This is a message to my fellow network security professionals,
www.asquad.com is formed by a group of security professionals with
experience and knowledge. Even so, we would like your participation in
the exchanging of ideas and your contribution of knowledge. We would
appreciate your input a
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:48:04PM +0200, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
> Jim Penny wrote:
> > Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
> > > Isn't this a problem? Especially for packages depending on
> > > libraries with long release cycles, such as libgcc1 and libc6.
> >
> > Not often. Most slow release libraries are str
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:51:48AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> If you search ad www.postgresql.org for "admin tool" you get several links
> for instance also
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/
>
> which might end in a necie tool perhaps. Would be nice if somebody could
> check this out
Jim Penny wrote:
> Björn Stenberg wrote:
> > Isn't this a problem? Especially for packages depending on libraries with
> > long release cycles, such as libgcc1 and libc6.
>
> Not often. Most slow release libraries are strongly backwards
> compatible.
That was my point. Since these libs are stron
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 07:27:18AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> > seems like broken package..?
>
> Broken in what sense?
deb's dependencies :)
> now, and since koffice has just begun tagging 1.3 betas you can expect
> some improvements in 1.3 when it comes into sid.
good news, when ~?
Andrius
> seems like broken package..?
Broken in what sense?
Kivio 1.2.x certainly had its problems as one of the more unloved
children of the koffice suite. But kivio is getting some loving in CVS
now, and since koffice has just begun tagging 1.3 betas you can expect
some improvements in 1.3 when it c
Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> >>>Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.2.3-0pre6), ...
> > Note that the version shown is simply the current libgcc.so version.
>
> Current as of when? When the upload was done?
Current as of when libgcc1 froze the shlibs, which was r
* Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
>
> > There is a nice graphical front-end to Postgresql, in the non-US
> > section :
> I would like to vote against "nice" here. :)
> Moreover you can do several stuff but it is not comparable to PgAdmin
>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 10:43:50PM +0200, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote:
> Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>
> >>>Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.2.3-0pre6), ...
> > Note that the version shown is simply the current libgcc.so version.
>
> Current as of when? When the upload was done?
Current at
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>>>Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.2.3-0pre6), ...
> Note that the version shown is simply the current libgcc.so version.
Current as of when? When the upload was done?
> dpkg-shlibdeps has no idea whether an older version would be sufficient,
> so it play
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
> At the time, James talked to Adam Conrad and me about the packages, and
> we agreed with the decision to hold the packages out of the archive for
> the time being. For one thing, it looks like you packaged *all* PEAR
> modules available, including some
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-15
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: netbrake
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Salvatore Sanfilippo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.hping.org/netbrake/
* License : MIT/X
Description : network bandwidth li
On 8 April 2003 "Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 07, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>A difficulty is that only a whole "options { ... };"
>>statement can be included from the named configuration file,
>>not just the "forwarders { ... };" statement inside it.
>
>You can in
Hi,
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:36:56 +, Samuli Suonpaa wrote:
> "Matthias Urlichs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> [ straight to DELAYED/7-day ]
>> Hmm. If I wanted to do something like that (not too sure yet) I'd
>> have to go through a sponsor. That doesn't sound like a net
>> reduction of work.
Hi Piotr,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 03:15:56PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> A week ago James rejected my PEAR packages. I need this packages because
> there are newer version than libraries in php4-pear package. There are
> used by IMP and other applications. I don't like to install PEAR
> repos
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:19:08AM -0600, Peter van Rossum wrote:
> Pingus is a free Lemmings clone. For several years now, the upstream
> code has not been in very good shape. A new release (0.6.0) is now
> imminent and is an enormous improvement. It does not have very many
> levels yet, but
retitle 189146 ITA: pingus -- Free Lemmings(tm) clone
merge 158510 189146
thanks
* Peter van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-15 11:19]:
> Unless someone has objections, I would like to take over
> maintainance of this package.
Simon Richter said in August 2002 that he would adopt the package
>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 12:44:49 -0400,
>> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Flex sets up a number of things that are available in the rules
>> section, and now cleans it all up before polluting the user
>> namespace. Now, actions can be any C statement, but usin
"Matthias Urlichs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:54:06 +, Michael Banck wrote:
>> I did a couple of NMUs for RC bugs in the last days - I uploaded
>> straight to DELAYED/7-day, sent a mail with a diff to the BTS and
>> set the bug to +pending. So far, I did not get much c
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Pingus is a free Lemmings clone. For several years now, the upstream
code has not been in very good shape. A new release (0.6.0) is now
imminent and is an enormous improvement. It does not have very many
levels yet, but is very much playable.
Unless someone has ob
Package: wnpp
Severity wishlist
BDB http://moulon.inra.fr/ruby/bdb.html> is Berkeley DB interface
for Ruby. libdb4.1-ruby provides BDB which links to libdb-4.1.so.
libdb-ruby is already provided. It has Bug#154727. libdb4.1-ruby is
solution for the situation of the bug. I also intend to package
l
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Joey, I am going to be presumtuous and assume you would not
> mind this response going to a public list; I have condensed your
> questions down to the technical details, and you did imply that you
> considered filing a bug, so the email was not really personal and
Hi,
>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:56:06 -0400,
>> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Joey, I am going to be presumtuous and assume you would not
mind this response going to a public list; I have condensed your
questions down to the technical details, and you did imply that you
considered
seems like broken package..?
Andrius
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 03:54:06PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:30:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Yes, sure, easy for you to say. There are so many of them, and on such a
> > diversity of packages, i could be fixing bugs for weeks and not improve
> > the situation.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 09:21:15AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 02:42, Sven Luther wrote:
> > * chromium : 1 RC bug, out of date on arm.
> Note this RC bug is tagged "sarge" so it doesn't really apply. The only
> thing holding this back is the arm autobuilder which I'm ho
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:31:16AM +0100, Mark Howard wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 08:44, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > This is a sorted (worst offenders first) list of maintainers who have
> > excessive numbers of old RC bugs open against their packages.
> Great work... Just wish I wasn't on there.
Hi,
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:54:06 +, Michael Banck wrote:
> Guess what people are trying to do. It's hunting season guys. It's
> bug-squashing *year*, OK? We can only release sarge if we start working
> on RC-bugs *NOW*, like asuffield does.
Oh, I don't know, we could start by re-classifying
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:30:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > If you want to help with something, please help in fixing the RC
> > bugs in these packages.
>
> Yes, sure, easy for you to say. There are so many of them, and on such a
> diversity of packages, i could be fixing bugs for weeks and n
On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 02:42, Sven Luther wrote:
> * chromium : 1 RC bug, out of date on arm.
Note this RC bug is tagged "sarge" so it doesn't really apply. The only
thing holding this back is the arm autobuilder which I'm hoping will
retry sometime soon with the newly uploaded openal package.
A week ago James rejected my PEAR packages. I need this packages because
there are newer version than libraries in php4-pear package. There are
used by IMP and other applications. I don't like to install PEAR
repository with bundled 'pear' installer as far as I've got Debian
packaging system.
I se
hi,
why is gdm still gnome1 version on unstable ??
version 2.4 works well !!!
at least a gdm2 package should be created
Hi,
> Through the shlibdeps system. Probably, the libgcc and libc packages
> decided that on ARM they should have those versioned dependencies. The
> libcurl2 package needs not do anything by itself to pick them up.
>
Note that the version shown is simply the current libgcc.so version.
dpkg-shli
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:10:39PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:56:22AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > It could be a nice solution to t
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:45:04PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
[...]
> So my complaints list about debconf questions is:
> 1. Bad grammar or spelling (in the English templates);
> 2. Questions/notes that assume too much background knowledge; and
> 3. Questions/notes which are just too trivial to w
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:07:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:56:22AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > It could be a nice solution to this kind of solution though.
> >
> > Trying to think up solutions for
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, LapTop006 wrote:
> > Is there any better way of keeping snapshot packages out of testing than
> > RC bugs?
> > Picking a random architecture and making its builds fail is not a valid
> > answer :)
> I had been thinking that, something like a control feild "Dists:
> unstable" (
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:31:16AM +0100, Mark Howard arranged a set of bits
into the following:
> On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 08:44, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > This is a sorted (worst offenders first) list of maintainers who have
> > excessive numbers of old RC bugs open against their packages.
> Great
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 12:40:37PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mar 15/04/2003 à 08:55, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > Well, i don't really care about those packages, it is just that this
> > will hold up any packages which depend on libvorbis (post 0a). I could
> > try rebuilding those packages
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:56:22AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > It could be a nice solution to this kind of solution though.
>
> Trying to think up solutions for problems that don't exist, eh?
So, why is the new libvrobis not in te
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:02:16PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > > Just ignore it or add a override.
> > >
> > > Any reason not to Build-Depend: chrpath, and do 'chrpath --delete' on
> > > the result?
> >
> > Personnaly i don't know, i am no expert in rpath and don't fully
> > understand the
Le lun 14/04/2003 à 16:45, Drew Scott Daniels a écrit :
> 2 libpng transition? debian-devel has some discussion about this archived
> for Jan and Jul 2002.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200207/msg01106.html
> is quite interesting.
As the new maintainer of libpng, I can
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 08:58:40PM -0400, Daniel Martin wrote:
> "John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > all the footnote says is that imake Does The Right Thing, which is why
> > it is exempted.
>
> See, now I read it as "imake doesn't quite do the right thing, really,
> but it's i
Le mar 15/04/2003 à 08:55, Sven Luther a écrit :
> Well, i don't really care about those packages, it is just that this
> will hold up any packages which depend on libvorbis (post 0a). I could
> try rebuilding those packages with the testing libvorbis, but i doubt
> out autobuilders will be happy i
debian-devel:您好!
音频干扰,录音噪声,诚信圣通
www.spwe.com
普通的监听器在传输距离超出100米后就会有很大的噪声，在应用于硬盘录象机时，录音噪声使得业主无法接收。
诚信圣通开发的监听器采用特殊的电路，可以消除音频干扰，传输距离可达300米以上。
应用领域：与硬盘录象机配套使用，广泛应用于安防、高速公路收费站等。
相关热门产品：地线回路平衡器－消除视频干扰
诚信圣通公司网站：http://www.spwe.com
联系电话：010-66027364、010-66026820
传 真：010-66025560
销售经理：王 亚
电话：010-66027
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:15:13PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Should we have a review of all debconf questions on debian-qa perhaps?
> > Anyone interested?
>
> That would be interesting.
> Translating some debconf entries, some look too difficult.
> I guess many people are looking at debconf
> Should we have a review of all debconf questions on debian-qa perhaps?
> Anyone interested?
That would be interesting.
Translating some debconf entries, some look too difficult.
I guess many people are looking at debconf questions while translating,
but aren't very expressive about it.
regar
> > > Just ignore it or add a override.
> >
> > Any reason not to Build-Depend: chrpath, and do 'chrpath --delete' on
> > the result?
>
> Personnaly i don't know, i am no expert in rpath and don't fully
> understand the issues involved.
If you are adding an rpath to a non-default directory, the
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> It could be a nice solution to this kind of solution though.
Trying to think up solutions for problems that don't exist, eh?
Michael, scnr
--
netscape < 6 is only really useful for seeing how browsers used
to be broken ;)
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 10:39:51AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:55:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:39:55PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 10:29:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Yes, but it is better than havi
Hello,
See subject: is this package missing from our archive or did I simply
overlooked it ?
Cordialement,
--
Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:55:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:39:55PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 10:29:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Yes, but it is better than having our packages hold back by libvorbis
> > > and the 105 or so packages
Hello
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 02:07:55AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > > I once tried to do something similar, but noticed that
> > > user-mode-linux does the same thing to a fuller extent.
> > >
> > > If you look at it this way, user-mode-linux is a fakeroot that traps
> > > all syscalls
On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 08:44, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> This is a sorted (worst offenders first) list of maintainers who have
> excessive numbers of old RC bugs open against their packages.
Great work... Just wish I wasn't on there.
Is there any better way of keeping snapshot packages out of testin
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:24:44 -0400,
Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (3) is the email gateway used?
I tried but failed to change my latitude/longitude data.
None of the following worked. RTFM instructions welcome.
---
Lat: +0334500., Long: +1303000.
---
Lat: 33:45:00.000 N Lo
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 11:39:55PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 10:29:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Yes, but it is better than having our packages hold back by libvorbis
> > and the 105 or so packages that will be breaken by its inclusion in
> > testing, many of them h
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 05:07:26PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:11:17AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 10:56:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > > lintian says:
> > >
> > > W: planets: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/planets
> > > /usr/lib:/us
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 12:31:44PM +1000, Paul Hampson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 05:59:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 04:40:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > depth, i cannot help all that mu
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> There is a nice graphical front-end to Postgresql, in the non-US
> section :
I would like to vote against "nice" here. :)
Moreover you can do several stuff but it is not comparable to PgAdmin
http://pgadmin.postgresql.org/pgadmin2.php?ContentID
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 05:27:48PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> [ I host the xshipwars upstream mailing lists... ]
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:32:04AM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:27:06AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 09:06:29AM +0200, Andreas
60 matches
Mail list logo
