> which cannot be statisfied on [port]." Must all such build time dependencies
> be resolved before a package is accepted into testing?
No. testing doesn't care about Builddeps. and you can sa
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 03:37:09PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeu 24/04/2003 ŕ 15:02, Robert Nagy a écrit :
> > * Package name: splashutils
> > Version : 1.0
> > Upstream Author : SuSE Gmbh.
> > * URL : http://www.bootsplash.org
> > * License : GPL
> >
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 01:55:31PM +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> I know about the five rules, valid candidates, the excuses page(s) and
> packages.qa.debian.org. I'm mostly looking at valid candidates and there are
> a few things that I don't understand:
I have a feeling you want to discover upda
Le jeu 24/04/2003 à 15:02, Robert Nagy a écrit :
> * Package name: splashutils
> Version : 1.0
> Upstream Author : SuSE Gmbh.
> * URL : http://www.bootsplash.org
> * License : GPL
> Description : User-space programs to manipulate the framebuffer splash
> l
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kernel-patch-bootsplash
Version : 3.0.7
Upstream Author : SuSE Gmbh.
* URL : http://www.bootsplash.org
* License : GPL
Description : This is the home of the graphic
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: splashutils
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : SuSE Gmbh.
* URL : http://www.bootsplash.org
* License : GPL
Description : User-space programs to manipulate the framebu
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-24
Followup-For: Bug #189659
* Package name: dnrd
Version : 2.10-8
Upstream Author : Brad Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://users.zoominternet.net/~garsh/dnrd/
* License : GPL
Description : Proxy
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 03:53:12PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Really? As I explained already, I will put generated texmf.cnf under
> /var, because it is not a file for a user to modify it. I believe
> there are many such files under /var which don't preseve direct user
> modifications.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 08:04:51AM -0400, christophe barbe wrote:
>
> I wonder why only the .changes files are readable in the NEW queue.
> Is there a reason for this?
Crypto-in-main.
Michael
En réponse à christophe barbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I wonder why only the .changes files are readable in the NEW queue.
> Is there a reason for this?
Yes, it is normal. The reason is crypto-in-main: they have to be
checked by ftp-masters first.
--
Jérôme Marant
Le jeu 24/04/2003 à 13:12, Junichi Uekawa a écrit :
> On the other hand, it will break any package that has a
> versioned dependency on libpng12-0-dev (I don't know if there are
> any).
It looks like there are no such packages.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :
I wonder why only the .changes files are readable in the NEW queue.
Is there a reason for this?
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E
There is no snooze button on a cat who wants breakfast.
Hi.
I'm trying to understand the dependency system so I can find the complete and
correct answer to questions in the form "why is the latest version of package
X not in testing yet". I've been annoying some of you with wrong assumptions
previously, sorry about that. I'll avoid that this time and j
> > Shuttle:/home/josh# apt-get -s install libpng3
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > The following extra packages will be installed:
> > libpng12-0
> > The following packages will be REMOVED:
> > kdelibs4-dev kdesdk kspy libarts1-dev libartsc0-dev libpng
Hello,
I tried to investigate the problem a little bit deeper. The problem seems
to be hidden in the configure script and I have no idea how to fix that.
This is from a build which I tried at crest.debian.org in an unstable chroot
>
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checkin
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 05:39:25PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Can't you understand that as an author you would like that messages
> like this are not removed without your consent? The internet
> robustness principle says: Be liberal in what you accept and
> conservative in what you send. Modifiy
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:52:33 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> the new mechanism might be okay if it first checks whether
> texmf.cnf is an admin's file or a file generated by update-texmf
> before generating texmf.cnf and overwrites it only in the case it
>
Le jeu 24/04/2003 à 05:37, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> > I agree. I am not trying to defend Hans's diplomatic skills.
>
> Diplomatic skill? It is not a feat of extraordinary diplomacy
> not to accuse your correspondent of various acts theft and piracy
> while initiating a dialogue. Has c
upon apt-get dist-upgrading, I couldn't print to my hp4050 anymore.
Cups was looking for /usr/lib/cups/filters/cupsomatic which doesn't
belong to the upgraded version.
Quick fix :
cd /usr/lib/cups/filters
ln -s foomatic-rip cupsomatic
and it works like a charm
my versions :
ii cupsomatic-ppd
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:41:33 +0900
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > So everytime we have to restart all binaries which use a library
> > > > involving security-problem. In additionm this problem affects
> > > > not only debian packages, but user-built binaries.
>
> I also think i
El día 23 abr 2003, Robert Millan escribía:
>
> CCing debian-devel..
>
> hi!
>
> as noticed in DWN [1] and debian-devel [2], Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> has actualy started work [3] on the x86-64 port by using Bochs' x86-64
> emulation.
>
> it's likely that debian-x86-64 developement di
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Joel Baker wrote:
> larger sense, is whether there is a way to have the translations available
> in some easily selectable format.
I think the i18ned fortune makes this simple.
> I suppose that simply having multiple text/index files with a language
> designation as part of t
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 11:44:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> --
> "Lesser artists borrow, great artists steal." Igor Stravinsky
(-:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 02:02:45PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> >
> > This works fine when the locales exist for each localisation, but if
> > they don't exist, it defaults to C locale/US-ASCII charset. Can the
> > autobuilders guarantee a full set of generated locales, or is
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:51:23 -0500
> Not quite. a) even if the file was generated by update-texmf,
> and the user modified it later, the user changes *must* be
> preserved.
Really
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 11:38:32PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Joel Baker wrote:
>
> > What I was wondering is whether there is a way to do translations of
> > the fortune data, without having to have 'fortunes-debian-hints-'
> > packages. Granted, I probably won't be able t
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:04:00 +1000, Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:43:24 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:46:32 +1000, Martin Pool
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>> On Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:53:14 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: I was
>>> intenti
89 matches
Mail list logo
